Re: Bye bye seamonkey

2013-01-20 Thread Daniel

question wrote:

Since Seamonkey is set to Disable Java as it startup,, many of us will
be moving to INTERNET EXPLOITER ..


How many of you??

Seems to me, if SeaMonkey is disabling Java (because *Java* has a known 
problem), why would you then want to move to MSIE (which, I'm guessing, 
has the same problem with Java), and have to deal with MSIE's other 
problems (like ActiveX, .)!!


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread Rob
Charlie Siracuse cs...@verizon.net wrote:
  I asked them a while ago and they said they have gotten hardly any 
 requests for seamonkey access.  Let's get as many as possible to request 
 this access.  I did get a phone response.

Many, many website owners have no idea what Seamonkey is and what
they need to do to support it.
(often no more than recognizing it and handling it as Firefox)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 2.14.1 won't remember Browser and Email window positions

2013-01-20 Thread Rob
b...@cowboyneeds.com b...@cowboyneeds.com wrote:
 On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 6:47:17 PM UTC-5, bi...@cowboyneeds.com wrote:
 We are a business and always have both the Browser and Email windows open in 
 Win XP. These are both checked to open when SeaMonkey starts. The default 
 use to be Browser first, then email to the right. If somehow this order was 
 changed, you could put them in the order you want, exit SeaMonkey, and upon 
 restart it would open with the window positions you had upon exit. The 
 latest SeaMonkey update starts with Email on the left, and the Browser to 
 the right, and will not remember these if changed and restarted. It is a 
 small thing, but the reason we use SeaMonkey (and always used Netscape) is 
 it lets us customize much better than IE.
 
 
 
 Does anybody know how to force SeaMonkey to open with Browser on left and 
 Email on right, on the Win XP task bar. We have multiple computers and 
 SeaMonkey profiles, so consistency is important.

 Thanks Michael Gordon. 
 I am talking about the System Task Bar with the Clock. Either a Windows XP, 
 or a SeaMonkey update, changed this behavior. SeaMonkey always use to reopen 
 its component windows in the order they were in when we last closed the 
 program, but now when opened, it always forces the SeaMonkey Email component 
 to open first, and be closest to the Start button. 
 We always have SeaMonkey's Browser and Email windows open on the System Task 
 Bar. We are an internet store, and frequently are replying to customers 
 emails with links to specific products on our html website. Those are the 
 main programs we have open, and use constantly, throughout the day. While we 
 may also need to open Excel, an HTML editor, an FTP program, etc., it is 
 always handiest to have the SeaMonkey Browser window open to the far left on 
 the System Task Bar (closest to Start button), and then SeaMonkey Email, and 
 then other programs to the right of these, which get opened and closed 
 throughout the day. When this order changes, we have to spend more time 
 hunting the correct window on the System Task Bar to click, instead of just 
 knowing where it is.
 Its an annoyance more than anything, I just don't know what changed in one of 
 the updates, but it effected four computers at the same time, so this is not 
 a one computer preference setting. I have done a work around by only having 
 SeaMonkey open the Browser, and then we click SeaMonkey's Email icon to open 
 the Email component to the right. We have multiple SeaMonkey Profiles, so it 
 is just one more step every time we open SeaMonkey. I was hoping somebody 
 knew what changed, and a simple fix.

Simple fix: do NOT configure the e-mail window to open on startup.
Only open the browser window on startup.  Once the browser opens, click
on the little envelope in the bottom left of the window, and the e-mail
window will open.   Now the buttons will be in the order that you like,
with only a single click.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Bye bye seamonkey

2013-01-20 Thread Ant

On 1/19/2013 10:09 PM PT, question typed:


Since Seamonkey is set to Disable Java as it startup,, many of us will
be moving to INTERNET EXPLOITER ..


Why? Mozilla does the same to Firefox by design (security holes).
--
When you turn on a light in a room, what happens? Shaw said. The 
roaches scatter, but the ants keep marching. You can step on them, throw 
water on them, but they keep on marching. I want ants for my defense. 
--Willy Shaw

   /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Bye bye seamonkey

2013-01-20 Thread Jim Dell

Daniel wrote:

question wrote:

Since Seamonkey is set to Disable Java as it startup,, many of us will
be moving to INTERNET EXPLOITER ..


How many of you??

Seems to me, if SeaMonkey is disabling Java (because *Java* has a known
problem), why would you then want to move to MSIE (which, I'm guessing,
has the same problem with Java), and have to deal with MSIE's other
problems (like ActiveX, .)!!



My problem is not that it is disabling it, but it keeps trying to 
install 7u10 when 7u11 was installed yesterday.

Anybody got a fix for that?

Jim
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Win7/SM15/Java7.11 problem

2013-01-20 Thread Jim Dell

Roger Fink wrote:

question wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

On each of two computers, one running XP the other Windows 7, I'm
running Seamonkey 15 and Firefox 18 with Java 7.11 installed. As far
as I know, the settings for Java, and the browser configurations,
are identical, or as close to that as possible, from machine to
machine. On XP everything works fine, but I'm having a Java problem
on Win7. At this site, www.time.gov, on both machines, java in Seamonkey
asked for permission to run and committed it to memory. So no
problem there. But at this site, www.stockwatch.com, when I tried to
access
streaming quotes (behind a paywall), Seamonkey on Win7 refused to
launch java. Firefox launches java here without a problem.

Security is set to allow popups (required for the java app) at
Stockwatch.com, and the firewall would have given me an option if it
was about to block it, so I'm not sure what else to try.


I've noticed that one other site with a similar application, and
where I would expect the same problem of not being able to launch
java to occur, works OK, so it appears that the above problem may be
site-related.

The newest version of Java .. raises the secrity lever Bat to HIGH
because of Kackers taking control... It checks for Security
Certificates at the web sites. If there expired or have none , it
   will not function.. Click Java in control panel and lower the
security bar to Medium. But download the newest java from Java.com .. They
also explain this
to you .


Here's a question, question. Why don't I have this problem in Firefox 18,
which is the equivalent level browser to Seamonkey 15, and which I've
configured the same way? Anyway, thanks for the tip.



I can't get 7u11 to work in Firefox, SeaMonkey or Chrome, works okay in IE.
Jim
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Win7/SM15/Java7.11 problem

2013-01-20 Thread Rickles

Jim Dell wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

question wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

On each of two computers, one running XP the other Windows 7, I'm
running Seamonkey 15 and Firefox 18 with Java 7.11 installed. As far
as I know, the settings for Java, and the browser configurations,
are identical, or as close to that as possible, from machine to
machine. On XP everything works fine, but I'm having a Java problem
on Win7. At this site, www.time.gov, on both machines, java in
Seamonkey
asked for permission to run and committed it to memory. So no
problem there. But at this site, www.stockwatch.com, when I tried to
access
streaming quotes (behind a paywall), Seamonkey on Win7 refused to
launch java. Firefox launches java here without a problem.

Security is set to allow popups (required for the java app) at
Stockwatch.com, and the firewall would have given me an option if it
was about to block it, so I'm not sure what else to try.


I've noticed that one other site with a similar application, and
where I would expect the same problem of not being able to launch
java to occur, works OK, so it appears that the above problem may be
site-related.

The newest version of Java .. raises the secrity lever Bat to HIGH
because of Kackers taking control... It checks for Security
Certificates at the web sites. If there expired or have none , it
   will not function.. Click Java in control panel and lower the
security bar to Medium. But download the newest java from Java.com ..
They
also explain this
to you .


Here's a question, question. Why don't I have this problem in Firefox 18,
which is the equivalent level browser to Seamonkey 15, and which I've
configured the same way? Anyway, thanks for the tip.



I can't get 7u11 to work in Firefox, SeaMonkey or Chrome, works okay in IE.
Jim
I'm chasing what amounts to the same issue, now suspect it's something 
in how SM decides/records/reports what versions of plugins are installed 
on the machine.  Looks like it's a carry-over from some previous install 
that went slightly wrong.  My existing thread is 
of-dnumkgvmxfmtnnz2dnuvz_v6dn...@mozilla.org if you want to read.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread Daniel

Rob wrote:

Charlie Siracuse cs...@verizon.net wrote:

  I asked them a while ago and they said they have gotten hardly any
requests for seamonkey access.  Let's get as many as possible to request
this access.  I did get a phone response.


Many, many website owners have no idea what Seamonkey is and what
they need to do to support it.
(often no more than recognizing it and handling it as Firefox)


Given that it's not just SeaMonkey that's affected, surely, a better 
action would be for the website owners/techs to set their sites up to 
sniff for Gecko! That would fix them for a whole series of browsers, 
wouldn't it??


--
Daniel

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Win7/SM15/Java7.11 problem

2013-01-20 Thread question

Jim Dell wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

question wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

On each of two computers, one running XP the other Windows 7, I'm
running Seamonkey 15 and Firefox 18 with Java 7.11 installed. As far
as I know, the settings for Java, and the browser configurations,
are identical, or as close to that as possible, from machine to
machine. On XP everything works fine, but I'm having a Java problem
on Win7. At this site, www.time.gov, on both machines, java in
Seamonkey
asked for permission to run and committed it to memory. So no
problem there. But at this site, www.stockwatch.com, when I tried to
access
streaming quotes (behind a paywall), Seamonkey on Win7 refused to
launch java. Firefox launches java here without a problem.

Security is set to allow popups (required for the java app) at
Stockwatch.com, and the firewall would have given me an option if it
was about to block it, so I'm not sure what else to try.


I've noticed that one other site with a similar application, and
where I would expect the same problem of not being able to launch
java to occur, works OK, so it appears that the above problem may be
site-related.

The newest version of Java .. raises the secrity lever Bat to HIGH
because of Kackers taking control... It checks for Security
Certificates at the web sites. If there expired or have none , it
   will not function.. Click Java in control panel and lower the
security bar to Medium. But download the newest java from Java.com ..
They
also explain this
to you .


Here's a question, question. Why don't I have this problem in Firefox 18,
which is the equivalent level browser to Seamonkey 15, and which I've
configured the same way? Anyway, thanks for the tip.



I can't get 7u11 to work in Firefox, SeaMonkey or Chrome, works okay in IE.
Jim
Looks like Oracle ( Java as sold out to Microsoft .  Remember The 
NETSCAPE days ?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread Rob
Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:
 Rob wrote:
 Charlie Siracuse cs...@verizon.net wrote:
   I asked them a while ago and they said they have gotten hardly any
 requests for seamonkey access.  Let's get as many as possible to request
 this access.  I did get a phone response.

 Many, many website owners have no idea what Seamonkey is and what
 they need to do to support it.
 (often no more than recognizing it and handling it as Firefox)

 Given that it's not just SeaMonkey that's affected, surely, a better 
 action would be for the website owners/techs to set their sites up to 
 sniff for Gecko! That would fix them for a whole series of browsers, 
 wouldn't it??

Well, once a website is working with some browsers and not with others,
you usually know that it is not very well set up.

Printing something in a defined format is better solved using a print
stylesheet than with a plugin.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Bye bye seamonkey

2013-01-20 Thread Rob
Jim Dell del...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Daniel wrote:
 question wrote:
 Since Seamonkey is set to Disable Java as it startup,, many of us will
 be moving to INTERNET EXPLOITER ..

 How many of you??

 Seems to me, if SeaMonkey is disabling Java (because *Java* has a known
 problem), why would you then want to move to MSIE (which, I'm guessing,
 has the same problem with Java), and have to deal with MSIE's other
 problems (like ActiveX, .)!!


 My problem is not that it is disabling it, but it keeps trying to 
 install 7u10 when 7u11 was installed yesterday.
 Anybody got a fix for that?

Maybe it helps when you remove the file blocklist.xml from your profile
directory while the program is not running.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Every version of Java disabled by SM!

2013-01-20 Thread Rickles

Rickles wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Michael Gordon wrote:


SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA.  Yesterday I
had SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling
JAVA in the Ad-Ons Manager.  Last night I upgraded to SM 2.15
and JAVA applets would not run. ...

Side note:  Internet Explorer, v.8, has no problem with the
latest version of the JAVA plugin.

It is time to jump the sinking ship.  The Mozilla Fire
Breathing Dragon has run out of gas, has lost its spark, and
should be laid to rest with honors.

Thanks for the ride, Mozilla, it has been a fun ride.


On my system, at about:plugins, the plugin is listed with a
bright red message, Java(TM) Platform SE 7 U11 is known to be
vulnerable. Use with caution, followed by a link to More
information, which points here:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p182.
Details of the block request are available here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829111. Using SM
2.15, I visited a familiar site that uses a Java applet,
and that part of the page was displayed with a puzzle piece
saying I had to click here to activate plugin. I clicked,
Java started, and it ran normally.

I closed the page (which clears its session cookies) and
returned, logged in all over again, and repeated the procedure.
Once again, I was told I had to click to activate Java. So that
one click did not enable Java globally or permanently.

Accordingly, two points:

1) The problem is not of Mozilla's making, it's a fault with
Oracle's product so it's not fair to blame Mozilla for
protecting you. 2) If you really want to run Java despite its
vulnerability, you can, on demand.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.


The java plugin is enabled without conditions or warnings in my
SM v.15. My experience in activating java on time.gov is like
what you describe. The first time I clicked the box to enable
it, java presented me with an option to remember the permission,
which I selected. The second time it just presented the box, so
there is a glitch somewhere, but at least you can use it in
selected instances if you need to (and some of us do).

I'm not seeing any box, pop-up, pop-under, jigsaw-puzzle
placeholder, nuttin'.  SM Add-On Mgr shows a warning that the
Java (version) is known to be vulnerable.  Use with caution.
Then a link called 'More Information' which takes you to
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p186 (in the
case of Java 1.6_38), and that tells you it's been automatically
disabled and no longer usable.

Back to my original question: how do I turn it back on?  If I'm
supposed to see some dialog box, how do I force THAT on so I can
turn Java back on?


If you install the prefbar extension you can easily access (by one
of several display options) a check box to enable or disable java.
That should do it, but I would upgrade to java 7.11 first.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/?src=ss


And based on the recognition problem you're experiencing, I would
completely uninstall the version that you have before installing a
later one. By uninstall I mean a conventional uninstall via
Seamonkey and then go into the Windows file tree and erase all that
detritus.


Sorry for the mistake - my bad: I meant conventional uninstall
through Windows (or Revo), not SeaMonkey.



I had already done the complete cleanup and re-install of the latest
version, but it's not changing anything.  In the Java control panel
applet, I have ticked the box under 'Advanced - Default java for
browsers - Mozilla Family', but as soon as SM opens, the box gets
cleared again.  And using the Pogo site as called out earlier in this
thread, there is no puzzle-piece drawing where I can select and
authorize the use of Java, no matter how I set the security level in
the Java Cntrl Pnl applet.

This is really getting old.


Try re-installing the same version of SeaMonkey over itself.
Longshot, but longshots are all you have left.



OK, think I'm on the right track finally.  I'm documenting below what
process I've gone thru to get this far, but what it boils down to is
something in the current profile which appears to cause a version
reporting issue between installed Java vs how SM reads/reports this.

And no, clearing cookies/cache/etc. has no effect.  Java applet tick
boxes aren't really having any effect, but here's what I do know:

A sterile test profile doesn't have the Java issues--it all works fine.
  Looking at the Plugins list thru Add-on Mgr shows both the current
installed Java version (7 upd 11) and the Java Deployment Toolkit (a
sub-component installed as part of the JRE.)

The troubled profile shows the same 2 components, but the JRE entry
shows a security warning with a web link, and the web link article
states Java functionality has been shut down for my own good.  Makes no
difference 

www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/

2013-01-20 Thread Smiles
Why does this tab always now show up 
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ Seamonkey 2.13


thanks
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Bye bye seamonkey

2013-01-20 Thread Jim Taylor

Jim Dell wrote:

Daniel wrote:

question wrote:

Since Seamonkey is set to Disable Java as it startup,, many of us will
be moving to INTERNET EXPLOITER ..


How many of you??

Seems to me, if SeaMonkey is disabling Java (because *Java* has a known
problem), why would you then want to move to MSIE (which, I'm guessing,
has the same problem with Java), and have to deal with MSIE's other
problems (like ActiveX, .)!!







My problem is not that it is disabling it, but it keeps trying to
install 7u10 when 7u11 was installed yesterday.
Anybody got a fix for that?

Jim


Mine was doing that, Windows 7 64 Bit Home Premium, with both 64 bit 
and 32 bit Java 7u11 installed.  Every time I would click on a java 
object SeaMonkey would want to download 7u10.  I copied the java 7u11 
plugin from the java directory to the SeaMonkey plugin directory and 
then SeaMonkey plugin manager would show the 7u11 plugin but Java 
would not work.  It would actually crash SeaMonkey when trying to run 
www.time.gov or other java pages.


I tried several things that didn't work, but what finally did is I 
uninstalled 32 bit Java 7u11 run time (jre-7u11-windows-i586.exe), 
then installed 32 bit Java 7u10 run time (jre-7u10-windows-i586.exe), 
then reinstalled Java 7u11 (jre-7u11-windows-i586.exe) over top of it.


After that SeaMonkey see the correct plugin and java is working fine. 
 Of course there is a new exploit for 7u11 so I will probably disable 
it again.


--
Jim
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread berniez

Rob wrote:

Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:

Rob wrote:

Charlie Siracuse cs...@verizon.net wrote:

   I asked them a while ago and they said they have gotten hardly any
requests for seamonkey access.  Let's get as many as possible to request
this access.  I did get a phone response.


Many, many website owners have no idea what Seamonkey is and what
they need to do to support it.
(often no more than recognizing it and handling it as Firefox)


Given that it's not just SeaMonkey that's affected, surely, a better
action would be for the website owners/techs to set their sites up to
sniff for Gecko! That would fix them for a whole series of browsers,
wouldn't it??


Well, once a website is working with some browsers and not with others,
you usually know that it is not very well set up.

Printing something in a defined format is better solved using a print
stylesheet than with a plugin.

I think the idea of a coupon printer plug in, at least the way they use 
it is to limit your ability to print the coupons only once. That is the 
way it appears to work when using Firefox. I can post a link so you can 
try it yourself. It is a test coupon sent to me by tech support.

http://bricks.coupons.com/z.asp
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


[linux] closing a tab with middle click [SOLVED]

2013-01-20 Thread Béèm
Having had a crash HDD I had to re-install Seamonkey. I had 2.11 and 
installed now 2.15
I can't remember how I got it, but in 2.11 I was able to middle-click on 
an open tab and it closed.

In 2.15 this doesn't work anymore.
Is this due to a 'feature change' in 2.15, or was it a plugin in 2.11 
which I might have installed?

I didn't have to re-install the OS.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: [linux] closing a tab with middle click

2013-01-20 Thread Béèm

Hartmut Figge wrote:

Béèm:


I can't remember how I got it, but in 2.11 I was able to middle-click on
an open tab and it closed.


I do not use that, but a test shows that it is so for my SM. Looking
into 'about:config' with the filter middle i see
middlemouse.contentLoadURL with the value false. Might be worth a try. :)

Hartmut


Great Hartmut.
That did the trick.
Thanks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread berniez

Rob wrote:

Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:

Rob wrote:

Charlie Siracuse cs...@verizon.net wrote:

   I asked them a while ago and they said they have gotten hardly any
requests for seamonkey access.  Let's get as many as possible to request
this access.  I did get a phone response.


Many, many website owners have no idea what Seamonkey is and what
they need to do to support it.
(often no more than recognizing it and handling it as Firefox)


Given that it's not just SeaMonkey that's affected, surely, a better
action would be for the website owners/techs to set their sites up to
sniff for Gecko! That would fix them for a whole series of browsers,
wouldn't it??


Well, once a website is working with some browsers and not with others,
you usually know that it is not very well set up.

Printing something in a defined format is better solved using a print
stylesheet than with a plugin.

I should advise anyone who is using coupon printer that I have found a 
fix that works. In Firefox, there are 3 files that are in the plugin 
section related to the coupon printer. You need all 3 files in Seamonkey 
for it to work. Copy these files from the plug in directory of Firefox 
to the plug in directory of Seamonkey. They are pretty obvious which 
files they are. They have dll extensions. Once you are done, run the 
coupon installer again and it will now print properly. The files all 
have coupon in the signature under the file name. If some one needs the 
exact file names, I can post them. Bernie

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread Ed Mullen

Rob wrote:

Charlie Siracuse cs...@verizon.net wrote:

  I asked them a while ago and they said they have gotten hardly any
requests for seamonkey access.  Let's get as many as possible to request
this access.  I did get a phone response.


Many, many website owners have no idea what Seamonkey is and what
they need to do to support it.
(often no more than recognizing it and handling it as Firefox)



They need to:

1.  Design standards-compliant pages
2.  Stop sniffing for User Agents (not needed if #1 above is done right)

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail but a true friend will 
be sitting next to you saying, Dang, that was fun.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread Philip TAYLOR


Ed Mullen wrote:

 
 They need to:
 
 1.  Design standards-compliant pages
 2.  Stop sniffing for User Agents (not needed if #1 above is done right)

And, from bitter experience : provide variant JavaScript
based on feature detection, if they intend to make non-trivial
use of JavaScript.

Philip Taylor

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer problem solved

2013-01-20 Thread berniez



I should advise anyone who is using coupon printer that I have found a 
fix that works. In Firefox, there are 3 files that are in the plugin 
section related to the coupon printer. You need all 3 files in Seamonkey 
for it to work. Copy these files from the plug in directory of Firefox 
to the plug in directory of Seamonkey. They are pretty obvious which 
files they are. They have dll extensions. Once you are done, run the 
coupon installer again and it will now print properly. The files all 
have coupon in the signature under the file name. If some one needs the 
exact file names, I can post them. Bernie

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: coupon printer

2013-01-20 Thread Rob
bern...@nospam.com bern...@nospam.com wrote:
 I think the idea of a coupon printer plug in, at least the way they use 
 it is to limit your ability to print the coupons only once. That is the 
 way it appears to work when using Firefox.

HAH!  That is a good joke...  how many copies do you want?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Unbelieveable!!--was Re: Every version of Java disabled by SM!

2013-01-20 Thread Rickles

Rickles wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Roger Fink wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Michael Gordon wrote:


SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA.  Yesterday I
had SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling
JAVA in the Ad-Ons Manager.  Last night I upgraded to SM 2.15
and JAVA applets would not run. ...

Side note:  Internet Explorer, v.8, has no problem with the
latest version of the JAVA plugin.

It is time to jump the sinking ship.  The Mozilla Fire
Breathing Dragon has run out of gas, has lost its spark, and
should be laid to rest with honors.

Thanks for the ride, Mozilla, it has been a fun ride.


On my system, at about:plugins, the plugin is listed with a
bright red message, Java(TM) Platform SE 7 U11 is known to be
vulnerable. Use with caution, followed by a link to More
information, which points here:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p182.
Details of the block request are available here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829111. Using SM
2.15, I visited a familiar site that uses a Java applet,
and that part of the page was displayed with a puzzle piece
saying I had to click here to activate plugin. I clicked,
Java started, and it ran normally.

I closed the page (which clears its session cookies) and
returned, logged in all over again, and repeated the procedure.
Once again, I was told I had to click to activate Java. So that
one click did not enable Java globally or permanently.

Accordingly, two points:

1) The problem is not of Mozilla's making, it's a fault with
Oracle's product so it's not fair to blame Mozilla for
protecting you. 2) If you really want to run Java despite its
vulnerability, you can, on demand.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.


The java plugin is enabled without conditions or warnings in my
SM v.15. My experience in activating java on time.gov is like
what you describe. The first time I clicked the box to enable
it, java presented me with an option to remember the permission,
which I selected. The second time it just presented the box, so
there is a glitch somewhere, but at least you can use it in
selected instances if you need to (and some of us do).

I'm not seeing any box, pop-up, pop-under, jigsaw-puzzle
placeholder, nuttin'.  SM Add-On Mgr shows a warning that the
Java (version) is known to be vulnerable.  Use with caution.
Then a link called 'More Information' which takes you to
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p186 (in the
case of Java 1.6_38), and that tells you it's been automatically
disabled and no longer usable.

Back to my original question: how do I turn it back on?  If I'm
supposed to see some dialog box, how do I force THAT on so I can
turn Java back on?


If you install the prefbar extension you can easily access (by one
of several display options) a check box to enable or disable java.
That should do it, but I would upgrade to java 7.11 first.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/?src=ss


And based on the recognition problem you're experiencing, I would
completely uninstall the version that you have before installing a
later one. By uninstall I mean a conventional uninstall via
Seamonkey and then go into the Windows file tree and erase all that
detritus.


Sorry for the mistake - my bad: I meant conventional uninstall
through Windows (or Revo), not SeaMonkey.



I had already done the complete cleanup and re-install of the latest
version, but it's not changing anything.  In the Java control panel
applet, I have ticked the box under 'Advanced - Default java for
browsers - Mozilla Family', but as soon as SM opens, the box gets
cleared again.  And using the Pogo site as called out earlier in this
thread, there is no puzzle-piece drawing where I can select and
authorize the use of Java, no matter how I set the security level in
the Java Cntrl Pnl applet.

This is really getting old.


Try re-installing the same version of SeaMonkey over itself.
Longshot, but longshots are all you have left.



OK, think I'm on the right track finally.  I'm documenting below what
process I've gone thru to get this far, but what it boils down to is
something in the current profile which appears to cause a version
reporting issue between installed Java vs how SM reads/reports this.

And no, clearing cookies/cache/etc. has no effect.  Java applet tick
boxes aren't really having any effect, but here's what I do know:

A sterile test profile doesn't have the Java issues--it all works fine.
  Looking at the Plugins list thru Add-on Mgr shows both the current
installed Java version (7 upd 11) and the Java Deployment Toolkit (a
sub-component installed as part of the JRE.)

The troubled profile shows the same 2 components, but the JRE entry
shows a security warning with a web link, and the web link article
states Java functionality has been shut down for my own good.  Makes no

Ref newsgroups

2013-01-20 Thread Lee
anyone else having problems signing in to their newsgroups.  I am with 
USENET and sometimes I can log in automatically and then turn around

and have to log in manually and sometimes that does not work for the
first 4 or 6 times.  Could it be something with SM I have checked with
USENET and they have not indicated any problem and to my knowledge
nothing has changed over the last 3 days.

Thanks
Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Ref newsgroups

2013-01-20 Thread WaltS
Lee wrote:
 anyone else having problems signing in to their newsgroups.  I am with
 USENET and sometimes I can log in automatically and then turn around
 and have to log in manually and sometimes that does not work for the
 first 4 or 6 times.  Could it be something with SM I have checked with
 USENET and they have not indicated any problem and to my knowledge
 nothing has changed over the last 3 days.
 
 Thanks
 Lee


Do you mean news.us.usenet-news.net?

-- 
Fedora 17 (64-bit) KDE 4.9.4
SeaMonkey Release
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Ref newsgroups

2013-01-20 Thread chicagofan

Lee wrote:
anyone else having problems signing in to their newsgroups.  I am with 
USENET and sometimes I can log in automatically and then turn around

and have to log in manually and sometimes that does not work for the
first 4 or 6 times.  Could it be something with SM I have checked with
USENET and they have not indicated any problem and to my knowledge
nothing has changed over the last 3 days.

Thanks
Lee


Who provides your newsgroup service?  Many of them do maintenance on the 
weekends, which can create access problems.


I use eternal-september and I'm not having any problems, but I don't 
have to log in.

bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: 2.15. Save Page As. filename

2013-01-20 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/19/13 7:34 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
 On 1/19/13 5:52 PM, MCBastos wrote:
 Interviewed by CNN on 19/01/2013 17:53, Tom told the world:
 When I download an .html page seamonkey uses no longer the filename in the 
 URL since V2.15 but it uses the description of the page as filename.

 Can I change this that it is like before?


 Well, this change in behavior was documented in bug 254139:
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254139

 Apparently this change has been requested for years, and Mozilla was the
 only major browser who did *not* do this. The reasoning is that in most
 cases the page title field is more descriptive than the filename --
 that's particularly true in large sites with automatically-generated pages.

 There isn't a pref to turn it off, but Gavin Sharp made an extension for
 people who prefer the old way (linked from Comment #71 on the bug thread):

 https://github.com/gavinsharp/SaveAsFilename


 
 The SaveAsFilename extension is not compatible with SeaMonkey.  It
 appears to be a Firefox-only extension.
 

A version of the SaveAsFilename extension modified for SeaMonkey does
install, but it does not work.  With it installed and enabled, the file
name is still being taken from the title element instead of the URI.

-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Are taxes too high in the U.S.?  Check the bar graph
at http://www.rossde.com/taxes/trickling.html to see.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Every version of Javaa disabled by SM!

2013-01-20 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/18/13 9:51 AM, Rickles wrote:
 I've seen the notices and recommendations about the various Java 
 security holes.  I understand the concerns.  But there's one site my 
 wife visits regularly which requires Java, and now won't work on either 
 our XP-SP3 tower mainframe or a Win7 laptop, both with SM 2.15, because 
 SM has taken it upon itself to block every Java version back thru v6 
 Update 38.  The only option available to the user is to disable it in 
 Add-On Mgr, which is useless since SM has already locked it out.
 
 This is the only site she wants to use which uses Java, so I'd 
 appreciate any recommendations as to how to turn SOME version of Java 
 back on in SM.
 

While I could still have Web pages use Java by selecting the Lego
graphic with the Click here to activate plugin. caption, there was no
way to use the Java test page at
http://www.java.com/en/download/installed.jsp to verify a correct
installation of Java.

I located the file blocklist.xml in my profile.  I opened it in an ASCII
editor (WordPad) and commented out six consecutive
pluginItem/pluginItem blocks that referenced Java.  I then changed
the properties of blocklist.xml to be read-only.

I DO NOT RECOMMEND this to others because of the risks, not only from
possible Java vulnerabilities but also because it disables future blocks
of other malware.  Thus, I will undo this when a newer version of Java
becomes available.  In the meantime, however, I now have Java fully
enabled for the very few Web pages with Java that I visit.

-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Are taxes too high in the U.S.?  Check the bar graph
at http://www.rossde.com/taxes/trickling.html to see.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Every version of Java disabled by SM!

2013-01-20 Thread Roger Fink
Rickles wrote:
 Rickles wrote:
 Roger Fink wrote:
 Rickles wrote:
 Roger Fink wrote:
 Roger Fink wrote:
 Roger Fink wrote:
 Rickles wrote:
 Roger Fink wrote:
 Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
 Michael Gordon wrote:

 SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA.  Yesterday
 I had SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling
 JAVA in the Ad-Ons Manager.  Last night I upgraded to SM
 2.15 and JAVA applets would not run. ...

 Side note:  Internet Explorer, v.8, has no problem with the
 latest version of the JAVA plugin.

 It is time to jump the sinking ship.  The Mozilla Fire
 Breathing Dragon has run out of gas, has lost its spark, and
 should be laid to rest with honors.

 Thanks for the ride, Mozilla, it has been a fun ride.

 On my system, at about:plugins, the plugin is listed with a
 bright red message, Java(TM) Platform SE 7 U11 is known to
 be vulnerable. Use with caution, followed by a link to More
 information, which points here:
 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p182.
 Details of the block request are available here:
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829111. Using
 SM 2.15, I visited a familiar site that uses a Java applet,
 and that part of the page was displayed with a puzzle piece
 saying I had to click here to activate plugin. I clicked,
 Java started, and it ran normally.

 I closed the page (which clears its session cookies) and
 returned, logged in all over again, and repeated the
 procedure. Once again, I was told I had to click to activate
 Java. So that one click did not enable Java globally or
 permanently. Accordingly, two points:

 1) The problem is not of Mozilla's making, it's a fault with
 Oracle's product so it's not fair to blame Mozilla for
 protecting you. 2) If you really want to run Java despite its
 vulnerability, you can, on demand.

 --
 War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.

 The java plugin is enabled without conditions or warnings in
 my SM v.15. My experience in activating java on time.gov is
 like what you describe. The first time I clicked the box to
 enable it, java presented me with an option to remember the
 permission, which I selected. The second time it just
 presented the box, so there is a glitch somewhere, but at
 least you can use it in selected instances if you need to
 (and some of us do).
 I'm not seeing any box, pop-up, pop-under, jigsaw-puzzle
 placeholder, nuttin'.  SM Add-On Mgr shows a warning that the
 Java (version) is known to be vulnerable.  Use with caution.
 Then a link called 'More Information' which takes you to
 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p186 (in the
 case of Java 1.6_38), and that tells you it's been
 automatically disabled and no longer usable.

 Back to my original question: how do I turn it back on?  If I'm
 supposed to see some dialog box, how do I force THAT on so I
 can turn Java back on?

 If you install the prefbar extension you can easily access (by
 one of several display options) a check box to enable or
 disable java. That should do it, but I would upgrade to java
 7.11 first.
 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/?src=ss

 And based on the recognition problem you're experiencing, I
 would completely uninstall the version that you have before
 installing a later one. By uninstall I mean a conventional
 uninstall via Seamonkey and then go into the Windows file tree
 and erase all that detritus.

 Sorry for the mistake - my bad: I meant conventional uninstall
 through Windows (or Revo), not SeaMonkey.


 I had already done the complete cleanup and re-install of the
 latest version, but it's not changing anything.  In the Java
 control panel applet, I have ticked the box under 'Advanced -
 Default java for browsers - Mozilla Family', but as soon as SM
 opens, the box gets cleared again.  And using the Pogo site as
 called out earlier in this thread, there is no puzzle-piece
 drawing where I can select and authorize the use of Java, no
 matter how I set the security level in the Java Cntrl Pnl applet.

 This is really getting old.

 Try re-installing the same version of SeaMonkey over itself.
 Longshot, but longshots are all you have left.


 OK, think I'm on the right track finally.  I'm documenting below what
 process I've gone thru to get this far, but what it boils down to is
 something in the current profile which appears to cause a version
 reporting issue between installed Java vs how SM reads/reports this.

 And no, clearing cookies/cache/etc. has no effect.  Java applet tick
 boxes aren't really having any effect, but here's what I do know:

 A sterile test profile doesn't have the Java issues--it all works
   fine. Looking at the Plugins list thru Add-on Mgr shows both the
 current installed Java version (7 upd 11) and the Java Deployment
 Toolkit (a sub-component installed as part of the JRE.)

 The troubled profile shows the same 2 components, but the JRE entry
 shows a security warning with a web link, and the web link 

Re: Every version of Java disabled by SM!

2013-01-20 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Roger Fink wrote:


I can't remember how many definitive conclusions I've reached in solving
particular computer problems that I've had to walk back, but it's been many,
many. Usually, the farther out you travel on the diagnostic tree, the more
suspicious you need to be of the latest definitive conclusion.


OK, folks, it's time to start pruning.

Did this message really need to include 158 lines of previous messages?

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Filters question...

2013-01-20 Thread Rufus
...is there a way to set a Filter to check against future Date?  i.e.; 
if the message Date is later than (after) today?


--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM is incompatible with the new Google groups

2013-01-20 Thread Ray_Net

Clicking on a link in usenet bring me there:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=offie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8as_umsgid=50f8adad$0$8985$ba4ac...@reader.news.orange.fr

where we can read in a RED bar:

Les anciens Google Groupes vont bientôt disparaître, mais votre 
navigateur est incompatible 
http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=33864 avec la 
nouvelle version.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM is incompatible with the new Google groups

2013-01-20 Thread WaltS
Ray_Net wrote:
 Clicking on a link in usenet bring me there:
 http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=offie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8as_umsgid=50f8adad$0$8985$ba4ac...@reader.news.orange.fr
 
 
 where we can read in a RED bar:
 
 Les anciens Google Groupes vont bientôt disparaître, mais votre
 navigateur est incompatible
 http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=33864 avec la
 nouvelle version.

WFM.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!overview

-- 
Fedora 17 (64-bit) KDE 4.9.4
SeaMonkey 64-bit Release
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM is incompatible with the new Google groups

2013-01-20 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Ray_Net wrote:

 Clicking on a link in usenet bring me there:
 http://groups.google.com/groups?
safe=offie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8as_umsgid=50f8adad$0$8985
$ba4ac...@reader.news.orange.fr
 
 where we can read in a RED bar:
 
 Les anciens Google Groupes vont bientôt disparaître, mais votre
 navigateur est incompatible
 http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=33864 avec la
 nouvelle version.

So? Google is one of millions of web sites that only supports mainstream 
browsers. Did you click the link in the red bar? (the 'support' link you 
included above) It says:

quote
Supported browsers

Google Apps supports the following browsers:

Chrome
Internet Explorer
Firefox
Safari

/quote

Does the same thing with Opera. Your beef is with Google, not SeaMonkey.

http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-plans-to-support-modern-
browsers.html

If you were to mask your User Agent string, it would probably work.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


v2.15.1 is out now. EOM

2013-01-20 Thread Ant


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 2.15

2013-01-20 Thread Desiree

Ken Dixon m...@kentraco.com wrote in message 
news:mailman.7506.1358181740.32706.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org...
I installed this client yesterday and had it working just fine. Now, 
however, it is deleting messages from my Inbox for no apparent reason.

 Having reviewed all of my settings and preferences, I'm stumped as to why, 
 for example, opening the Drafts mailbox causes messages in the Inbox 
 to disappear.  Sometimes clicking on the message itself has the same 
 result.  I can read it once but not again.

 KEN DIXON

Excuse me, but how was the time machine? (Your message is dated
Thursday, March 14, 2013 5:42 AM  )






___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: v2.15.1 is out now. EOM

2013-01-20 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Well, my Norton/Symantec Internet Security detected the high risk 
Suspicious.Cloud.7.F in the file nssckbi.dll and quarantined it. I 
restored the file to c:\Program Files (x86)\SeaMonkey\ but did not tell 
it to quit scanning for this risk.


The system automatically submitted it to Symantec for evaluation.

Is this an important file? I mean, by quarantining it, did Norton damage 
my SM installation? Should I worry? Or is this just an annoyance that I 
can now forget about since I've restored it?


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: v2.15.1 is out now. EOM

2013-01-20 Thread David E. Ross
What is new?  The Release Notes are for 2.15, not 2.15.1.

-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Are taxes too high in the U.S.?  Check the bar graph
at http://www.rossde.com/taxes/trickling.html to see.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: v2.15.1 is out now. EOM

2013-01-20 Thread Arne

David E. Ross skriver:

What is new?  The Release Notes are for 2.15, not 2.15.1.



See the changes page for minor changes 
(http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.15/changes).


[quote]Fixes in 2.15.1
Problems involving HTTP proxy transactions have been fixed (bug list).
The Unity player crashed on Mac OS X (bug 828954)[/quote].

--
/Arne
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey