Re: [pfSense Support] monitoring bandwidth usage of individual lan addresses
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Patrick M. Murray, M.F.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is there any noticeable speed increase or decrease? Over an hdd given the box it's on, it boots WAY faster. I'm using a 2GB Sandisk Extreme II card, so it's pretty blazing fast for pfSense. For normal operations, there's no noticable difference in speed as all the disk IO (for config writes) ends up being buffered by the OS anyway. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] monitoring bandwidth usage of individual lan addresses
is there any noticeable speed increase or decrease? Patrick M. Murray, M.F.A. http://www.patrickmurray.net On 17 Jun 2008, at 15:28-0400, Bill Marquette wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Patrick M. Murray, M.F.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm going to run the CF card and see how long it lasts :) they are cheaper each day - wouldn't be a big loss and i can always yank the card and back it up anytime. It's not great uptime yet and I'm not running packages on it, so YMMV, but I've been running a full install since January or so w/out any issues. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] monitoring bandwidth usage of individual lan addresses
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Patrick M. Murray, M.F.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to run the CF card and see how long it lasts :) they are cheaper > each day - wouldn't be a big loss and i can always yank the card and back it > up anytime. It's not great uptime yet and I'm not running packages on it, so YMMV, but I've been running a full install since January or so w/out any issues. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] DHCP ranges
Also, is it possible to set DHCP options? I know the new Wyse thin client v10L looks for certain DHCP options to be configured in order for it to automatically pull new firm ware. So I was hoping to accomplish this with our pfSense machines. Would it be possible to set them manually in the config, or would it be wiped? Thanks, -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matias Surdi Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:37 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] DHCP ranges Is it possible to specify more than one dhcp range? If not, will it be available in 1.3? Sorry for making so much questions, but I'm trying to migrate our firewalls here, and I've to find work arounds for every feature we need. Thanks for your patience. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] DHCP ranges
Is it possible to specify more than one dhcp range? If not, will it be available in 1.3? Sorry for making so much questions, but I'm trying to migrate our firewalls here, and I've to find work arounds for every feature we need. Thanks for your patience. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Non power user
Hiren Joshi wrote: Hello all, I know this goes against best practise but would it be possible to have a non-admin user for the web interface on PFsense? Basically I would like to allow people to see the RDD graphs but no be able to make any changes to the setup etc. Any idea how this could be done? Many Thanks, Hiren. This *exact* feature is coming in 1.3 as part of the user manager setup. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] monitoring bandwidth usage of individual lan addresses
I'm going to run the CF card and see how long it lasts :) they are cheaper each day - wouldn't be a big loss and i can always yank the card and back it up anytime. Patrick M. Murray, M.F.A. http://www.patrickmurray.net On 17 Jun 2008, at 10:14-0400, Christopher Iarocci wrote: I stuck a 60GB hard drive in a NET5501 and run the full install. Works beautifully and I'm not worried about killing my CF card. Maybe Patrick is doing the same or could do the same if he is not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Buechler Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:11 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] monitoring bandwidth usage of individual lan addresses On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:07 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Daniel Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The bandwithd package does just that. But he's running on a ALIX board, isn't he most likely using the embedded version which does not support packages? Ah, missed that. No way currently to run packages on embedded, it's not capable of saving data for things of this nature because of the limits of CF. Some people do full installs on CF and run that way, it's not recommended because theoretically it'll kill your CF. In practice, I know of a number of people running that way and have yet to hear from one who killed a CF card. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Non power user
Hello all, I know this goes against best practise but would it be possible to have a non-admin user for the web interface on PFsense? Basically I would like to allow people to see the RDD graphs but no be able to make any changes to the setup etc. Any idea how this could be done? Many Thanks, Hiren.
RE: [pfSense Support] monitoring bandwidth usage of individual lan addresses
I stuck a 60GB hard drive in a NET5501 and run the full install. Works beautifully and I'm not worried about killing my CF card. Maybe Patrick is doing the same or could do the same if he is not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Buechler Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:11 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] monitoring bandwidth usage of individual lan addresses On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:07 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Daniel Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The bandwithd package does just that. > > But he's running on a ALIX board, isn't he most likely using the > embedded version which does not support packages? > Ah, missed that. No way currently to run packages on embedded, it's not capable of saving data for things of this nature because of the limits of CF. Some people do full installs on CF and run that way, it's not recommended because theoretically it'll kill your CF. In practice, I know of a number of people running that way and have yet to hear from one who killed a CF card. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Re: Destination NAT
Bill Marquette escribió: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Matias Surdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In our current firewall (using iptables) we have a set of rules that makes a DNAT redirectin ALL outgoing udp port 53 (DNS) traffic to an internet DNS server, so that everybody is forces to use it. Is it possible to accomplish the same thing with pfSense? If yes, which is the correct/recommended way to do it? Firewall->NAT->Port Forward - there were numerous discussions on changing the titles of our NAT entries, no concensus was reached so it got left alone ;) Create a rule there and assign it to your LAN interface. Don't forget TCP port 53 while you're at it. --Bill Thanks, that worked correctly. Maybe in a few days we will have our new pfSense powered firewall :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Destination NAT
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Matias Surdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In our current firewall (using iptables) we have a set of rules that makes a > DNAT redirectin ALL outgoing udp port 53 (DNS) traffic to an internet DNS > server, so that everybody is forces to use it. > > Is it possible to accomplish the same thing with pfSense? > If yes, which is the correct/recommended way to do it? Firewall->NAT->Port Forward - there were numerous discussions on changing the titles of our NAT entries, no concensus was reached so it got left alone ;) Create a rule there and assign it to your LAN interface. Don't forget TCP port 53 while you're at it. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Destination NAT
Hi, In our current firewall (using iptables) we have a set of rules that makes a DNAT redirectin ALL outgoing udp port 53 (DNS) traffic to an internet DNS server, so that everybody is forces to use it. Is it possible to accomplish the same thing with pfSense? If yes, which is the correct/recommended way to do it? Thanks a lot. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
