Re: [freenet-support] Re: Secure NIMs?
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:41:17PM +0200, Jano wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You mean, like Freemail? http://www.freenet.org.nz/freemail/ Freemail is an idea I like a lot but at least my windows experience has been... lacking. The alpha 20 has been there for ages... is it still under development? Is someone using it on stable? It doesn't seem to be. I sent him an email (not a freemail) to ask about a feature, and never got a reply. However at least we have the tarball; it is under the GPL so it can be maintained even if he disappears. Of course we need to store a copy of the site... Thanks for the rest of your comments. I was more interested in an automated, a-la NIM solution, but I should have known that if NIMs aren't like that is for a reason. Well... FreeMail is quite usefully automated. And should be reasonably reliable as long as Freenet is working... of course freenet isn't working well enough for FreeMail to work well... -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: trouble getting any information
Restarted freenet last night. Slow to make contacts but by an hour later 62 were open and freenet seemed to be behaving nicely together with SETI running. CPU at 100% but behavior was what I now call normal. At about noon today I checked and data transferred was many megs and messages were at about 15,000 on two most active connections. Checked mail and came back about an hour later to find that SETI had transmitted results and was not maximized any longer. Then I realized that system seemed inactive. ISP had closed connection and I had some difficulty getting anything to respond. Finally after right click on rabbit in tray, I was able to open popup window and stopped freenet. Few things started to show apparent activity and I could then maximize SETI and it had completed about 6% of a job after sending and bringing down a new job. I then reconnected and restarted freenet and function seemed to return. I checked the log and it showed a very long segment of failures. (Log was at about 2.5 megs.) Errors continued abundantly as I expected since contact had been lost from other nodes for some time. Shut down. (To do other work.) About three hours later I tried to restart, but experience little success. Log hung when I tried to work back through the log (problem here?). Finally shut down OS and restarted. The apparent hang from shut down of ISP connection I had not observed before (not to say that I actually know it never did). Is this common? Will freenet do this when only it is producing high CPU usage or could it be because two programs were trying to work at maximum level (SETI freenet)? Should freenet not detect loss of internet connection and not go blindly on with unsuccessful high usage? I would think that when finally operating this should not be allowed to happen as ISP closure would certainly not be uncommon with large numbers of nodes running (even if it only happens with multiple high demands on CPU). Recently checked thread usage and seems seldom to go beyond 700 even when system very busy. Oh, 2KWin and Sun Java (recent). 256 memory. Dial up connection. ~18.6 hard drives capacity each of two(C: pretty high, about 1.5 gig open, D: with about 4-5 gig open). What else important? Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Secure NIMs?
Toad wrote: On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:41:17PM +0200, Jano wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You mean, like Freemail? http://www.freenet.org.nz/freemail/ Freemail is an idea I like a lot but at least my windows experience has been... lacking. The alpha 20 has been there for ages... is it still under development? Is someone using it on stable? It doesn't seem to be. I sent him an email (not a freemail) to ask about a feature, and never got a reply. However at least we have the tarball; it is under the GPL so it can be maintained even if he disappears. Of course we need to store a copy of the site... Thanks for the rest of your comments. I was more interested in an automated, a-la NIM solution, but I should have known that if NIMs aren't like that is for a reason. Well... FreeMail is quite usefully automated. And should be reasonably reliable as long as Freenet is working... of course freenet isn't working well enough for FreeMail to work well... I've seen it work almost fine for some time over unstable, but at some point something gets corrupted in the database and no progress can be made; messages don't get dispatched nor received... at least that's not freenet's fault. It was on a WinXP. Yesterday I tried to run it in linux and didn't managed to insert my identity on stable. Too many time stuck, and the node was running great... maybe I'll try some other day. But seriously, the concept of freemail is great... I'd say a must have application for a working freenet 1.0 ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Secure NIMs?
Jano schrieb: Freemail is an idea I like a lot but at least my windows experience has been... lacking. The alpha 20 has been there for ages... is it still under development? Is someone using it on stable? I tried to use it on stable, but it doesn't work that good. Almost all of the times it tries to insert a message an gets a RNF it doesn't remember the slot it used to insert. So after some hours the same message got inserted in multiple slots. To make it worse, the message somehow got through and got confirmed by the receiver, but freemail didn't get it right and was still trying to insert the message. After an manual count I saw that the one message I did send was inserted into about 80 receiver slots and there was no way to tell freemail to stop inserting it again and again into new slots. Additionally the freemail process stalled totally after some hours using all available CPU which means I had to run it on a very low priority or it would starve my freenet node to death. All this is with the latest windows version of freemail, don't know if the linux version runs better. My conclusion about it: nice idea but far from beeing usable at the moment. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RE: trouble getting any information
You have no idea WHY it lost the connection to the ISP? Did they contact you to complain about bandwidth usage or anything? How do you connect to the internet? Has that changed recently? On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 06:38:37PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: Restarted freenet last night. Slow to make contacts but by an hour later 62 were open and freenet seemed to be behaving nicely together with SETI running. CPU at 100% but behavior was what I now call normal. At about noon today I checked and data transferred was many megs and messages were at about 15,000 on two most active connections. Checked mail and came back about an hour later to find that SETI had transmitted results and was not maximized any longer. Then I realized that system seemed inactive. ISP had closed connection and I had some difficulty getting anything to respond. Finally after right click on rabbit in tray, I was able to open popup window and stopped freenet. Few things started to show apparent activity and I could then maximize SETI and it had completed about 6% of a job after sending and bringing down a new job. I then reconnected and restarted freenet and function seemed to return. I checked the log and it showed a very long segment of failures. (Log was at about 2.5 megs.) Errors continued abundantly as I expected since contact had been lost from other nodes for some time. Shut down. (To do other work.) About three hours later I tried to restart, but experience little success. Log hung when I tried to work back through the log (problem here?). Finally shut down OS and restarted. The apparent hang from shut down of ISP connection I had not observed before (not to say that I actually know it never did). Is this common? Will freenet do this when only it is producing high CPU usage or could it be because two programs were trying to work at maximum level (SETI freenet)? Should freenet not detect loss of internet connection and not go blindly on with unsuccessful high usage? I would think that when finally operating this should not be allowed to happen as ISP closure would certainly not be uncommon with large numbers of nodes running (even if it only happens with multiple high demands on CPU). Recently checked thread usage and seems seldom to go beyond 700 even when system very busy. Oh, 2KWin and Sun Java (recent). 256 memory. Dial up connection. ~18.6 hard drives capacity each of two(C: pretty high, about 1.5 gig open, D: with about 4-5 gig open). What else important? Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Difference between Connection Attempts and Requests.
What are the difference between these two set of data? http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/inboundContacts.txt http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/inboundRequests.txt Inbound contact attempts is different from inbound requests?? -- Best regards, Weiliang Zhang Department of Computing Imperial College London, UK ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
