[pfSense Support] Log problems

2008-01-24 Thread Jack Doyle
I am running RC4 of 1.2.

Almost immediately after upgrading, logging stopped for the DHCP
server as well as the NTP client.  This was also happening in 1.0.1,
which is the primary reason I tried upgrading (which went smoothly --
thanks).

Thanks in advance.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Filtering, etc

2008-01-24 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Content filtering on pfSense is still a work in progress.  There has 
been a lot of work done on a port of SquidGuard, but I haven't used it 
so I don't know how functional it is yet.  There will be a more robust 
content filtering component coming later this year as part of Centipede 
Networks' contribution to pfSense, but that piece is still a ways off.


-Gary

Richard Sperry wrote:

I have a client that needs to play god over their employees.  I need to create 
a 6 site IPSEC mesh and I need Content filtering along with IM filtering.

IPSec seemed to have an issue on my test, but I think that may be the server 
itself. As the carp failover peer went offline. I would like to limit upstream 
content to SMB/CIFS/DNS/HTTP/etc/  I can only figure how to block on the 
receiving end, and could cause me to have a large bandwidth cost as I am billed 
per what goes up the pipe, not what I accept.

The issue on content filtering was that the upstream provider has latency 
issues and squid returned a basic 404 instead of trying  a few times like IE or 
FF.

Also IMspector had no log and throws an err of missing mysql. Even thou I want 
it locally for now.  ( a central point like OSSIM.net would kick arse.

Any thoughts?

--Richard




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Log problems

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, Jack Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am running RC4 of 1.2.

 Almost immediately after upgrading, logging stopped for the DHCP
 server as well as the NTP client.  This was also happening in 1.0.1,
 which is the primary reason I tried upgrading (which went smoothly --
 thanks).

Reboot the firewall and it should start working again.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Log problems

2008-01-24 Thread Paul M
Jack Doyle wrote:
 Yes, I did that with the old version, too, and it stopped logging
 after a short while.

what happens if you kill and restart syslogd? does logging restart, or
is the problem upstream?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Log problems

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, Paul M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jack Doyle wrote:
  Yes, I did that with the old version, too, and it stopped logging
  after a short while.

 what happens if you kill and restart syslogd? does logging restart, or
 is the problem upstream?

For the record, clicking Save in the logging settings screen should do
a full restart of syslogd.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Richard Sperry
Since this is becoming more of a commercial project, do we have to worry about 
this becoming a pay software?


Richard Sperry



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, Richard Sperry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Since this is becoming more of a commercial project, do we have to worry 
 about this becoming a pay software?

Absolutely not.  Never.  Over my dead body.  It will remain free forever.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
technically it already is. if you want elevated support, they charge for it. 
but out of that comes upgrades and feature enhancements of the software for all 
users. also the rewards programs on the forum for adding functionality that is 
being asked for.
 
-Sean



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 
 10:34:08 -0800 Subject: [pfSense Support] License  Since this is becoming 
 more of a commercial project, do we have to worry about this becoming a pay 
 software?   Richard Sperry
 - To 
 unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail®-get your 
fix.
http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx

Re: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Wade Blackwell
You just made the Christmas cad list ;~)
Thanks Scott (and team). This product has come a long way.

-W
-  
Wade Blackwell

Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than
perception management


On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:53 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
 On 1/24/08, Richard Sperry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Since this is becoming more of a commercial project, do we have to worry 
  about this becoming a pay software?
 
 Absolutely not.  Never.  Over my dead body.  It will remain free forever.
 
 Scott
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:47:52PM -0500, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
 
technically it already is. if you want elevated support, they charge

The support is worth every penny, though (said as a paying customer).

for it. but out of that comes upgrades and feature enhancements of the
software for all users. also the rewards programs on the forum for
adding functionality that is being asked for.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The support is worth every penny, though (said as a paying customer).

Thanks for the kind words!!

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Richard Sperry
So if I wanted OSSIM.net integration, what would I pay?  Give me and the group 
the sales pitch, please.

Richard Sperry
Director of Operations
WrinkleBrain, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
206.729.4799 x13

MCP - Small Business Specialist
WOT - Thawte Notary

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this electronic mail transmission is 
legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of the transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please delete the message and immediately 
notify us by telephone at 206.729.4799 or by responding to this email.  If this 
email is signed or encrypted you may not forward to another party with out 
written permission in a signed email.

Recycle Notice:  This email was sent using recycled electrons.






-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 11:32 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] License

On 1/24/08, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The support is worth every penny, though (said as a paying customer).

Thanks for the kind words!!

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, Richard Sperry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So if I wanted OSSIM.net integration, what would I pay?  Give me and the 
 group the sales pitch, please.

Sorry, I am not sales person but I can suggest that you start a bounty
in the forum and pledge what you think it's worth.   Then others can
piggyback on top that would also like to see this added (as a
package).

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Log problems

2008-01-24 Thread Jack Doyle
I restarted syslogd using the method you suggested.  As of right now,
the latest message I have in my log from the DHCP server is at 8:03
yesterday morning and the NTPD log at 8:00 yesterday morning.

On Jan 24, 2008 1:13 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 For the record, clicking Save in the logging settings screen should do
 a full restart of syslogd.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 rrdtool graphing stopped

2008-01-24 Thread Wade Blackwell
It seems very random,
Anyone else see this in 1.2RC2? I just rebooted and the quality graphs
stopped, I rebooted again (hoping for the microsoft fix) and now all the
rrdtool graphs are broken. Thx.

-W
-- 
Wade Blackwell

Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than
perception management



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Attempting to install pfSense; gets stuck

2008-01-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello,

I am attempting to install pfSense on a 2 GB CF card for use on a PC  
Engines motherboard without video (alix2c3.)


I have used the live disc under VMWare and connected the card via USB  
reader. Everything works great and the install begins, but then hangs  
forever (overnight at least) at 35%, which is:

/usr/local/bin/cpdup -vvv -I -o /usr /mnt/usr

I have tested the card and reader extensively; everything works. I  
have re-attempted the above process several times.


How do I work around this?

Also, how do I put reasonable settings onto here, so that I can avoid  
setting up a console with my alix board? I'd prefer to have simple  
DHCP auto-configuration on at least one NIC and SSH/HTTP admin access  
working immediately after booting.


Thank you!

-Galen




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] ifconfig -v ath0 scan borken?

2008-01-24 Thread Espen Johansen
Command you should use is ifconfig ath0 scan (-v is to list long ssids)
You can only list in adhoc or station mode (infrastructure).
Is the interface enabled in pfsense at all ? And if it is, make sure it's
not configured as a AP.

-lsf

On Jan 23, 2008 11:13 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 According to this:


 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html

 29.3.3.1.1 How to Find Access Points

 To scan for networks, use the ifconfig command. This request may take a
 few moments to complete as it requires that the system switches to each
 available wireless frequency and probes for available access points.

 and:

 Note: You must mark the interface up before you can scan. Subsequent scan
 requests do not require you to mark the interface up again.

 If I do:

  # ifconfig -v ath0 down
  # ifconfig -v ath0 up scan

 I get results in a jiffy.  But any subsequent:

  # ifconfig -v ath0 scan

 never returns :(

 Is there something I'm missing?  Is there a better way?


 --
 Cristian

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [pfSense Support] Wifi NIC

2008-01-24 Thread Espen Johansen
As far as I know there is still no MIMO cards supported in FreeBSD.
You might have some luck with project evil (ndisulator) but this is not
supported at all.

-lsf

On Jan 17, 2008 1:58 AM, MyStiC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have an Airlink 101 MIMO XR PCI and am trying to use it as the WAN.
 The first problem is pfSense doesn't show it's match as an option, if
 there is a fix for this, I could problably take it from there.  Is
 this possible  if so, how.  I'm running the latest  greatest RC4.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [pfSense Support] Wifi NIC

2008-01-24 Thread MyStiC
No worries.  A friend  I have been digging through it off  and
trying to make it work.

On Jan 24, 2008 3:07 PM, Espen Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As far as I know there is still no MIMO cards supported in FreeBSD.
 You might have some luck with project evil (ndisulator) but this is not
 supported at all.

 -lsf


 On Jan 17, 2008 1:58 AM, MyStiC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 
  I have an Airlink 101 MIMO XR PCI and am trying to use it as the WAN.
  The first problem is pfSense doesn't show it's match as an option, if
  there is a fix for this, I could problably take it from there.  Is
  this possible  if so, how.  I'm running the latest  greatest RC4.
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



AW: [pfSense Support] Wifi NIC

2008-01-24 Thread Fuchs, Martin
Afaik it will be supported in freebsd 7

 

Von: Espen Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 22:07
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Wifi NIC

 

As far as I know there is still no MIMO cards supported in FreeBSD.

You might have some luck with project evil (ndisulator) but this is not
supported at all.

-lsf

 

On Jan 17, 2008 1:58 AM, MyStiC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have an Airlink 101 MIMO XR PCI and am trying to use it as the WAN.
The first problem is pfSense doesn't show it's match as an option, if 
there is a fix for this, I could problably take it from there.  Is
this possible  if so, how.  I'm running the latest  greatest RC4.

- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



Re: [pfSense Support] Attempting to install pfSense; gets stuck

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 I am attempting to install pfSense on a 2 GB CF card for use on a PC
 Engines motherboard without video (alix2c3.)

 I have used the live disc under VMWare and connected the card via USB
 reader. Everything works great and the install begins, but then hangs
 forever (overnight at least) at 35%, which is:
 /usr/local/bin/cpdup -vvv -I -o /usr /mnt/usr

 I have tested the card and reader extensively; everything works. I
 have re-attempted the above process several times.

 How do I work around this?

 Also, how do I put reasonable settings onto here, so that I can avoid
 setting up a console with my alix board? I'd prefer to have simple
 DHCP auto-configuration on at least one NIC and SSH/HTTP admin access
 working immediately after booting.

That portion of the installer takes quite a while depending on speed
of the CF card, etc.  Give it  a bit longer.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Evenly share bandwidth

2008-01-24 Thread Luiz Vaz
Scott,

  yes i had some port fowards.
  But in my case i don't want to get them shaped.
  They are serving data from internal machines to internet.

  I only want local users don't eating all band.
  And it works like a charm.

  I look forward for a implementation that uses dynamic shape the bandwidth
between users.
  Spliting an amount of band between incomming connections.
  But its ok by now.

Thanks in Advanced,
Luiz Vaz

2008/1/8, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



 On 1/8/08, Luiz Vaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
wondering how to shape the traffic within a customer network, i was
  not happy with pfsense wizard. ;-(
 
But a simple solution saved my sleep nights, IPFW!
Using the developers edition, i manually loaded the required kernel
  modules after the boot.
So, using old approach created a bandwidth pipe and queue like this
  below:
 
 
 - kldload -v /boot/kernel/ipfw.ko
 - kldload -v /boot/kernel/dummynet.ko
 - ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.0.0/24
 - ipfw pipe 1 config bw 250Kbit/s queue 70 mask dst-ip 0x00ff
 
 
Other rules can be added to expand this set.
But this basic works well.
 
Another sources to this can be found on this links:
 
 
 - http://www.linux.com/feature/46616
 - http://www.tummy.com/journals/entries/jafo_20041222_193902
 
 
 
Hope this helps! ;-)
 
 
  Best Regards,
  Luiz Vaz
 

 Do you have any port forwards defined?  My experience with this is that
 the two will not work together for some reason.
 Scott




Re: [pfSense Support] Evenly share bandwidth

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, Luiz Vaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott,

   yes i had some port fowards.
   But in my case i don't want to get them shaped.
   They are serving data from internal machines to internet.

   I only want local users don't eating all band.
   And it works like a charm.

   I look forward for a implementation that uses dynamic shape the bandwidth
 between users.
   Spliting an amount of band between incomming connections.
   But its ok by now.

This unfortunately contradicts years worth of testing by a number of
us.  Can you show us:

ipfw show
ipfw pipe show

And I'll take yet another look at it.

Thanks!

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Attempting to install pfSense; gets stuck

2008-01-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Jan 24, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:

On 1/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

Hello,

I am attempting to install pfSense on a 2 GB CF card for use on a PC
Engines motherboard without video (alix2c3.)

I have used the live disc under VMWare and connected the card via USB
reader. Everything works great and the install begins, but then hangs
forever (overnight at least) at 35%, which is:
/usr/local/bin/cpdup -vvv -I -o /usr /mnt/usr

I have tested the card and reader extensively; everything works. I
have re-attempted the above process several times.

How do I work around this?

Also, how do I put reasonable settings onto here, so that I can avoid
setting up a console with my alix board? I'd prefer to have simple
DHCP auto-configuration on at least one NIC and SSH/HTTP admin access
working immediately after booting.


That portion of the installer takes quite a while depending on speed
of the CF card, etc.  Give it  a bit longer.

Scott


How long should I give it? I already gave it roughly 4-6 hours...

I can write the whole card full of data in about 15 minutes using the  
same reader.


What in the world is it doing??

-Galen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Re: ifconfig -v ath0 scan borken?

2008-01-24 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Espen Johansen wrote:

 Command you should use is ifconfig ath0 scan (-v is to list long ssids)

Yes.

 You can only list in adhoc or station mode (infrastructure).

Oh, I see.

 Is the interface enabled in pfsense at all ?

Yes.

 And if it is, make sure it's not configured as a AP.

I need it to be AP.  Though, I can do the scanning on the client, now that
I got it working :)


Cheers,

-- 
Cristian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Attempting to install pfSense; gets stuck

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 1/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I can write the whole card full of data in about 15 minutes using the
 same reader.

 What in the world is it doing??

Well it should finish well before that.

Can you cancel out during this time?  If so, send over /tmp/installer.log

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Attempting to install pfSense; gets stuck

2008-01-24 Thread Richard Sperry
I had a couple of machines fail to install like that, I had to disable ACPI  
for it to install.


--Richard





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:26 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Attempting to install pfSense; gets stuck

On Jan 24, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:

 On 1/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 Hello,

 I am attempting to install pfSense on a 2 GB CF card for use on a PC
 Engines motherboard without video (alix2c3.)

 I have used the live disc under VMWare and connected the card via USB
 reader. Everything works great and the install begins, but then hangs
 forever (overnight at least) at 35%, which is:
 /usr/local/bin/cpdup -vvv -I -o /usr /mnt/usr

 I have tested the card and reader extensively; everything works. I
 have re-attempted the above process several times.

 How do I work around this?

 Also, how do I put reasonable settings onto here, so that I can avoid
 setting up a console with my alix board? I'd prefer to have simple
 DHCP auto-configuration on at least one NIC and SSH/HTTP admin access
 working immediately after booting.

 That portion of the installer takes quite a while depending on speed
 of the CF card, etc.  Give it  a bit longer.

 Scott

How long should I give it? I already gave it roughly 4-6 hours...

I can write the whole card full of data in about 15 minutes using the
same reader.

What in the world is it doing??

-Galen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Speaking on behalf of the company doing the commercial support, I can 
safely say that I don't ever see pfSense becoming a for-pay solution.  
Scott, Chris and the other developers have always been very committed to 
the open source software community.  The reason there is a commercial 
support option at all is because many companies require it in order to 
consider implementing a solution. 

The commercial development side of things is a way for people (or 
companies) who want to see a particular feature in pfSense and want to 
reward the developers for doing the work.  This benefits everyone since 
almost all of these development projects find their way into the pfSense 
system, and the developers are able to see a financial benefit for their 
time and effort spent. 

I hope this helps clarify fears that people might have about pfSense.  
In short, the intent is to give people more options, not less. 


-Gary

Sean Cavanaugh wrote:


technically it already is. if you want elevated support, they charge 
for it. but out of that comes upgrades and feature enhancements of the 
software for all users. also the rewards programs on the forum for 
adding functionality that is being asked for.
 
-Sean





 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:34:08 -0800
 Subject: [pfSense Support] License

 Since this is becoming more of a commercial project, do we have to 
worry about this becoming a pay software?



 Richard Sperry



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail®-get 
your fix. Check it out. http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Evenly share bandwidth

2008-01-24 Thread Luiz Vaz
Hi,

  You put me on doubt, and i tested again to check...
  Yeah, it works! ;)
  I cleaned the pipe and created again to remove polluted info.

  As you can see in the test bellow my machine was 0.0.0.102.
  After a jump in http://www.bandwidthplace.com/ the test come with this:

 227.09 kilobits per second
 27.72  kilobytes per second
 73.734 seconds
 8:47 PM Thur Jan 24, 2008

  The commands that you give me reported:

# ipfw show:
00100  8388  4994385 pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.0.0/24
65535 295283626 146234227789 allow ip from any to any

# ipfw pipe show
1: 250.000 Kbit/s0 ms   70 sl. 9 queues (64 buckets) droptail
mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x00ff/0x
BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte
Drp
  1 ip   0.0.0.0/0   0.0.0.129/0  42444418  00
0
  2 ip   0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.2/0 3778  1078580  00
0
  5 ip   0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.5/0  70581866  00
0
  6 ip   0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.6/0  594   150145  00
0
 32 ip   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.32/05  430  00
0
 38 ip   0.0.0.0/0   0.0.0.102/0 3175  3723408  00
44
 58 ip   0.0.0.0/0   0.0.0.122/07  602  00
0
 62 ip   0.0.0.0/0   0.0.0.254/0   94 8264  00
0
 63 ip   0.0.0.0/0   0.0.0.255/0   32 5614  00
0


Thanks in advanced.
I'm your fan, no jokes! ;)

Luiz Vaz


Re: [pfSense Support] PFSense VLAN Tagging on the WAN Port

2008-01-24 Thread Bill Marquette
On Jan 23, 2008 9:47 PM, Richard Sperry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Your NIC must support VLAN tagging.  I'm sure the dev's would love to take
 your money, any open source project could use support (although I don't
 think this is GPL or other, I thinks it is directly under Scott Ulrich) .

BSD Licensed.  Even more free than GPL.

--Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] License

2008-01-24 Thread Chris Buechler

Scott Ullrich wrote:

On 1/24/08, Richard Sperry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Since this is becoming more of a commercial project, do we have to worry about 
this becoming a pay software?



Absolutely not.  Never.  Over my dead body.  It will remain free forever.
  


Absolutely. Under no circumstances will this project change to 
commercial software.


We're just providing a way for folks to support the project, receive the 
best quality support possible with fast response times, and hopefully 
eventually make it our primary source of income which will allow us to 
further improve the open source project.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 rrdtool graphing stopped

2008-01-24 Thread sai
I saw this after upgrading to RC4

Fix:

using exec.php

   rm -rf /var/db/rrd*

Then in the Execute PHP command box type in:

enable_rrd_graphing();

This will delete all your rrd data :-(

sai

On 1/25/08, Wade Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It seems very random,
 Anyone else see this in 1.2RC2? I just rebooted and the quality graphs
 stopped, I rebooted again (hoping for the microsoft fix) and now all the
 rrdtool graphs are broken. Thx.

 -W
 --
 Wade Blackwell

 Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than
 perception management



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 rrdtool graphing stopped

2008-01-24 Thread Jeppe Øland
  It seems very random,
  Anyone else see this in 1.2RC2? I just rebooted and the quality 
  graphs
  stopped, I rebooted again (hoping for the microsoft fix) and now all the
  rrdtool graphs are broken. Thx.

I have had the RRD graphs broken a lot recently.
After lots of poking around, I tracked it down to pfSense not always
being able to get the current time from the Internet during bootup.
(Like if I had the WAN unplugged while booting pfSense).

Regards,
-Jeppe

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]