Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.2 Update
HenriK wrote: Can the SeaMonkey v.2.0.2 update be installed on top of (i.e., without deinstallation of) v.2.0.1? I am not quite clear on the best approach for v.2.x. updates. Thank you, in advance, for your assistance. Yes, it can. Just click on Help- Check for updates, and it will download the necessary components.(You don't need to download the full installer from the website) I just finished updating without any problems. - It's not *you* that is the problem, it's all the other people on the net. -- Peter da Silva - ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Q about mail/news sorting
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Arne wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/11/2010 3:41 AM, Arne wrote: I would like to know what the difference is between Sort by: Date and Sort by: Received? Do you mean Sort by: Order Received? That is the date/time the message showed up on your doorstep, regardless of the date shown in the Date header of the message. These can be different. No, I don't mean Sort by: Order Received. As I wrote, I can see what happen with that sort order. But I can't see what happen with the plain Received sorting that is different from sorting by Date. OK, here's a theory: If you look at a message header, you'll see that it contains Date: and Received: fields. The Date: field is the date attached by the sending computer, which may or may not be accurate. The Received: fields are attached by the various servers that handle the message en route. So if you sort by Date:, you're sorting by when the sender's computer thought it sent it, and if you sort by Received:, you're sorting by when one of the mail servers thought it got it. Could be as much as several days apart. Thanks, that makes sense. The date and time could be my computers then, when sorting by Order Received? That option seems to be the only one that always put all posts and threads in a logical order, from my point of view. ;) -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: video problem/question
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Norvin wrote: Trying to watch a video on SM 1.1.18 without success. Tried FF 3.5.6 and was successful. Below is URL. Any suggestions other than going to SM2. http://www.thefoxnation.com/judge-andrew-napolitano/2010/01/11/judge-andrew-napolitanos-constitution-and-freedom-part-1 Had trouble here, too, but once I wiped the vomit off my screen I could see it OK... All kidding aside, it's blank here, too. Plays OK in Internet Exploiter 8 even after I rejected all their cookies. I had a lot of video problems on a lot of sites with all SM 1.x.x versions, all that problem are gone after the upgrad to SM 2.0. Also that thefoxnation.com video played nicely! ;) I believe it is just about where SM2 is installed default, C:\Program Files\SeaMonkey instead of C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey since I didn't need to do any tweaking to make it work after the SM2 install, it just started to work. It was the same with my online bank account, it was impossible to use it with SM1 ;) So I say, don't hesitate to upgrade to SM 2! -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
Interviewed by CNN on 12/1/2010 01:43, Paul B. Gallagher told the world: Of course, some reported errors are just plain silly: Line 9, Column 47: Attribute BORDER is not a valid attribute. Did you mean border? (from a frameset declaration) Well, I didn't see the original page, but this is not a silly error in XHTML. XHTML is case-sensitive, after all. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... BOFH excuse #108: The air conditioning water supply pipe ruptured over the machine room *Added by TagZilla 0.0661 running on Seamonkey 2.0.2 * http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 12/1/2010 01:43, Paul B. Gallagher told the world: Of course, some reported errors are just plain silly: Line 9, Column 47: Attribute BORDER is not a valid attribute. Did you mean border? (from a frameset declaration) Well, I didn't see the original page, but this is not a silly error in XHTML. XHTML is case-sensitive, after all. i agree, the silly error is that so many have the XHTML DTD for their pages with no need for it, and the content-type is text/html. -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.2 Update
Updated 3 machines here using Help/Check for Updates... with no trouble whatsoever. Kudos! -JW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeamonkeyV2.0.1-unable to send emails after migration
Hartmut Figge schrieb: Karl: Question: Where do i find the location to uncheck 'Use name and password'. I did not find any location neither in 'Preferences' nor in 'about:config'. Edit-Mail Newsgroups Account Settings-Outgoing Server (SMTP). Choose one and click Edit. Hartmut Hartmut: i just tested it and found at this location two possibilities: use of standard server and my email address. I selected the first one and the result follows: Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server mailto.t-online.de. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and password' for that server or contact your service provider. Sorry Karl ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.2 Update
Robert Kaiser wrote: As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.2 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. I see no new problems in this release. The warning that most of my add-ons and themes are incompatible and have been disabled remains, even though compatibility checking is still disabled, and the add-on manger puts up a yellow banner warning me about it. I was able to re-enable everything without more than the usual inconvenience of restarting over and over and over... -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Q about mail/news sorting
Arne wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Arne wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/11/2010 3:41 AM, Arne wrote: I would like to know what the difference is between Sort by: Date and Sort by: Received? Do you mean Sort by: Order Received? That is the date/time the message showed up on your doorstep, regardless of the date shown in the Date header of the message. These can be different. No, I don't mean Sort by: Order Received. As I wrote, I can see what happen with that sort order. But I can't see what happen with the plain Received sorting that is different from sorting by Date. OK, here's a theory: If you look at a message header, you'll see that it contains Date: and Received: fields. The Date: field is the date attached by the sending computer, which may or may not be accurate. The Received: fields are attached by the various servers that handle the message en route. So if you sort by Date:, you're sorting by when the sender's computer thought it sent it, and if you sort by Received:, you're sorting by when one of the mail servers thought it got it. Could be as much as several days apart. Thanks, that makes sense. The date and time could be my computers then, when sorting by Order Received? That option seems to be the only one that always put all posts and threads in a logical order, from my point of view. ;) Some spammers put a very old or very new date on their mail, to get it to the top of your display. Order received normalizes that, and puts it in the right place. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM2.0.1: Still Getting Random Set as Default Home Page
Sqwertz wrote: Nobody else is seeing this behavior? I didn't get any sympathizers last time I posted this. Sometimes when I press the Home Button (which has been moved to the navigation bar, if that matters), a dialog pops up that asks me if I want to set the new home page as the default. (...) According to the SM documentation the only shortcut for this action is to: Tip: To specify your home page quickly, drag the bookmark icon image of bookmark icon from the Location Bar to the Home Page button on the Personal Toolbar. Maybe Seamonkey is intercepting some errant VNC event. But I don't see how it could be interpreted as the above action - whatever that poorly worded double-talk above is trying to say. I found that you can drag drop the Home button onto itself which might be what you see. Maybe you dragged it for just a few pixels. I have a Bookmark folder icon on my Personal toolbar, but that doesn't drag. That's not the bookmark icon from the Location Bar. And what is a Location Bar? Is that the URL/Navigation bar? Yes. And the icon in front of the URL (favicon) is what the tip refers to. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeamonkeyV2.0.1-unable to send emails after migration
On 1/12/2010 9:10 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: Have you unchecked '[ ] Use name and password' in the window, which pops up after clicking Edit? And may be, Connection Security must be None. BTW, you could go to de.comm.software.mozilla.mailnews, where we can talk in German. ;) Hartmut But then the rest of us will miss out :) Incidentally, I suspect that the OP is not looking at the correct SMTP server settings. If there is more than one entry in the list of SMTP servers, then he should look at the Outgoing Server settings in his account settings to see which one is to be used (or if it is to use the default). From that, it should be clear which SMTP entry needs to be corrected. Best Regards, ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: YMMV, but in any case, if we would not have moved to it, SeaMonkey would be dead by now. Why ? The Gecko 1.8 branch was abandoned by the Mozilla Core devs a long, long time ago. Only security and stability patches were then backported to that branch, not by Mozilla but by Linux distributors with long lived branches, but even that source of bug fixes seem to have dried up in the middle of 2009. Without a SeaMonkey 2.0 to migrate our users to. SeaMonkey would have died on the wine before the end of 2009. That's why the original plan to release SeaMonkey 2.0 in sync with Thunderbird 3.0 became fatal when Mozilla Messaging kept pushing back their release schedules, and pushing and pushing, until January 2010. So we took the decision to release SeaMonkey 2.0 at around Thunderbird 3.0b4 with the risk of a slightly unstable mailnews backend. But as the alternative was to let SeaMonkey die it wasn't really a choice. You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ? Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have lit a fire under the Firefox devs and they plan to abandon the 3.5 (Gecko 1.9.1) branch once Firefox 3.6 is out in early 2010 and Firefox 3.7 in late 2010. We had originally planned to keep 2.0 as our current branch for most of 2010. However it looks like we will need to release a 2.1 based on 1.9.2 (Firefox 3.6) somewhere in summer this year whether we like it or not. Phil Phil, I have waited several months to see the improvements in SM 2.x, but all I saw was a severely broken product. SM 2.x trashed my address books, pass words, forms, and all of the extensions I used for creating and testing we pages. In addition, SM2.x did not import my e-mail accounts and trashed all my business mail. I have gone back to SM 1.1.18 for the time being until I have the time to install FireFox and ThunderBird as individual programs and rebuild my business accounts and tools (extensions), or third party applications. Good luck with SM, I hope the developers finally get it right; what the had core users really want. Regards, Michael Gordon ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Michael Gordon a écrit : SM 2.x trashed my address books, pass words, forms, and all of the extensions I used for creating and testing we pages. For the extensions, fair enough: not all of them are compatible (yet). And much have been said about doing away with the much loved form manager. But I don't see how version 2 could have trashed anything if you haven't done anything weird with either it or version 1 (or either or both of their profiles). The version 1 profile isn't used at all by version 2 (because it simply *can't* use it) and so sits untouched for you to go back to if needed, without anything changed in it. If version 2 trashed your version 1 address book and such, then I'd say it's a case of PEBKAC. S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. There are a lot of bozos who are putting up Web pages but who have NO IDEA what they are doing. The next time you encounter this situation, go to this page: http://validator.w3.org/ Feed in the URL of the page with problems. You should see something like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.debian.org/ **Passed** and not like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8 3134 Errors At that point, you will know where to place the blame. Of course, some reported errors are just plain silly: Line 9, Column 47: Attribute BORDER is not a valid attribute. Did you mean border? (from a frameset declaration) XHTML requires all tag names and attributes to be lowercase. HTML does not. This only reinforces that the site serves fake XHTML. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: new usenet feature in reply
Bill Davidsen a écrit : This works for mail too! cool !! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: new usenet feature in reply
cyberzen: Bill Davidsen a écrit : This works for mail too! cool !! It's so long in the Nightlies, that i have forgotten it may be new. ;) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM2.0.1: Still Getting Random Set as Default Home Page
On 1/12/2010 9:34 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Sqwertz wrote: Nobody else is seeing this behavior? I didn't get any sympathizers last time I posted this. Sometimes when I press the Home Button (which has been moved to the navigation bar, if that matters), a dialog pops up that asks me if I want to set the new home page as the default. (...) According to the SM documentation the only shortcut for this action is to: Tip: To specify your home page quickly, drag the bookmark icon image of bookmark icon from the Location Bar to the Home Page button on the Personal Toolbar. Maybe Seamonkey is intercepting some errant VNC event. But I don't see how it could be interpreted as the above action - whatever that poorly worded double-talk above is trying to say. I found that you can drag drop the Home button onto itself which might be what you see. Maybe you dragged it for just a few pixels. Oh! That's it! I just tested this, and I can recreate the problem at will. I submitted bug #538500 on this problem last week. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538500. I will update it to include how to recreate the problem. I have a Bookmark folder icon on my Personal toolbar, but that doesn't drag. That's not the bookmark icon from the Location Bar. And what is a Location Bar? Is that the URL/Navigation bar? Yes. And the icon in front of the URL (favicon) is what the tip refers to. HTH Jens -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: test only
Leonidas Jones wrote: jim wrote: jim Jim, please, please, please don't post test messages in the support groups. We've been over and over this over the years, and it still comes back after a while. Post test messages in mozilla.test. I have copied you on this via email, in case you are having some problem seeing your posts in the group. Feel free to email me back if you are having a problem. Lee Thanks for offer Lee. cheers. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: test only
Leonidas Jones wrote: jim wrote: jim Jim, please, please, please don't post test messages in the support groups. We've been over and over this over the years, and it still comes back after a while. Post test messages in mozilla.test. I have copied you on this via email, in case you are having some problem seeing your posts in the group. Feel free to email me back if you are having a problem. Lee Thanks for your offer Lee.Cheers. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: test only
Leonidas Jones wrote: jim wrote: jim Jim, please, please, please don't post test messages in the support groups. We've been over and over this over the years, and it still comes back after a while. Post test messages in mozilla.test. I have copied you on this via email, in case you are having some problem seeing your posts in the group. Feel free to email me back if you are having a problem. Lee Thanks for offer Lee. cheers. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: about:crashes invalid url SM 2.0.3pre linux - 64bit
On 01/11/2010 09:20 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 1/11/2010 5:08 PM, NoOp wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100110 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Anyone else getting this message in the 64bit version of SeaMonkey? - In the url bar enter: about:crashes - Result on this system: Alert! The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded. Works just fine on my 32bit SM - same 2.0.3pre version. Can you reply with the info from that about:buildconfig I'd like to see if it includes breakpad based on that. - ~Justin Wood (Callek) Here you go thanks for having a look. Also wish to add that I've tried in a clean profile et al, so it doesn't seem to be profile related (that I can tell). The install is simply an extract to a home folder run from that folder: about:buildconfig Source Built from http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1/rev/74a9c37bc887 Build platform target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Build tools Compiler Version Compiler flags /tools/gcc/bin/gccgcc version 4.2.3 -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -W -Wno-long-long -pedantic -gstabs+ -fno-strict-aliasing -pthread -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -Os -freorder-blocks -fno-reorder-functions -finline-limit=50 /tools/gcc/bin/g++gcc version 4.2.3 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wcast-align -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-long-long -pedantic -gstabs+ -fno-strict-aliasing -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -Os -freorder-blocks -fno-reorder-functions -finline-limit=50 Configure arguments --enable-application=suite --enable-optimize --enable-update-channel=nightly --enable-update-packaging --disable-debug --disable-tests --enable-codesighs --enable-static --disable-shared --enable-application=suite --enable-optimize --enable-update-channel=nightly --enable-update-packaging --disable-debug --disable-tests --enable-codesighs --enable-static --disable-shared --enable-application=../suite --disable-official-branding --with-branding=../suite/branding/nightly --disable-debug --enable-optimize --enable-64bit --cache-file=.././config.cache --srcdir=/builds/slave/comm-1.9.1-linux64-nightly/build/mozilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
chk
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: chk
On 01/12/2010 05:08 PM, jim wrote: jim plonk ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: invoke composer
Rick Merrill wrote: When I go to edit an HTML or HTM document I would like Windows XP sp3 to know to use composer for the job. After installing SM2.0._ Word takes over! SM1 used to do this just fine. Is there a fix to the registry to make .HTM or .HTML files edit with Composer? Is SeaMonkey set as your default browser? If so, double click on the local html file to open the page in the browser open the page in the browser, from which you can go FileEdit Page to open Composer. Its an estra step, but maybe just as easy as right clickedit. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: lose of folders on migration 2.0.2
On Jan 12, 6:48 pm, Smiles smile_inspec...@hotmail.com wrote: OK I did it again moved from 1.1.18 to 2.0.2 and it got worse. last attempt by using all preset option old version was removed this time it stayed in place not all files migrated this is the end result of my main profile any comments thanks pasted from directory*** C:\Documents and Settings\Smiles\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\default\ro06av8e.slt\Mail\mail.XXX.ca === beavers-church beavers-church.msf client client.msf clubs clubs.msf Drafts Drafts.msf filterlog.html friends friends.msf fun fun.msf garbage garbage.msf hold hold.msf Inbox Inbox.msf job job.msf laughs laughs.msf msgFilterRules.dat MyView MyView.msf popstate.dat Sent Sent.msf Templates Templates.msf tools tools.msf Trash Trash.msf undeliver undeliver.msf Total 37 file(s); Size: 16309689 Byte(s) * C:\Documents and Settings\Smiles\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\p5gdxbu8.default\Mail\mail.XXX.ca = Drafts Drafts.msf filterlog.html hold hold.msf Inbox Inbox.msf msgFilterRules.dat popstate.dat Sent Sent.msf Trash Trash.msf Total 13 file(s); Size: 1159285 Byte(s) *** Hey Smiles, Sounds like your in a loop going from 1x to 2x. Had this problem When I uninstalled 1.x had to delete the old directory included Add-Ons. Maybe this will help http://maxludz.blogspot.com/2009/12/problem-installing-seamonky-2x-from-1x.html This is how I was able to get a clean install of 2.01 and now running build 2.02 HTH ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
Benoit Renard wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JeffM wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. There are a lot of bozos who are putting up Web pages but who have NO IDEA what they are doing. The next time you encounter this situation, go to this page: http://validator.w3.org/ Feed in the URL of the page with problems. You should see something like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.debian.org/ **Passed** and not like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8 3134 Errors At that point, you will know where to place the blame. Of course, some reported errors are just plain silly: Line 9, Column 47: Attribute BORDER is not a valid attribute. Did you mean border? (from a frameset declaration) XHTML requires all tag names and attributes to be lowercase. HTML does not. This only reinforces that the site serves fake XHTML. As it happens, the page I fed it was plain vanilla HTML, but contained no doctype declaration. It runs fine because browsers don't care. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:56:20 -0600, Michael Gordon wrote: I have waited several months to see the improvements in SM 2.x, but all I saw was a severely broken product. SM 2.x trashed my address books, pass words, forms, and all of the extensions I used for creating and testing we pages. That's impossible. SeaMonkey 2.0 does not use the same profile or install location as SeaMonkey 1.1. SM 2.0 does not touch your 1.1 extensions, address books, passwords, etc at all. Perhaps what you meant is that 2.0 failed to import your 1.1 profile. You might not known that you can manually force migration using the -migration command line switch but if you had asked here we could have given you the right advice. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.
On 1/12/2010 9:51 AM PT, Bill Davidsen typed: Bah, it was fine on my new office machine and now it has duplicate login prompts too. :( Okay, problem solved, you now have consistent behavior everywhere. ;-) Ha, yeah. And two different ISPs too. So we know it is the same usenet/news server account and SeaMonkey v2. I have not looked at this in SM-2.0.x but is it possible that you have number of threads set to more than one, and you get asked every time a thread connects. I'm still on 1.1.xx here, as I need functional forms, but that seems possible. Hmm, how is that possible? I never saw anything about multiple threads. I thought SM's newsreaders only use one thread connection at a time. And why still on v1.1.x? :( Does Windows have any functional network sniffer software built in? Linux has several applications which will let you see if the AUTHINFO is actually needed multiple times, I'm betting it is, but I have no idea why. I tried your suggestion with the latest version of WireShark in my Windows XP Pro. SP3 system and copied and pasted from the first to the last nntp entries with other non-nntp entries: Frame 4 (60 bytes on wire, 60 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Cisco-Li_4a:c8:b4 (00:25:9c:4a:c8:b4), Dst: Micro-St_1a:c6:72 (00:21:85:1a:c6:72) Internet Protocol, Src: 76.13.15.32 (76.13.15.32), Dst: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: mmcc (5050), Dst Port: avauthsrvprtcl (2068), Seq: 1, Ack: 34, Len: 0 No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 5 8.02192.168.1.2 192.168.0.1 DNS Standard query A nntp.earthlink.net Frame 5 (78 bytes on wire, 78 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Micro-St_1a:c6:72 (00:21:85:1a:c6:72), Dst: Cisco-Li_4a:c8:b4 (00:25:9c:4a:c8:b4) Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2), Dst: 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 52800 (52800), Dst Port: domain (53) Domain Name System (query) No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 6 8.294778192.168.0.1 192.168.1.2 DNS Standard query response CNAME earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net CNAME earthlink.us.supernews.com A 216.168.3.70 Frame 6 (177 bytes on wire, 177 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Cisco-Li_4a:c8:b4 (00:25:9c:4a:c8:b4), Dst: Micro-St_1a:c6:72 (00:21:85:1a:c6:72) Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1), Dst: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2) User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: domain (53), Dst Port: 52800 (52800) Domain Name System (response) No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 7 8.295979192.168.1.2 216.168.3.70 TCP remote-collab nntp [SYN] Seq=0 Win=64240 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=0 Frame 7 (66 bytes on wire, 66 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Micro-St_1a:c6:72 (00:21:85:1a:c6:72), Dst: Cisco-Li_4a:c8:b4 (00:25:9c:4a:c8:b4) Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2), Dst: 216.168.3.70 (216.168.3.70) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: remote-collab (2250), Dst Port: nntp (119), Seq: 0, Len: 0 No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 8 8.296597192.168.1.2 216.168.3.70 TCP dif-port nntp [SYN] Seq=0 Win=64240 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=0 Frame 8 (66 bytes on wire, 66 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Micro-St_1a:c6:72 (00:21:85:1a:c6:72), Dst: Cisco-Li_4a:c8:b4 (00:25:9c:4a:c8:b4) Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2), Dst: 216.168.3.70 (216.168.3.70) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: dif-port (2251), Dst Port: nntp (119), Seq: 0, Len: 0 No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 9 8.419314216.168.3.70 192.168.1.2 TCP nntp remote-collab [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5840 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=7 Frame 9 (66 bytes on wire, 66 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Cisco-Li_4a:c8:b4 (00:25:9c:4a:c8:b4), Dst: Micro-St_1a:c6:72 (00:21:85:1a:c6:72) Internet Protocol, Src: 216.168.3.70 (216.168.3.70), Dst: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: nntp (119), Dst Port: remote-collab (2250), Seq: 0, Ack: 1, Len: 0 No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 10 8.419470192.168.1.2 216.168.3.70 TCP remote-collab nntp [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=64240 Len=0 Frame 10 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Micro-St_1a:c6:72 (00:21:85:1a:c6:72), Dst: Cisco-Li_4a:c8:b4 (00:25:9c:4a:c8:b4) Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2), Dst: 216.168.3.70 (216.168.3.70) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: remote-collab (2250), Dst Port: nntp (119), Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 0 No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 11 8.419634216.168.3.70 192.168.1.2 TCP nntp dif-port [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5840
