Re: SM 2.53.3: Some sites not displaying correctly
Chuck wrote: I use SeaMonkey primarily for mail client, primarily FF as my browser. Version 2.46 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751 Should I install 2.53 (I know backup profile, etc) I would, just to get current security updates. And when going from 2.49 to 2.53, it's a good idea to uninstall 2.49, first, especially if you intend to install a 64 bit version. Recently, I'm having same problem with Ebay - in browser and email notices and deal alerts. The browser site only shows hyperlink line items no pictures. The inline pics on emails only show empty boxes. I'm not seeing any issues in 2.53.3, even with aggressive use of noScript and uBlock Origin (at least in the home page). I think if I'm actually shopping at eBay, I tend to have to enable at least some of their scripts. If you're not running these extensions, I'm going to suggest that it would be a good idea to clear your cache and cookies, and let Seamonkey get a clean download of all the content. These days, so much content is based on scripting that I think that sometimes the scripts get confused, and don't download new stuff when they need to. Smith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.53.3: Some sites not displaying correctly
mike wrote: Hi, with SM 2.53.3 (Win10 64) some sites are not displaying correctly, e.g: https://www.mailbox.org/ -> Parts of the navigation are cut off on the right side. The page content is too wide so that it needs a scroll bar. https://www.ebay-kleinanzeigen.de/ -> Open any classified ad with an image, then click on the image. SM only displays the bottom half of the image. Tried with add-ons disabled to no avail. No problem with FF 60. I use SeaMonkey primarily for mail client, primarily FF as my browser. Version 2.46 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751 Should I install 2.53 (I know backup profile, etc) Recently, I'm having same problem with Ebay - in browser and email notices and deal alerts. The browser site only shows hyperlink line items no pictures. The inline pics on emails only show empty boxes. Thanks, Chuck ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a way to make SM confirm my ^Q (exit SM) hotkeys to quit it?
On 8/13/2020 12:31 PM, EE wrote: Once in a while I accidently press them instead of ^W (close current tab) in the middle of something. Relaunching with restored sessions don't always remember my form inputs and logins. It's quite annoying. :( You want to do a restart instead of shutting SeaMonkey down? If you get Chromedit Plus, it gives you a restart button. It is also handy to edit userChrome.css, userContent.css, and user.js if you have them. No, I don't want SM to exit without asking me to confirm it like in Firefox with ctrl-q hot keys. If you have more than one tab open, you should be asked if you really want to quit. It doesn't even though I have "Warn me when closing a window with multiple tabs"'s box is checked. Maybe a bug since it happens 64-bit W7 HPE SP1, Debian Jessie v8, and mac OS Mojave v10.14.6? :/ -- Life's so loco! ..!.. *isms, sins, hates, (d)evil, illnesses (e.g., COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2), deaths (RIP), interruptions, stresses, heat waves, fires, out(r)ages, dramas, unlucky #4, 2020, greeds, bugs (e.g., crashes & female mosquitoes), etc. Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx / / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org | |o o| | Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately. \ _ / Please kindly use :( Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting. ( ) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a way to make SM confirm my ^Q (exit SM) hotkeys to quit it?
Ant wrote: On 8/12/2020 12:23 PM, EE wrote: Ant wrote: Once in a while I accidently press them instead of ^W (close current tab) in the middle of something. Relaunching with restore sessions don't always remember my form inputs and logins. It's quite annoying. :( Thank you for reading and hopefully answering. :) You want to do a restart instead of shutting SeaMonkey down? If you get Chromedit Plus, it gives you a restart button. It is also handy to edit userChrome.css, userContent.css, and user.js if you have them. No, I don't want SM to exit without asking me to confirm it like in Firefox with ctrl-q hot keys. If you have more than one tab open, you should be asked if you really want to quit. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.3 Won't Open
Michael F. Simon wrote: I installed SeaMonkey 2.53.3 on my iMac running Catalina. After putting it in the Applications folder, double clicking it produced an Alert. How can I download a copy which Apple will allow to open? Thanks. Mike Simon Portage MI Right-click the icon and choose "open". You might have to put in an admin login. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey 2.53.3 Won't Open
I installed SeaMonkey 2.53.3 on my iMac running Catalina. After putting it in the Applications folder, double clicking it produced an Alert. How can I download a copy which Apple will allow to open? Thanks. Mike Simon Portage MI ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
É PEDOFILO ASSASSINO: PAOLO BARRAI DI CRIMINALE TERRABITCOIN. IL DELINQUENTE LEGHISTA LUCA SOSTEGNI, ORA IN GALERA, STAVA SCAPPANDO IN BRASILE A PORTO SEGURO, DOVE IL VERME MALAVITOSO PAOLO BARRAI HA
É PEDOFILO ASSASSINO: PAOLO BARRAI DI CRIMINALE TERRABITCOIN. IL DELINQUENTE LEGHISTA LUCA SOSTEGNI, ORA IN GALERA, STAVA SCAPPANDO IN BRASILE A PORTO SEGURO, DOVE IL VERME MALAVITOSO PAOLO BARRAI HA LAVATO PARTE DEI 49 MLN € RUBATI DA LEGA LADRONA! E' PEDOFILO ASSASSINO PAOLO BARRAI (TELEGRAM)! E' BESTIA CRIMINALE CHE ORDINA PURE TANTI OMICIDI! E' INDAGATO, AL MOMENTO, DALLA PROCURA DI MILANO. COME PURE DALLA PROCURA DI LUGANO, DA SCOTLAND YARD LONDRA E DA FBI NEW YORK. NE TROVATE VINCENTISSIMAMENTE QUI, A PROPOSITO DEL SUO AVER RICICLATO 21 MLN ASSASSINI DI NDRANGHETA, IN FALLENTISSIMA ICO EIDOO https://valori.it/nel-dedalo-delle-criptovalute-i-nomi-eccellenti-dentro-blockchain-invest/ https://valori.it/chiasso-dove-riciclatori-ndrine-e-criptovalute-sincontrano/ https://valori.it/banche-politica-blogger-tutti-gli-affari-dietro-le-cripto-elvetiche/ https://valori.it/criptovalute-quei-fondi-in-viaggio-tra-italia-irlanda-e-svizzera/ https://it.coinidol.com/mafie-usano-bitcoin/ https://coinidol.com/mafias-use-bitcoin/ https://coinatory.com/2019/04/06/italian-mafia-launders-money-through-crypto/ https://blockfxgold.com/crypto/italian-mafia-launders-money-through-crypto/ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1brAgD1hHTOBXlf9iHPfxbj0nty3RRmMRxYBcA_RTFow/edit TRATTASI ANCHE DI UNO DEI PRINICIPALI PORCI UNENTI NDRANGHETA E MASSONERIA. É DA SEMPRE UN CAPO DEI CAPI SANTISTI (OSSIA DEI NDRANGHETISTI MASSONI). INFATTI ERA PAPPA E CICCIA CON L'ARRESTATO MASSONE NDRANGHETISTA BERLUSCONICCHIO GIANCARLO PITTELLI (http://www.iacchite.blog/giancarlo-pittelli-laffarista-massone-dei-boss-della-ndrangheta/ ). ED ERA CICCIA E PAPPA PURE CON GRAN PARTE DEI 334 MASSONI NDRANGHETISTI ARRESTATI DAL GRANDE PM NICOLA GRATTERI NEL DICEMBRE 2019 ( https://www.ilprimatonazionale.it/cronaca/ndrangheta-334-arresti-onorevoli-massoni-colonnello-cosche-140387/ ). MI PRESENTO. SONO ANDREAS NIGG VICE PRESIDENT AND HEAD OF ASSET MANAGEMENT. PRESSO SAFRA-SARASIN BANK ZURICH PRIMA, BEN APPUNTO, VICE PRESIDENT AND HEAD OF ASSET MANAGEMENT PRESSO BANK VONTOBEL ZURICH. https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=30273980&privcapId=1460324 QUANDO ERO VICE PRESIDENTE DI VONTOBEL BANK ZURICH, ALLORCHE' COMPRAMMO LA EX FINTER BANK ZURICH DEI MASSONI NAZISTI E LEGHISTI PESENTI, IO IN PERSONA, ANDREAS NIGG, ORDIANI DI CHIUDERE TUTTI I CONTI BANCARI CONNESSI A STA BESTIA CRIMINALISSIMA CHE DA SEMPRE E' PAOLO BARRAI, NATO A MILANO IL 28.6.1965. IN QUANTO PUZZAVANO DI NDRANGHETA, COSA NOSTRA E CAMORRA, DA LONTANO 3.000 KM. MUMBLE, MUMBLE, MUMBLE... SONO SVIZZERO, ICH BIN SCHWEIZER, QUINDI SONO UN UOMO PRECISO. AMO LA PRECISIONE. PER VIA DI QUESTO, ANALIZZIAMO BEN BENE, OGNI CONCETTO, DA ORA IN AVANTI, PLEASE! DICEVAMO. L'ASSASSINO PEDOFILO PAOLO BARRAI, ANCHE NEL 2019, FA CRIMINI TERRIFICANTI PIU' CHE MAI! TRATTASI DI UN MANDANTE DI OMICIDI, DI UN PEDERASTA CHE STUPRA ED AMMAZZA TANTI BAMBINI. HA RICICLATO EURO ASSASSINI DI NDRANGHETA IN MALAVITOSISSIMA ICO EIDOO E' STATO CACCIATO DA CITIBANK E FATTO CONDANNARE A GALERA DA CITIBANK! HA FATTO FILM PEDOPORNOGRAFICI, STUPRANDO QUASI A MORTE TANTI BAMBINI! HA UCCISO LUI STESSO, TANTI BAMBINI, PER PRENDER I LORO ORGANI E TRAFFICARLI! HA FATTO FILM PORNO CON CAVALLI, BEVENDO LITRI DI SPERMA EQUINO! E' STATO MULTATO DA CONSOB BEN 70.000 EURO! HA 23 CAUSE, CON GENTE DI MEZZA DITTATURA FASCIOMAFIOSA DI BERLUSCONIA, A CUI HA AZZERATO I RISPARMI! PER SCAPPARE ALLE QUALI, SI E' ORA RIFUGIATO A LONDRA, OVE FA TANTI POMPINI AL NAZISTA NIGEL FARAGE AFFINCHE' LO PROTEGGA! E' STATO CONDANNATO AL CARCERE IN BRASILE, ANCHE PER PEDERASTIA VIOLENTA ( E PER ALTRI TANTISSIMI CRIMINI)! NON NE AZZECCA MAI MEZZA UNA IN BORSA, OVE AZZERA I RISPARMI DI TUTTI E SEMPRE! E VI E' TANTISSIMO PIU', DI CUI SCRIVEREMO FINO A 15 MINUTI DOPO LA NOSTRA MORTE! E' DA ARRESTARE IMMEDIATAMENTE: PAOLO BARRAI (CRYPTOPOLIS E CRYPTOLAB)! E' STATO IL REGISTA CRIMINALE DELL'OPERAZIONE "EIDOO RICICLA CASH MAFIOSO PER LA NDRANGHETA"! IL GIA' 3 VOLTE FINITO IN GALERA, IL DELINQUENTE BASTARDO PAOLO BARRAI, ABITAVA A MILANO, IN VIA.. IPPODROMO 105 (ZONA SAN SIRO- CERTOSA). ED IN ZONA SAN SIRO - CERTOSA, I RAS NDRANGHETISTI ERANO I MEGA ASSASSINI GIULIANO MARTINO, VINCENZO MARTINO E DOMENICO MARTINO. https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2015/03/09/news/_ndrangheta_la_procura_di_milano_chiede_il_processo_per_la_cosca_che_voleva_mettere_le_mani_su_san_siro-109119504/ ED INFATTI, STA BESTIA DELINQUENTISSIMA DI PAOLO BARRAI, NATO A MILANO IL 28.6.1965, SPACCIAVA COCAINA UN PO' IN TUTTO IL NORD ITALIA, COME PURE IN CANTON TICINO, IN CONNESSIONE PROPRIO COL NDRANGHETISTA OMICIDA GIULIO MARTINO, IN CONNESSIONE PROPRIO COL NDRANGHETISTA OMICIDA VINCENZO MARTINO, IN CONNESSIONE PROPRIO COL NDRANGHETISTA OMICIDA DOMENICO MARTINO. COME PURE PER IL FACCENDIERE CRIMINALISSIMO FRANCO LONGO. POSE POI TUTTA STA GANG MALAVITOSA IN CONTATTO COL PORCO MALAV
Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: NFN Smith wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two different Win10 computers. I've looked at the various warnings about this update but can't find any that would explain this behavior. What might I be missing??? I'm not aware of specific issues, but I know that when I upgraded to 2.53.1, I uninstalled 2.49.5 first (as well as backing up my profiles by copying the contents of %APPDATA%\Mozilla\Seamonkey to another location). I'm wondering if there's a possibility of you having problems with 32 and 64 bit versions. If your 2.49.5 is 32 bit and you're running a 64 bit installer for 2.53.3, I'm pretty sure the release notes instruct you to uninstall the 32 bit version first. In Windows, 32 bit files are normally put in c:\program files (x86) and 64 bit files are normally put in c:\program files. Technically, it is possible to install multiple versions of Seamonkey side by side (as long as you don't run them simultaneously), and I have done this on a virtual machine. My suspicion is that you may have two versions installed, and where the shortcut you're using for launching Seamonkey points to the installation of 2.49.5. If you want to dig further, two things to look at: 1) Right-click on a Seamonkey icon, look at the Properties and go to the Shortcut tab, and in the Target line, note the name/location of what binary file is being opened. 2) Use the Explorer to check your Program Files and Program Files (x86) folders. Check to see which (or both) have Seamonkey folders. Check the properties (Details tab) of any Seamonkey.exe files to verify version numbers. If you're seeing any indication of Seamonkey installed in multiple locations, I suggest making sure you uninstall all copies of Seamonkey (and Windows will probably also report two versions active), and then install a new copy. Smith Yes -- I think this turned out to be my problem! I had 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Seamonkey installed on both machines; one with both versions of 2.53.3, and one with 2.53.3 and 2.49.5. I uninstalled the 32-bit versions and adjusted the shortcuts to point to the 64-bit versions, and both machines worked properly right away -- didn't even require use of my backed-up profiles. I probably was running both versions at once. I normally keep the mail window open all day, and typically open and close multiple browser windows as I need them. The conflict probably accounted for yesterday's strange behavior of my POP3 email servers as well! As always, I greatly appreciate those in this group who go to the trouble of helping out we the bewildered! Be warned that "running both versions at once" is a very dangerous - ok, suicidal - thing to do with those two versions. When you move from a 2.49.x (or older) version to a 2.53.x version, the profile undergoes some migration reformatting which renders part of it useless for 2.49.x levels. That is the reason for THOSE BIG WARNINGS IN RED IN THE RELEASE NOTES which you should have seen. If you then do a fallback to a 2.49.x level then it will mark some of the files as unuseable and rename them, replacing them with valid files with no content. I'm rather assuming that going forwards again will cause those no-content files to be migrated in turn, you will have lost your original data. The Release Notes are slightly misleading here in that there are imho no problems switching between 2.53.x (or 2.49.x) releases, just when you switch between the two families. Yes -- I saw the clear warnings about NOT going back after updating -- that's why I was so concerned when it seemed to be happening to me, despite my best efforts to avoid it... I seem to have suffered few if any ill effects; maybe because I never tried to "go back." When I was (inadvertently) running 2.49 again, I did notice difficulties with my POP mail server; but once I deleted the 2.49 version and both of my 32-bit versions, those problems disappeared. I keep rigorous daily backups, otherwise I'd be petrified to update important software at all! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Be warned that "running both versions at once" is a very dangerous - ok, suicidal - thing to do with those two versions. When you move from a 2.49.x (or older) version to a 2.53.x version, the profile undergoes some migration reformatting which renders part of it useless for 2.49.x levels. That is the reason for THOSE BIG WARNINGS IN RED IN THE RELEASE NOTES which you should have seen. Something that I neglected to mention when I noted that I have had two versions installed simultaneously is that it's essential that each version have its own profile. This is something that comes from Firefox since about version 54 or 55, in that profiles are not backward-compatible. In Seamonkey, that means that if a profile has been used 2.53.x, then if you try to use the same profile again in 2.49.x, there is significant chance for data loss. Although I may be annoyed that the upgrade-in-place tool has been broken for several releases, I still consider that to be something of a positive thing. If I have to manually download and install a new version, then it's a good reminder to make a backup of a profile before I install. Then, if it turns out that there's a reason to revert to the earlier version, I still have a copy of a profile that's known to work with that version. Smith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey Themes
On 8/12/20 10:15 AM, Nuno Silva wrote: Does your desktop environment inside Fedora have an option to change the UI theme? Does it change the appearance of SeaMonkey with the Default theme? If so, does the situation improve if you try other UI themes? I am not aware of one within Fedora itself that changes it system-wide. I mainly use either the LXDE or LXQt desktop environments (DE). LXDE includes an option to change the theme. LXQT has a similar option (under Customize Look & Feel), but they call it 'Window Border', which does the same. Both DE's were using 'Onyx' by default. I changed the LXQt window border setting to 'Orang' which changed the color of the title bar at the top, left-justified the title bar text and when moving the cursor on a menu, the menu item turns blue. Upon changing the SeaMonkey theme from Modern back to Default and restarting, it is faster now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3
Bill Spikowski wrote: NFN Smith wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two different Win10 computers. I've looked at the various warnings about this update but can't find any that would explain this behavior. What might I be missing??? I'm not aware of specific issues, but I know that when I upgraded to 2.53.1, I uninstalled 2.49.5 first (as well as backing up my profiles by copying the contents of %APPDATA%\Mozilla\Seamonkey to another location). I'm wondering if there's a possibility of you having problems with 32 and 64 bit versions. If your 2.49.5 is 32 bit and you're running a 64 bit installer for 2.53.3, I'm pretty sure the release notes instruct you to uninstall the 32 bit version first. In Windows, 32 bit files are normally put in c:\program files (x86) and 64 bit files are normally put in c:\program files. Technically, it is possible to install multiple versions of Seamonkey side by side (as long as you don't run them simultaneously), and I have done this on a virtual machine. My suspicion is that you may have two versions installed, and where the shortcut you're using for launching Seamonkey points to the installation of 2.49.5. If you want to dig further, two things to look at: 1) Right-click on a Seamonkey icon, look at the Properties and go to the Shortcut tab, and in the Target line, note the name/location of what binary file is being opened. 2) Use the Explorer to check your Program Files and Program Files (x86) folders. Check to see which (or both) have Seamonkey folders. Check the properties (Details tab) of any Seamonkey.exe files to verify version numbers. If you're seeing any indication of Seamonkey installed in multiple locations, I suggest making sure you uninstall all copies of Seamonkey (and Windows will probably also report two versions active), and then install a new copy. Smith Yes -- I think this turned out to be my problem! I had 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Seamonkey installed on both machines; one with both versions of 2.53.3, and one with 2.53.3 and 2.49.5. I uninstalled the 32-bit versions and adjusted the shortcuts to point to the 64-bit versions, and both machines worked properly right away -- didn't even require use of my backed-up profiles. I probably was running both versions at once. I normally keep the mail window open all day, and typically open and close multiple browser windows as I need them. The conflict probably accounted for yesterday's strange behavior of my POP3 email servers as well! As always, I greatly appreciate those in this group who go to the trouble of helping out we the bewildered! Be warned that "running both versions at once" is a very dangerous - ok, suicidal - thing to do with those two versions. When you move from a 2.49.x (or older) version to a 2.53.x version, the profile undergoes some migration reformatting which renders part of it useless for 2.49.x levels. That is the reason for THOSE BIG WARNINGS IN RED IN THE RELEASE NOTES which you should have seen. If you then do a fallback to a 2.49.x level then it will mark some of the files as unuseable and rename them, replacing them with valid files with no content. I'm rather assuming that going forwards again will cause those no-content files to be migrated in turn, you will have lost your original data. The Release Notes are slightly misleading here in that there are imho no problems switching between 2.53.x (or 2.49.x) releases, just when you switch between the two families. -- spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Printing Problems
Bill Spikowski wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 8/12/2020 7:20 AM, Tom Pamin wrote: I continue to have problems printing pages with SM. I usually only get maybe one page printed out of 3. Edge seems to work fine. Anyone else having trouble? Solutions? I often see this with certain newspaper Web sites. It is a function of the site. I think in some cases it is intentionally trying to prevent printing in order to protect the site's copyright. Other cases are merely very bad HTML. On rare occasions, I can print what I want by disabling JavaScript (not Java, which is different). Otherwise, I [right-click > Select All > Copy] and then paste into a plain-text editor (ususally Wordpad). I must then adjust the paragraph spacing and sometimes the font before printing from the editor. Sometimes I find that I can print an 'unprintable' or awkward page using the "Print Friendly" add-on. On other pages, Seamonkey native printing ability does a better job. I often experiment with both when trying to print something of importance. I installed Print Friendly on both browsers. I'll see how they work. Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
