Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme
On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:59:01 -0400, W3BNR wrote: I accomplished two things this last week: 1. New Computer - now running Windows 7 2. Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a drop-down menu or an item in the drop-down menu the text changes to white and the background is the same as the existing background except lighter.. Very hard to read what is selected. If I switch to SM Modern Theme this hovering action shows black text on a light blue background. Easy to read. Also on my Linux Mint machine running SM 2.9.1 Default theme the background is black and the text is white. Also easy to read. This would seem be be a change in SM 2.9.1 not Win 7. Anyone else seeing this? For Classic we generally use the native OS widgets (menus and menuitems) so you are likely seeing us picking the colours from the current OS theme. As to why you are only seeing this in 2.9.x perhaps we (or rather core code) is picking up rather more of the OS styling than before. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
Jean Zebloski wrote: Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time? Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has been initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for now he have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY SLOWLY. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
INstead why don't you ask yourself: am I making stupid assumptions based on information I recollected myself as true? How can you assume a PC would have 4MB of RAM? not even a Cell phone has that little, if you don't know anything about computers I'd suggest to shut up and inform yourself before writing anything else. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme
That's not SM fault, is yours, something is wrong with your video sus-system. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
How do I import SeaMonkey v2.0.14's addressbooks into SeaMonkey v2.9.1's addresbooks?
Hello! I did a clean installation of v2.9.1 and manually copied over my old SM v2.0.14 addressbooks, bookmarks, and e-mails to my Linux/Debian box. I got my bookmarks imported manually, but I can't seem to import my old addresssbooks from *.mab files. Do I really have to export them to non .mab formats and then import from them? Thank you in advance. :) -- The ants are back Ted! --Dougal from Father Ted TV show. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. Pray tell, what pages are opened in those 18 tabs? -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. Pray tell, what pages are opened in those 18 tabs? Sorry I can't. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme
On 5/18/2012 7:34 AM Philip Chee submitted the following: On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:59:01 -0400, W3BNR wrote: I accomplished two things this last week: 1. New Computer - now running Windows 7 2. Installed SM 2.9.1 on new computer Using the SM Default Theme when I 'hover' over an item, either the icon for a drop-down menu or an item in the drop-down menu the text changes to white and the background is the same as the existing background except lighter.. Very hard to read what is selected. If I switch to SM Modern Theme this hovering action shows black text on a light blue background. Easy to read. Also on my Linux Mint machine running SM 2.9.1 Default theme the background is black and the text is white. Also easy to read. This would seem be be a change in SM 2.9.1 not Win 7. Anyone else seeing this? For Classic we generally use the native OS widgets (menus and menuitems) so you are likely seeing us picking the colours from the current OS theme. As to why you are only seeing this in 2.9.x perhaps we (or rather core code) is picking up rather more of the OS styling than before. Phil Thanks Phil. As mentioned, this happened when 2 things got changed at one time. Previously was running Win XP-Pro SP3 with SM 2.8. Now running Win 7 SP1 2.9.1. I'll investigate the OS and see what I can find, if anything. -- Ed, W3BNR http://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ Whenever there is an interest and power to do wrong, wrong will generally be done...-James Madison (1751-1836) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. gjikkl. Just for funnsies, How about opening just 12 tabs and reporting on a more comparable case. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
gjikkl wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. Pray tell, what pages are opened in those 18 tabs? Sorry I can't. Because you don't want to reveal, or because you can't remember? The reason I asked is because your half-gigabyte is way far and above what I get from a similar number of tabs. If one is checking memory used by *tabs*, one does not normally load up a dozen different pages filled with images and videos which will skew the results. My testing page for this experiment was a simple local page of about 4 KB, opened a dozen times and resulting in less than a tenth of your version. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
gjikkl wrote: INstead why don't you ask yourself: am I making stupid assumptions based on information I recollected myself as true? How can you assume a PC would have 4MB of RAM? not even a Cell phone has that little, if you don't know anything about computers I'd suggest to shut up and inform yourself before writing anything else. Jahwohl master gjikkl! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. Pray tell, what pages are opened in those 18 tabs? Minor detail ! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme
On 19/05/2012 03:06, W3BNR wrote: On 5/18/2012 7:34 AM Philip Chee submitted the following: This would seem be be a change in SM 2.9.1 not Win 7. Anyone else seeing this? For Classic we generally use the native OS widgets (menus and menuitems) so you are likely seeing us picking the colours from the current OS theme. As to why you are only seeing this in 2.9.x perhaps we (or rather core code) is picking up rather more of the OS styling than before. Phil Thanks Phil. As mentioned, this happened when 2 things got changed at one time. Previously was running Win XP-Pro SP3 with SM 2.8. Now running Win 7 SP1 2.9.1. I'll investigate the OS and see what I can find, if anything. Ah, Now that you mention it. On the Windows 7 desktop right click on a blank area, and select Personalize. In the themes window scroll all the way down and select Windows Classic. This is the OS theme I'm using which may explain why I'm not seeing your problem. I only turn on the default Aero theme when I'm testing a theme patch that depends on it. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme
On 5/18/2012 4:34 PM Philip Chee submitted the following: On 19/05/2012 03:06, W3BNR wrote: On 5/18/2012 7:34 AM Philip Chee submitted the following: This would seem be be a change in SM 2.9.1 not Win 7. Anyone else seeing this? For Classic we generally use the native OS widgets (menus and menuitems) so you are likely seeing us picking the colours from the current OS theme. As to why you are only seeing this in 2.9.x perhaps we (or rather core code) is picking up rather more of the OS styling than before. Phil Thanks Phil. As mentioned, this happened when 2 things got changed at one time. Previously was running Win XP-Pro SP3 with SM 2.8. Now running Win 7 SP1 2.9.1. I'll investigate the OS and see what I can find, if anything. Ah, Now that you mention it. On the Windows 7 desktop right click on a blank area, and select Personalize. In the themes window scroll all the way down and select Windows Classic. This is the OS theme I'm using which may explain why I'm not seeing your problem. I only turn on the default Aero theme when I'm testing a theme patch that depends on it. Phil Ah, yes. There-in lies the answer. Thanks again, Phil. I never even thought of looking there. And I had run out of ideas. I shudder to even think of Win8. Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. gjikkl. Just for funnsies, How about opening just 12 tabs and reporting on a more comparable case. ...on my Mac, with 12 tabs open - 1 to my Exite home page, and the other 11 to Google (which is mostly white-space) my Activity Monitor shows SM 2.9.1 using 409.2M of real memory, and 301.2M of virtual memory - which is odd to me, because I have my cashe set to zero and have 8G of RAM installed, so I wouldn't expect SM to use *any* VM. Or should I?.. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
gjikkl wrote: INstead why don't you ask yourself: am I making stupid assumptions based on information I recollected myself as true? How can you assume a PC would have 4MB of RAM? not even a Cell phone has that little, if you don't know anything about computers I'd suggest to shut up and inform yourself before writing anything else. Sorry, you've clipped all preceding content so I have not a clue what you're talking about/replying to. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ Just before someone gets nervous, do they experience cocoons in their stomach? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Massive RAM usage
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. Pray tell, what pages are opened in those 18 tabs? You want URLs? Shit, I have no idea, I just opened random URLs. But, not Flash pages that I remember. Nor Java ones. Fairly plain-Jane pages. And, yes, sure, that would affect the data. But, hell, no one in this discussion seems to have offered any rigourous method of analysis. I was just offering my two cents in case anyone cared to observe it. So, pray tell what do you have to offer other than a veiled slur on my post? Or, as one of my best friends is fond of saying: Bite me. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ Just before someone gets nervous, do they experience cocoons in their stomach? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
