Re: 2.9.1 and right click

2012-05-20 Thread question

question wrote:

What could the reason be that I can no longer Right Click on a page...
There use to be a menu that came up so I could Send the page or link.

For example http://www.seamonkey-project.org/



Sorry But it Was a BAD Microsoft Mouse .  All Fixed
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


2.9.1 and right click

2012-05-20 Thread question
What could the reason be that I can no longer Right Click on a page... 
There use to be a menu that came up so I could Send the page or link.


For example  http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: View Source

2012-05-20 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Ray_Net wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+
>>
>> I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)
>
> That's another way of doing things, but if you want to see the real
> source without any modifications permitting to see
>  ,& per example, a neutral editor is always a reference.

Hmmm? You don't think I see   when I type it?  Bluefish is not a 
WYSIWYG editor. Are you familiar with it?




> More infos about html free editors -> 
> http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-
editors.htm

Sorry, those are all for Windows...

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: 2.8 new e-mails appear/disappear occasionally

2012-05-20 Thread PhillipJones

chicagofan wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

chicagofan wrote:


P.S. Can someone tell me what font size this appears to be ... to you?


It's my user-specified default font for plain-text messages (Courier
New 14 pt), so probably no help to you. Your message code does not
specify font or size, just "text/plain."

If you sent an HTML message, your settings would affect my display.



Thanks Philip and Paul. You would not believe how small the text is when
I compose ng messages. That's why I wondered if it looks the same to the
others. :)

I've finally accepted that I will never be able to control font size,
unless I use text only in e-mail and newsgroups. :)
bj


Here is what I see:

https://skitch.com/pjonescet/85mur/re-2.8-new-e-mails-appear-disappear-occasionally-mozilla.support.seamonkey-news.mozilla.org

--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: View Source

2012-05-20 Thread Ray_Net

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 17:21:

Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and
select [View>   Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity
references remain untranslated.

Then that should be the way you get your copy.

What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is
happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a
viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/


I hand-code my HTML and CSS using Wordpad.

I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+

I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)

That's another way of doing things, but if you want to see the real 
source without any modifications permitting to see


 ,& per example, a neutral editor is always a reference.

More infos about html free editors ->  
http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-editors.htm


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: 2.8 new e-mails appear/disappear occasionally

2012-05-20 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

chicagofan wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

chicagofan wrote:


P.S. Can someone tell me what font size this appears to be ... to you?


It's my user-specified default font for plain-text messages (Courier
New 14 pt), so probably no help to you. Your message code does not
specify font or size, just "text/plain."

If you sent an HTML message, your settings would affect my display.



Thanks Philip and Paul. You would not believe how small the text is when
I compose ng messages. That's why I wondered if it looks the same to the
others. :)

I've finally accepted that I will never be able to control font size,
unless I use text only in e-mail and newsgroups. :)


As a matter of convenience in composing, I've found that I can vary the 
zoom by holding the CTRL key and rotating the mouse wheel. You might try 
that. It doesn't change what code you send out, just how it looks on 
your screen.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: 2.8 new e-mails appear/disappear occasionally

2012-05-20 Thread chicagofan

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

chicagofan wrote:


P.S. Can someone tell me what font size this appears to be ... to you?


It's my user-specified default font for plain-text messages (Courier New 14 pt), so probably no help to you. Your 
message code does not specify font or size, just "text/plain."


If you sent an HTML message, your settings would affect my display.



Thanks Philip and Paul.   You would not believe how small the text is when I compose ng messages.  That's why I wondered 
if it looks the same to the others.  :)


I've finally accepted that I will never be able to control font size, unless I 
use text only in e-mail and newsgroups.  :)
bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-20 Thread Libertarian Lilly
Daniel   wrote :

> Libertarian Lilly wrote:
>> gjikkl   wrote :
>>
>>> Jean Zebloski wrote:
 Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time?

>>> Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has
>>> been initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for
>>> now he have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY
>>> SLOWLY. 
>>>
>>
>> People keep saying to just give it up and use Firefox.
>>
>> With the interminably slow bookmarks loading in SM, I'm getting to
>> agree with them.
>>
> 
> *YOU* (and others) may experience "interminably slow bookmarks loading 
> in SM", but I (and others) do not, so the problem may be with your 
> bookmarks file!
> 

Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me. 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: View Source

2012-05-20 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Ray_Net wrote:

> David E. Ross wrote:
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
 I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and
 select [View>  Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity
 references remain untranslated.
>>> Then that should be the way you get your copy.
>>>
>>> What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is
>>> happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a
>>> viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/
>>>
>> I hand-code my HTML and CSS using Wordpad.
>
> I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+

I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How do I import SeaMonkey v2.0.14's addressbooks into SeaMonkey v2.9.1's addresbooks?

2012-05-20 Thread Ant

No answers? :(


On 5/18/2012 9:04 AM PT, Ant typed:


Hello!

I did a clean installation of v2.9.1 and manually copied over my old SM
v2.0.14 addressbooks, bookmarks, and e-mails to my Linux/Debian box. I
got my bookmarks imported manually, but I can't seem to import my old
addresssbooks from *.mab files. Do I really have to export them to non
.mab formats and then import from them?

Thank you in advance. :)

--
"We're all ants. I'm a glittery little ant." --Alanis Morissette
   /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: View Source

2012-05-20 Thread Ray_Net

David E. Ross wrote, On 20/05/2012 08:04:

On 5/19/12 5:47 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:


I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and select
[View>  Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity references remain
untranslated.

Then that should be the way you get your copy.

What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is
happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a
viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/


I hand-code my HTML and CSS using Wordpad.



I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Is motogp.com secure or not

2012-05-20 Thread Daniel
I'm sitting here watching the French Moto Gp and thought I check out 
something at the web site motogp.com. I've never been there before, and 
I got a security warning, informing me that the security certificate 
offered was not for motogp.com, but for three other sites.


Figuring that simply meant that the motogp.com site is hosted by one or 
other of the three sites, in much the same way that news.Mozilla.org 
server is hosted by giganews.com, I accepted the situation.


When I clicked "I Accept" or whatever the security notification page 
offers, I went to www.motogp.com, the padlock in the bottom right was 
closed, but I got a virtually blank page, except for an error message:-


Quote
An error occurred while processing your request.

Reference #97.7f8ffe3c.1337515288.639cd956
End Quote.

What is this telling me??

Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0) 
Gecko/20120429 SeaMonkey/2.9.1


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-20 Thread Daniel

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

gjikkl   wrote :


Jean Zebloski wrote:

Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time?


Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has been
initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for now he
have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY SLOWLY.



People keep saying to just give it up and use Firefox.

With the interminably slow bookmarks loading in SM, I'm getting to agree with
them.



*YOU* (and others) may experience "interminably slow bookmarks loading 
in SM", but I (and others) do not, so the problem may be with your 
bookmarks file!


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-20 Thread Daniel

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:

Daniel wrote:

gjikkl wrote:

Jean Zebloski wrote:

Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time?


Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has been
initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for now he
have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY SLOWLY.


Sorry, about:memory tells me my SeaMonkey is using approx 625MB of
(vsize) memory, but does not list anything about the cache size!!


about:cache should help there



Thanks, Barry, I was aware!!

My reply was with regards to gjikkl's post above, which seems, to me, to 
suggest that SM's usage of RAM was tied in with it's cache usage, but I 
believe they are separate problems/situations!


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey