SM v2.48's Print Preview's First Page and Last Page buttons...

[Ant via support-seamonkey]

https://i.cubeupload.com/NC2Fkm.gif for an example from my updated 
64-bit W7 HPE SP1 box (see the print preview toolbar). Is anyone else 
seeing this too in theirs? I did not have this problem in v2.46 and earlier.


Thank you in advance. :)
--
"Busy as ants hurrying orcs were digging, digging lines of deep trenches 
in a huge ring, just out of bowshot from the walls;" --The Return of the 
King (book)
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( )   Axe ANT from its address if e-mailing privately.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 released!

[Jonathan N. Little]

Yamo' wrote:

Hi,

David H. Durgee wrote on 7/31/17 6:35 PM:

In that case, has anyone notified the maintainer of Ubuntuzilla that the
official release of 2.48 is now available?  I would like to get back to
using that repository to update SeaMonkey as opposed to a manual install
every time an update comes out.


On my Ubuntu 16.04.3, the 2.48  can't start.




How did you install it? Here is how I did it on many systems: Open a 
terminal and follow steps 1-6 and then once you confirm it's working run 
step 7


[1]
cd Downloads

[2]
wget 
https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.48/contrib/seamonkey-2.48.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2


[3]
tar -jxvf seamonkey-2.*.tar.bz2

[4]
sudo mv /opt/seamonkey /opt/seamonkey.bak

[5]
sudo mv ./seamonkey /opt/seamonkey

[6]
sudo chown -vR root:root /opt/seamonkey

[7]
sudo rm -Rv /opt/seamonkey.bak




--
Take care,

Jonathan
---
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.50???

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

If you don't want to become a Beta tester switch to 2.49.1 when it becomes 
available.


2.50 has some problems especially with mail. If they don't bother you stay on 
it for now. The codebase is at least newer than 2.48. 2.51 is the same.


FRG


Pat Connors wrote:
I am also using 2.50.  Should I continue with it or go install the 2.48?  I am 
confused as usual.


What is this 2.50 I have been using.  I now don't even know where I got it. 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.50???

[Pat Connors]

Thanks, Ray

I have had no problems with 2.50, all of Adrian's versions have worked fine.

Keep as many versions of SM on the HDD as you would like to try.  Use 
the same profiles for each.  When there is a version you no longer 
want, delete.  Never get rid of something that works until you like 
the replacement better - including OSs. 



--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.50???

[Ray Davison]

Pat Connors wrote:

I am also using 2.50.  Should I continue with it or go install the
2.48?  I am confused as usual.


What is this 2.50 I have been using.  I now don't even know where I
got it.


Keep as many versions of SM on the HDD as you would like to try.  Use 
the same profiles for each.  When there is a version you no longer want, 
delete.  Never get rid of something that works until you like the 
replacement better - including OSs.


Ray


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Starting SM empties profile data files

[Ray Davison]

HP Pavilion dv7

The as-shipped plus updates W7 home is on one partition.
W7U is on another partition.

The following SMs are on an apps partition.  I started using 2.50 a few 
months ago.  I just got 2.48 and am using it now.


User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 
Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46

Build identifier: 20161213183751

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 
Firefox/51.0 SeaMonkey/2.48

Build identifier: 20170707010522

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:53.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0 SeaMonkey/2.50

Build identifier: 20170424091539

The profiles are on a data partition.  Mail is in a separate tree on the 
same data partition as the profiles.


OSs, apps and data structure has been stable for a few years.

*

I mostly use the W7U partition.  I took the machine on the road for 
forty days, and all seemed OK.  When I got home the first time I ran SM 
2.50 under W7U there was no personal data.  Prefs.js had been replaced 
by three zero files numbered i,2,3, and one basic prefs.js file.  Later 
I noticed other data files were also empty.


I replaced the profile, booted W7 home, and everything was OK.  I tried 
all three of the above SM versions, and if I run any SM version under 
W7U it trashes the data files.


I have had a file manager open and watched the files being changed.  I 
have a monitor that catches the activity, but most of the files are 
changed before I can click block.


Whatever is causing this seems to only effect the profile, but is not 
located in the profile, nor the app, because replacing those has no effect.


Ideas?

TY
Ray

PS: Things like this is a primary reason I have redundant OSs.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.50???

[Pat Connors]

I am also using 2.50.  Should I continue with it or go install the 
2.48?  I am confused as usual.


What is this 2.50 I have been using.  I now don't even know where I 
got it. 

--
Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.50???

[Mason83]

On 04/08/2017 17:50, Ray Davison wrote:

> What is this 2.50 I have been using.  I now don't even know where I got it.
> 
> You are currently on the release update channel.
> Build identifier: 20170424091539

You probably got it from there:

https://web.archive.org/web/https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/

i.e. an unofficial build from Adrian.

Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E MAIL CRASHES ON 2.48

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

> I jumped on the ESR as soon as Adrian published it.
> The source code is ready, it just needs to be compiled.

Nope. Just found out the OS X bug wasn't fixed for 52. TB took it into a 
branch. We need to do the same or maybe use the branch from the next TB which 
should be due soon.


There were some real problems in early 2.49 builds. The last ones got just 
fixed last week. Browsing was usually fine but mail had it share of them. Look 
at reports for early TB 52 versions. A lot of unhappy campers out there. Most 
were caused by changes in mozilla code which tightened security or just 
changed something... Thankfully the TB devs fixed the nasty ones so that we 
can profit from their work.


FRG

Mason83 wrote:

On 04/08/2017 14:34, WaltS48 wrote:

On 8/4/17 3:06 AM, Mason83 wrote:

On 04/08/2017 04:12, Edmund Wong wrote:

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

It is probably bug 1286613:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286613

Solution is unfortunately to go back to 2.46 and wait for 2.49.1. Not
sure if we can backport all the parts to 2.48 and do a 2.48.1


It is worth doing that if it fixes problems.


Isn't it far simpler to push a 2.49.1 release?


How long did you have to wait for 2.48?


I jumped on the ESR as soon as Adrian published it.
The source code is ready, it just needs to be compiled.

I don't understand the difference between Adrian's builds
and official builds...

Regards.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SM 2.50???

[Ray Davison]

What is this 2.50 I have been using.  I now don't even know where I got it.

You are currently on the release update channel.
Build identifier: 20170424091539

TY
Ray
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: win64 contributed builds.

[Dirk Munk]

I'm running 2.53a1 (downloaded this afternoon), and I noticed that mail 
doesn't follow the HTML preference in a contact entry. I have to use 
Options to send the message in HTML.


Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Got a late beta fix and is now working in 2.53+

2.54 is broken right now. I wouldn't touch it for a week at least. 
Need some time to fix up the tree.


FRG

TCW wrote:
I reverted back to Adrian's 2.52 beta for now. Thanks for the info on 
ABP though.



 > Well, got my first crash with this new build:
 > 
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/83db8b72-a57f-4010-8ead-ae2f70170802 



Uninstall Adblock+ 2.9.1. and use 2.8.2. Currently much better 
anyway. Top crasher for Thunderbird too. Some Web extension changes 
a few weeks ago caused this. Fx also crashes now occasionally during 
shutdown.


FRG

TCW wrote:

On 8/2/2017 5:07 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:

Hi Everyone,

Just wanna mention that I've generated the very first set of
Win64 builds.

I've set up a schedule to generate both 32 and 64 bit nightlies.

But while it's building 2.53, Win64 isn't officially 'contributed'
until (tentatively) 2.54 (which gives us some time to figure the 
quirks

of Win64 building).

Please do check it out.  At this moment, I would just download
the ZIP file (as opposed to the Installer... unless you're running
it on a spare computer.)

http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/seamonkey-2.53a1.en-US.win64.zip 



Edmund

PS: Not entirely sure if I generated it right even if the 
about:support

shows Win64.  So feedback appreciated.  (Getting a bad feeling I
did something wrong...)



Well, got my first crash with this new build: 
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/83db8b72-a57f-4010-8ead-ae2f70170802 







___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E MAIL CRASHES ON 2.48

[Mason83]

On 04/08/2017 14:34, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 8/4/17 3:06 AM, Mason83 wrote:
>> On 04/08/2017 04:12, Edmund Wong wrote:
>>> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
 It is probably bug 1286613:

 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286613

 Solution is unfortunately to go back to 2.46 and wait for 2.49.1. Not
 sure if we can backport all the parts to 2.48 and do a 2.48.1
>>>
>>> It is worth doing that if it fixes problems.
>>
>> Isn't it far simpler to push a 2.49.1 release?
> 
> How long did you have to wait for 2.48?

I jumped on the ESR as soon as Adrian published it.
The source code is ready, it just needs to be compiled.

I don't understand the difference between Adrian's builds
and official builds...

Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: win64 contributed builds.

[TCW]

\o/ Looking forward to testing whenever it appears. Thanks for the update.


Got a late beta fix and is now working in 2.53+

2.54 is broken right now. I wouldn't touch it for a week at least. Need 
some time to fix up the tree.


FRG

TCW wrote:
I reverted back to Adrian's 2.52 beta for now. Thanks for the info on 
ABP though.



 > Well, got my first crash with this new build:
 > 
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/83db8b72-a57f-4010-8ead-ae2f70170802 



Uninstall Adblock+ 2.9.1. and use 2.8.2. Currently much better 
anyway. Top crasher for Thunderbird too. Some Web extension changes a 
few weeks ago caused this. Fx also crashes now occasionally during 
shutdown.


FRG

TCW wrote:

On 8/2/2017 5:07 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:

Hi Everyone,

Just wanna mention that I've generated the very first set of
Win64 builds.

I've set up a schedule to generate both 32 and 64 bit nightlies.

But while it's building 2.53, Win64 isn't officially 'contributed'
until (tentatively) 2.54 (which gives us some time to figure the 
quirks

of Win64 building).

Please do check it out.  At this moment, I would just download
the ZIP file (as opposed to the Installer... unless you're running
it on a spare computer.)

http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/seamonkey-2.53a1.en-US.win64.zip 



Edmund

PS: Not entirely sure if I generated it right even if the 
about:support

shows Win64.  So feedback appreciated.  (Getting a bad feeling I
did something wrong...)



Well, got my first crash with this new build: 
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/83db8b72-a57f-4010-8ead-ae2f70170802 







___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 released!

[lxuser via support-seamonkey]

On 04/08/17 22:33, WaltS48 wrote:

On 8/4/17 5:26 AM, Yamo' wrote:

Hi,

David H. Durgee wrote on 7/31/17 6:35 PM:

In that case, has anyone notified the maintainer of Ubuntuzilla that the
official release of 2.48 is now available?  I would like to get back to
using that repository to update SeaMonkey as opposed to a manual install
every time an update comes out.


On my Ubuntu 16.04.3, the 2.48  can't start.


I can conform that too on Ubuntu Mate 17.04 (i.e. tarball extracted to 
user home directory).


https://download.mozilla.org/?product=seamonkey-2.48=linux=en-US


Where did you install 2.48 from?

The SeaMonkey contributed build 64-bit version downloaded and installed 
from  works just 
fine for me on 16.04.3 LTS.


I can confirm that too on Ubuntu Mate 17.04 (i.e. tarball extracted to 
user home directory).


Downloaded both from the following link page:
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.48/contrib/seamonkey-2.48.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2

Cheers,
Peter
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E MAIL CRASHES ON 2.48

[WaltS48]

On 8/4/17 3:06 AM, Mason83 wrote:

On 04/08/2017 04:12, Edmund Wong wrote:

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

It is probably bug 1286613:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286613

Solution is unfortunately to go back to 2.46 and wait for 2.49.1. Not
sure if we can backport all the parts to 2.48 and do a 2.48.1


It is worth doing that if it fixes problems.


Isn't it far simpler to push a 2.49.1 release?

Regards.



How long did you have to wait for 2.48?

Probably not far simpler.

--
Go Bucs!
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Unity Desktop
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 released!

[WaltS48]

On 8/4/17 5:26 AM, Yamo' wrote:

Hi,

David H. Durgee wrote on 7/31/17 6:35 PM:

In that case, has anyone notified the maintainer of Ubuntuzilla that the
official release of 2.48 is now available?  I would like to get back to
using that repository to update SeaMonkey as opposed to a manual install
every time an update comes out.


On my Ubuntu 16.04.3, the 2.48  can't start.




Where did you install 2.48 from?

The SeaMonkey contributed build 64-bit version downloaded and installed 
from  works just 
fine for me on 16.04.3 LTS.


--
Go Bucs!
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Unity Desktop
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Cannot contact my router.

[marksattler]

On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:54:49 PM UTC-5, marks...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Just updated to 2.48 a few minutes ago.  Now I cannot contact my router at 
> 192.168.11 anymore.  I get a red error screen saying...401 Authorization 
> Required
> This server could not verify that you are authorized to access. Either you 
> supplied the wrong credentials(e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn't 
> understand how to supply the credentials required.
> 
> I never had a problem before since going to Seamonkey from Netscape.  It used 
> to bring up a dialog box with the password and I just had to click OK to 
> connect to the router.
> 
> This release broke it.  Have not yet tried to reinstall 2.46 yet.
> Any ideas?
> 
> Mark

I downgraded to 2.40 because it was the latest that I had already downloaded 
and had saved.  I must have done the 2.46 update automatically.  
I see that the 1350152 bug is marked as resolved as of 11 hours ago.
I assume that means that I must wait for the next release beyond 2.48 for the 
fix to be active?  If so, I will download and manually reinstall 2.46 in the 
meantime.
Thank you for your information.
Mark
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 released!

[Yamo']

Hi,

David H. Durgee wrote on 7/31/17 6:35 PM:
> In that case, has anyone notified the maintainer of Ubuntuzilla that the 
> official release of 2.48 is now available?  I would like to get back to 
> using that repository to update SeaMonkey as opposed to a manual install 
> every time an update comes out.

On my Ubuntu 16.04.3, the 2.48  can't start.


-- 

Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
http://pasdenom.info/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: FF 57 Changes and SeaMonkey

[Richmond via support-seamonkey]

Paul Bergsagel  writes:

> Hi,
>
> I am wondering how all the new changes to FF57 will effect SeaMonkey?
>
> Will most of the changes be to the rendering engine, Gecko (or whatever the
> new rendering engine will be called). Will we see a lot of new changes to how
> we as end users interact with and use SeaMonkey?
>
> Can anyone provide an update as to what the changes to FF 57 will mean for
> SeaMonkey?
>
> Thanks.

You can get some idea of the future from the minutes:

https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2017-07-23

For a while Seamonkey will be based on Firefox ESR which is currently
52. 52.8 will be hanging around in mid 2018.

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/

The world could change by then.

(I am not a developer, just sticking my oar in)

-- 
~
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: E MAIL CRASHES ON 2.48

[Mason83]

On 04/08/2017 04:12, Edmund Wong wrote:
> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>> It is probably bug 1286613:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286613
>>
>> Solution is unfortunately to go back to 2.46 and wait for 2.49.1. Not
>> sure if we can backport all the parts to 2.48 and do a 2.48.1
> 
> It is worth doing that if it fixes problems.

Isn't it far simpler to push a 2.49.1 release?

Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Cannot contact my router.

[Mason83]

On 04/08/2017 03:54, marksattler wrote:

> Just updated to 2.48 a few minutes ago.  Now I cannot contact my
> router at 192.168.11 anymore.  I get a red error screen
> saying...401 Authorization Required
> 
> This server could not verify that you are authorized to access.
> Either you supplied the wrong credentials(e.g., bad password), or
> your browser doesn't understand how to supply the credentials
> required.
> 
> I never had a problem before since going to Seamonkey from Netscape.
> It used to bring up a dialog box with the password and I just had to
> click OK to connect to the router.
>
> This release broke it.  Have not yet tried to reinstall 2.46 yet.
> Any ideas?

Known bug.
Work-around: close and restart SM in browser mode.

(Why would you downgrade to 2.40?)

See these threads:

Subject: might some change in 2.48 break some web servers?
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:15:23 -0400

Subject: Problems with sites requiring authentication
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 23:32:31 +0200

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347857
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1350152

Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey