Re: [pfSense Support] VPN question

2010-05-20 Thread Gary Buckmaster
If I understand your scenario, you're wanting to send all Internet bound 
traffic from your office LAN connection across a VPN tunnel and egress 
your network at the colocation facility?  This can be accomplished quite 
easily with OpenVPN (maybe with IPSEC, but I've personally done it with 
OpenVPN) by using the OpenVPN tunnel as your default route.  It should 
be noted that this may impact performance in a noticeable way, depending 
on how much data traffic you send across the tunnel. 


Chris Flugstad wrote:

So i have a scenario I'd like to run by you all

I have a location with a dsl connection.  pfsense router there.  I 
want to vpn that connection back to my COLO so I can use my public 
IP's on the pfsense router at the location with the dsl connection.


Would i setup pfsense in my colo with public ip's on my LAN, then 
setup vpn(openvpn perhaps) on both boxes, and then dhcp out the public 
ip's from the colo'd pfsense box on the remote box?


does this make sense?
-topher

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] VPN question

2010-05-20 Thread Chris Flugstad
i have gig e on one end.  the bottleneck im sure will be the office end. 
however, i get faster download speeds from my colo to the office than i 
do from other internet sites.  maybe this will improve my speeds?


do you have a config for this, so i can test it out. i have a vmware 
pfsense box i just installed and gonna setup a client side now.


much appreciated.
topher

On 5/20/2010 6:11 PM, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
If I understand your scenario, you're wanting to send all Internet 
bound traffic from your office LAN connection across a VPN tunnel and 
egress your network at the colocation facility?  This can be 
accomplished quite easily with OpenVPN (maybe with IPSEC, but I've 
personally done it with OpenVPN) by using the OpenVPN tunnel as your 
default route.  It should be noted that this may impact performance in 
a noticeable way, depending on how much data traffic you send across 
the tunnel.

Chris Flugstad wrote:

So i have a scenario I'd like to run by you all

I have a location with a dsl connection.  pfsense router there.  I 
want to vpn that connection back to my COLO so I can use my public 
IP's on the pfsense router at the location with the dsl connection.


Would i setup pfsense in my colo with public ip's on my LAN, then 
setup vpn(openvpn perhaps) on both boxes, and then dhcp out the 
public ip's from the colo'd pfsense box on the remote box?


does this make sense?
-topher

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] VPN question

2010-05-20 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Your restriction is going to be the DSL line speed. 

I'm afraid I don't have a generic config for this off the top of my 
head, but it should be a very standard point-to-point OpenVPN tunnel 
other than the difference in the remote network being your default route 
(0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0).  It's been a bit since I've done this setup, but I 
remember it being pretty straightforward. 



Chris Flugstad wrote:
i have gig e on one end.  the bottleneck im sure will be the office 
end. however, i get faster download speeds from my colo to the office 
than i do from other internet sites.  maybe this will improve my speeds?


do you have a config for this, so i can test it out. i have a vmware 
pfsense box i just installed and gonna setup a client side now.


much appreciated.
topher

On 5/20/2010 6:11 PM, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
If I understand your scenario, you're wanting to send all Internet 
bound traffic from your office LAN connection across a VPN tunnel and 
egress your network at the colocation facility?  This can be 
accomplished quite easily with OpenVPN (maybe with IPSEC, but I've 
personally done it with OpenVPN) by using the OpenVPN tunnel as your 
default route.  It should be noted that this may impact performance 
in a noticeable way, depending on how much data traffic you send 
across the tunnel.

Chris Flugstad wrote:

So i have a scenario I'd like to run by you all

I have a location with a dsl connection.  pfsense router there.  I 
want to vpn that connection back to my COLO so I can use my public 
IP's on the pfsense router at the location with the dsl connection.


Would i setup pfsense in my colo with public ip's on my LAN, then 
setup vpn(openvpn perhaps) on both boxes, and then dhcp out the 
public ip's from the colo'd pfsense box on the remote box?


does this make sense?
-topher

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] VPN question

2010-05-20 Thread Chris Flugstad
Ill give it a run and post any problems i come up with.  I am not 
looking for any speed increases really just want to use my ip's not the 
ip's of the isp


-chris

On 5/20/2010 6:22 PM, Gary Buckmaster wrote:

Your restriction is going to be the DSL line speed.
I'm afraid I don't have a generic config for this off the top of my 
head, but it should be a very standard point-to-point OpenVPN tunnel 
other than the difference in the remote network being your default 
route (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0).  It's been a bit since I've done this setup, 
but I remember it being pretty straightforward.


Chris Flugstad wrote:
i have gig e on one end.  the bottleneck im sure will be the office 
end. however, i get faster download speeds from my colo to the office 
than i do from other internet sites.  maybe this will improve my speeds?


do you have a config for this, so i can test it out. i have a vmware 
pfsense box i just installed and gonna setup a client side now.


much appreciated.
topher

On 5/20/2010 6:11 PM, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
If I understand your scenario, you're wanting to send all Internet 
bound traffic from your office LAN connection across a VPN tunnel 
and egress your network at the colocation facility?  This can be 
accomplished quite easily with OpenVPN (maybe with IPSEC, but I've 
personally done it with OpenVPN) by using the OpenVPN tunnel as your 
default route.  It should be noted that this may impact performance 
in a noticeable way, depending on how much data traffic you send 
across the tunnel.

Chris Flugstad wrote:

So i have a scenario I'd like to run by you all

I have a location with a dsl connection.  pfsense router there.  I 
want to vpn that connection back to my COLO so I can use my public 
IP's on the pfsense router at the location with the dsl connection.


Would i setup pfsense in my colo with public ip's on my LAN, then 
setup vpn(openvpn perhaps) on both boxes, and then dhcp out the 
public ip's from the colo'd pfsense box on the remote box?


does this make sense?
-topher

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] VPN question

2007-06-26 Thread Pablo Montoro EscaƱo
Have a look to the web of pfSense, in Tutorials, there is a wonderful tutorial 
that maybe can help you: OpenVPN road warrier and site to site


http://www.pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=tutorials/openvpn/pfsense-ovpn.pdf

Hope it can help.
Pablo Montoro.


Tim Dickson wrote:

I'll throw in my 2 cents...
I've used PPTP and OpenVPN.
I like the ease of use of OpenVPN to the end user (via the openvpn GUI)
The manuals on pfSense.com walk you through it step by step... so setup
is easy for you as well.
Just click and go! is all the user has to do, and if their connection
drops for whatever reason, it will automatically reconnect for them.  I
also like the way it adds the interface rather  that tunneling all
traffic. This saves our precious bandwidth on site and lets all the
downloading at home go out their own gateway.

PPTP is nice for the devices that can't support openvpn (such as
pocketpc's), so I use both protocols
-Tim





-Original Message-
From: Steven Hodgen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 4:45 PM

To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] VPN question

Ok, so I hope you will all forgive my inexcusable use of this list for 
questions that aren't 100% specific to pfSense.


Nevertheless, I want to use pfSense to let me create a road-warrior for 
our internal Windows domain. So, at some level there are questions 
specific to pfSense.  Actually, what this message is really about is my 
ignorance, and lack of ability to ferret out cogent answers on Google 
and searching this list.


Information:
* We have a server running Windows 2003 Standard Edition.
* Another machine running pfSense 1.2 Beta-1
* A Comcast Business WAN with a static IP.
* An internal LAN subnet 192.168.1.0/24
* Another subnet on a different different ethernet port 192.168.2.0/24 
used for isolating our internal wireless traffic (we're a school and 
kids all use wireless and are not on domain).

* So, we're using three of four available ethernet ports on the firewall

machine.
* I have roaming profiles configured and lots of Group Policy rules.

Questions:
1. What is the best way to configure pfSense so that a road-warrior can 
access our LAN domain as if he/she was here (except for speed, of

course).
2. Related to 1: what is the best (balance easy with secure) of the four

choices: IPsec, OpenVPN, PPPoE, PPTP, way to achieve this.  Pros/Cons.

Ok, so now I'm going to thank you in advance for putting up with my 
questions.  Truthfully, I know just about  enough about networking and 
TCP/IP, etc. to be dangerous.  But I learn quickly, and really 
appreciate your help.


I hope I gave you all enough information.  If there's a specific log or 
config file that would help you, please let me know.


--Steven


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Pablo Montoro Esca=C3=B1o
n;quoted-printable:Montoro Esca=C3=B1o;Pablo
org:Amitelo Wireless, S.L., (Amitelo AG Group)
adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Pol=C3=ADgono Industrial Alameda.;;c/ Marea Baja, n=C2=BA 33.;M=C3=A1laga;M=C3=A1laga;29006;SPAIN
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Telecomunication Engineer
tel;work:0034 951 013 026
tel;fax:0034 952 038 390
tel;home:0034 952 038 962
tel;cell:0034 671 621 263
note;quoted-printable:Pablo Montoro Esca=C3=B1o=0D=0A=
	Telecomunication Engineer=0D=0A=
	Amitelo Wireless, S.L.=0D=0A=
	(Amitelo AG Group)=0D=0A=
	=0D=0A=
	Phone : 0034 951 013 026=0D=0A=
	Mobile: 0034 671 621 263=0D=0A=
	Office: 0034 952 038 962=0D=0A=
	FAX   : 0034 952 038 390=0D=0A=
	MSN   : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
	Skype : pabloamitelo=0D=0A=
	Gizmo : pabloamitelo=0D=0A=
	=0D=0A=
	Amitelo Wireless, S.L.=0D=0A=
	c/ Marea Baja, n=C2=BA 33.=0D=0A=
	Pol=C3=ADgono Industrial Alameda.=0D=0A=
	29006 M=C3=A1laga (SPAIN)
url:http://www.wireless.amitelo.com
version:2.1
end:vcard


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [pfSense Support] VPN question

2007-06-25 Thread Tim Dickson
I'll throw in my 2 cents...
I've used PPTP and OpenVPN.
I like the ease of use of OpenVPN to the end user (via the openvpn GUI)
The manuals on pfSense.com walk you through it step by step... so setup
is easy for you as well.
Just click and go! is all the user has to do, and if their connection
drops for whatever reason, it will automatically reconnect for them.  I
also like the way it adds the interface rather  that tunneling all
traffic. This saves our precious bandwidth on site and lets all the
downloading at home go out their own gateway.

PPTP is nice for the devices that can't support openvpn (such as
pocketpc's), so I use both protocols
-Tim





-Original Message-
From: Steven Hodgen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 4:45 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] VPN question

Ok, so I hope you will all forgive my inexcusable use of this list for 
questions that aren't 100% specific to pfSense.

Nevertheless, I want to use pfSense to let me create a road-warrior for 
our internal Windows domain. So, at some level there are questions 
specific to pfSense.  Actually, what this message is really about is my 
ignorance, and lack of ability to ferret out cogent answers on Google 
and searching this list.

Information:
* We have a server running Windows 2003 Standard Edition.
* Another machine running pfSense 1.2 Beta-1
* A Comcast Business WAN with a static IP.
* An internal LAN subnet 192.168.1.0/24
* Another subnet on a different different ethernet port 192.168.2.0/24 
used for isolating our internal wireless traffic (we're a school and 
kids all use wireless and are not on domain).
* So, we're using three of four available ethernet ports on the firewall

machine.
* I have roaming profiles configured and lots of Group Policy rules.

Questions:
1. What is the best way to configure pfSense so that a road-warrior can 
access our LAN domain as if he/she was here (except for speed, of
course).
2. Related to 1: what is the best (balance easy with secure) of the four

choices: IPsec, OpenVPN, PPPoE, PPTP, way to achieve this.  Pros/Cons.

Ok, so now I'm going to thank you in advance for putting up with my 
questions.  Truthfully, I know just about  enough about networking and 
TCP/IP, etc. to be dangerous.  But I learn quickly, and really 
appreciate your help.

I hope I gave you all enough information.  If there's a specific log or 
config file that would help you, please let me know.

--Steven


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]