Latest Release Version of Slide

2003-10-14 Thread Ritu Kedia
I am new to Slide. I wanted to know whether Slide is an ongoing project or
has it been shelved, since a friend of mine told me that Slide project
stopped sometime in 2001. From the Slide home page I am further confused,
since the last news (at http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/news.html ) is
posted on 11/06/2001. Moreover the latest binary download available is of
version 1.0.16. But the changelog page (at
http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/changelog.html) shows the changelog of
version 2.0.0. 
If 2.0.0 is released, why the download page
(http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi) has pointer to Slide version
1.0.16?
Is the searching/indexing module implemented in 2.0.0?

I will really appreciate any replies.

Thanks,

Ritu Kedia
Module Manager
Saba
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Saba
moving the enterprise.
moving minds.
www.saba.com

p.s. I had sent the same mail to Slider User List earlier. Re-sending this
to the dev List since I did not receive any conclusive answer on the
user-list. Sorry for the inconvenience to those who are subscribed to both
the lists. But I really need a definite answer on this question, before
recommending the use of Slide in our product. 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23827] - Make Nested-EL tags

2003-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23827

Make Nested-EL tags

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Maked Nested-EL tags|Make Nested-EL tags

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23827] - Maked Nested-EL tags

2003-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23827

Maked Nested-EL tags





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-10-15 05:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=8578)
Implementation of nested-el

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23827] New: - Maked Nested-EL tags

2003-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23827

Maked Nested-EL tags

   Summary: Maked Nested-EL tags
   Product: Struts
   Version: Nightly Build
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: Enhancement
  Priority: Other
 Component: Custom Tags
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


It would be nice to be able to use EL with the Nested tags.

This could be used when doing a jsp include and passing in the name of a property.  


  


then, inside of selectComponent.jsp


...


I will attach a set of classes that implement the packages:
org.apache.strutsel.taglib.nested
org.apache.strutsel.taglib.nested.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals todo-1.1.xml

2003-10-14 Thread martinc
martinc 2003/10/14 22:25:40

  Modified:doc/proposals todo-1.1.xml
  Log:
  Remove myself as interested in ActionForm generation, since there are
  better solutions to that now.
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.7   +0 -1  jakarta-struts/doc/proposals/todo-1.1.xml
  
  Index: todo-1.1.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/proposals/todo-1.1.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.6
  retrieving revision 1.7
  diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
  --- todo-1.1.xml  9 Sep 2003 17:49:21 -   1.6
  +++ todo-1.1.xml  15 Oct 2003 05:25:40 -  1.7
  @@ -444,7 +444,6 @@
   
 
 
  -mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Martin Cooper
   Ravindran Ramaiah
 
   
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Well, even though it isn't important, wanted, needed, etc... would you guys at
least take a look at the work that I have done?  Should I just attach a zip in
a mail to the list?
 

I cannot commit any personal time to this, although I think it 
definitely makes sense.  The best way to make sure your proposed code 
doesn't get lost in the mailing list archives, it's best to create an 
enhancement request in the bug tracking system:

 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/

and then add your ZIP to the existing report as an attachment.

I have created the packages:
org.apache.strutsel.taglib.nested
org.apache.strutsel.taglib.nested.html
I did not implement logic and bean since they are both replaced by JSTL.  I
need to do the tld and I think this little excursion will be complete.
 

That would be quite interesting.

Carl
 

Craig

Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

 

Edgar P Dollin wrote:

   

Everyone has preferences but in my opinion JSTL doesn't hold a candle to
 

the
   

nested tags, especially customized nested tags.  

I do agree however that JSTL for nested tags is not that important.  It
 

does
   

help in environments where there is ZERO tolerance for JSP expressions

 

Conveniently ignoring the fact that something like  stll contains a "JSP expression" -- just not a 
*standard* JSP expression :-).

   

or
that are running older versions of the servlet container.
 

Definitely.

   

Edgar

 

Craig



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc volunteers.xml

2003-10-14 Thread martinc
martinc 2003/10/14 22:15:11

  Modified:doc  volunteers.xml
  Log:
  Update my bio to reflect change of employer, amongst other things.
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.38  +50 -10jakarta-struts/doc/volunteers.xml
  
  Index: volunteers.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/volunteers.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.37
  retrieving revision 1.38
  diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38
  --- volunteers.xml29 Sep 2003 01:35:16 -  1.37
  +++ volunteers.xml15 Oct 2003 05:15:11 -  1.38
  @@ -294,16 +294,56 @@
   From a professional point of view, I have a Ph.D. in computer 
science. I have worked for 3 years in the R&D department of a worldwide company 
developing Internet banking solutions. I am now a researcher at a university, and work 
European research projects. My main research interest is WWW, Distributed Systems and 
Object Oriented Design. When developing code, I always try to first propose reusable 
pieces of code.
   
   Martin Cooper -- Committer
  -
  -Currently, I'm a Principal Software Engineer at Tumbleweed 
Communications, working the Messaging Management System. Early last year (2000), I was 
working the architecture for a new web- based administration system for the product, 
and headed in the direction of servlets and JSP. I joined the JSP-INTEREST and 
SERVLET-INTEREST mailing lists to see what was going in those respective areas.
  -
  -Before too long, some interesting discussions started up around the 
topic of Model 2 architectures. Model 2 sounded like the right way to go about things, 
and I followed those discussions closely. I was, however, still looking for a "leg up" 
- something to give me that core which to build.
  -
  -Then, in May, I saw a post to JSP-INTEREST from Craig McClanahan 
entitled something like "New Jakarta-Struts Subproject", and describing Struts, and 
his vision for it. I hopped right over to the Jakarta web site and signed up for the 
mailing list. Before long, I realized this was exactly what I had been looking for.
  -
  -Now, a year or so later, we have a team of people, which I am the 
technical lead, just finishing up our web-based administration system as Struts 
reaches its 1.0 release. And I am still firmly convinced that I made the right 
decision in going with Struts in the first place.
  -
  -Like anyone else, my first postings to the struts-user list were 
questions to help me understand how to do things, and why Struts is the way it is. 
Over time, reading the lists and also the source code, and working my own fairly large 
web application, I came to the point where I could answer questions too. Now, I'm glad 
to able to give something back to the Struts community by helping others understand, 
and also by contributing ideas and code to help make Struts even better than it 
already is.
  +
  +  Early in the year 2000, I was asked, by my employer at that time,
  +  to investigate the best way to develop a new web-based application
  +  for the administration and management of an existing product.
  +  After exploring a number of technologies, I settled on Java, along
  +  with servlets and JSP, as the way to go. Then I started looking
  +  for methodologies and "best practices", since others must surely
  +  have been down that path before me.
  +
  +
  +  In addition to rummaging around on the web, I subscribed to the
  +  SERVLET-INTEREST and JSP-INTEREST mailing lists, along with
  +  several others, and monitored the discussions for a while. It was
  +  clear that others were seeking the same answers as I was, and it
  +  was also clear that many people were building their applications
  +  in truly horrible ways.
  +
  +
  +  At some point -- I don't recall when, exactly -- the concept of
  +  "Model 1" versus "Model 2" applications came up, and there was a
  +  great deal of discussion around that. Model 2 seemed very much
  +  like A Good Thing to me, and I paid it close attention.
  +
  +
  +  Then, in May of 2000, I saw a message from Craig McClanahan
  +  about a new framework called Struts that was designed to ease
  +  the process of building Model 2 applications, and provide
  +  solutions for some of the important issues at the same time. I
  +  hopped on over to the web site and took a look around. This was
  +  exactly what I had been looking for.
  +
  +
  +  My first postings to the Struts mailing list were, of course,
  +  questions to help me 

Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread struts
David,

Understood.  I have all of the classes written. The TLD is looking a little
daunting.  From my studies it appears that the tld is generated from an xml
file that is run through an xsl stylesheet.  If you want the classes, I can
send them to you.

Carl

Quoting "David M. Karr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> > "struts" == struts  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> struts> Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL
> and Nested-EL.  I
> struts> see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet.  Nested-EL
> seems to be
> struts> missing.  David, have you started working on Nested-EL?  If so,
> how far off is
> struts> it from being complete?  If not, do you have any tips, because
> I am getting
> struts> started on it tonight.
> 
> No, I haven't started on it yet.  However, realize that the library that
> I
> would build might not be what you're looking for.  The only result of
> building
> an "-el" library is that any tag attribute values can use the EL to specify
> the
> value, as opposed to JSP expression scriptlets.  In general, the EL
> library
> would not add or delete any attributes, or add any basic architectural
> functionality.
> 
> -- 
> ===
> David M. Karr  ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ; SCJP; SCWCD; SCBCD
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread David M. Karr
> "struts" == struts  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

struts> Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL and 
Nested-EL.  I
struts> see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet.  Nested-EL seems to be
struts> missing.  David, have you started working on Nested-EL?  If so, how far 
off is
struts> it from being complete?  If not, do you have any tips, because I am getting
struts> started on it tonight.

No, I haven't started on it yet.  However, realize that the library that I
would build might not be what you're looking for.  The only result of building
an "-el" library is that any tag attribute values can use the EL to specify the
value, as opposed to JSP expression scriptlets.  In general, the EL library
would not add or delete any attributes, or add any basic architectural
functionality.

-- 
===
David M. Karr  ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ; SCJP; SCWCD; SCBCD





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread struts
Well, even though it isn't important, wanted, needed, etc... would you guys at
least take a look at the work that I have done?  Should I just attach a zip in
a mail to the list?

I have created the packages:
org.apache.strutsel.taglib.nested
org.apache.strutsel.taglib.nested.html

I did not implement logic and bean since they are both replaced by JSTL.  I
need to do the tld and I think this little excursion will be complete.

Carl

Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Edgar P Dollin wrote:
> 
> >Everyone has preferences but in my opinion JSTL doesn't hold a candle to
> the
> >nested tags, especially customized nested tags.  
> >
> >I do agree however that JSTL for nested tags is not that important.  It
> does
> >help in environments where there is ZERO tolerance for JSP expressions
> >
> 
> Conveniently ignoring the fact that something like  property="foo.bar"/> stll contains a "JSP expression" -- just not a 
> *standard* JSP expression :-).
> 
> > or
> >that are running older versions of the servlet container.
> >  
> >
> 
> Definitely.
> 
> >Edgar
> >  
> >
> Craig
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Edgar P Dollin wrote:

Everyone has preferences but in my opinion JSTL doesn't hold a candle to the
nested tags, especially customized nested tags.  

I do agree however that JSTL for nested tags is not that important.  It does
help in environments where there is ZERO tolerance for JSP expressions
Conveniently ignoring the fact that something like  stll contains a "JSP expression" -- just not a 
*standard* JSP expression :-).

or
that are running older versions of the servlet container.
 

Definitely.

Edgar
 

Craig



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread Edgar P Dollin
Everyone has preferences but in my opinion JSTL doesn't hold a candle to the
nested tags, especially customized nested tags.  

I do agree however that JSTL for nested tags is not that important.  It does
help in environments where there is ZERO tolerance for JSP expressions or
that are running older versions of the servlet container.

Edgar

> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 8:24 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Nested-EL
> 
> 
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL and 
> > Nested-EL.  I see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet.  
> > Nested-EL seems to be missing.  David, have you started working on 
> > Nested-EL?  If so, how far off is
> > it from being complete?  If not, do you have any tips, because I am
> > getting
> > started on it tonight.
> 
> Doesn't the EL replace the need for a nested tag library?  
> Isn't the EL syntax easier than using nested tags?  I haven't 
> used Nested but it seems like a Nested-EL is redundant.
> 
> David
> 
> > 
> > Carl
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search 
http://shopping.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread struts
David,

To give you a technical answer: Kinda.

If there was a way for JSTL to reach in and grab the info that the nested tags
are holding (IE Pass the contents of ) then I don't
think you would need Nested-EL.  Or, if all of the nested tags worked like
 where it assumes you are trying to get the latest nested:nest
property.

I want to do  but the select requires a property.  Which the
best way for me to specify would be EL, because I don't always know what the
name of the property is going to be.

So, the plan is to pass in the name of the property through  which
EL can then grab: 

 ...


Alternatives are welcome...

Carl

Quoting David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL and
> > Nested-EL.  I
> > see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet.  Nested-EL seems to be
> > missing.  David, have you started working on Nested-EL?  If so, how far
> > off is
> > it from being complete?  If not, do you have any tips, because I am
> > getting
> > started on it tonight.
> 
> Doesn't the EL replace the need for a nested tag library?  Isn't the EL
> syntax easier than using nested tags?  I haven't used Nested but it seems
> like a Nested-EL is redundant.
> 
> David
> 
> > 
> > Carl
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread David Graham
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL and
> Nested-EL.  I
> see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet.  Nested-EL seems to be
> missing.  David, have you started working on Nested-EL?  If so, how far
> off is
> it from being complete?  If not, do you have any tips, because I am
> getting
> started on it tonight.

Doesn't the EL replace the need for a nested tag library?  Isn't the EL
syntax easier than using nested tags?  I haven't used Nested but it seems
like a Nested-EL is redundant.

David

> 
> Carl
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Nested-EL

2003-10-14 Thread struts
Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL and Nested-EL.  I
see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet.  Nested-EL seems to be
missing.  David, have you started working on Nested-EL?  If so, how far off is
it from being complete?  If not, do you have any tips, because I am getting
started on it tonight.

Carl



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23816] - Error in struts-blank struts-config.xml file

2003-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23816

Error in struts-blank struts-config.xml file

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-10-14 17:06 ---
The form bean is missing a closing tag. The example should be:



Thanks for spotting it. It will be fixed in the nightly build.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/blank/WEB-INF struts-config.xml

2003-10-14 Thread sraeburn
sraeburn2003/10/14 10:02:53

  Modified:web/blank/WEB-INF struts-config.xml
  Log:
  Fixed missing end tag in form-bean example config
  PR# 23816 
  
  Also reformatted to remove unneccessary blank lines.
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.10  +1 -142jakarta-struts/web/blank/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml
  
  Index: struts-config.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/web/blank/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.9
  retrieving revision 1.10
  diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
  --- struts-config.xml 29 Dec 2002 21:41:57 -  1.9
  +++ struts-config.xml 14 Oct 2003 17:02:53 -  1.10
  @@ -4,288 +4,147 @@
 "-//Apache Software Foundation//DTD Struts Configuration 1.1//EN"
 "http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/struts-config_1_1.dtd";>
   
  -
  -
   
   
   
  -
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
   
  -
   
   
   
  -
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
  -
   
  -
   
   
   
  -
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
  -
   
  -
   
  -
   
  -
   
   
   
  -
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
  -
   
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
  -
  -
   
   
   
  -
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
   
  -
  -
  -
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
   
  -
  -
  -
   
  -
   
 
 
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23816] New: - Error in struts-blank struts-config.xml file

2003-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23816

Error in struts-blank struts-config.xml file

   Summary: Error in struts-blank struts-config.xml file
   Product: Struts
   Version: Nightly Build
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: Other
 Component: Example
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


In the struts-config.xml file in the struts-blank webapp from the 10/14 nightly 
build, the example for a DynaValidatorForm is missing the  tag.

It says:


Simply uncommenting it produces an error:
2003-10-14 08:44:23 StandardContext[/struts-blank]: Servlet /struts-blank threw 
load() exception
javax.servlet.UnavailableException: Parsing error processing resource path /WEB-
INF/struts-config.xml

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[test] test

2003-10-14 Thread PILGRIM, Peter, FM
test 1 2 3 4

--
Peter Pilgrim,
Struts/J2EE Consultant, RBoS FM, Risk IT
Tel: +44 (0)207-375-4923


***
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is registered in Scotland No 90312
Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB
 Regulated by the Financial Services Authority

Visit our website at http://www.rbs.co.uk/CBFM/
***


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]