Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-10 Thread Ant

On 8/7/2011 11:01 PM PT, Stanimir Stamenkov typed:

...

Seem related to the recent fact Google Groups is not showing any new
messages for some time, although it seems to allow posting. Currently,
the last message visible in mozilla.support.seamonkey on Google Groups
is from Aug 2:

http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey


Gogle doesn't seem to care about its newsgroup/usenet service. I use 
Giganews and sometimes I don't see my latest posts as well. This has 
been like that for years. :(

--
"I think the ants are waking up -- they need to start farming so..." 
--Erin from The Office (U.S.) S7E18 (Todd Packer).

   /\___/\   Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov

[Sending to Don, in addition to the group.]

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:53:45 -0400, /Justin Wood (Callek)/:

Don wrote:


...


Don your message here is a repeat of yesterdays, yesterdays (Aug 6)
also recieved many replies addressing your concerns, please do not
double post, and see those replies. From there we can move on with
further discussion if need be.


Seem related to the recent fact Google Groups is not showing any new 
messages for some time, although it seems to allow posting. 
Currently, the last message visible in mozilla.support.seamonkey on 
Google Groups is from Aug 2:


http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey

--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)

Don wrote:


Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.

...


Don


Don your message here is a repeat of yesterdays, yesterdays (Aug 6) also 
recieved many replies addressing your concerns, please do not double 
post, and see those replies. From there we can move on with further 
discussion if need be.


Thanks,
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Don

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.   It has many changes with
no real improvement.  This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark.   Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.

Many other problems.  For one thing there is no documentation for the
new changes.  example:  what the heck are "unsorted bookmarks"?   Also
when you open the bookmark header, what is the order of all the
bookmarks below the "recent tags"?

Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug.  (this version IS a bug.)

Thanks for any help.

Don
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Ray_Net

Keith Whaley wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Don wrote:

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.


[...]


Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug. (this version IS a bug.)



No. You must accept the developers dreams ... they are not paid, so they
can do what they want.


A commonly-stated incorrect-ism.

While the developers may not receive any remuneration for what they do,
they ARE employed. And as such, that 'team' must follow the direction(s)
set down by those in charge, who (presumably) have a direction they have
planned to follow, to attain whatever mutual goals have been established.

All moving vehicles or groups need a goal and a direction.

Do/go where they want? I don't think so... The SM team is not a
reincantation of the Keystone Kops.

keith whaley

Just what i have said:
And as such, that 'team' must follow the direction(s) set down by those 
in charge, who (presumably) have a direction they have planned to 
follow, to attain whatever mutual goals have been established.


Not the individual do what they want, but the "those in charge" what 
they want.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Keith Whaley

Ray_Net wrote:

Don wrote:

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.


[...]


Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug. (this version IS a bug.)



No. You must accept the developers dreams ... they are not paid, so they
can do what they want.


A commonly-stated incorrect-ism.

While the developers may not receive any remuneration for what they do, 
they ARE employed. And as such, that 'team' must follow the direction(s) 
set down by those in charge, who (presumably) have a direction they have 
planned to follow, to attain whatever mutual goals have been established.


All moving vehicles or groups need a goal and a direction.

Do/go where they want? I don't think so... The SM team is not a 
reincantation of the Keystone Kops.


keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread denewton

Don a écrit :

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.   It has many changes with
no real improvement.  This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark.   Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.

Many other problems.  For one thing there is no documentation for the
new changes.  example:  what the heck are "unsorted bookmarks"?   Also
when you open the bookmark header, what is the order of all the
bookmarks below the "recent tags"?

Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug.  (this version IS a bug.)

Thanks for any help.

Don


Hello
You bookmars list is in "menu des marque-pages" (menu of bookmarks?)
good luck
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread denewton

Don a écrit :

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.   It has many changes with
no real improvement.  This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark.   Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.

Many other problems.  For one thing there is no documentation for the
new changes.  example:  what the heck are "unsorted bookmarks"?   Also
when you open the bookmark header, what is the order of all the
bookmarks below the "recent tags"?

Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug.  (this version IS a bug.)

Thanks for any help.

Don


Hello
You can create a new folder in your bookmark list : in frensh (translate 
in english) the way is :
marque-pages (bookmarks)->organiser les marque-pages (organise the 
bookmarks???)->fichier(file)->nouveau dossier(new folder)-> name this 
new folder

Thats all
Sinserly
Bertrand
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Ray_Net

Don wrote:

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.   It has many changes with
no real improvement.  This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark.   Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.

Many other problems.  For one thing there is no documentation for the
new changes.  example:  what the heck are "unsorted bookmarks"?   Also
when you open the bookmark header, what is the order of all the
bookmarks below the "recent tags"?

Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug.  (this version IS a bug.)

No. You must accept the developers dreams ... they are not paid, so they 
can do what they want.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-06 Thread Robert Kaiser

Don schrieb:

Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?


There is no older version that still is supported.

Unsorted bookmarks are those you file quickly with the new bookmarks 
icon at the right of the location bar.


Robert Kaiser


--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never 
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible 
arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the 
time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-06 Thread Don
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.   It has many changes with
no real improvement.  This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark.   Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.

Many other problems.  For one thing there is no documentation for the
new changes.  example:  what the heck are "unsorted bookmarks"?   Also
when you open the bookmark header, what is the order of all the
bookmarks below the "recent tags"?

Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug.  (this version IS a bug.)

Thanks for any help.

Don

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey