Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.2 released!

[noob]

Done thanks
WaltS48 wrote:

On 5/8/20 9:29 AM, noob wrote:

How, there's no RSS link there :/


This one should work for you. 



Add it to your Blogs & News Feeds account.



Ant wrote:
Got this RSS feed at 1:56 AM PDT: ::seamonkeyblog:: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 
has been released! @ 
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2020/05/03/seamonkey-2-53-2-has-been-released/ 








___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.2 released!

[noob]

Done thanks
Ant wrote:

https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/feed/

On 5/8/2020 6:29 AM, noob wrote:

How, there's no RSS link there :/

Ant wrote:
Got this RSS feed at 1:56 AM PDT: ::seamonkeyblog:: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 
has been released! @ 
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2020/05/03/seamonkey-2-53-2-has-been-released/ 




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Opening an attached PDF file

[WaltS48]

Ken wrote:

WaltS48 wrote:

On 5/8/20 2:19 PM, Ken wrote:

Cecil Bankston wrote:

Ken wrote:
I recently upgraded from version 2.49.5 to version 2.53.2 and I 
seem to have lost the ability to open (in Email) an attached PDF 
file I received.  Previously I had done so by clicking on the 
attached file and choosing OPEN.  I can save the file to a folder 
and open it there, but I would like to open the file in MAIL if 
possible.  I downloaded and installed PDF Viewer, but that seems to 
have no effect.  Any ideas what might have happened or how to get 
this ability back??


Look in Helper Applications in the Browser section of Preferences. 
You can specify what application will be used to open any file type.




Appreciate your reply and suggestion, but that did not change the 
situation.  Any other ideas??  The browser seems to work just fine, 
it is within the MAIL part that it fails to open.


So you receive PDF attachments and they don't open in the browser?


It opens in the browser, but not in the MAIL component.


What did your Helper Application indicate they should be opening with?


It initially said to choose, but I set it to Acrobat Reader DC.  That 
did not solve the problem.


I think if you have a working PDF Viewer extension the Content Type 
should be "Portable Document Format(PDF)" and the Action "Preview in 
SeaMonkey" (Maybe Firefox).






I've never had any attachment open in the Mail window.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Opening an attached PDF file

[Ken]

WaltS48 wrote:

On 5/8/20 2:19 PM, Ken wrote:

Cecil Bankston wrote:

Ken wrote:
I recently upgraded from version 2.49.5 to version 2.53.2 and I seem 
to have lost the ability to open (in Email) an attached PDF file I 
received.  Previously I had done so by clicking on the attached file 
and choosing OPEN.  I can save the file to a folder and open it 
there, but I would like to open the file in MAIL if possible.  I 
downloaded and installed PDF Viewer, but that seems to have no 
effect.  Any ideas what might have happened or how to get this 
ability back??


Look in Helper Applications in the Browser section of Preferences. 
You can specify what application will be used to open any file type.




Appreciate your reply and suggestion, but that did not change the 
situation.  Any other ideas??  The browser seems to work just fine, it 
is within the MAIL part that it fails to open.


So you receive PDF attachments and they don't open in the browser?


It opens in the browser, but not in the MAIL component.


What did your Helper Application indicate they should be opening with?


It initially said to choose, but I set it to Acrobat Reader DC.  That 
did not solve the problem.


I think if you have a working PDF Viewer extension the Content Type 
should be "Portable Document Format(PDF)" and the Action "Preview in 
SeaMonkey" (Maybe Firefox).




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Opening an attached PDF file

[Cecil Bankston]

Ken wrote:

Cecil Bankston wrote:

Ken wrote:
I recently upgraded from version 2.49.5 to version 2.53.2 and I seem 
to have lost the ability to open (in Email) an attached PDF file I 
received.  Previously I had done so by clicking on the attached file 
and choosing OPEN.  I can save the file to a folder and open it 
there, but I would like to open the file in MAIL if possible.  I 
downloaded and installed PDF Viewer, but that seems to have no 
effect.  Any ideas what might have happened or how to get this 
ability back??


Look in Helper Applications in the Browser section of Preferences.  
You can specify what application will be used to open any file type.




Appreciate your reply and suggestion, but that did not change the 
situation.  Any other ideas??  The browser seems to work just fine, it 
is within the MAIL part that it fails to open.


The Helper Applications preferences appear to apply to browser and mail 
even though they are in the Browser section.  You may need to adjust the 
settings for 3 Content Types: Adobe Acrobat Document, PDF file 
(application/download), and PDF file (application/x-PDF).  Mine 
defaulted to Always ask.  I clicked Use other, and selected Adobe 
Acrobat Reader DC from the list of choices.  Double-clicking or opening 
a PDF attachment now opens the file in an Acrobat Reader window.


--
C. Bankston
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Opening an attached PDF file

[WaltS48]

On 5/8/20 2:19 PM, Ken wrote:

Cecil Bankston wrote:

Ken wrote:
I recently upgraded from version 2.49.5 to version 2.53.2 and I seem 
to have lost the ability to open (in Email) an attached PDF file I 
received.  Previously I had done so by clicking on the attached file 
and choosing OPEN.  I can save the file to a folder and open it 
there, but I would like to open the file in MAIL if possible.  I 
downloaded and installed PDF Viewer, but that seems to have no 
effect.  Any ideas what might have happened or how to get this 
ability back??


Look in Helper Applications in the Browser section of Preferences.  
You can specify what application will be used to open any file type.




Appreciate your reply and suggestion, but that did not change the 
situation.  Any other ideas??  The browser seems to work just fine, it 
is within the MAIL part that it fails to open.


So you receive PDF attachments and they don't open in the browser?

What did your Helper Application indicate they should be opening with?

I think if you have a working PDF Viewer extension the Content Type 
should be "Portable Document Format(PDF)" and the Action "Preview in 
SeaMonkey" (Maybe Firefox).


--
OS: Ubuntu Linux 18.04LTS - Gnome Desktop
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/get-involved/
https://give.thunderbird.net/en-US/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Ant]

On 5/8/2020 2:47 PM, rmpbklyn wrote:

try another webbrowser or phone to isolate.
check that an adblocker is not conflicting eg, in terminal type ping   
eg, ping google.com
see if you get response, if not might be the firewall
you can also clear the dns cache,depends on the os and brower

try a different profile or create a new one to see if its an extension  or 
script you installed that interferring

if certificate error , you may need to update the certificate they come with 
the browser but if not updated version may have old 'expired' certificates that 
have old dates
either get the new certificates by updating browser  OR  download the 
certficate in impport.
you many export from a newer browser as IE(even if you don't want to use) you 
can apply those certificates to your browser
they are in a 'universal format' named something like Dig..RootCA.crt

or  SymantecClass1/1 pubblicCertifcaiton Authority.crt
but only download from a known browser and not a fork/clone that may have 
invalid certificates.
(btw i ran into this issue bec using  browser on xp,bec of db program that I 
cann't install on my current
os therefore using a virtual machine) , if all fails try a virtual machine of 
an newer os if you dont want to distrupt your settings at the least you can 
always delete the clone and it runs in sandbox , thats how many ppl open 
old-games


The web site issue is gone/fixed as of 1:09 PM PDT. Another weird part 
is that private mode in the same profile session didn't show it at 1:41 
AM PDT. Weird.

--
:) National Nurse Wk. ..!.. heat wave & illness like 
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2! :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Ant]

On 5/8/2020 1:46 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
...
Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the 
same profile. Hmm!


Has to do with hsts. There is a list in the profile which needs to be 
edited. I encountered it once. I think was a mix of Noscript, some 
options and the preload list. Forgot how I solved it. Same version 
would show the override in one vm and don't in another.


Interesting. If you or anyone ever remembers it, then please kindly 
feel free to post about it. For now, https://videos.antville.org works 
again since its expired SSL certificate issue was fixed. I am sure I 
will run into another HTTPS web site with this issue again which 
happens once in a while. :(


https://badssl.com/


Thanks, bookmarked, and nice duplicate posts. https://expired.badssl.com 
worked and showed the one I was looking for:


"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to expired.badssl.com, but 
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. 
However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you 
shouldn't continue.

Technical Details

expired.badssl.com uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Sunday, April 12, 2015, 4:59 PM. The current 
time is Friday, May 08, 2020, 3:16 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE
I Understand the Risks

If you understand what's going on, you can tell SeaMonkey to start 
trusting this website's identification. Even if you trust the website, 
this error could mean that someone is tampering with your connection.


Don't add an exception unless you know there's a good reason why this 
website doesn't use trusted identification." with its "Add Exception" 
button option that I was looking for.



However, you said HSTS earlier which I saw a few in https://badssl.com's 
list. I tried its red https://subdomain.preloaded-hsts.badssl.com which 
was probably the closest to the one I ran into last night, but it also 
let me add an exception. It didn't show "This site uses HTTP Strict 
Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that SeaMonkey only connect to it 
securely. As a result, it is not possible to add an exception for this 
certificate... uses an invalid security certificate Error code: 
SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


Hmm! My SeaMonkey must be possessed or something! :O
--
:) National Nurse Wk. ..!.. heat wave & illness like 
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2! :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[rmpbklyn]

try another webbrowser or phone to isolate.
check that an adblocker is not conflicting eg, in terminal type ping   
eg, ping google.com
see if you get response, if not might be the firewall
you can also clear the dns cache,depends on the os and brower

try a different profile or create a new one to see if its an extension  or 
script you installed that interferring

if certificate error , you may need to update the certificate they come with 
the browser but if not updated version may have old 'expired' certificates that 
have old dates
either get the new certificates by updating browser  OR  download the 
certficate in impport.
you many export from a newer browser as IE(even if you don't want to use) you 
can apply those certificates to your browser
they are in a 'universal format' named something like Dig..RootCA.crt

or  SymantecClass1/1 pubblicCertifcaiton Authority.crt
but only download from a known browser and not a fork/clone that may have 
invalid certificates. 
(btw i ran into this issue bec using  browser on xp,bec of db program that I 
cann't install on my current 
os therefore using a virtual machine) , if all fails try a virtual machine of 
an newer os if you dont want to distrupt your settings at the least you can 
always delete the clone and it runs in sandbox , thats how many ppl open 
old-games 





On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 12:46:24 AM UTC-4, Ant wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:
> 
> "This Connection is Untrusted
> 
> You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but 
> we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
> 
> Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
> trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. 
> However, this website's identity can't be verified.
> What Should I Do?
> 
> If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
> could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you 
> shouldn't continue.
> 
> This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
> SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not possible 
> to add an exception for this certificate.
> Technical Details
> 
> videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.
> 
> The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The current 
> time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.
> 
> Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".
> 
> 
> In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or not. I 
> did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. In Firefox 
> v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey remove this 
> while Firefox still has it?
> 
> Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)
> -- 
> :) National Nurse Wk. ..!.. heat wave & illness like 
> COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2! :(
> Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
> this signature correctly.
> /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
>/ /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
>   | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
>  \ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
>   ( )

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't use Seamonkey 2.53.2

[Gerry Hickman via support-seamonkey]

Yamo' wrote:

I cannot use the latest version there must be something that happen
during the upgrade...


You need to clarify what you mean by "upgrade"?
I thought the install process on Linux was just to extract the x64 
binaries, so the upgrade process would be:


1. Write down the profile location
2. Back up the profile
3. Back up the old SeaMonkey binaries
4. Extract the new SeaMonkey binaries


--
Gerry Hickman (London UK)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Is there an add-on that blocks Twitter promoted tweets?

[Jonathan Wilson]

Is there an add-on for blocking Twitter promoted tweets that actually works
I tried a number of different ad-blockers and other things claiming to 
block promoted tweets (both on SeaMonkey and on a copy of Firefox I had 
laying around) but nothing out there seems to be able to block them. Does 
such a thing exist? (for SeaMonkey ideally but even something for another 
browser that works would help since it would give me useful info on where 
to start in terms of blocking these things)


Or has Twitter finally made it impossible for blockers to tell the 
difference between a promoted tweet and a regular tweet?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Ant wrote:

On 5/8/2020 3:31 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Ant wrote:

On 5/8/2020 1:21 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but 
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. 
However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you 
shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not possible 
to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The current 
time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or not. I 
did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. In Firefox 
v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey remove this 
while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and clicking 
on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i 
access to this web page.


Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the same 
profile. Hmm!


Has to do with hsts. There is a list in the profile which needs to be 
edited. I encountered it once. I think was a mix of Noscript, some options 
and the preload list. Forgot how I solved it. Same version would show the 
override in one vm and don't in another.


Interesting. If you or anyone ever remembers it, then please kindly feel free 
to post about it. For now, https://videos.antville.org works again since its 
expired SSL certificate issue was fixed. I am sure I will run into another 
HTTPS web site with this issue again which happens once in a while. :(


https://badssl.com/

FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Ant wrote:

On 5/8/2020 3:31 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Ant wrote:

On 5/8/2020 1:21 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but 
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. 
However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you 
shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not possible 
to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The current 
time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or not. I 
did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. In Firefox 
v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey remove this 
while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and clicking 
on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i 
access to this web page.


Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the same 
profile. Hmm!


Has to do with hsts. There is a list in the profile which needs to be 
edited. I encountered it once. I think was a mix of Noscript, some options 
and the preload list. Forgot how I solved it. Same version would show the 
override in one vm and don't in another.


Interesting. If you or anyone ever remembers it, then please kindly feel free 
to post about it. For now, https://videos.antville.org works again since its 
expired SSL certificate issue was fixed. I am sure I will run into another 
HTTPS web site with this issue again which happens once in a while. :(


https://badssl.com/

FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Ping FRG: following development releases

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

NFN Smith wrote:

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:



They are more or less profile compatible at the moment. If you use it only 
for testing you can use the same profile. Just need to reinstall Lightning 
if you used 2.57 and did go back. Actually 2.53.3 has even some later stuff in.


With extensions I would recommend separate profiles. Older ones can hang 
2.57 at shutdown or produce funny results.


Basically only the browser works right in 2.57. Various problems with the 
other components. Usually use it only when I encounter a web site broken in 
2.53 to check, when I find some time for a few 2.57 fixes or test 2.53 to 
2.57 ports.


Thanks for the feedback.

I will go with separate profiles, because I do want to monitor status with 
extensions.  I found that to be really useful when watching Firefox, then 
Thunderbird make the transition to WebExtensions.  I'm not making any use of 
Lightning, so I'm not concerned about that.


 From the developer meeting notes, I do know that mail/news is not working in 
2.57, but that's one of the things I want to keep an eye on, so that when the 
notes indicate there's changes, I can see the effects.


And somewhere along, I may be able to do some bug reporting, as well.

Smith


Actually sending mail got fixed in the last 2 months. Just the 3 pane is 
broken but without it pretty hard to see what is going on :)
Tested by copying my 2.53 profile into a 2.57 one. Then sent myself an email 
via the address book. Hung with a spinning cursor but the email arrived fine 
and was copyied ot the imap sent folder. So some progress.


FRG


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.2 released!

[Ant]

https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/feed/

On 5/8/2020 6:29 AM, noob wrote:

How, there's no RSS link there :/

Ant wrote:
Got this RSS feed at 1:56 AM PDT: ::seamonkeyblog:: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 
has been released! @ 
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2020/05/03/seamonkey-2-53-2-has-been-released/ 

--
:) National Nurse Wk. ..!.. heat wave & illness like 
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2! :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Ant]

On 5/8/2020 3:31 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Ant wrote:

On 5/8/2020 1:21 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to 
videos.antville.org, but we can't confirm that your connection is 
secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right 
place. However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and 
you shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify 
that SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not 
possible to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The 
current time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or 
not. I did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. 
In Firefox v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey 
remove this while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and 
clicking on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i 
access to this web page.


Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the same 
profile. Hmm!


Has to do with hsts. There is a list in the profile which needs to be 
edited. I encountered it once. I think was a mix of Noscript, some 
options and the preload list. Forgot how I solved it. Same version would 
show the override in one vm and don't in another.


Interesting. If you or anyone ever remembers it, then please kindly feel 
free to post about it. For now, https://videos.antville.org works again 
since its expired SSL certificate issue was fixed. I am sure I will run 
into another HTTPS web site with this issue again which happens once in 
a while. :(

--
:) National Nurse Wk. ..!.. heat wave & illness like 
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2! :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Ant]

On 5/8/2020 2:03 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:


https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to 
videos.antville.org, but we can't confirm that your connection is 
secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right 
place. However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and 
you shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify 
that SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not 
possible to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The 
current time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or 
not. I did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. 
In Firefox v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey 
remove this while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and 
clicking on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i 
access to this web page.


Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the same 
profile. Hmm!


What are your add-ons?  (I don't need to know, but you do!)


From Prefbar's button:
Last updated: Fri May 08 2020 12:44:58 GMT-0700 (Pacific Standard Time)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.2


Extensions (enabled: 6)
* ColorfulTabs 31.1.9 (http://www.addongenie.com/colorfultabs)
* DOM Inspector 2.0.17.2 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/)
* Expire history by days [converted] 1.2.0
* Open With 6.8.6 (https://github.com/darktrojan/openwith)
* PrefBar 7.1.1 (http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/)
* uBlock Origin 1.16.4.20 
(https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy)



I was going to do more testings, but the http://videos.antville.org/ web 
site got fixed (no more errors). Does anyone know of another broken safe 
SSL web site for me to use?

--
:) National Nurse Wk. ..!.. heat wave & illness like 
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2! :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM2.53.2 portable?

[NFN Smith]

WaltS48 wrote:

On 5/8/20 5:13 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

jcteyssier a écrit :

Hello folks,

does seamonkey 2.53.2 / win 10 64 portable version exist somewhere?
I use to have portable edition with 2.49.x and did not find 
equivalent in 2.53.x


Jean-Charles

Found:

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.2/win64/fr/seamonkey-2.53.2.fr.win64.zip 



But no direct link  here:
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.53.2


SeaMonkey doesn't make the portable versions.

You get those from 

There is a Support link there where you could probably ask for an update.


In the past, portableapps.com has been pretty good about having current 
copies of Seamonkey, although at the moment, the most recent version 
offered is 2.49.5.  I don't know how soon the developer is likely to 
update, although https://portableapps.com/development/outdated does 
indicate that 2.53.2 is being built.


Smith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Ping FRG: following development releases

[NFN Smith]

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:



They are more or less profile compatible at the moment. If you use it 
only for testing you can use the same profile. Just need to reinstall 
Lightning if you used 2.57 and did go back. Actually 2.53.3 has even 
some later stuff in.


With extensions I would recommend separate profiles. Older ones can hang 
2.57 at shutdown or produce funny results.


Basically only the browser works right in 2.57. Various problems with 
the other components. Usually use it only when I encounter a web site 
broken in 2.53 to check, when I find some time for a few 2.57 fixes or 
test 2.53 to 2.57 ports.


Thanks for the feedback.

I will go with separate profiles, because I do want to monitor status 
with extensions.  I found that to be really useful when watching 
Firefox, then Thunderbird make the transition to WebExtensions.  I'm not 
making any use of Lightning, so I'm not concerned about that.


From the developer meeting notes, I do know that mail/news is not 
working in 2.57, but that's one of the things I want to keep an eye on, 
so that when the notes indicate there's changes, I can see the effects.


And somewhere along, I may be able to do some bug reporting, as well.

Smith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Opening an attached PDF file

[Ken]

Cecil Bankston wrote:

Ken wrote:
I recently upgraded from version 2.49.5 to version 2.53.2 and I seem 
to have lost the ability to open (in Email) an attached PDF file I 
received.  Previously I had done so by clicking on the attached file 
and choosing OPEN.  I can save the file to a folder and open it there, 
but I would like to open the file in MAIL if possible.  I downloaded 
and installed PDF Viewer, but that seems to have no effect.  Any ideas 
what might have happened or how to get this ability back??


Look in Helper Applications in the Browser section of Preferences.  You 
can specify what application will be used to open any file type.




Appreciate your reply and suggestion, but that did not change the 
situation.  Any other ideas??  The browser seems to work just fine, it 
is within the MAIL part that it fails to open.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Opening an attached PDF file

[Cecil Bankston]

Ken wrote:
I recently upgraded from version 2.49.5 to version 2.53.2 and I seem to 
have lost the ability to open (in Email) an attached PDF file I 
received.  Previously I had done so by clicking on the attached file and 
choosing OPEN.  I can save the file to a folder and open it there, but I 
would like to open the file in MAIL if possible.  I downloaded and 
installed PDF Viewer, but that seems to have no effect.  Any ideas what 
might have happened or how to get this ability back??


Look in Helper Applications in the Browser section of Preferences.  You 
can specify what application will be used to open any file type.


--
C. Bankston
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Opening an attached PDF file

[Ken]

I recently upgraded from version 2.49.5 to version 2.53.2 and I seem to 
have lost the ability to open (in Email) an attached PDF file I 
received.  Previously I had done so by clicking on the attached file and 
choosing OPEN.  I can save the file to a folder and open it there, but I 
would like to open the file in MAIL if possible.  I downloaded and 
installed PDF Viewer, but that seems to have no effect.  Any ideas what 
might have happened or how to get this ability back??

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.2 released!

[WaltS48]

On 5/8/20 9:29 AM, noob wrote:

How, there's no RSS link there :/


This one should work for you. 



Add it to your Blogs & News Feeds account.



Ant wrote:
Got this RSS feed at 1:56 AM PDT: ::seamonkeyblog:: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 
has been released! @ 
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2020/05/03/seamonkey-2-53-2-has-been-released/ 






--
OS: Ubuntu Linux 18.04LTS - Gnome Desktop
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/get-involved/
https://give.thunderbird.net/en-US/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM2.53.2 portable?

[WaltS48]

On 5/8/20 5:13 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

jcteyssier a écrit :

Hello folks,

does seamonkey 2.53.2 / win 10 64 portable version exist somewhere?
I use to have portable edition with 2.49.x and did not find equivalent 
in 2.53.x


Jean-Charles

Found:

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.2/win64/fr/seamonkey-2.53.2.fr.win64.zip 



But no direct link  here:
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.53.2


SeaMonkey doesn't make the portable versions.

You get those from 

There is a Support link there where you could probably ask for an update.

--
OS: Ubuntu Linux 18.04LTS - Gnome Desktop
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/get-involved/
https://give.thunderbird.net/en-US/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.2 released!

[noob]

How, there's no RSS link there :/

Ant wrote:
Got this RSS feed at 1:56 AM PDT: ::seamonkeyblog:: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 has 
been released! @ 
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2020/05/03/seamonkey-2-53-2-has-been-released/ 



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Ant wrote:

On 5/8/2020 1:21 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but 
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present trusted 
identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, 
this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error could 
mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you shouldn't 
continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not possible to 
add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The current 
time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or not. I 
did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. In Firefox 
v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey remove this while 
Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and clicking on 
that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i access 
to this web page.


Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the same 
profile. Hmm!


Has to do with hsts. There is a list in the profile which needs to be edited. 
I encountered it once. I think was a mix of Noscript, some options and the 
preload list. Forgot how I solved it. Same version would show the override in 
one vm and don't in another.


FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.49.5 On W10 Pro Lenovo Laptop

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

bono1...@yallhoo.com wrote:

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

bono1...@yallhoo.com wrote:

Hello all,

Getting tense on this side and not from being quarantined either!!!


I have not been able to upgrade from SM 2.49.5 because the email module 
gets blanked out and as such cannot see them unless I place, at random, my 
cursor in the box then that particular account filter will only show the 
email on which it lands.


On three (3) other computers I have with SM and W10 Pro there have been no 
issues with upgrading at all


There may be something obvious which I Am overlooking, now it is time for 
another set of eyes and thoughts...


TIA - bo1953



With 2.53.x Lightbird 0.7.1 can cause this. If safe mode or test profile 
also shows it check video drivers. Intel ones are notoriously bad and should 
be updated to the latest level.


FRG
FRG - Thank you for your suggestion. My video drivers were updated with the 
latest version.


I tried to install 2.53.2 and still had the same issue with the mail module.

Also, Sticky Password which is on the Tool Bar is greyed out, I forgot to say 
that.


I have tried dis-abling add-on's as well... to no avail.

Any further suggestions or ideas I need to pursue?

TIA - bo1953



> My video drivers were updated with the latest version.

If it is a laptop make sure they are really the latest. HP, Lenovo, Dell 
usually ship ancient ones only and never/seldom update.


FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Ping FRG: following development releases

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

NFN Smith wrote:
I have a virtual machine where I have the betas for 2.53.3 installed.  I don't 
make a lot of use of that setup (and not enough to do any serious bug testing 
or reporting), although it's useful to see how progress is coming along.


I do follow the notes of the developer meetings, and would be interested in 
taking a look at current status of the 2.57 version, as well.


Is there any problem with installing 2.57 to a separate directory, if I'm not 
trying to share a profile between the two releases?


Smith


They are more or less profile compatible at the moment. If you use it only for 
testing you can use the same profile. Just need to reinstall Lightning if you 
used 2.57 and did go back. Actually 2.53.3 has even some later stuff in.


With extensions I would recommend separate profiles. Older ones can hang 2.57 
at shutdown or produce funny results.


Basically only the browser works right in 2.57. Various problems with the 
other components. Usually use it only when I encounter a web site broken in 
2.53 to check, when I find some time for a few 2.57 fixes or test 2.53 to 2.57 
ports.


FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM2.53.2 portable?

[jcteyssier]

jcteyssier a écrit :

Hello folks,

does seamonkey 2.53.2 / win 10 64 portable version exist somewhere?
I use to have portable edition with 2.49.x and did not find equivalent 
in 2.53.x


Jean-Charles

Found:

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.2/win64/fr/seamonkey-2.53.2.fr.win64.zip

But no direct link  here:
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.53.2
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't launch my profile

[Daniel]

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 8/05/2020 5:39 PM:

Yamo' wrote:

Hi,
rfd...@optonline.net a tapoté le 06/05/2020 01:00:
Why do I keep getting this message and can't launch my profile? It's 
happening

constantly.

SeaMonkey cannot use the profile "Rick". It may be in use, 
unavailable or

damaged.

Please choose another profile or create a new one.

Thanks.


To post on this newsgroups, you should use news.mozilla.org


I did a search on: SeaMonkey cannot use the profile
and the very first result was http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use

Yeap! I often get a similar screen when I launch SM on this (possibly 
now underpowered) twelve year old Laptop.


Takes forever for SM to start up, so (sometimes) I double-click on the 
desktop Icon again  so when SM does get going, I get that screen 
telling me SM is doing stuff so the 2nd version of SM can't do stuff!!


--
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

Ant wrote:

On 5/8/2020 1:21 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, 
but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right 
place. However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and 
you shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not 
possible to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The 
current time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or 
not. I did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. 
In Firefox v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey 
remove this while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and 
clicking on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i 
access to this web page.


Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the same 
profile. Hmm!


What are your add-ons?  (I don't need to know, but you do!)

--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Ant]

On 5/8/2020 1:21 AM, jcteyssier wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, 
but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right 
place. However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you 
shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not 
possible to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The 
current time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or not. 
I did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. In 
Firefox v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey 
remove this while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and 
clicking on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i 
access to this web page.


Interesting. I wonder why mine isn't offering me this anymore. More 
interesting is that using private window does show me this in the same 
profile. Hmm!

--
:) National Nurse Wk. ..!.. heat wave & illness like 
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2! :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[jcteyssier]

Daniel a écrit :

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, 
but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. 
However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you 
shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not possible 
to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The 
current time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or not. 
I did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. In 
Firefox v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey remove 
this while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and clicking 
on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

Seamonkey 2.53.2: Like Daniel i can add an exemption and after this i 
access to this web page.

Jean-Charles
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't launch my profile

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

Yamo' wrote:

Hi,

rfd...@optonline.net a tapoté le 06/05/2020 01:00:

Why do I keep getting this message and can't launch my profile? It's happening
constantly.

SeaMonkey cannot use the profile "Rick". It may be in use, unavailable or
damaged.

Please choose another profile or create a new one.

Thanks.




To post on this newsgroups, you should use news.mozilla.org



I did a search on: SeaMonkey cannot use the profile
and the very first result was http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use

--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unable to continue when a HTTPS connection is untrusted?

[Daniel]

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:

Hello.

https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:

"This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but 
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.


Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present 
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. 
However, this website's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error 
could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the website, and you 
shouldn't continue.


This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
SeaMonkey only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not possible 
to add an exception for this certificate.

Technical Details

videos.antville.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on Thursday, May 07, 2020, 5:06 PM. The current 
time is Thursday, May 07, 2020, 9:42 PM.


Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE".


In the past, SeaMonkey web browser used to ask me to continue or not. I 
did not see any continue on it even though I know the risks. In Firefox 
v76 web browser, it lets me continue. Why did SeaMonkey remove this 
while Firefox still has it?


Thank you for reading and hopefully answering soon. :)


Clicking on your link in my Win7 SM 2.49.5, I get the "Connection 
Untrusted" screen with the "I understand the Risks" option and clicking 
on that, I can add an exemption.


Is this what you are suggesting has been removed in 2.53.2, Ant?

--
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Forwarding a HTML e-mail gets bigger.

[Daniel]

Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 12:55 PM:
I noticed forwarding an incoming HTML e-mail gets lots bigger when I 
sent it out when forwarding (not as an attachment). Example with a 
mailing list e-mail that was about 200 KB in my inbox folder, but it was 
800 KB after forwarding (not as an attachment) in my sent folder. Why is 
that?


Is anyone else noticing this too? Thank you for reading and hopefully 
answering. :)


Hmm! Just this afternoon, I received an e-mail addressed to my sister at 
my e-mail address which I then forwarded Inline to my sister.


My Inbox copy 49kB
My Sent copy 3.3kB

I'm guessing the difference is because the received e-mail included HTML 
Pretty Picture stuff (or, maybe, BOTH HTML and Plain Text stuff) but 
I've only forwarded the Plain Text stuff in my Forwarded message!


--
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Can't use Seamonkey 2.53.2

[Yamo']

Hi,

I cannot use the latest version there must be something that happen
during the upgrade...

Black screen on the web module and I cannot post on usenet.


How can I redo the upgrade (there may be a file to remove or edit).


I'm on linux debian 10 amd64bits.

-- 
Stéphane
Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't launch my profile

[Yamo']

Hi,

rfd...@optonline.net a tapoté le 06/05/2020 01:00:
> Why do I keep getting this message and can't launch my profile? It's happening
> constantly.
> 
> SeaMonkey cannot use the profile "Rick". It may be in use, unavailable or
> damaged.
> 
> Please choose another profile or create a new one.
> 
> Thanks.



To post on this newsgroups, you should use news.mozilla.org

-- 
Stéphane
Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.49.5 On W10 Pro Lenovo Laptop

[jcteyssier]

bono1...@yallhoo.com a écrit :

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

bono1...@yallhoo.com wrote:

Hello all,

Getting tense on this side and not from being quarantined either!!!


I have not been able to upgrade from SM 2.49.5 because the email 
module gets blanked out and as such cannot see them unless I place, 
at random, my cursor in the box then that particular account filter 
will only show the email on which it lands.


On three (3) other computers I have with SM and W10 Pro there have 
been no issues with upgrading at all


There may be something obvious which I Am overlooking, now it is time 
for another set of eyes and thoughts...


TIA - bo1953



With 2.53.x Lightbird 0.7.1 can cause this. If safe mode or test 
profile also shows it check video drivers. Intel ones are notoriously 
bad and should be updated to the latest level.


FRG
FRG - Thank you for your suggestion. My video drivers were updated with 
the latest version.


I tried to install 2.53.2 and still had the same issue with the mail 
module.


Also, Sticky Password which is on the Tool Bar is greyed out, I forgot 
to say that.


I have tried dis-abling add-on's as well... to no avail.

Any further suggestions or ideas I need to pursue?

TIA - bo1953

Maybe not related, but i think windows Defender is more and more 
agressive from some month ago.
Try tu uninstal seamonkey, disabled Defender, install Seamonkey, 
re-activated Defender. Maybe something went wrong first time installation?


I use Seamonkey 2.53.2 on both Destop win 10 Pro and Laptop (Lenovo T61) 
win 10 Pro with shared profil located on a NAS.
I was forced on both computer to add Seamonkey.exe to "allowed" program 
to Dender. It was worling well but without this addition the start of 
Seamonkey windows takes between 5 to 10 minutes. After adding , the 
start have normal speed (a pair of seconds due to network).


Jean-Charles

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SM2.53.2 portable?

[jcteyssier]

Hello folks,

does seamonkey 2.53.2 / win 10 64 portable version exist somewhere?
I use to have portable edition with 2.49.x and did not find equivalent 
in 2.53.x


Jean-Charles
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey