RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users
i dont know it that well but from the documentation below you have to modify the browsers proxy settings so that the proxy server is pointing to Localhost and the port used is 8000. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnduwon/htm l/d5wast_2.asp you should be able to make this change, even without local admin rights... > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2003 23:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > Sean, downloaded this software and set it up. Its pretty > simple to use. > Getting a problem though. Its not able to find the link to my > application. > It talks about changing the proxy server of IE. However i > don't have the > rights to do that on my system. Do you have any ideas on this? > > Thanks. > > -Original Message- > From: Sean Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > sorry, should point out that its blatantly not open source. but it is > free-ish > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sean Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 March 2003 19:52 > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > > Subject: RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > > > > dont flame me for this, but you could try micro$ofts web > > appliaction stress > > test tool. it only *runs* on NT x but u can use it to stress > > anything i > > think.. and apparently its pretty simple to use. > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tec > > hnet/itsolutio > > ns/intranet/downloads/webstres.asp > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jim Krygowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 05 March 2003 19:45 > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > > Subject: RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > > > > > > > Does JMeter fit the bill? > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:20 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there some open source tool or technique > that I can use to > > > > simulate concurrent users for our application? I > especially want > > > > to test our > > > > connection pooling implementation. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gaurav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE > > > > This communication contains information, which is confidential > > and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > > the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) > > please note that any distortion, copying or use of this > > communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the > > author and do not necessarily represent those of > > Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. > > > > If you have received this communication in error please notify > > us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) > > and then delete the communication and any copies of it. > > > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been > > swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > > > http://www.eurorscg.co.uk > > ** > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mai
RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users
sorry, should point out that its blatantly not open source. but it is free-ish > -Original Message- > From: Sean Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2003 19:52 > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > dont flame me for this, but you could try micro$ofts web > appliaction stress > test tool. it only *runs* on NT x but u can use it to stress > anything i > think.. and apparently its pretty simple to use. > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tec > hnet/itsolutio > ns/intranet/downloads/webstres.asp > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jim Krygowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 March 2003 19:45 > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > > > > Does JMeter fit the bill? > > http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/index.html > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:20 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > Is there some open source tool or technique that I can use to > > > simulate concurrent users for our application? I especially want > > > to test our > > > connection pooling implementation. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Gaurav > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ** > > CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE > > This communication contains information, which is confidential > and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) > please note that any distortion, copying or use of this > communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent those of > Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. > > If you have received this communication in error please notify > us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) > and then delete the communication and any copies of it. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been > swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > http://www.eurorscg.co.uk > ** > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE This communication contains information, which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any distortion, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. If you have received this communication in error please notify us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) and then delete the communication and any copies of it. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. http://www.eurorscg.co.uk ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users
dont flame me for this, but you could try micro$ofts web appliaction stress test tool. it only *runs* on NT x but u can use it to stress anything i think.. and apparently its pretty simple to use. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutio ns/intranet/downloads/webstres.asp > -Original Message- > From: Jim Krygowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2003 19:45 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > Does JMeter fit the bill? > http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/index.html > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:20 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [OT] Simulating Concurrent Users > > > > > > Hi, > > Is there some open source tool or technique that I can use to > > simulate concurrent users for our application? I especially want > > to test our > > connection pooling implementation. > > > > Thanks, > > Gaurav > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE This communication contains information, which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any distortion, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. If you have received this communication in error please notify us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) and then delete the communication and any copies of it. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. http://www.eurorscg.co.uk ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [OT] RE: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing)
centrino is out soon of course, so you get longer battery life and built in wireless. http://www.intel.com/products/mobiletechnology/index.htm?iid=Homepage+Highli ght_030127a& > -Original Message- > From: Hookom, Jacob John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2003 17:38 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: [OT] RE: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing) > > > I love my laptop, well, I shouldn't call it a laptop-- more > properly termed a mobile desktop since the beautiful 16" > screen leaves you with about 2 hours of battery life at a > given sitting (I leave it plugged in all the time). For the > mobile P4 processor, I've been extremely happy with the > performance, apps load up in a flash. Granted you have to do > some tweaking to remove all of the pre-installed Sony applications. > > The screen though is like a billboard, just amazing, running > at 1280x1024, everything is crisp and colorful. Make sure > you get some kind of service coverage, the batteries for it > will run you about 400 dollars US. > > GET ONE! > > -Original Message- > From: Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 3/5/2003 11:29 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Cc: > Subject: RE: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing) > > > > I've been thinking about those 16" Sonys, how are they > size-wise WRT > portability? How is the 'desktop' version of the P4 > when running on > battery? > > -- > Voytek Jarnot > Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hookom, Jacob John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:11 AM > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: RE: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing) > > > > > > I have: > > Sony GRV550 P4 2.4GHz Laptop w/ 512 MB DDR and 16" > Screen w/ XP Pro > > Server P4 1.5GHz 1GB RDRAM, 15" LCD, 200 GB HD with 8MB > > cache, Red Hat 8 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chappell, Simon P > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wed 3/5/2003 10:18 AM > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Cc: > > Subject: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient > computing) > > > > > > > > OK, enough reminising ... what do people currently have? > > > > I have a Mac tower with dual 550MHz G4 CPUs, 1.5Gb of > > RAM and the 22" CinemaDisplay flat panel monitor. I run Mac > > OS X 10.2.4 on it. And, it almost goes without saying > that, I love it. > > > > Simon > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: du Plessis, Corneil C > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:13 AM > > >To: Struts Users Mailing List > > >Subject: RE: [OT] Ancient computing > > > > > > > > >Playing the Space shuttle games on the Commodore 64 > > was just awesome! > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Nelson, Laird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: 05 March, 2003 18:10 > > >To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > > >Subject: RE: [OT] Ancient computing > > > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Tim Shadel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> First family computer I remember: 8080 > > >> > > >> First that I used: Atari or Commodore64 with > BASIC (hooked it > > >> to the TV, > > >> screen was blue with white letters > [forboadings of M$??], > > >> eventually had > > >> a 5 1/4 disk drive) > > > > > >First computer used: Commodore PET (was that what they > > were called?) > > >First computer used extensively: Radio Shack TRS-80 > > >First computer that awed me: Commodore 64 > > > > > >Laird > > > > > > > > >- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >__ > > > > > >Disclaimer and confidentiality note > > > > > > > > >Everything in this e-mail and any attachments > relating to the > > >official business of > > >Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to > the company. It > > >is confidential, legally > > >privileged and protec
RE: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing)
yeah but i only have the ZX81 ;) >Joel Wickard wrote: > >I still have an IBM system23 with 8" or 10" (haven't looked at them >lately ) >floppies. > -Original Message- > From: Joel Wickard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2003 16:59 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing) > > > Sean Chambers wrote: > > >i still have the zx81 > > > > > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: 05 March 2003 16:18 > >>To: Struts Users Mailing List > >>Subject: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing) > >> > >> > >>OK, enough reminising ... what do people currently have? > >> > >>I have a Mac tower with dual 550MHz G4 CPUs, 1.5Gb of RAM and > >>the 22" CinemaDisplay flat panel monitor. I run Mac OS X > >>10.2.4 on it. And, it almost goes without saying that, I love it. > >> > >>Simon > >> > >> > >> > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: du Plessis, Corneil C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:13 AM > >>>To: Struts Users Mailing List > >>>Subject: RE: [OT] Ancient computing > >>> > >>> > >>>Playing the Space shuttle games on the Commodore 64 was > just awesome! > >>> > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: Nelson, Laird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Sent: 05 March, 2003 18:10 > >>>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > >>>Subject: RE: [OT] Ancient computing > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-Original Message- > >>>>From: Tim Shadel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>First family computer I remember: 8080 > >>>> > >>>>First that I used: Atari or Commodore64 with BASIC (hooked it > >>>>to the TV, > >>>>screen was blue with white letters [forboadings of M$??], > >>>>eventually had > >>>>a 5 1/4 disk drive) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>First computer used: Commodore PET (was that what they > were called?) > >>>First computer used extensively: Radio Shack TRS-80 > >>>First computer that awed me: Commodore 64 > >>> > >>>Laird > >>> > >>>--- > -- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>>__ > >>> > >>>Disclaimer and confidentiality note > >>> > >>> > >>>Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the > >>>official business of > >>>Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It > >>>is confidential, legally > >>>privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own > >>>and endorse any other content. > >>>Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly > >>>stated as being that of Standard Bank. > >>> > >>>The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised > >>>recipient. Please notify the sender > >>>immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not > >>>read, disclose or use the content > >>>in any way. > >>> > >>>Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this > >>>communication has been maintained nor > >>>that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. > >>> > >>>__ > >>> > >>>--- > -- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > - > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >**
RE: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing)
i still have the zx81 > -Original Message- > From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2003 16:18 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Modern Computing (was RE: [OT] Ancient computing) > > > OK, enough reminising ... what do people currently have? > > I have a Mac tower with dual 550MHz G4 CPUs, 1.5Gb of RAM and > the 22" CinemaDisplay flat panel monitor. I run Mac OS X > 10.2.4 on it. And, it almost goes without saying that, I love it. > > Simon > > >-Original Message- > >From: du Plessis, Corneil C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:13 AM > >To: Struts Users Mailing List > >Subject: RE: [OT] Ancient computing > > > > > >Playing the Space shuttle games on the Commodore 64 was just awesome! > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Nelson, Laird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: 05 March, 2003 18:10 > >To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > >Subject: RE: [OT] Ancient computing > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Tim Shadel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> First family computer I remember: 8080 > >> > >> First that I used: Atari or Commodore64 with BASIC (hooked it > >> to the TV, > >> screen was blue with white letters [forboadings of M$??], > >> eventually had > >> a 5 1/4 disk drive) > > > >First computer used: Commodore PET (was that what they were called?) > >First computer used extensively: Radio Shack TRS-80 > >First computer that awed me: Commodore 64 > > > >Laird > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >__ > > > >Disclaimer and confidentiality note > > > > > >Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the > >official business of > >Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It > >is confidential, legally > >privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own > >and endorse any other content. > >Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly > >stated as being that of Standard Bank. > > > >The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised > >recipient. Please notify the sender > >immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not > >read, disclose or use the content > >in any way. > > > >Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this > >communication has been maintained nor > >that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. > > > >__ > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE This communication contains information, which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any distortion, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. If you have received this communication in error please notify us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) and then delete the communication and any copies of it. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. http://www.eurorscg.co.uk ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [OT] Don't beat on James! (was RE: [OT] JavaScript: ActionForm Does Not Contain Dynamically Set Data)
my ZX81 had a 16k RAM pack. > -Original Message- > From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2003 13:45 > To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OT] Don't beat on James! (was RE: [OT] JavaScript: > ActionForm Does Not Contain Dynamically Set Data) > > > You know it was! The ZX81 was the first machine I owned. The > first machinesI used were a ZX80 and an Acorn Atom at our > school computer club. > > >-Original Message- > >From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:53 PM > >To: Struts Users Mailing List > >Subject: RE: [OT] Don't beat on James! (was RE: [OT] JavaScript: > >ActionForm Does Not Contain Dynamically Set Data) > > > > > >Wossit a ZX81 perchance? > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2003 05:34 > >To: Struts Users Mailing List > >Subject: RE: [OT] Don't beat on James! (was RE: [OT] JavaScript: > >ActionForm Does Not Contain Dynamically Set Data) > > > > > >My first two computers didn't even have floppy drives ... 300 > >baud tape and > >1024 bytes of memory! > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:28 PM > >>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > >>Subject: RE: [OT] Don't beat on James! (was RE: [OT] JavaScript: > >>ActionForm Does Not Contain Dynamically Set Data) > >> > >> > >>> From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> Gladly only I had you figured as an old guy! > >>> > >>> Simon "Programmed in RPG/400 once and now regret it" Chappell > >>> > >> > >>Well, I'm old to the computer industry, but only a year > with Struts... > >> > >>James "Has punched cards for OS/VS1 on an IBM/360" Turner > >> > >> > >> > >> > - > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE This communication contains information, which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any distortion, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. If you have received this communication in error please notify us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) and then delete the communication and any copies of it. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. http://www.eurorscg.co.uk ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [OT] Text editor usage (was RE: [OT]: What is vim?)
who are ginger and mary anne? > -Original Message- > From: Jaye Bass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 March 2003 01:43 > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Text editor usage (was RE: [OT]: What is vim?) > > > First off...I'd take Mary Ann any day. Second I love IntelliJ. Does it > make me a better programmer...I think it probably does: alt-enter, > refactoring, multiple paste buffers, optimizing imports, > finding usages, > ok CVS support and a pretty decent debugger. I know it makes me a > happier programmer. > > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:57 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [OT] Text editor usage (was RE: [OT]: What is vim?) > > Wow, this argument is about as winnable as a 'Ginger or Mary Anne' > discussion > and not nearly as interesting. Although the diatribes about > productivity are > kinda humorous, given the context ;) > > -jeff > > > On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 04:42 PM, Assenza, Chris wrote: > > > If one were to make a value judgement such as "better" then > one would > > require a common basis for comparison. I would be safe in assuming > > that not > > everyone here is analyzing this question based on a common frame of > > reference, in fact I bet we all have slightly different concepts of > > who or > > what makes a better programmer. > > > > Therefore, the first question to ask must instead be: "What does it > > mean to > > be a good programmer?" or even: "What is a good programmer." For > > argument's > > sake, as part of our answer to that question we say that > one trait of > > a good > > programmer is thorough knowledge (or perhaps memorization) of a > > syntax. If > > that is true, then someone who uses a text editor is more > likely to be > > considered a better programmer. > > > > However, it can be argued that syntax memorization is not so > > all-important. > > For example, there are many excellent writers and thinkers > who cannot > > spell > > worth a dime, yet they work with words all day long. As such, the > > programmer who uses an IDE may well be a "better" programmer in the > > sense > > that A) the IDE supplements their knowledge of the syntax and B) > > separates > > the programmer from a requirement to memorize syntax and instead > > allows them > > to focus on what they're supposed to be doing: engineering software > > through > > solid design principles, etc. > > > > Ultimately, I think the answer is completely subjective and depends > > wholly > > on what one means by "better" programmer. Certainly someone > who lives > > in an > > IDE cannot jump into Textpad and be expected to be nearly as > > productive, but > > that does not necessarily diminish their core aptitude as a > programmer! > > > > All that being said, if you don't use Textpad you're a n00b! =) > > > > -Chris > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:58 PM > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: RE: [OT] Text editor usage (was RE: [OT]: What is vim?) > > > > > > No. I very specifically said that the better programmers > CAN use text > > editors and command-line tools. This does not mean that > they have to, > > only > > that they COULD use them if they choose to. I now use the > Eclipse IDE > > for > > alot of my personal programming because it is like a text > editor that > > wants > > to be helpful. I like the wrappers that it gives me for the > compiles > > and > > junit tests, but that it keeps out of the way for the > actual editing > > if I > > don't invoke any of the "helpful" intelli-wotsits. > > > > Simon > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Chen, Gin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:49 PM > >> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > >> Subject: RE: [OT] Text editor usage (was RE: [OT]: What is vim?) > >> > >> > >> I think your confusing personal perference with programming skill. > >> Thats like saying that Ted drink Sprite when most of the > >> better programmers > >> drinks Mountain Dew. > >> -Tim > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:38 PM > >> To: Struts Users Mailing List > >> Subject: [OT] Text editor usage (was RE: [OT]: What is vim?) > >> > >> > >> Actually, my primary point was text editor usage and > >> programmer ability. > >> > >> It is my personal observation that the better programmers use > >> text editors. > >> (vi or emacs or jedit or vim ... I don't care ... that's not > >> the argument > >> here). I'm not quite saying that IDEs are bad, although > I'm certainly > >> tempted to say that some days, but programmers who CAN program > >> with text > >> editors and command-line tools are orders of magnitude better > >> than those who > >> can't. You are more than welcome to tell me that you believe > >> t
RE: Server detection of Javascript enabled?
It doesnt really get round the problem of not using javascript on teh client; but perhaps a better way to do this is to interrogate the DOM. If you use one of teh standards objects like document.image it returns a boolean showing whther or not javascript is installed. In addition you could explicitly test for the existence of an object from a specific version, so you could tell which version of js was being used. but as i say, both of these involve using js on the client. -Original Message- From: James Childers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 21:38 To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Server detection of Javascript enabled? No. HTTP headers contain information about the request to the server. Unfortunately none of those headers have information about JavaScript. The only way that I could see you being able to do this is to send a simple page with JavaScript to the client and have the JavaScript forward to a separate page on your server. If your server receives the request, you know that JavaScript is enabled. Kludgy and heavy, but that's all I got. -= J > -Original Message- > From: Jerome Jacobsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:34 PM > To: Struts User > Subject: Server detection of Javascript enabled? > > > Without using Javascript on the client, can the server detect > if the client > has Javascript enabled? Is there something in the HTTP > request header that > indicates this? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE This communication contains information, which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any distortion, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. If you have received this communication in error please notify us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) and then delete the communication and any copies of it. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. http://www.eurorscg.co.uk ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AW: easy struts 0.6.3 ?
translation: thank you for this useful/meaningful? message > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 05 February 2003 13:57 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: AW: easy struts 0.6.3 ? > > > Hi, > > I can speak french, I can speak english, I can understand > spanish...but german, I can't ;) > > > vielen Dank für diese aussagekräftige Nachricht > > in french > > merci beaucoup pour cette information valable > > > BTW: I write a response in french for Alex and by mistake I > send it to struts-user list, sorry. > > -emmanuel > > --- "Hirschmann, Bernhard" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > emmanuel, > > > > vielen Dank für diese aussagekräftige Nachricht. > > > > Freundliche Grüße, > > Bernhard Hirschmann > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2003 14:24 > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: Struts Users Mailing List > > Betreff: Re: easy struts 0.6.3 ? > > > > > > HEllo Alex, > > > > J'imagine que c'est à propos du bug avec les projets Tomcat > Sysdeo, si oui > > alors il est corrigé > > dans CVS mais j'ai pas eu le temps de faire une release > (j'ai pas CVS au > > boulot). > > > > Voici un pointeur vers le fichier concerné : > > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/easystruts/easystruts-plugin/ > src/org/easystruts/eclipse/wizards/NewStrutsSupportWizardPage.java > > a+ > -emmanuel > > > --- alexj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi anybody know when the easy > struts 0.6.3 plug in for > eclipse > > will be released ? > > Or anybody know in the source code where to update the add easy struts > > support ? > > > > Thanks > > > > <-- > > Alexandre Jaquet > > -> > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER NOTICE This communication contains information, which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any distortion, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Euro RSCG Wnek Gosper. If you have received this communication in error please notify us by e-mailing the author or by telephoning (020 7240 4111) and then delete the communication and any copies of it. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. http://www.eurorscg.co.uk ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
