Re: Message-Headers are erroneously ADDED AT THE SUBJECT in SeaMonkey's Thread-pane's Subject window
»Q« wrote, On 09/04/2013 03:31: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:22:54 +0100 Philip TAYLOR p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote: Ray_Net wrote: then as asked i have attached the file-save-file-eml format No attachment received here. Ray attached it to the bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776096#c15. Correct. I have also to say that the bug i have and reproductible by Tony Mechelynck mailto:antoine.mechely...@gmail.com could be corrected by 2 different ways. 1. Perhaps that creating SPACE + CRLF instead of creating CRLF + SPACE + CRLF when sending the mail - or perhaps removing the trailing spaces before sending. 2. Solving only the display of the subject in the Thread-pane. I prefer the second solution, because i encountered this problem for the first time from a guy not using SM as mail-client. If the first solution(s) is used, i still will encounter the bug with a mail coming from the same guy. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Message-Headers are erroneously ADDED AT THE SUBJECT in SeaMonkey's Thread-pane's Subject window
Ray_Net wrote, On 09/04/2013 08:24: »Q« wrote, On 09/04/2013 03:31: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:22:54 +0100 Philip TAYLOR p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote: Ray_Net wrote: then as asked i have attached the file-save-file-eml format No attachment received here. Ray attached it to the bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776096#c15. Correct. I have also to say that the bug i have and reproductible by Tony Mechelynck mailto:antoine.mechely...@gmail.com could be corrected by 2 different ways. 1. Perhaps that creating SPACE + CRLF instead of creating CRLF + SPACE + CRLF when sending the mail - or perhaps removing the trailing spaces before sending. 2. Solving only the display of the subject in the Thread-pane. I prefer the second solution, because i encountered this problem for the first time from a guy not using SM as mail-client. If the first solution(s) is used, i still will encounter the bug with a mail coming from the same guy. More info: The same mail sent to my gmail box did not exhibit the problem when using the webmail interface. In that point of vue, Gmail is perfect. If i access my gmail box by using SM in pop mode, SM have the problem. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Persistent cookie
HilsB wrote: Mac 10.8.3 and SM 2.17 I'm not very keen on tracking cookies and successfully block many through Preferences - Privacy etc. But one 'outlet-spacci.blogspot.com' cannot, it appears, be blocked. Web investigation suggests it originates from California in spite of the title used by an Italian outlet. Any ideas as to how to get rid of these cookies HilsB Load http://outlet-spacci.blogspot.com then select Tools/Cookie Manager/Block Cookies from This Web Site GW SM 2.17, on OSX 10.6 some cat, IDR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17)
Hartmut Figge wrote: Paul B. Gallagher: Here's a theory: Newsgroup posts have a From: field and a Newsgroups: field, but no Sender: field. The option Reply to all would include the From: address as well as Newsgroups: and Sender:, but Reply to Sender and Newsgroup would not include the From: address. So sender is being used here as a technical term, not in the vernacular sense in which most people understand it. Well, 'Reply to Sender only' works as expected. :-P How about a bug? Hartmut Thanks for answering. Here's what I managed to ascertain: Imaging we have a post with the following fields: To: t...@to.to From: f...@from.from Newsgroup: news1.news, news2.news 1. Reply to Sender Only will send the message to t...@to.to 2. Reply to Newsgroup will send the message to news1.news and news2.news 3. Reply to Sender and Newsgroup will send the message to news1.new and news2.news (seems Hartmut was right, that's a bug) 4. Reply to All will send the message to t...@to.to, f...@from.from, news1.news and news2.news. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: IETab?
Iceman wrote: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0400, Tom Pamin wrote in message news:abwdndjuwq_fb__mnz2dnuvz_jodn...@mozilla.org: Is there any version of IETab that still works with SM and IE10? IE Tab V2 works with SM 2+, but IE 9 is the most recent compatibility level, according to their support forum. You can get it at: https://addons.mozilla.org/EN-US/seamonkey/addon/ie-tab-2-sm-20/?src=search Thanks - it does work with IE10. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17)
Sorry, made mistakes in the previous message, the corrected text: Imagine we have a post with the following fields: To: t...@to.to From: f...@from.from Newsgroup: news1.news, news2.news 1. Reply to Sender Only will send the message to f...@from.from 2. Reply to Newsgroup will send the message to news1.news and news2.news 3. Reply to Sender and Newsgroup will send the message to news1.news and news2.news (Seems Hartmut was right, that's a bug) 4. Reply to All will send the message to t...@to.to, f...@from.from, news1.news and news2.news. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Message-Headers are erroneously ADDED AT THE SUBJECT in SeaMonkey's Thread-pane's Subject window
Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote, On 08/04/2013 15:43: Ray_Net wrote: Snip May i sent a mail with a subject ending with a space from my pc to one or you ? Ray, you can e-mail me if you wish!! Remove the nospam. from my munged address here! Just done - hoping you have the same problem. Nothing heard, Ray, do you want to try again?? -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Who's thread is this, anyway?? (was:- Re: Context menu horrible large and it doesn't work in 2.17)
Otto Wyss wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote: Erness Wild wrote: Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss about::config somewhere else. Otto, I seem to remember one of the bosses here stating that threads are, effectively, under the control of the poster who posted the original post! The OP can take the thread where *they* want. Therefore, I was responding to the thread creators re-response! It having a different focus to the original post is not my problem, it might be your problem (because *you* didn't get an answer to the question *you* had not, yet, asked!!), but not mine! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.17 breaks Mailredirect extension
NFN Smith wrote: Daniel wrote: All very good, Bob, but some here don't read the Subject's of the post, they look at the content of the message, so just putting FYI in the message may not be very useful! Perhaps if you were to give a bit more detail as to what you are seeing Yep. Just love problem reports that are some version of it doesn't work, without describing what that actually means. might help other extension users to know if they are experiencing the same, or different, problem and the extension developer might be able make a start or fixing things. Do you get any error messages on screen or in the Error console (Tools-Web Development-Error Console). I'm seeing the same difficulty. The key symptom that I'm seeing is that the drop down for selecting the sending account is blank (actually ...) Thus, if you click send, nothing happens, presumably because no account has been/can be selected. I checked this against Thunderbird 17.0.5, and the problem isn't there. It seems to be specific to Seamonkey 2.17. That said, I would not assume that the developer of Mailredirect reads mozilla.support.seamonkey. Thus, for the OP, a better course of action would be to file a bug report with the maintainer of that extension. I may get around to doing that myself, in a few days, but it's not something that's especially urgent for me to do. Smith Thanks for this, Smithy, at least we now have half a clue what Bob might be talking about. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.17 breaks Mailredirect extension
Bob Fleischer wrote: Daniel wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: Daniel wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: FYI Sorry, Bob, did you mean to tell the Mailredirect Extension Developer that his/her Mailredirect extension does not work with SM 2.17?? Or something else?? The developer, or SeaMonkey users, or possibly the SeaMonkey developers would find this of interest. It can be helpful to somebody who is experiencing an issue to see that somebody else has noticed the same issue. It can also raise a flag to developers that something was changed perhaps in an unexpected area. Bob All very good, Bob, but some here don't read the Subject's of the post, they look at the content of the message, so just putting FYI in the message may not be very useful! Perhaps if you were to give a bit more detail as to what you are seeing might help other extension users to know if they are experiencing the same, or different, problem and the extension developer might be able make a start or fixing things. Do you get any error messages on screen or in the Error console (Tools-Web Development-Error Console). I don't have any more information on this. The redirect window does pop up, but it is incorrect in content and does not function. Can I attach a screen shot? Bob Bob, TPTB here used to allow posters to post a screen shot to one of the other ng's here-abouts but diffinatly not here. I think that other NG has since been closed, so you may have to post you screen shot to one of the free image hosting sites . sorry, I don't know one, so cannot suggest to you. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Context menu horrible large and it doesn't work in 2.17
On 04/07/2013 04:27 PM, Otto Wyss wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote: Erness Wild wrote: Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss about::config somewhere else. Firebug is an extension that caused context menus to have many extra selections. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=2686991 -- openSUSE 12.3 (64-bit) KDE 4.10.0 Thunderbird Release April is Jazz Appreciation Month ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Who's thread is this, anyway??
On 04/09/2013 09:24 AM, Daniel wrote: Otto Wyss wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote: Erness Wild wrote: Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss about::config somewhere else. Otto, I seem to remember one of the bosses here stating that threads are, effectively, under the control of the poster who posted the original post! The OP can take the thread where *they* want. Therefore, I was responding to the thread creators re-response! It having a different focus to the original post is not my problem, it might be your problem (because *you* didn't get an answer to the question *you* had not, yet, asked!!), but not mine! I'm confused. Otto originally posted his question in m.general, which you set followup-to: to this newsgroup, so the original thread is his about context menu problems. Seems he got put off by you derailing it with your reply to Erness about about:config settings, the following replies, and the non-support he received here, since he hasn't replied to requests for more information. If Otto is still around this may help. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=2686991 -- openSUSE 12.3 (64-bit) KDE 4.10.0 Thunderbird Release April is Jazz Appreciation Month ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
OT Re: IETab?
Tom Pamin wrote: Iceman wrote: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0400, Tom Pamin wrote in message news:abwdndjuwq_fb__mnz2dnuvz_jodn...@mozilla.org: Is there any version of IETab that still works with SM and IE10? IE Tab V2 works with SM 2+, but IE 9 is the most recent compatibility level, according to their support forum. You can get it at: https://addons.mozilla.org/EN-US/seamonkey/addon/ie-tab-2-sm-20/?src=search Thanks - it does work with IE10. How does IETab work with IE10?? Or are you trying to suggests that the results provided by SM 2.17 with IETab installed display a particular page the same as it would appear in IE10?? -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Archive Email Messages?
Gerry Hickman wrote: Hi, I'd like to archive all email messages from 2008, 2009, then save them off-line. I noticed a setting in Mail Newsgroups account settings : account name : Copies and Folders Message Archives This sounds like it would solve the first part, but I don't know how to start the archive process? Assuming I can get an Archives folder inside Local Folders, containing yearly archives, the next part is how can I save that folder outside of SeaMonkey, and how can I restore it if needed? I seem to remember this was easy in Netscape 3.x. They also have it in Outlook. Gerry, I've never noticed/used the setting you have pointed to, but I don't think it will do what you want!! ... but it might!! When I want to archive my mail, I set up several folders, in SeaMonkey Mail Account, at the same level as the Inbox, e.g. I have folders for 2013_Family, 2013_Jokes, 2013_Moz_SM, etc., and I then drag e-mails (both Sent received) into the appropriate folders, then at the end of each year, I move these folders to the Local Folders Account, but if you wanted you could close SM and move these folders to some other location on your HD, or, burn the folders (or your entire e-mail account) to CD/DVD's or store them elsewhere off-line. HTH -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17)
Ilya wrote: Hello, guys. I'm bit confused about 2 of 4 newsgroup reply types: When I chose to Reply to Sender and Newsgroup, the message goes to the newsgroup only. When I chose to Reply to All, the message goes to the sender and to the newsgroup. Why doesn't Reply to Sender and Newsgroup work the way it's supposed to and why does Reply to All do what Replay to Sender and Newsgroup should do? Ilya, could I ask, Why do you want to (be able to) reply directly to a Sender?? If the Sender has posted to this/any group, chances are they will be back and see your reply! So why annoy them/me by replying directly to them/me at all? To para-phrase someone . what happens on the group remains on the group!! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Opps ....Sorry Otto (Re: Who's thread is this, anyway??)
WaltS wrote: On 04/09/2013 09:24 AM, Daniel wrote: Otto Wyss wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote: Erness Wild wrote: Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss about::config somewhere else. Otto, I seem to remember one of the bosses here stating that threads are, effectively, under the control of the poster who posted the original post! The OP can take the thread where *they* want. Therefore, I was responding to the thread creators re-response! It having a different focus to the original post is not my problem, it might be your problem (because *you* didn't get an answer to the question *you* had not, yet, asked!!), but not mine! I'm confused. Otto originally posted his question in m.general, which you set followup-to: to this newsgroup, so the original thread is his about context menu problems. Looks like I'm confusing myself as well as others!! Sorry. Seems he got put off by you derailing it with your reply to Erness about about:config settings, the following replies, and the non-support he received here, since he hasn't replied to requests for more information. If Otto is still around this may help. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=2686991 -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: OT Re: IETab?
Yes, exactly that. Daniel wrote: Tom Pamin wrote: Iceman wrote: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0400, Tom Pamin wrote in message news:abwdndjuwq_fb__mnz2dnuvz_jodn...@mozilla.org: Is there any version of IETab that still works with SM and IE10? IE Tab V2 works with SM 2+, but IE 9 is the most recent compatibility level, according to their support forum. You can get it at: https://addons.mozilla.org/EN-US/seamonkey/addon/ie-tab-2-sm-20/?src=search Thanks - it does work with IE10. How does IETab work with IE10?? Or are you trying to suggests that the results provided by SM 2.17 with IETab installed display a particular page the same as it would appear in IE10?? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17)
Daniel wrote: Ilya, could I ask, Why do you want to (be able to) reply directly to a Sender?? If the Sender has posted to this/any group, chances are they will be back and see your reply! So why annoy them/me by replying directly to them/me at all? To para-phrase someone . what happens on the group remains on the group!! I can't say from the top of my head, Daniel. But I'm pretty sure SM developers would not have implemented Reply to Sender Only and Reply to Sender and Newsgroup features if noone needed them. Not that I'm eager to reply directly to senders :) I just like things working properly. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Message-Headers are erroneously ADDED AT THE SUBJECT in SeaMonkey's Thread-pane's Subject window
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:24:57 +0200 Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote: »Q« wrote, On 09/04/2013 03:31: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:22:54 +0100 Philip TAYLOR p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote: Ray_Net wrote: then as asked i have attached the file-save-file-eml format No attachment received here. Ray attached it to the bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776096#c15. Correct. I have also to say that the bug i have and reproductible by Tony Mechelynck mailto:antoine.mechely...@gmail.com could be corrected by 2 different ways. 1. Perhaps that creating SPACE + CRLF instead of creating CRLF + SPACE + CRLF when sending the mail - or perhaps removing the trailing spaces before sending. 2. Solving only the display of the subject in the Thread-pane. I prefer the second solution, because i encountered this problem for the first time from a guy not using SM as mail-client. If the first solution(s) is used, i still will encounter the bug with a mail coming from the same guy. Folding headers in such a way that an entire folded line consists of only whitespace is something a client MUST NOT do, per RFC 2822 §3.2.3. IMO, SeaMonkey sending out e-mails with bad headers is a worse problem than what SeaMonkey does when it receives e-mails with bad headers, but it would be nice if both could be fixed. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Autofill Forms?
Tom Pamin wrote: I've used Autofill Forms v0.9.5.2 on other PC's with SM 2.17. When I try to install it on a new laptop, it says not compatible with 2.17. Any help? You need to install the adapted version from here: http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#autofillforms HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Java, again
Craig McCluskey wrote: I clicked on the upgrade to the latest version link and was taken to http://java.com/en/download/index.jsp . There I clicked on the red Free Java Download button and ended up at http://java.com/en/download/linux_manual.jsp?locale=en, which was Java Downloads for Linux Recommended Version 7 Update 17 I downloaded and installed the Linux (i386) RPM and quit SeaMonkey. (...) As described in the release notes (Known Issues section), the Oracle Java 7 plugin does not work with SeaMonkey on Linux. The analysis has been ongoing for months but still no clue. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622 AFAIK the free Java alternatives like IcedTea or GNU Java do work. Normal users should look for package names like openjdk-7-jre, icedtea-7-plugin or gcj-jre. However in your case you might end up with the x64 version. Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: about:
»Q« wrote: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:48:02 -0400 Ed Mullen e...@mungeedmullen.net wrote: So, the linked page is: http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/arts/reasons.html And here is what it looks like to me in SeaMonkey: http://edmullen.net/Clipboard01.jpg The link to your screenshot gives me a 404. However! I tried the page in Firefox and got what others indicate: The only thing that displays is the last line: Legal Terms. I have no explanation for this odd behavior. Here's what I see in SeaMonkey, same as in Firefox: http://remarqs.net/misc/parked-page1.png. If I turn on any ad-blocking I only see Legal Terms. Is it possible that all your browsers other than Firefox are using cached copies of the page? It seems like a long shot, but it's all I can think of. My bad. http://edmullen.net/temp/Clipboard01.jpg -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ A closed mouth gathers no feet. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: about:
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: As I mentioned in another reply the link works for me and goes to: http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/arts/reasons.html Which looks like this: http://edmullen.net/Clipboard01.jpg Which in turn displays : edmullen dot net MOZILLA ABINGTON GENERAL MUSIC ERROR 404 - Not Found! Sorry about that! The requested page was not found. Please check the URL and try again. It is possible you tried to reach a .html page. All previous .html pages are now .php pages. If a link on this site brought you here please contact Ed by clicking the link below. If a link outside of this site (or your bookmarks/favorites) brought you here it is likely out-of-date. My bad. http://edmullen.net/temp/Clipboard01.jpg -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ A closed mouth gathers no feet. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Message-Headers are erroneously ADDED AT THE SUBJECT in SeaMonkey's Thread-pane's Subject window
»Q« wrote, On 09/04/2013 18:01: On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:24:57 +0200 Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote: »Q« wrote, On 09/04/2013 03:31: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:22:54 +0100 Philip TAYLOR p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote: Ray_Net wrote: then as asked i have attached the file-save-file-eml format No attachment received here. Ray attached it to the bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776096#c15. Correct. I have also to say that the bug i have and reproductible by Tony Mechelynck mailto:antoine.mechely...@gmail.com could be corrected by 2 different ways. 1. Perhaps that creating SPACE + CRLF instead of creating CRLF + SPACE + CRLF when sending the mail - or perhaps removing the trailing spaces before sending. 2. Solving only the display of the subject in the Thread-pane. I prefer the second solution, because i encountered this problem for the first time from a guy not using SM as mail-client. If the first solution(s) is used, i still will encounter the bug with a mail coming from the same guy. Folding headers in such a way that an entire folded line consists of only whitespace is something a client MUST NOT do, per RFC 2822 §3.2.3. IMO, SeaMonkey sending out e-mails with bad headers is a worse problem than what SeaMonkey does when it receives e-mails with bad headers, but it would be nice if both could be fixed. I agree, if both is fixed, all is perfect, however, if SM did not create the problem, we cannot test the display problem :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Message-Headers are erroneously ADDED AT THE SUBJECT in SeaMonkey's Thread-pane's Subject window
Daniel wrote, On 09/04/2013 15:12: Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote, On 08/04/2013 15:43: Ray_Net wrote: Snip May i sent a mail with a subject ending with a space from my pc to one or you ? Ray, you can e-mail me if you wish!! Remove the nospam. from my munged address here! Just done - hoping you have the same problem. Nothing heard, Ray, do you want to try again?? I juste resent you the same mail at the following adress TBR removed: dxmt...@albtbrury.net.au ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Persistent cookie
Geoff Welsh wrote: HilsB wrote: Mac 10.8.3 and SM 2.17 I'm not very keen on tracking cookies and successfully block many through Preferences - Privacy etc. But one 'outlet-spacci.blogspot.com' cannot, it appears, be blocked. Web investigation suggests it originates from California in spite of the title used by an Italian outlet. Any ideas as to how to get rid of these cookies HilsB Load http://outlet-spacci.blogspot.com then select Tools/Cookie Manager/Block Cookies from This Web Site GW SM 2.17, on OSX 10.6 some cat, IDR Thanks for your suggestion but regret it does not work - the dam cookie is still there! The site you suggest is Italian. Through cookie manager these cookies are listed as 'blocked' but clearly are not. Any other ideas? HilsB ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17)
Ilya: I can't say from the top of my head, Daniel. But I'm pretty sure SM developers would not have implemented Reply to Sender Only and Reply to Sender and Newsgroup features if noone needed them. *g* Hopefully this is a bug and did not happen on purpose. The regression range is Last good: 2012-11-18 17:07:00 PST First bad: 2012-11-19 15:11:00 PST You can search for the checkin which caused the change. You can search bugzilla or you can file a bug. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Persistent cookie
HilsB wrote: Thanks for your suggestion but regret it does not work - the damn cookie is still there! The site you suggest is Italian. Through cookie manager these cookies are listed as 'blocked' but clearly are not. Any other ideas? If blocking new cookies doesn't remove old ones, you'll have to remove the old ones manually. If you do so and they come back, then you have a problem and should report back. Go into the Data Manager and click the domain name on the left to show its contents. On the Cookies tab on the right, if you see any cookies, select and delete them (sorry, you have do do them one at a time). When you've deleted them all, the page should revert to a listing like this: outlet-spacci.blogspot.com Set Cookies ( ) Allow( ) Allow for Session(•) Block If the Block option is not selected for the domain or any of its subdomains, click to enable it. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: IETab?
Iceman wrote: On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0400, Tom Pamin wrote in message news:abwdndjuwq_fb__mnz2dnuvz_jodn...@mozilla.org: Is there any version of IETab that still works with SM and IE10? IE Tab V2 works with SM 2+, but IE 9 is the most recent compatibility level, according to their support forum. You can get it at: https://addons.mozilla.org/EN-US/seamonkey/addon/ie-tab-2-sm-20/?src=search Perfect! Worked like a charm, but I did have to update all of my old IE bookmarks. You saved my Seamonkey installation at the office. -- Jaime A. Cruz Secretary Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club http://www.nassauwings.org/ AMA District 34 http://www.AMADistrict34.com/ Pop's Run http://www.popsrun.org/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
can't receive AIM mail in Sea Monkey email
A couple of months ago I started experiencing trouble getting email through my AIM mail account. It is properly set up and was working fine. But now I get this message: The current operation on 'Inbox' did not succeed. The mail server for account responded: parse error: zero-length content. Today when I tried it said my password was no good. I couldn't enter a new one without going to AIM's website. After satisfying all their questions I changed it. But I still get the above message. Any ideas on fixing this? Thanks, Tony ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17)
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:37:31 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote in message news:ueodnfzoluxref7mnz2dnuvz_rodn...@mozilla.org: Here's a theory: Newsgroup posts have a From: field and a Newsgroups: field, but no Sender: field. The option Reply to all would include the From: address as well as Newsgroups: and Sender:, but Reply to Sender and Newsgroup would not include the From: address. So sender is being used here as a technical term, not in the vernacular sense in which most people understand it. Interesting, but what about my mailinglist theory (See above in thread)? Is that totally wrong? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
