[pfSense Support] VLAN Problems

2010-06-25 Thread Joseph Hardeman
Hi Everyone,

I have an interesting VLAN setup/problem question.  I followed the pfSense
doc on setting up multiple vlans on the same interface (VLAN Trunking) and
the switch is setup with trunking going to the pfSense box (vlan1 untagged,
all other vlans tagged).  However, the VLANs do not pass traffic or respond
unless we are running a tcpdump or packet capture on the VLAN interface.  We
have a system behind one of the vlans we are testing with and it will is not
able to hit the pfSense box or internet, until we turn on tcpdump ­i vlan2
or packet capture on vlan2 interface.

Has any one else seen this problem or know how to fix it?  We will be happy
to send out screen captures and other stuff if that will help.

Thanks

Joe



[pfSense Support] pfSense Blocking some traffic

2009-08-16 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Greetings everyone,

I have noticed some strange behavior, I have setup a Bridge and setup 
specific blocking rules for access to systems behind our firewall, I 
also have explicit access rules for port 80:


   pass in quick on $wan reply-to (em0 GATEWAYIP) proto tcp from any to 
any port = 80 keep state  label USER_RULE: HTTP Port Allow Access


at the bottom of the firewall rules I have this entry to allow 
everything that I am not specifically blocking:


   pass in quick on $wan reply-to (em0 GATEWAYIP) from any to any keep 
state  label USER_RULE: Allow Everything Else



On my internal interface of the bridge I have the following entry:

   pass in quick on $InternalNetwork from any to any keep state  label 
USER_RULE


However I am seeing entries captured in my firewall logs where visitors 
are being denied per the Default deny rule at the very bottom of the pf 
rules. 

My question is why are my explicit rules not capturing the entries 
before it gets to the last rule?  And also, how can I disable those two 
rules or can they be disabled?


Thanks

Joe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense Blocking some traffic

2009-08-16 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Jim Pingle wrote:

Joseph Hardeman wrote:
  

However I am seeing entries captured in my firewall logs where visitors
are being denied per the Default deny rule at the very bottom of the pf
rules.
My question is why are my explicit rules not capturing the entries
before it gets to the last rule?  And also, how can I disable those two
rules or can they be disabled?



My guess is that you're really seeing this:

http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Logs_show_%22blocked%22_for_traffic_from_a_legitimate_connection%2C_why%3F

And no traffic is actually being dropped.

Jim

  
Very interesting, but definitely makes sense, specially since I can't 
seem to get a blocked session to my systems.


Thanks Jim for the link.

Joe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] AINA Bogon List Update

2009-08-05 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Greetings Everyone,

Just wanted to make you aware, if you weren't already, that on Aug 3rd 
2009 IANA has recently assigned two IP Ranges that were previously Bogon 
Ranges out to the wild.  The IP Ranges are:


  175/8  APNIC   2009-08   whois.apnic.net   ALLOCATED
  182/8  APNIC   2009-08   whois.apnic.net   ALLOCATED

I received the notification from the Team Cymru group, their master 
bogon list can be found here:


http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/

Just wanted to let everyone know, so you don't block legitimate traffic 
thinking its from Bogon networks like has happened to me in the past. *S*


Have a great day

Joseph

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] AINA Bogon List Update

2009-08-05 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:

Joseph Hardeman wrote:

Greetings Everyone,

Just wanted to make you aware, if you weren't already, that on Aug 
3rd 2009 IANA has recently assigned two IP Ranges that were 
previously Bogon Ranges out to the wild.  The IP Ranges are:


  175/8  APNIC   2009-08   whois.apnic.net   ALLOCATED
  182/8  APNIC   2009-08   whois.apnic.net   ALLOCATED

I received the notification from the Team Cymru group, their master 
bogon list can be found here:


http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/

Just wanted to let everyone know, so you don't block legitimate 
traffic thinking its from Bogon networks like has happened to me in 
the past. *S*


Have a great day

Joseph

Thanks for update. Could somebody explain when 
/etc/rc.update_bogons.sh is supposed to run on pfSense?
Joseph, I could not find any subscription available on their site, how 
are you receiving notifications?


Thanks.
Eugene



Hi Eugene,

I joined their mailing list at:
bogon-announce mailing list

bogon-annou...@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/bogon-announce

As for the rc.update_bogons.sh, you can look in /etc/crontabs and see 
that, at least my setup, is set to run:


1   3   1   *   *   root/usr/bin/nice -n20 
/etc/rc.update_bogons.sh


on the first day of each month at 3:01 am.

Joe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Multiple WANs on a Single Bridge

2009-06-25 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Hi Everyone,

I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a 
single bridge. 

For instance: 


111.111.111.111/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers
222.222.222.222/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers


I see a way to add a virtual IP in the Firewall section, but not to add 
a VIP to the em0 Interface.   I have em0 bridged with em1 and my bridge 
is setup with allowing certain ports through to internal servers, each 
server has an external IP so I have to use bridged mode, not NATing.


Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Joe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] CARP and Bridging

2009-06-25 Thread Joseph Hardeman

One other question now that I think of it.

Does CARP work between two firewalls that are running in full Bridge 
mode, no NATing done at all, just port blocking on the WAN interface? 

We have two firewalls and I want to make sure any states are kept intact 
on the chance we have to failover to the secondary.


Joe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs on a Single Bridge

2009-06-25 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Chris,

Thanks for your reply, I found this out earlier today.  Yes, all of the 
gateways are outside of the firewall so when I changed the IP on my 
laptop after getting the firewall upgraded it was able to get out with 
no problem.


Again, thank you for your reply.  I appreciate it.

Joe

Chris Buechler wrote:

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Joseph Hardemanjharde...@colocube.com wrote:
  

Hi Everyone,

I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a
single bridge.
For instance:
111.111.111.111/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers
222.222.222.222/25  - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers




Nothing to it, if what you really need is a bridge. If the gateway IP
is outside the firewall, it's no different to use two subnets than it
is one. If the gateway IP isn't outside the firewall, you don't need
bridging, you need a routed public IP subnet on an OPT interface.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org


  


--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner



[pfSense Support] Configuration Questions

2009-02-01 Thread Joseph Hardeman

Hi Everyone,

I have a question that I am hoping someone will be able to help me with.

I am about to migrate to a network that has two circuits to the same 
provider with BGP on each circuit so if one circuit goes down we will be 
able to keep our traffic flowing.  Our pfSense firewall is setup in 
Bridge mode connecting on the front interface of the bridge to one of 
our routers and the backend interface of the bridge to one of our 
switches which then connect to the front side of all of our servers.


What I want to do is use the Multi-WAN and possible Load Balancing 
functionalities and have one circuit as primary and the other circuit as 
secondary then have CARP running as a hardware failover between two 
identical pfSense boxes.  My question is can this be done in bridge mode 
and if so, how would I go about setting it up in pfSense so that three 
interfaces are part of the bridge?  The multi-wan load balancing shows 
connecting to two separate carriers and using NAT not Bridge mode which 
is what I want to use. 

Has anyone set up this sort of configuration before or can point me to a 
document or information on how to accomplish this?


Thanks

Joe

--
This message has been scanned for viruses by Colocube's AV Scanner

begin:vcard
fn:Joseph Hardeman
n:Hardeman;Joseph
org:Colocube, LLC;Operations
adr:;;4311 Communications Dr;Norcross;GA;30093;US
email;internet:jharde...@colocube.com
title:Data Center Manager
tel;work:678-427-5890
tel;cell:678-427-5890
note:This email message is intended for the use of the person to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments.  Thank you.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.colocube.com
version:2.1
end:vcard


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org