No full screen HTML5 YouTube videos?
Why won't SeaMonkey 2.23 on Windows 8 Pro play YouTube HTML5 videos in full screen? The same videos play in full screen on my old Fx 17.0.11 ESR (that I haven't had time to upgrade to version 24 yet). YouTube videos say they are playing in HTML5 full screen but in reality I still see the title bar, menu bar, navigation bar, status bar, and Windows Task bar and my SeaMonkey theme background. I don't get the YouTube popup that says I am entering full screen and need to use the escape key to exit yet the full screen icon lower right bottom on the HTML5 player screen says I am in full screen. I also get a popup from SeaMonkey when trying to enter full screen HTML5 video that says I need further media to properly play the video and says to go to Addons Manager. Why would I need additional media to play an HTML5 video in full screen on SeaMonkey? So, is SeaMonkey 2.23 incapable of playing HTML5 YouTube videos in full screen? If so, anyone know when it will be able to do this? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23/javascript problem?
On 12/24/2013 6:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much. http://propertyrecords.montcopa.org/search/advancedsearch.aspx?mode=sales (you'll be redirected to a disclaimer page, accept and you'll be let in) In the Criteria are, you can select among several different categories. In most cases, the site works as designed. For example, if you choose Block Number, you get an input window where you can enter the desired block number. However, I've recently found that the Building Style and Municipality options don't work. In the past (at least through September 2013), selecting Municipality produced a pull-down list from which the user could select one of 62 municipalities to constrain the search. Now, nothing happens. For you, too? I don't have Firefox, so I can't test with it. I tried the site with Internet Explorer, and it's working normally (if you use IE 11 you must specify compatibility mode). Try it and see. The site claims to be HTML 3.2!! If it is, it has 98 HTML errors. I generally view such error-filled Web pages as not worth diagnosing. Hmmm... Can anyone tell me whether recent versions of Firefox, which they claim to support, have the same problem? I went there on Fx 17.0.11 ESR and automatically denied cookies when the cookie prompt appeared. Then I could not accept the disclaimer. I have zero patience with arrogant sites that require cookies for no good reason other than to track me. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23/javascript problem?
On 12/28/2013 6:19 AM, Desiree wrote: On 12/24/2013 6:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much. http://propertyrecords.montcopa.org/search/advancedsearch.aspx?mode=sales (you'll be redirected to a disclaimer page, accept and you'll be let in) In the Criteria are, you can select among several different categories. In most cases, the site works as designed. For example, if you choose Block Number, you get an input window where you can enter the desired block number. However, I've recently found that the Building Style and Municipality options don't work. In the past (at least through September 2013), selecting Municipality produced a pull-down list from which the user could select one of 62 municipalities to constrain the search. Now, nothing happens. For you, too? I don't have Firefox, so I can't test with it. I tried the site with Internet Explorer, and it's working normally (if you use IE 11 you must specify compatibility mode). Try it and see. The site claims to be HTML 3.2!! If it is, it has 98 HTML errors. I generally view such error-filled Web pages as not worth diagnosing. Hmmm... Can anyone tell me whether recent versions of Firefox, which they claim to support, have the same problem? I went there on Fx 17.0.11 ESR and automatically denied cookies when the cookie prompt appeared. Then I could not accept the disclaimer. I have zero patience with arrogant sites that require cookies for no good reason other than to track me. After making sure I have only the cookies I realy want, I mark my cookies.sqlite file read-only. Then, I accept cookies only from the requested domain. They think they are setting cookies, but they are wrong. Their cookies disappear as soon as I terminate SeaMonkey, which is several times a day. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Where does your elected official stand? Which politicians refuse to tell us where they stand? See the non-partisan Project Vote Smart at http://votesmart.org/. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23/javascript problem?
WaltS wrote: On 12/24/2013 11:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much. http://propertyrecords.montcopa.org/search/advancedsearch.aspx?mode=sales (you'll be redirected to a disclaimer page, accept and you'll be let in) In the Criteria are, you can select among several different categories. In most cases, the site works as designed. For example, if you choose Block Number, you get an input window where you can enter the desired block number. However, I've recently found that the Building Style and Municipality options don't work. In the past (at least through September 2013), selecting Municipality produced a pull-down list from which the user could select one of 62 municipalities to constrain the search. Now, nothing happens. For you, too? I don't have Firefox, so I can't test with it. I tried the site with Internet Explorer, and it's working normally (if you use IE 11 you must specify compatibility mode). Try it and see. The site claims to be HTML 3.2!! If it is, it has 98 HTML errors. I generally view such error-filled Web pages as not worth diagnosing. Hmmm... Can anyone tell me whether recent versions of Firefox, which they claim to support, have the same problem? No pull-down list for Municipality with Firefox 26.0 in my test. Nothing for Building Style either. Thanks, that's what I need to know. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23/javascript problem?
On 12/24/2013 11:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much. http://propertyrecords.montcopa.org/search/advancedsearch.aspx?mode=sales (you'll be redirected to a disclaimer page, accept and you'll be let in) In the Criteria are, you can select among several different categories. In most cases, the site works as designed. For example, if you choose Block Number, you get an input window where you can enter the desired block number. However, I've recently found that the Building Style and Municipality options don't work. In the past (at least through September 2013), selecting Municipality produced a pull-down list from which the user could select one of 62 municipalities to constrain the search. Now, nothing happens. For you, too? I don't have Firefox, so I can't test with it. I tried the site with Internet Explorer, and it's working normally (if you use IE 11 you must specify compatibility mode). Try it and see. The site claims to be HTML 3.2!! If it is, it has 98 HTML errors. I generally view such error-filled Web pages as not worth diagnosing. Hmmm... Can anyone tell me whether recent versions of Firefox, which they claim to support, have the same problem? No pull-down list for Municipality with Firefox 26.0 in my test. Nothing for Building Style either. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23/javascript problem?
On 12/28/2013 11:34 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS wrote: On 12/24/2013 11:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much. http://propertyrecords.montcopa.org/search/advancedsearch.aspx?mode=sales (you'll be redirected to a disclaimer page, accept and you'll be let in) In the Criteria are, you can select among several different categories. In most cases, the site works as designed. For example, if you choose Block Number, you get an input window where you can enter the desired block number. However, I've recently found that the Building Style and Municipality options don't work. In the past (at least through September 2013), selecting Municipality produced a pull-down list from which the user could select one of 62 municipalities to constrain the search. Now, nothing happens. For you, too? I don't have Firefox, so I can't test with it. I tried the site with Internet Explorer, and it's working normally (if you use IE 11 you must specify compatibility mode). Try it and see. The site claims to be HTML 3.2!! If it is, it has 98 HTML errors. I generally view such error-filled Web pages as not worth diagnosing. Hmmm... Can anyone tell me whether recent versions of Firefox, which they claim to support, have the same problem? No pull-down list for Municipality with Firefox 26.0 in my test. Nothing for Building Style either. Thanks, that's what I need to know. Works in Chrome/Chromium. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23/javascript problem?
Desiree wrote: I went there on Fx 17.0.11 ESR and automatically denied cookies when the cookie prompt appeared. Then I could not accept the disclaimer. I have zero patience with arrogant sites that require cookies for no good reason other than to track me. I'm a stickler for privacy, too, and I understand why you have that policy. But if you refuse to test the site, why waste your time and mine telling me that? Just ignore my query and go on with your life. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: No full screen HTML5 YouTube videos?
Jens Hatlak wrote: Desiree wrote: Why won't SeaMonkey 2.23 on Windows 8 Pro play YouTube HTML5 videos in full screen? The same videos play in full screen on my old Fx 17.0.11 ESR (that I haven't had time to upgrade to version 24 yet). That's because SM is missing the front-end integration of full-screen support. This is mainly bug 610509. Once that is fixed, maybe bug 701714 will have to be fixed as well in order to enable HTML5 full-screen video. I also get a popup from SeaMonkey when trying to enter full screen HTML5 video that says I need further media to properly play the video and says to go to Addons Manager. I wonder whether you actually switched to HTML5 video mode. Better double-check at http://www.youtube.com/html5. The additional media request suggests your SM is still trying to play using Flash. So, is SeaMonkey 2.23 incapable of playing HTML5 YouTube videos in full screen? Unfortunately yes. If so, anyone know when it will be able to do this? Whenever someone fixes the above mentioned bugs. However, to date no-one is working on them. I provided a patch for the latter, but in order to get the bugs fixed it needs a good team of at least two people: Someone who reviews patches, and someone who writes and adapts them according to the reviewer's needs. The latter is the hard part which often stalls due to time constraints. HTH Jens Interesting, because my website shows WebM videos, and if you right-click on the video while it's playing, you'll get a menu with one of the selections being Full Screen. It's not as obvious as Firefox, which actually places a full screen mode icon in the video toolbar, but it works... Aren't WebM videos shown via HTML5? -- Jaime A. Cruz Secretary Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club http://www.nassauwings.org/ AMA District 34 http://www.AMADistrict34.com/ Pop's Run http://www.popsrun.org/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: copy and paste broken again with latest upgrade
Trane Francks wrote: On 12/27/13 11:08 PM +0900, Ray_Net wrote: Trane Francks wrote, On 27/12/2013 06:05: On 12/27/13 11:56 AM +0900, Ed Mullen wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Ed Mullen wrote, On 26/12/2013 17:39: Ray_Net wrote: Rick Merrill wrote, On 26/12/2013 13:52: On 12/26/2013 3:31 AM, Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote, On 26/12/2013 07:59: Geoff Welsh wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote, On 24/12/2013 22:02: r2var...@telusplanet.net wrote: The latest SeaMonkey upgrade has broken the copy and paste feature when composing mail. As in.. can no longer select something off the desktop and paste it into an email. This was a problem.. then fixed and now broken again. Makes one want to stop automatic upgrades.. auto upgrade to SM v2.23 works for me. Right click from desktop then send to email recipient. or Open email the just click in attachment square (Upper right on mine). Then just go to whatever you want to attach. He did not speak about an attachment, he speaked about copy/paste. I, for one, have no clue about select something off the desktop and paste it into an email to even try and reproduce. And he doesn't mention OS. GW I guess I'm having a little problem understanding his problem also. I assumed he was talking about taking a file from the desktop and copying and pasting it into an email. He said: As in.. can no longer select something off the desktop and paste it into an email. Effectively, this is strange. Anyway, i test your suggestion here: and i cannot paste it here. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 I finally noticed that drag-n-drop from desktop to email only works if I compose in HTML. This may or may not be relevant! You can drag and drop a file created by notepad like testfile.txt ? I have tested here in the newgroup where i compose in HTML -***that doesnot work.* Windows 7 Pro, SM 2.23. Opened a compose window in a mail account, dragged and dropped a file from the desktop into the message body and into the attachment window. Works fine. Windows 7 Pro, SM 2.17 drag and drop into the attachment works ok. Into the message body it looks working but no result. Just a question, when you do a drag and drop into the message body what happens ? - The content of the file is copied to the body text ? I used an image file and it was embedded into the message body. - The file is inserted into the Attachment window ? I did two separate operations: DD into the message body (see above) and then DD into the attachment window which attached the file to the email message. Exactly what I expected to happen. WFM: SM 2.23, OS X 10.7.5. WFM too - It works in the body and in the attachment window when i DD an image. BUT try it with a testfile.txt created by notepad ... You will see that DD doesnot work in the body. Fascinating. I can reproduce the inability to drag-and-drop a text file into the message body on OS X. A JPG works fine; the text file, not. I had never imagined trying to do that. It doesn't strike me as a normal thing to try and do.I wouldn't expect it to work. The drive-by OP was about copy and paste anyway GW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23/javascript problem?
WaltS wrote: On 12/24/2013 11:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much. http://propertyrecords.montcopa.org/search/advancedsearch.aspx?mode=sales (you'll be redirected to a disclaimer page, accept and you'll be let in) In the Criteria are, you can select among several different categories. In most cases, the site works as designed. For example, if you choose Block Number, you get an input window where you can enter the desired block number. However, I've recently found that the Building Style and Municipality options don't work. In the past (at least through September 2013), selecting Municipality produced a pull-down list from which the user could select one of 62 municipalities to constrain the search. Now, nothing happens. For you, too? I don't have Firefox, so I can't test with it. I tried the site with Internet Explorer, and it's working normally (if you use IE 11 you must specify compatibility mode). Try it and see. The site claims to be HTML 3.2!! If it is, it has 98 HTML errors. I generally view such error-filled Web pages as not worth diagnosing. Hmmm... Can anyone tell me whether recent versions of Firefox, which they claim to support, have the same problem? No pull-down list for Municipality with Firefox 26.0 in my test. Nothing for Building Style either. Those two things still work in SM 2.0 on my PPC so the site likely hasn't changed. (That doesn't mean it was ever proper scripting to begin with thought.) GW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.23 constantly opening preview pane to warn about suspicious / junk mail
Greetings Paul, Paul Bergsagel wrote: I have never experienced this behavior with Junk email warnings. Make sure you have the preference set When I mark messages as junk: Move them to the account's 'Junk' folder I have it configured thusly. Here is a sort of screen shot of it playing its nonsense with me... http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/pub/bugs/SMJunkOpensPreviewWindowPane/ScreenshotSMJunkOpensPreviewWindowPaneCrop.jpg 1) The preview pane is opened 2) The new Mozilla text stating that gee, I think this is junk Never mind the junk status icon, I had to mock up the small screen capture. Normal behavior had been to simply move it to the junk folder. I find annoying that SM is suddenly opening the preview pane and saying gee, I think this is junk. Ddduuuaaa, seriously Mozilla!? Blessings, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: No full screen HTML5 YouTube videos?
Cruz, Jaime wrote, On 29/12/13 02:15: Jens Hatlak wrote: Desiree wrote: Why won't SeaMonkey 2.23 on Windows 8 Pro play YouTube HTML5 videos in full screen? The same videos play in full screen on my old Fx 17.0.11 ESR (that I haven't had time to upgrade to version 24 yet). That's because SM is missing the front-end integration of full-screen support. This is mainly bug 610509. Once that is fixed, maybe bug 701714 will have to be fixed as well in order to enable HTML5 full-screen video. I also get a popup from SeaMonkey when trying to enter full screen HTML5 video that says I need further media to properly play the video and says to go to Addons Manager. I wonder whether you actually switched to HTML5 video mode. Better double-check at http://www.youtube.com/html5. The additional media request suggests your SM is still trying to play using Flash. So, is SeaMonkey 2.23 incapable of playing HTML5 YouTube videos in full screen? Unfortunately yes. If so, anyone know when it will be able to do this? Whenever someone fixes the above mentioned bugs. However, to date no-one is working on them. I provided a patch for the latter, but in order to get the bugs fixed it needs a good team of at least two people: Someone who reviews patches, and someone who writes and adapts them according to the reviewer's needs. The latter is the hard part which often stalls due to time constraints. HTH Jens Interesting, because my website shows WebM videos, and if you right-click on the video while it's playing, you'll get a menu with one of the selections being Full Screen. It's not as obvious as Firefox, which actually places a full screen mode icon in the video toolbar, but it works... Aren't WebM videos shown via HTML5? Jamie, I'm using a version similar to yours, (SeaMonkey/2.25a1) and I can see the non-functional full-screen icon in the video toolbar http://www.flickr.com/photos/64156765@N03/11613664243/, but the right-click full-screen menu-entry works fine. Exiting full-screen via the big X button, at the top-right of full-screen mode, also works fine. HTH ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
address book
Just as with the SeaMonkey Cache, i would like to put all of my address book information in a specialized directory. How is that possible? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: No full screen HTML5 YouTube videos?
Desiree wrote: Why won't SeaMonkey 2.23 on Windows 8 Pro play YouTube HTML5 videos in full screen? The same videos play in full screen on my old Fx 17.0.11 ESR (that I haven't had time to upgrade to version 24 yet). YouTube videos say they are playing in HTML5 full screen but in reality I still see the title bar, menu bar, navigation bar, status bar, and Windows Task bar and my SeaMonkey theme background. I don't get the YouTube popup that says I am entering full screen and need to use the escape key to exit yet the full screen icon lower right bottom on the HTML5 player screen says I am in full screen. I also get a popup from SeaMonkey when trying to enter full screen HTML5 video that says I need further media to properly play the video and says to go to Addons Manager. Why would I need additional media to play an HTML5 video in full screen on SeaMonkey? So, is SeaMonkey 2.23 incapable of playing HTML5 YouTube videos in full screen? If so, anyone know when it will be able to do this? You can use the fullerscreen addon to achieve real fullscreen. http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#fullerscreen After installing addon hit F11 to switch between fullscreen and normal mode -- Version 3.10.2 openSUSE 13.1 (Bottle) (x86_64) 64-bit Kernel Linux 3.11.6-4-desktop ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
