Re: Context option "Copy" doesn't work with links

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Hartmut Figge wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher:


If I right-click a link in an incoming or sent plain-text email,
where SM has already recognized the text as a link and displayed it
in blue underline,


That's still so.


I'm offered options including "Copy" and "Copy link." The latter
works as expected, but the former does nothing.


Hm- The latter is "Copy Link Location". I don't see "Copy Link".


You're right, of course, I misspoke.


I suspect this is because no text is selected, so "Copy" has
nothing to copy and leaves the clipboard intact (it doesn't copy a
null string and thereby clear the clipboard). But if that is so,
shouldn't "Copy" be grayed out?


If "Copy" is supposed to do nothing, then surely the menu entry
should be greyed out. Greyed? Grayed? Hm.


"Gray" is American, "grey" is British. Six of one, half-a-dozen of the 
other, or as the Russians say, один черт ("one devil").


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Context option "Copy" doesn't work with links

[David E. Ross]

On 3/26/2018 9:29 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> If I right-click a link in an incoming or sent plain-text email, where 
> SM has already recognized the text as a link and displayed it in blue 
> underline, I'm offered options including "Copy" and "Copy link." The 
> latter works as expected, but the former does nothing.
> 
> I suspect this is because no text is selected, so "Copy" has nothing to 
> copy and leaves the clipboard intact (it doesn't copy a null string and 
> thereby clear the clipboard). But if that is so, shouldn't "Copy" be 
> grayed out?
> 

If you want to copy a link as text, you must first mark it,  That is,
you place your cursor at one end (or just beyond to avoid triggering the
link) and -- holding down your keyboard's Shift key -- drag the cursor
to the other end.

-- 
David E. Ross


First you say you do, and then you don't.
And then you say you will, but then won't.
You're undecided now, so what're you goin' to do?
From a 1950s song
That should be Donald Trump's theme song.  He obviously
does not understand "commitment", whether it is about
policy or marriage.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Context option "Copy" doesn't work with links

[Hartmut Figge]

Paul B. Gallagher:

>If I right-click a link in an incoming or sent plain-text email, where 
>SM has already recognized the text as a link and displayed it in blue 
>underline,

That's still so.

>I'm offered options including "Copy" and "Copy link." The 
>latter works as expected, but the former does nothing.

Hm- The latter is "Copy Link Location". I don't see "Copy Link".
"Copy Link Location" works and "Copy" does nothing. But, I never used
"Copy" before, as far as I can recall, so I don't know if the behavior
was different in old times.

I'm using the last usable SM-Trunk and a recent Mail from Bugzilla.
There is always a link in those. :)

>I suspect this is because no text is selected, so "Copy" has nothing to 
>copy and leaves the clipboard intact (it doesn't copy a null string and 
>thereby clear the clipboard). But if that is so, shouldn't "Copy" be 
>grayed out?

If "Copy" is supposed to do nothing, then surely the menu entry should
be greyed out. Greyed? Grayed? Hm.

But that is a very low issue on current SM-Trunk. ;)

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Awful memory leaks

[Mason83]

Hello,

There is, as far as I can see, a large memory leak somewhere
in the TB code:

2,790,110,536 B (100.0%) -- explicit
+--2,359,661,280 B (84.57%) -- maildb
¦  +737,522,464 B (26.43%) -- database(news://SNIP
¦  +692,232,288 B (24.81%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +222,021,472 B (07.96%) -- database(news://SNIP
¦  +180,562,496 B (06.47%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +138,690,496 B (04.97%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +121,302,864 B (04.35%) -- database(snews://SNIP
¦  +-96,929,744 B (03.47%) -- database(snews://SNIP
¦  +-48,629,440 B (01.74%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +-42,458,432 B (01.52%) -- database(snews://SNIP
¦  +-24,473,008 B (00.88%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +-21,606,800 B (00.77%) -- database(news://SNIP
¦  +-10,834,000 B (00.39%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +--5,589,824 B (00.20%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +--4,862,032 B (00.17%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +--3,337,296 B (00.12%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +--2,627,888 B (00.09%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +--1,382,832 B (00.05%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +786,896 B (00.03%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +786,128 B (00.03%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +674,128 B (00.02%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +503,184 B (00.02%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +481,776 B (00.02%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +341,904 B (00.01%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +240,256 B (00.01%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +166,416 B (00.01%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +164,352 B (00.01%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +143,680 B (00.01%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +103,104 B (00.00%) -- database(imap://SNIP
¦  +103,104 B (00.00%) -- database(mailbox://SNIP
¦  +102,976 B (00.00%) -- database(imap://SNIP


737 MB of RAM to store the index of a single newsgroup?
And 692 MB for my main inbox? Something looks fishy there.


   76 B ── gfx-surface-image
  768 B ── gfx-surface-xlib
0 B ── gfx-textures
0 B ── gfx-textures-peak
0 B ── gfx-tiles-waste
  0 ── ghost-windows
2,112,485,288 B ── heap-allocated
1,048,576 B ── heap-chunksize
2,320,498,688 B ── heap-mapped
  0 ── host-object-urls
   24,929,212 B ── imagelib-surface-cache-estimated-locked
   24,930,812 B ── imagelib-surface-cache-estimated-total
  0 ── imagelib-surface-cache-overflow-count
5,087,232 B ── js-main-runtime-temporary-peak
 25,966 ── page-faults-hard
386,639,447 ── page-faults-soft
2,847,887,360 B ── resident
3,155,869,696 B ── resident-peak
2,574,921,728 B ── resident-unique
0 B ── system-heap-allocated
5,839,982,592 B ── vsize


5.8 GB of VM for a few tabs open sounds completely unreasonable.

Is there any work around other than quitting/restarting SM?

Regards.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: No automatic upgrades for this version, in red on home screen.

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Mort Linder wrote:

I downloaded the latest version of Sea Monkey, 2.49.2, and still get a 
notice in red letters on the home page, that there will be no automatic 
upgrades. What can I do to get these upgrades? I am running Windows 7 
Pro 64 bit.


If all you did was "download" it, you haven't installed it.

But if you mean to say you "installed" it (which is what it looks like 
from your user agent string), you're fine. The notice at 
 is still correct for people wishing 
to upgrade from previous versions.


What will happen for future versions is anyone's guess -- "watch this 
space," as they say.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

No automatic upgrades for this version, in red on home screen.

[Mort Linder]

Hi,

I downloaded the latest version of Sea Monkey, 2.49.2, and still get a 
notice in red letters on the home page, that there will be no automatic 
upgrades . What can I do to get these upgrades? I am running Windows 7 
Pro 64 bit.


Thank you.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Context option "Copy" doesn't work with links

[Paul B. Gallagher]

If I right-click a link in an incoming or sent plain-text email, where 
SM has already recognized the text as a link and displayed it in blue 
underline, I'm offered options including "Copy" and "Copy link." The 
latter works as expected, but the former does nothing.


I suspect this is because no text is selected, so "Copy" has nothing to 
copy and leaves the clipboard intact (it doesn't copy a null string and 
thereby clear the clipboard). But if that is so, shouldn't "Copy" be 
grayed out?


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Multi-selection not working in message lists

[Andrey ``Bass'' Shcheglov]

Hello,

I have Alt instead of Ctrl set as the default accelerator as described
in :

> user_pref("ui.key.accelKey", 18);
> user_pref("ui.key.menuAccessKey", 0);

This is the behavior Netscape 4.x used to have on Unices.

Surprisingly, starting with version 2.46, I'm no longer able to select
multiple mail/news messages with Ctrl key pressed (to be able to do so
in 2.46+, I have to revert ui.key.accelKey and ui.key.menuAccessKey to
their default values).

Version 2.40 was the last one not affected by this regression.

Is this a known problem?

Regards,
Andrey.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Adblock Plus Issue

[Tom Pamin]

Yes, I'm just referring to Adblock appearing on my dropdown Tools menu. 
I just enabled and disabled AB again, and now it has disappeared from my 
Tools menu.



Daniel wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 26/03/18 01:21:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 2018-03-24 3:38 PM, Tom Pamin wrote:

I grew tired of so many web pages asking me to turn off Adblock
Plus, so I disabled the SM extension on my Win 10 desktop and Win 7
laptops. The laptops seem OK, as the Adblock Plus title has
disappeared from the SM Tools dropdown list. But it did not
disappear on my desktop, so I don't know if it's still active or
not. Anyone know why the desktop still shows Adblock Plus under Tools?


I think in a case like this, it would be very useful to actually see
what you're referring to by "it did not disappear on my desktop". If
you can create a screenshot (see
)
and upload it to an image hosting site such as Dropbox, Google Drive,
Box, Microsoft OneDrive, etc, that would help everyone know what
you're referring to.


It seems pretty clear to me since he said, "The laptops seem OK, as
the Adblock Plus title has disappeared from the SM Tools dropdown
list. But it did not disappear on my desktop [computer]" and "Anyone
know why the desktop [computer] still shows Adblock Plus under Tools?"
Do you really need a screenshot of his desktop computer's SM Tools menu?


Reading the OP's post, I'm wondering if Tom hasn't got an icon on his
computers desktop (not just with-in his SM) and is wondering why this
desktop icon hasn't disappeared when the add-on has been deleted from
the SM Add-on's list.

May not be what Tom means, so a picture might help!



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Adblock Plus Issue

[Daniel]

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 26/03/18 01:21:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 2018-03-24 3:38 PM, Tom Pamin wrote:
I grew tired of so many web pages asking me to turn off Adblock Plus, 
so I disabled the SM extension on my Win 10 desktop and Win 7 
laptops. The laptops seem OK, as the Adblock Plus title has 
disappeared from the SM Tools dropdown list. But it did not disappear 
on my desktop, so I don't know if it's still active or not. Anyone 
know why the desktop still shows Adblock Plus under Tools?


I think in a case like this, it would be very useful to actually see 
what you're referring to by "it did not disappear on my desktop". If 
you can create a screenshot (see 
) 
and upload it to an image hosting site such as Dropbox, Google Drive, 
Box, Microsoft OneDrive, etc, that would help everyone know what 
you're referring to.


It seems pretty clear to me since he said, "The laptops seem OK, as the 
Adblock Plus title has disappeared from the SM Tools dropdown list. But 
it did not disappear on my desktop [computer]" and "Anyone know why the 
desktop [computer] still shows Adblock Plus under Tools?" Do you really 
need a screenshot of his desktop computer's SM Tools menu?


Reading the OP's post, I'm wondering if Tom hasn't got an icon on his 
computers desktop (not just with-in his SM) and is wondering why this 
desktop icon hasn't disappeared when the add-on has been deleted from 
the SM Add-on's list.


May not be what Tom means, so a picture might help!

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418


User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey