Re: [pfSense Support] Beta1 to Beta3 upgrade
On 4/20/06, Anders D. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I have Beta1 running on an embedded device and want to replace this > box with a server running Beta3. > Can I import the configuration from Beta1 and install this on the new > server running Beta3 without problems or do you recommed I start from > scrach? Yes, should not be a problem to go this route. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Beta1 to Beta3 upgrade
On Apr 20, 2006, at 18:12 , Scott Ullrich wrote: I have Beta1 running on an embedded device and want to replace this box with a server running Beta3. Can I import the configuration from Beta1 and install this on the new server running Beta3 without problems or do you recommed I start from scrach? Yes, should not be a problem to go this route. Nice, it worked pretty well - all I had to do after the import was to remap the interfaces because they were no longer called sis0 and so on. When I tested the new firewall the rules seemed to work both incoming, outgoing and between DMZ zones but the servers could not initiate traffic to the outside world. I could trace the outgoing traffic but somehow they did not get a response back? I use 1:1 NAT by the way... What can I have been missing? Any ideas? Thank you. Regards, Anders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Beta1 to Beta3 upgrade
On 4/23/06, Anders D. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 20, 2006, at 18:12 , Scott Ullrich wrote: > >> > >> I have Beta1 running on an embedded device and want to replace this > >> box with a server running Beta3. > >> Can I import the configuration from Beta1 and install this on the new > >> server running Beta3 without problems or do you recommed I start from > >> scrach? > > > > Yes, should not be a problem to go this route. > > > > Nice, it worked pretty well - all I had to do after the import was to > remap the interfaces because they were no longer called sis0 and so on. > When I tested the new firewall the rules seemed to work both > incoming, outgoing and between DMZ zones but the servers could not > initiate traffic to the outside world. > > I could trace the outgoing traffic but somehow they did not get a > response back? I use 1:1 NAT by the way... > > What can I have been missing? Any ideas? You have rules on the OPT interfaces? By default we block everything on all interfaces except for LAN. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Beta1 to Beta3 upgrade
Nice, it worked pretty well - all I had to do after the import was to remap the interfaces because they were no longer called sis0 and so on. When I tested the new firewall the rules seemed to work both incoming, outgoing and between DMZ zones but the servers could not initiate traffic to the outside world. I could trace the outgoing traffic but somehow they did not get a response back? I use 1:1 NAT by the way... What can I have been missing? Any ideas? You have rules on the OPT interfaces? By default we block everything on all interfaces except for LAN. --Bill Yes, the rules from the old firewall migrated perfectly so I don't think it has anything to do with the rules. The weird thing is that everything works from the LAN but not from other DMZ zones even though packages are sent out from the WAN interface. It's like keep state is not working as it is supposed to. I think I will try to debug some more on the problem. Thanks anyway. ~Anders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]