Re: one for the calek dude

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

km wrote:


... that's it!!! i'[m pissed! i don't like to do this but i'm gonna
hafta call a press conference:

:press conference!, press conference!

... i have called this press conference together today to announce to
you, my people, that i, Kevin W Mc Auley, am very dissapointed in the
'calek dude'. i don't feel that i, or the other denizens of this group
should have to put up with such irresponsible behavior! and to think i
once respected the man! i feel he should lose his bathroom privileges
for this one!!!



umm... huh, "why"?

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: one for the calek dude

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

km wrote:

... i am quite annoy. i might even be ANGRY!!!
SeaMonkey has been down the last 2 days!!! AND i
am blaming  you!

... i think you better heed this warning and take
an early retirement before the big wigs find out and
decide it would be best to fire you.

km


Note that I am not an employee, and do this and work on this, in 
strictly my free time, and out of pure passion for the product.


Blame will get you nowhere, and I am not afraid of being fired, as I 
won't lose any money if so.


That said, I'll presume you are just frustrated at the moment, and will 
now read the rest of your message as if this quoted part was never said.


--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: one for the calek dude

[MCBastos]

Interviewed by CNN on 09/02/2012 02:13, km told the world:
> ... i am quite annoy. i might even be ANGRY!!!
> SeaMonkey has been down the last 2 days!!! AND i
> am blaming  you!

Uh... are we supposed to take this at face value? Because if it's
supposed to be a joke, it's missing a couple emoticons.

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Babcom.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.7 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

one for the calek dude

[km]

... i am quite annoy. i might even be ANGRY!!!
SeaMonkey has been down the last 2 days!!! AND i
am blaming  you!

... i think you better heed this warning and take
an early retirement before the big wigs find out and
decide it would be best to fire you.

km

ps;
the above is friendly advice

day 3:

... look, calek dude, i'm getting kinda pissed here, ok?
sees this is my life. ya sure, it's not much of a life but
it *is* a life! you are killing this  life!! murder is
illegal [i think?] i'll see you in court!!!

?Wednesday, ?February ?08, ?2012 5:28:05 PM

... i becum slowly pissed as i contemplate my revenge against the calek 
dude. all i know is the dude must bw stopped.


. it may not do i've decided to take up a petion. it may not do any good 
but these are desperate times. THE MAN MUST BE TOPPED!!!


We, the undersigned call for the dismissal of Calek dude for many reason 
 which are left as an exercise for the acute angles:


Artie Bonk
Mike Hunt
Dick Hertze
Zelda Rottencrotch
Allota Fagina
Kenny Fakur
Mike Rotchburns

7:12:28 PM

... that's it!!! i'[m pissed! i don't like to do this but i'm gonna 
hafta call a press conference:


:press conference!, press conference!

... i have called this press conference together today to announce to 
you, my people, that i, Kevin W Mc Auley, am very dissapointed in the 
'calek dude'. i don't feel that i, or the other denizens of this group 
should have to put up with such irresponsible behavior! and to think i 
once respected the man! i feel he should lose his bathroom privileges 
for this one!!!


--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible. Just try
and free ur mind. then you will
realize the truth. … there is no pain.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.7 + Google now requiring cookies w/SM?

[Hartmut Figge]

David E. Ross:

>Again: Windows XP SP3 and SeaMonkey 2.7

Gentoo Linux SM 2.10a1

>I ensured there were no prior google.com cookies and that my cookies
>permission was set to block ALL cookies.
>
>I did a search at .  It was
>successful.
>
>I did a search at .  It too was successful.  I
>repeated that search with JavaScript disabled.  It too was successful.
>
>In the end, I verified that no google.com cookies had been set.

Ditto. But
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=test&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftest.com%2F&ei=rc8yT-2xM8KjiQKwq9CZCg&usg=AFQjCNFOu11ntRBzX7MsPNhB_fDzErp8qg&cad=rja
gives

Timestamp: 09.02.2012 00:45:59
Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Security error"  code: "1000"
nsresult: "0x805303e8 (NS_ERROR_DOM_SECURITY_ERR)"  location:
"http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=test&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftest.com%2F&ei=rc8yT-2xM8KjiQKwq9CZCg&usg=AFQjCNFOu11ntRBzX7MsPNhB_fDzErp8qg&cad=rja
Line: 1"]

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:


Composing mail : type a character or two, then press and hold
"control" while rotating your mouse wheel; the characters
should get progressively larger.

Should also work for most web sites.


In my 2.6.1, you need not launch a composition window or type anything. 
Just do CTRL-wheel and it varies the font size. When you reply, the 
setting is remembered and the composition window opens with the 
larger/smaller font.



--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[Philip TAYLOR]

chicagofan wrote:


I can now read headings, toolbars, and icons... but I'm back to my same old 
problem with the new SM 2.7 fonts in composing mail and viewing some web sites. 
I'll keep working on it though. Thanks for the good wishes. :)


Composing mail : type a character or two, then press and hold
"control" while rotating your mouse wheel; the characters
should get progressively larger.

Should also work for most web sites.

** Phil.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[chicagofan]

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Philip TAYLOR wrote:


Brief reply, because we are seriously off-topic here :

1) Don't give up with Win/7. I HATED it when I first tried it on
others' machines, and found myself saying over and over again
"Sorry, can't help you : no idea where they have hidden that
in Win/7". BUT, once I got it for myself, disabled Aero,
made it look as much like XP as possible, and finally came
to grips with the crazy Explorer that has ditched an "Up"
button, I began to see that it was not as bad as I thought.


Pretty much my reaction.

Note that Explorer shows the full path in the status bar at top, so if
you want to go "up" just click on any element of the path and it'll jump
right to it. If you're five levels down and want to go up three, one
click instead of three is more efficient.

Also better to view folders under the "Libraries" heading because
display options stick there, whereas if you view them directly under
C:\Users\yadayada... you have to customize each and every folder and it
keeps forgetting the sort order.



Thanks for the response & tips, Paul!  :)   I still love XP and SM 2.0+. 
  ;)

bj


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[chicagofan]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:



chicagofan wrote:


What I meant was they seem to have changed their focus from "personalization" to 
"specialization"... and dropping a lot of the flexibility previously available in Windows 
O/S.



Thanks, Phil. I hate to give up, because I know this isn't the only brand 
laptop having this problem.


Brief reply, because we are seriously off-topic here :

1) Don't give up with Win/7. I HATED it when I first tried it on
others' machines, and found myself saying over and over again
"Sorry, can't help you : no idea where they have hidden that
in Win/7".  BUT, once I got it for myself, disabled Aero,
made it look as much like XP as possible, and finally came
to grips with the crazy Explorer that has ditched an "Up"
button, I began to see that it was not as bad as I thought.
With XP having a shelf-life of about eighteen months now,
I am no longer terrified at the idea of having to upgrade
all my machines to Win/7, and I really /do/ like the idea
of running multiple VMs so that a virus in one cannot
affect the others (i.e., keep one VM for secure transactions,
one for general surfing, one for risky stuff), and use
the base Win/7 64-bit platform only for non-networking
activities.

2) Don't give up with your new Gateway : we're all rooting for you !

** Phil.


LOL!  Thanks, Phil.  After reading my third Gateway forum, I found where 
you can "customize" your DPI settings above the one... 125% option shown 
in the basic settings.


I can now read headings, toolbars, and icons... but I'm back to my same 
old problem with the new SM 2.7 fonts in composing mail and viewing some 
web sites.  I'll keep working on it though.  Thanks for the good wishes.  :)

bj

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.7 + Google now requiring cookies w/SM?

[NoOp]

On 02/07/2012 08:04 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 2/7/12 5:38 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 02/07/2012 05:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> ...
>>> Using the above, I am able to search, link, etc., on yahoo.com etc.,
>>> without issue. It is only google.com, and only since a few hours ago
>>> that this started.
>>>
>>> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129
>>> Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7
>>> but experiencing the exact same issue on a completely different machine
>>> with the 64bit version of SM 2.7 (final) and working Firefox 10.0.
>> 
>> I've just replicated on the Windows versions of SM 2.7 (even pre-beta)
>> and Firefox 10. So the issue is not OS build specific.
> 
> Windows XP SP3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 SeaMonkey/2.7
> 
> I just now successfully used Google for a search with cookies blocked
> after I deleted all prior Google cookies.  Is it possible you have a
> problem with an extension?  Try your searches in Safe Mode.
> 

Thanks for testing David. Yes, I did try both in safe mode, and with a
completely new profile - had the same results on two two different linux
machines (one 32bit, one 64bit), and one Windows XP Pro SP3.

I guess the question still remains why Firefox 10.0 works, but SeaMonkey
2.7 didn't. I'll need to put a sniffer on the wire and see if I can
figure out the difference.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:


Brief reply, because we are seriously off-topic here :

1) Don't give up with Win/7. I HATED it when I first tried it on
others' machines, and found myself saying over and over again
"Sorry, can't help you : no idea where they have hidden that
in Win/7". BUT, once I got it for myself, disabled Aero,
made it look as much like XP as possible, and finally came
to grips with the crazy Explorer that has ditched an "Up"
button, I began to see that it was not as bad as I thought.


Pretty much my reaction.

Note that Explorer shows the full path in the status bar at top, so if 
you want to go "up" just click on any element of the path and it'll jump 
right to it. If you're five levels down and want to go up three, one 
click instead of three is more efficient.


Also better to view folders under the "Libraries" heading because 
display options stick there, whereas if you view them directly under 
C:\Users\yadayada... you have to customize each and every folder and it 
keeps forgetting the sort order.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[Philip TAYLOR]

chicagofan wrote:
 

What I meant was they seem to have changed their focus from "personalization" to 
"specialization"... and dropping a lot of the flexibility previously available in Windows 
O/S.



Thanks, Phil. I hate to give up, because I know this isn't the only brand 
laptop having this problem.


Brief reply, because we are seriously off-topic here :

1) Don't give up with Win/7. I HATED it when I first tried it on
others' machines, and found myself saying over and over again
"Sorry, can't help you : no idea where they have hidden that
in Win/7".  BUT, once I got it for myself, disabled Aero,
made it look as much like XP as possible, and finally came
to grips with the crazy Explorer that has ditched an "Up"
button, I began to see that it was not as bad as I thought.
With XP having a shelf-life of about eighteen months now,
I am no longer terrified at the idea of having to upgrade
all my machines to Win/7, and I really /do/ like the idea
of running multiple VMs so that a virus in one cannot
affect the others (i.e., keep one VM for secure transactions,
one for general surfing, one for risky stuff), and use
the base Win/7 64-bit platform only for non-networking
activities.

2) Don't give up with your new Gateway : we're all rooting for you !

** Phil.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[chicagofan]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:



chicagofan wrote:


I've read 40-50 messages in forums about this resolution problem, with people 
debating how to solve this problem that many people with different brand 
pc's/graphics cards are having... without finding a resolution to mine.

I suspect all the Win7 adjustments being inaccessible are due to this ability 
to link to TV adapters, which I don't care about. I want to see what is on my 
computer screen. :)


No, I think it is the fact that you are using an LCD display, which
do have a (very) limited number of possible resolutions; the ?integrated?
graphics driver may also be a significant factor.  I still live in
the dark ages -- all of my monitors are 21" CRTs -- and whilst some
may think I am crazy, at least I can run everything at 1152 x 864,
which is the resolution at which I feel most comfortable.  But of
course I can also run them at 800 x 600 if I choose.


What I meant was they seem to have changed their focus from 
"personalization" to "specialization"... and dropping a lot of the 
flexibility previously available in Windows O/S.




If you had the below equipment where would you go to find out what to do? 
Gateway [mfr] or Intel or Microsoft? Considering I am a novice... that is.


Start with Gateway : they will know the limitations of their LCD
display.  If they say "the LCD panel can handle it : it must be
the driver or the video adapter", talk to Intel.

** Phil.


Thanks, Phil.  I hate to give up, because I know this isn't the only 
brand laptop having this problem.

bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[Philip TAYLOR]

chicagofan wrote:


I've read 40-50 messages in forums about this resolution problem, with people 
debating how to solve this problem that many people with different brand 
pc's/graphics cards are having... without finding a resolution to mine.

I suspect all the Win7 adjustments being inaccessible are due to this ability 
to link to TV adapters, which I don't care about. I want to see what is on my 
computer screen. :)


No, I think it is the fact that you are using an LCD display, which
do have a (very) limited number of possible resolutions; the ?integrated?
graphics driver may also be a significant factor.  I still live in
the dark ages -- all of my monitors are 21" CRTs -- and whilst some
may think I am crazy, at least I can run everything at 1152 x 864,
which is the resolution at which I feel most comfortable.  But of
course I can also run them at 800 x 600 if I choose.


If you had the below equipment where would you go to find out what to do? 
Gateway [mfr] or Intel or Microsoft? Considering I am a novice... that is.


Start with Gateway : they will know the limitations of their LCD
display.  If they say "the LCD panel can handle it : it must be
the driver or the video adapter", talk to Intel.

** Phil.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[chicagofan]

chicagofan wrote:

Philip TAYLOR wrote:



chicagofan wrote:


Thanks, guys. I've got even bigger problems so this new new laptop may be going 
back
and I won't have to worry about that for now. Win7 display options do not allow 
800x600
resolution in full screen mode, and I spend too much time on my laptop to 
squint at that miniscule text all day. :(


Not true.  I have just set my copy of Win 7 Enterprise to 800 x 600
without any difficulty.  I would imagine that it is a limitation
of your LCD (or LED) display driver than of Win 7 per se.

Philip Taylor


I've read 40-50 messages in forums about this resolution problem, with
people debating how to solve this problem that many people with
different brand pc's/graphics cards are having... without finding a
resolution to mine.

I suspect all the Win7 adjustments being inaccessible are due to this
ability to link to TV adapters, which I don't care about.  I want to see
what is on my computer screen.  :)

If you had the below equipment where would you go to find out what to
do?  Gateway [mfr] or Intel or Microsoft?  Considering I am a novice...
that is.


15.6" LED-backlit LCD high-definition display
With Ultrabright technology and 1366 x 768 resolution showcases movies
and games in stunning clarity.

Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Feature 128MB dedicated video memory for lush images. Also features
support for Microsoft DirectX 10.1. HDMI output allows for an easy
connection to an HDTV.

Barbara


 I probably should have included this too:

Intel® Wireless Display
Wirelessly transmits streamed or downloaded movies, TV shows, music, 
photos and more from your laptop, network or the Internet to your TV.


bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[chicagofan]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:



chicagofan wrote:


Thanks, guys. I've got even bigger problems so this new new laptop may be going 
back
and I won't have to worry about that for now. Win7 display options do not allow 
800x600
resolution in full screen mode, and I spend too much time on my laptop to 
squint at that miniscule text all day. :(


Not true.  I have just set my copy of Win 7 Enterprise to 800 x 600
without any difficulty.  I would imagine that it is a limitation
of your LCD (or LED) display driver than of Win 7 per se.

Philip Taylor


I've read 40-50 messages in forums about this resolution problem, with 
people debating how to solve this problem that many people with 
different brand pc's/graphics cards are having... without finding a 
resolution to mine.


I suspect all the Win7 adjustments being inaccessible are due to this 
ability to link to TV adapters, which I don't care about.  I want to see 
what is on my computer screen.  :)


If you had the below equipment where would you go to find out what to 
do?  Gateway [mfr] or Intel or Microsoft?  Considering I am a novice... 
that is.



15.6" LED-backlit LCD high-definition display
With Ultrabright technology and 1366 x 768 resolution showcases movies 
and games in stunning clarity.


Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Feature 128MB dedicated video memory for lush images. Also features 
support for Microsoft DirectX 10.1. HDMI output allows for an easy 
connection to an HDTV.


Barbara
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

[Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

[Philip TAYLOR]

chicagofan wrote:


Thanks, guys. I've got even bigger problems so this new new laptop may be going 
back
and I won't have to worry about that for now. Win7 display options do not allow 
800x600
resolution in full screen mode, and I spend too much time on my laptop to 
squint at that miniscule text all day. :(


Not true.  I have just set my copy of Win 7 Enterprise to 800 x 600
without any difficulty.  I would imagine that it is a limitation
of your LCD (or LED) display driver than of Win 7 per se.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.7 upgrade questions/problems

[chicagofan]

David E. Ross wrote:

On 2/7/12 4:11 PM, chicagofan wrote [in part]:


Also, I can no longer run speed tests at dslreports.com, because
Java or java applets(?) are missing with 2.7.
What can I do about this?



Windows XP SP3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 SeaMonkey/2.7

dslreports.com has the same IP address (209.123.109.175) as
broadbandreports.com.  However, a DNS lookup did not indicate either is
an alias for the other.


They didn't bother to change everything when it became Broadband 
Reports.  Don't know why.




I just now used broadbandreports.com to test via Flash through servers
in Toronto, Los Angeles, and Washington (DC) and via Java through
servers in Palo Alto and Parsippany.


That's what I could do on my 6 yr. old laptop easily.  ;)   I may be 
sticking with it longer than I expected, because of other problems.  :)

bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.7 upgrade questions/problems

[chicagofan]

MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 08/02/2012 00:53, Ed Mullen told the world:


http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html

You want the Java SE 7u2 JRE, not the JDK.

Just click the red Download button under JRE.


Actually, it's easier just to go to http://www.java.com . It's pretty
self-explanatory from there.




Thanks, guys.  I've got even bigger problems so this new new laptop may 
be going back and I won't have to worry about that for now.  Win7 
display options do not allow 800x600 resolution in full screen mode, and 
I spend too much time on my laptop to squint at that miniscule text all 
day.  :(


Thanks for letting me know what to do if I need it.  :)
bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is Lightning compatible with SM 2.7?

[WLS]

On 02/07/2012 09:26 PM, flyguy wrote:
> I'm using Lightning 1.1.1 on SM 2.6.1, but want to update to 2.7;
> however, I'd rather stay with 2.6.1 than lose Lightning.

Lightning 1.2.1 is the one you want for SM 2.7.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/lightning/

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions

-- 
Thunderbird Daily | openSUSE 11.4 Linux
Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Lost Bookmarks and Message Filter Items

[Daniel]

TMitchell wrote:

Trying to recover SeaMonkey 2.5 from failed attempts to update to 2.7
resulted in a loss of all my bookmarks and message-filter settings. Can
I copy them back into SeaMonkey from a saved "Profiles" file or
somewhere and, if so, where are they?


Close SeaMonkey then Ctrl-Alt-Del and look at Running processes. See if 
SeaMonkey is still running. If so, End Task and re-start SeaMonkey to 
see if you get your original profile back.


If not, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles and see if you have more 
profiles than you expect. If so, switch to the other profiles to see if 
your missing mail is there.


Report back.

--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey