Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
my uniformed guess is that since all routing of data is done totally peer to peer, the network is going to be pretty flakey for the next few hours while all these new slashdot nodes come online. its just a matter of dillution... suddenly there is a massive flood of nodes that dont know how to route to anything (because they are new to the networka) ... so until they start building up there routing tables... its gonna ge a bit rough. rest assured, yesterday freent was running great :) -joschi ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix Boom wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there :) Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal with ;) At any rate, I am running as a 24/7 node with port 2 as my fproxy port. I can't connect to *any* sites other than the main portal linked to on the front page. Even when setting the hops as high as 50 or so, i get absolutely no response from any sites! I definitely have no local network issues, no blocked ports or conflicting apps... Grrr.. Any ideas? Maybe it's because I'm in the UK? There can't be too many nodes locally yet.. Thanks in advance David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0 (Build 294) Beta iQA/AwUBPb2fKyOn+ry/opL7EQJY+ACfUsyjqaLPG8r/tMR0BXpwMnihiikAnjDk kwGDmecbqrL+75RPaJn6sMKp =AqM7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] How to get PHP to work with Fproxy?
to rephrase... in freenet there is *no* server... php/jsp/et all are all *server side* scripts :) Matthew Toseland wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:25:45PM -0800, Mike wrote: i installed freeweb, ran the site update, and it want finr, then i went to view my site, and it gave a file list of all my php files, i clicked on my default index.php file, and it tried to download the file. Um, freenet does not and never has supported PHP, ASP, javascript or any other dynamic content. I want it to View not download. what can i do t oget php enabled on the freenet proxy ? -- ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] slightly off topic: fat32methods of keeping my store folder size
good idea, hadnt thought about just making a freenet datastore partition, what are the negative effects of using smaller cluster sizes? (there must be some, otherwise they would default to 16 :) perhaps its just addressing, if you have smaller clusters you have *more* clusters and therefore have to address more clusters... if this is all, then it should matter as i'd be having at most a partition of a gig or two for freenet... i'm not sure i'm going to do this though since i dual boot to linux about 50% of the time i use my computer, so i was planning on setting up a node on my linux box that shares the same datastore... -joschi ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so (unfortunately) i am forced to use fat32 on my windows machine where i run my freenet node... right now here is the size info: Size: 391 MB (410,077,960 bytes) Size on disk: 506 MB (531,529,728 bytes) I would recommend putting the freenet datastore on a separate partition if possible. Partition Magic (commercial software, but well worth the money) can do this for you without destroying your existing files. When formatting the new filesystem, try to give it as large a cluster size as possible, and you will cut down on lost space. (Or format it as NTFS, if that's an option). no, sorry. make the clusters as SMALL as possible, so the last used cluster by a file is filled up more effectively. the clusters that do not fill completely contain the wasted space: cluster 256 bytes, data 64 bytes = 192 bytes wasted custer 4096 bytes, data 64 bytes = 4032 bytes wasted The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Latest version of FreeNet
R Allen wrote: I have installed and attempted to use the latest version of FreeNet, and have a few questions. First, the Readme file states there is presently no search function for the system. What good is the system without a search function ? plenty good, thousands of people are browsing freesites, posting their blogs and sharing files daily. If I have the system figured out correctly, it appears that I have to upload any material I want to share so that it can be split up and dispersed among the available storage of the system users ? How can others retrieve this material if there is no search function ? yeah, in order for other peopl to find the site, you have to publish the URL (or Key) to it, just like on the web. some people are working on providing search engines for freenet, but in the meantime The Freedome engine will list any and every site that you send to it, a great place to start browsing around for stuff to look at/read: http://127.0.0.1:/SSK%40rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE// When will you have a system that functions as simply and as easily as other P2P systems ? freenet is not like other p2p systems. think of freenet as more like the protocol that other applications ride on top of. if you want a kazaa like app that rides on top of freenet, you want frost. http://jtcfrost.sourceforge.net/ ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] slightly off topic: fat32methods of keeping my store folder size
Dave Hooper wrote: If you were planning to use Windows 2000 or XP exclusively, I might suggest using a compressed directory as your freenet datastore - not because of the disk space this saves (it would save very little, probably - see end of message), but because the compressed clusters are shared within the directory tree so only the last cluster allocated to the directory tree has 'wasted' space at the end. Ideal if you care about space but don't care so much about extra processing time. Although obviously an NTFSv5 feature only (and so not applicable to the original fat32 posting) this was my orginal plan, and i was posting to find out if anyone knew how to enable a compressed directory in win2k :) but now i think i'll probably go with a separate 2 gig fat32 partition... that is if i can figure out how to tweak a fat32 to have smaller blocks. OS-level compressing of directory trees in pre-NTFSv5 operating systems (i.e. before Windows 2000) can be achieved by using commercial software like www.zipmagic.com/zipmagic, which (among other things) makes zip files appear to the operating system as regular 'explorable' folders, or by using the built-in DriveSpace / DoubleSpace utilities to set up a virtual compressed drive. Actually I would make a personal recommendation for zipmagic, it really is rather good, and I'm sure there must be a less expensive alternative available On my NTFS partition, my store currently has about 3% wasted space from cluster allocation. Setting the NTFS Compress flag shrinks it so that my store uses only .5% more space 'on disk' . (Yes - the compressed datastore still uses more than the 'on paper' amount of disk space, mainly due to the encrypted nature of the datastore and its inherent incompressibility coupled with the still necessary cluster allocation) I would therefore expect similar results under FAT32 - that is, a .zip datastore with zipmagic or similar using only about .5% more space than the datastore size on paper. However that is on likely to be true if you can keep the .zip file fragments together... I don't know what zipmagic's fragmentation guarantees are, and I wouldn't be surprised if there were no guarantees whatsoever. It is possible to preallocate files under NTFS using tools such as Contig (www.sysinternals.com) to ensure that they do not fragment - however this only really works in practice for files which do not grow and shrink unpredictably, such as files which are written to rarely but read often. I'm guessing such a tool would be of only limited value for a freenet datastore. I have no idea if comparable utilities are available for use with FAT partitions. dave thanks for the quality info, dave -joschi ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] man, traffic picked up tonight.
yeah., the network is pretty muc htotally flouded... i can't retrive any freesites... if you are having better luck, you were probably thinking of The Freedome Engine: http://127.0.0.1:/SSK%40rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE// Mike wrote: I was running from 1% usage and 35% now, for the last hour i have 100% here are my stats thus far. a.. Current routingTime: 4772ms. b.. Active pooled jobs: 22264 (188.57143%) [Rejecting incoming connections and requests!] c.. Available threads: 289It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requestsfor a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). d.. Current estimated load: 100.0%. and at this point im very active on my node. :P guess thats what i get for sharing so much resources.. lol i might increase the bandwith later to allow even more traffic on my node. :P BTW, earlier today i was on a site that listed freenet sites. what was that url again ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Datastore problem between build 513 and 514?
its not build 514, this is the same bug i ran into and i think mine hit at 513 Bertrand Lorentz wrote: Hi, I started running Freenet a few days ago without problem, with build 513 (I think it's 0.5pre2), and my native store was reaching 50 Mo. Today I upgraded to build 514, but Freenet crashed on startup with the following error message : Oct 10, 2002 8:15:03 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Unexpected Exception: freenet.KeyException freenet.KeyException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at freenet.Key.readKey(Key.java:84) at freenet.node.rt.ReferenceSet.init(ReferenceSet.java:61) at freenet.node.rt.ReferenceSet.getProperty(ReferenceSet.java:27) at freenet.node.rt.TreeRoutingTable.init(TreeRoutingTable.java:42) at freenet.node.rt.CPAlgoRoutingTable.init(CPAlgoRoutingTable.java:34) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:483) I restarted Freenet several times, same problem. I renamed my store directory, and Freenet started just fine on an empty store directory. I went back to version 0.5pre2 and it started just fine with my 50 Mo store. I guess something's wrong with build 514... If anyone is interested, I have the logfile for the crash, in normal and debug loglevel. Thanks Bertrand ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Bugathon for 0.5pre2 - what you can do to help...
FYI, i needed to update my jre to 1.4.1 anyhow, so i thought i would go the yes to download and install a new jre route, it worked fine this way. -Josh Josh Steiner wrote: ok, i moved my existing node's folders and decided to try out the new windows installer to see how its doing, it is having problems finding my java installtion. it popped up the i did not find sun's java runtime message, i hit No so that it would search for it, it said congratulations! java interpreters have been found. you may choose from the list. i hit ok. it show's two runtimes: C:\j2sdk1.4.0\bin\java.exe C:\j2sdk1.4.0\jre\bin\java.exe i clicked on the top one, then update settings and it pops up the i still can't find any java interpretors, did you really install the JRE? installation will now stop ... and it does stop... this is on windows 2000 with the installer i grabbed from: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~oierw/freenet-0.5_pre1_0.0.exe -Josh Ian Clarke wrote: Ok, in a few days we will release 0.5pre2 - which may become Freenet 0.5. We need people to hunt for bugs, not just the obscure kind that you can only spot by pouring through the logs, but also the kind that are so obvious that the core developers don't see them - such as usability issues, assuming that the user knows things they might not know, holes in the documentation etc etc. If you think you have found such a bug, however superficial or obvious it might be - send it to the development mailing list so that we can ensure it is fixed in the next release. Bug reports on both Linux and Windows are needed - particularly Windows. All the best, Ian. ___ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
