Daniel <d...@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote : > Libertarian Lilly wrote: >> gjikkl<saul...@netscape.net> wrote : >> >>> Jean Zebloski wrote: >>>> Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time? >>>> >>> Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has >>> been initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for >>> now he have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY >>> SLOWLY. >>> >> >> People keep saying to just give it up and use Firefox. >> >> With the interminably slow bookmarks loading in SM, I'm getting to >> agree with them. >> > > *YOU* (and others) may experience "interminably slow bookmarks loading > in SM", but I (and others) do not, so the problem may be with your > bookmarks file! >
Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
