[biofuels-biz] Peugeot takes it's diesel racing on biofuel

2003-03-30 Thread Marc Bonanni

Hello,

Did you know that Peugeot will use one of the two RC prototypes(born 
in 2002 Geneva Motorshow)in REAL race on circuit 

It will use the same HDI engine than the red one(2.2l, particles 
filter, 175bhp)but using diester oil(more ecological than diesel), 
and 25 examples will be built to race in diffrent circuits in France 
and Belgium...

See the official photographes, it's a really nice sport car

a target=_blank
href=http://ffsa.turbo.m6.fr/images/030321_nogaro//p031492.jpg;http://ffsa.turbo.m6.fr/images/030321_nogaro//p031492.jpg/a

a target=_blank
href=http://ffsa.turbo.m6.fr/images/030321_nogaro//p031493.jpg;http://ffsa.turbo.m6.fr/images/030321_nogaro//p031493.jpg/a



Recommended format for your email subject lines:
Model # [Model Letters] Year Subject

Examples:
505 88 V6 Mileage
405 Mi16 89 Ignition Coil source?

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank email message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to a target=_blank
href=http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/;http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms//a 




Thanks!
Marc Bonanni


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/9bTolB/TM
-~-

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Making Vegetable Oil

2003-03-30 Thread Clarence

Thanks Keith, I'll check those out.

--- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Does anyone know of anywhere I can find
 information
 on making vegetable oil itself? The process, etc
 
  Clarence
 
 Hi Clarence
 
 Two ways, pressure extraction and solvent
 extraction, usually using 
 hexan - this is the commercial method, not for us.
 On pressure 
 extraction, do a couple of archive searches, for
 approtec and for 
 bielenberg - these are manual presses:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
 
 Lots more information here:
 Oilseed presses

http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_supply.html#Oilpress
 
 There's more to it than just pressing though. Check
 these out:
 
 The Fats and Oils: a General View, by Carl L.
 Alsberg and Alonzo E. 
 Taylor, 1928, Food Research Institute, Stanford
 University, California
 First in a series of five Fats and Oils Studies
 published in the 
 1920s by the Food Research Institute. Good overview
 of the subject 
 written in layman's terms, covers nature and sources
 of fats and 
 oils, properties, technology, production,
 international trade and 
 more. Not very much has changed since then, it's
 just grown more 
 complex. A clear and informative guide -- useful
 information for 
 anyone making biodiesel or working with SVO. Full
 text online at the 
 Biofuels Library.

http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/fatsoils/fatsoilsToC.html
 
 Oils -- King's American Dispensatory, by Harvey
 Wickes Felter, M.D., 
 and John Uri Lloyd, Phr. M., Ph. D., 1898

http://www.ibiblio.org/herbmed/eclectic/kings/olea.html
 
 Chemical Reactions of Oil, Fat and Fat Based
 Products
 http://alfa.ist.utl.pt/~fidel/creac/reac.html
 
 Food Fats and Oils (1994) -- online book (Acrobat
 file, 1.3Mb):
 http://www.iseo.org/foodfatsoils.pdf
 
 Minor Oil Crops, B.L. Axtell from research by R.M.
 Fairman, 
 Intermediate Technology Development Group, Rugby,
 UK, FAO 
 Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 94, Rome, 1992,
 ISBN 
 92-5-103128-2: Part I - Edible oils, Part II -
 Non-edible oils, Part 
 III - Essential oils -- Full text online:

http://www.fao.org/inpho/vlibrary/x0043e/x0043e00.htm
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel]

2003-03-30 Thread vern_hendershott





The following is from the New York Times, it is interesting that they see
the need for both diesel hybrid and fuel cells. It has been my experience
that when the military gets interested in throwing money at technology that
large gains are often made and they filter back to commercial or private
use products fairly quickly. It also tends to cause some interest in the
general public regarding the new technology being implemented which may
cause greater interest in diesel hybrid and fuel cell automotive
applications.

Best regards,
Vern


 On Horizon, Military Sees High-Technology Trucks   
 By SUE MEAD








 When today's military warhorses roll into the sunset, what will take their 
 place? Military officials, government agencies and the Detroit-based   
 automakers are working to develop trucks and technologies for future   
 missions.  


 Under a $14 billion initiative called Combatt  for commercially based 
 tactical truck  the Big Three have worked with the Army's National
 Automotive Center and other service branches to develop military vehicles  
 from the architecture of existing trucks. DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor and  
 General Motors have all built prototype Combatt trucks based on heavy-duty 
 versions of their full-size pickups, although Ford recently dropped out of 
 the program.   


 Hybrid diesel-electric versions of military trucks have also been  
 developed by Dodge and Chevrolet.  


 The goal is a truck with the latest technology, more off-road versatility, 
 improved fuel economy and easier maintenance. Most significant, adapting   
 an existing truck should hold down costs. The National Automotive Center,  
 which works to adapt commercial technologies for military applications,
 estimates that the government could buy trucks based on the prototypes for 
 $30,000 less than a Humvee.


 The National Automotive Center says Humvees currently cost about $62,000   
 each, an amount that it projects to rise to $75,000. The center estimates  
 that pickups with Combatt modifications would range from $40,000 to
 $50,000.   


 Requirements are for a light tactical truck remanufactured to Army 
 specifications to carry troops and cargo. Such a truck could replace, in   
 some applications, the Humvee. 


 Our mission directly affects the fighting men and women in today's Army, 
 said Maj. Gen. N. Ross Thompson III, commander of the Army's Tank, 
 Automotive and Armaments Command. But we look at a support horizon that   
 spans 70 years  from equipment built in the mid-1960's to equipment that  
 will still be in soldiers' hands in 2035. 
 The Combatt trucks receive heavy-duty modifications to meet military   
 standards, including air springs that adjust the ride height, advanced 
 differentials, antiroll bars of varying stiffness, bigger wheels and   
 tires, a system that inflates or deflates the tires while moving and 

Re: [biofuel] diesel cars in the United States?

2003-03-30 Thread murdoch

On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:59:34 -0500, you wrote:

http://search.ebaymotors.com/search/search.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetResultsit
eid=100from=R8s_partnerid=2categorymap=6000category0=6000query=dieselS
ortProperty=MetaEndSortebaytag1=ebayreg

Thanks, that's also an idea.  

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains Momentum

2003-03-30 Thread Jerry

Roger That!! Thanks  for sitting me straight...Shame on them...I will go on
a 1 mile run as soon as I finish
imported steak (LOL), and freedom wineHoorar  (82 Airborne word)'
Jerry
  -Original Message-
  From: Hakan Falk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:22 AM
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains
Momentum



  Jerry,

  I think you misunderstood it, it is in foreign countries that a movement
  is growing now to boycott American companies/products. It is a reaction
  on the unjust war and maybe the pictures of Americans emptying fine
  French wine in the gutter, a waste that is criminal. If anyone want to
  get rid of good French wine, please send it to me. But I think that the
  parents to those who did it, are angry now and are stocking up again.

  I talked to young people in Spain, Germany and Sweden and they want
  to boycott what they see as American interests. Not always smart, but
  a healthy reaction on something that they see as unjust war. They do
  not trust the altruistic songs from Bush  Co.

  It is expected that the PP party in Spain will loose a lot of votes on
this.
  Although  Bush get a lot of support for the war in the polls, a majority
  says that they would not vote for him again. So he stand a far chance
  of joining his father in being one of the very few presidents who lost a
  reelection. The support for Blair show a similar tendency.

  Boycotts are sometimes efficient, but I agree that it very seldom hurts
  the ones that they are aimed for. Look at the US led UN boycott against
  Iraq and the hundreds of thousands of children who died because of it.

  Personally I think that McDonalds is a part of the US chemical warfare
  and since I do not eat their stuff, I cannot boycott them. Maybe we will
  get some healthier youngsters as a result of the war and that is positive.
  I stopped to drink Coca Cola, but that was for health reasons also. I
  have a similar thing with French Fries (Freedom Fries, LOL), stopped
  eating that too, because if you do a chemical analysis, they are very
  easy mistaken for paper products. Jerry, we are both retired and have
  to think about our health.

  Hakan


  At 04:06 AM 3/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
  What is wrong with you people?? You really think that a boycott would
make
  any difference??
  The economy is gone to hell now, and you want to boycott American
products
  and or business!!
  Seems to me that you are trying to shoot yourself in the foot, with all
this
  boycott stuff.
  I really don't care;I'm retired and do not relay on a job or the economy,
  but you knotheads had better wake up!!!
  The people in charge are going to do what ever it takes to line their
  pockets(oil) and you can't do a damn thing about it,
  and not buying McDonalds(meat shipped in from another country) and or
  K-mart(made in China) is not going to
  hurt anyone in those countries, only the poor working slob here in
  america...
  Good Luck
  I do admire your basic idea.
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 6:15 PM
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War
Gains
  Momentum
  
  
 Hi Darryl,
  
 What about McDonalds/Budweiser/Texaco/Miller?
  
 dD
  
 biofuel@yahoogroups.com wrote:
  
 
   The boycotts cut both ways.
 
 
 However, if one wants to send a
   financial message to the U.S. and British administrations, are
there
  any target
   products that would be particularly effective if boycotted?
 
   Darryl McMahon
  



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
  ADVERTISEMENT




  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/

  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] Water injection

2003-03-30 Thread Jerry

Looked ever where.. can't find the Varijectection, any where. They stopped
making'em 10 years ago.
See any used one's around???The idea sounds good..wish I could find one..
Thanks
Jerry
  -Original Message-
  From: robert luis rabello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:33 PM
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] Water injection




  water_jerry wrote:

   I have been looking for any and all info about water injection for
   gas engines.

  I used water injection for high compression gasoline and propane
engines
  for many years.  The unit I owned was an Edelbrock VariJection model
that
  relied on a vacuum signal and engine rpm to determine how much water got
  injected into the engine.

  It was very effective at controlling detonation, and there seemed to
be
  some improvement in power between 2 500 and 3 000 rpm.  (I never push an
  engine faster than this. . .)  However, this is not quantifiable because I
  never put my vehicles on a dyno to test engine power.

  As far as fuel economy was concerned, you'll do just as well, if not
  better, by making sure your tires are properly inflated.  Water cools down
  the combustion temperatures--if you want more efficiency, you have to burn
  hot.


  robert luis rabello
  The Edge of Justice
  Adventure for Your Mind
  http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/9782



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/

  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: various auto safety comments

2003-03-30 Thread murdoch

yeah but worth paying for is the question...

The total costs of vehicle ownership is a pet subject of mine, and I
think that a system that makes a serious contribution to avoiding
major mishaps could be an important contributor to lowering the costs,
as it is integrated into the mainstream.  To illustrate, a little:

My car was destroyed 9 days ago by a Ford pickup, as it sat parked
legally at the side of the road.  The young woman driving the truck
was momentarily distracted by her little dog, she was a young
less-experienced driver, and when she looked up she was already
ploughing into my car @ around 45 mph or more.

There have been numerous costs associated with this for me, some of
which will be partly compensated, some of which won't, and some of
which cannot be.  One of the many topics I've had cause to think about
is that, if the insurance system was better integrated with costs and
more responsive and communicative, it would compensate me more for my
car (the fair market value was low, but the miles were unbelievably
low, as I had prioritized that to keep my TCO low when I bought it),
better communicate to states that improved young-driver education
would be helpful, and, in this case, get it through to the city that
if a half-dozen or so such incidents have occurred near that stretch
(I learn afterward), then maybe it would be less costly to redesign
the stretch than to just keep paying out half-compensations to people.

[An aside: like I've said before, someone somewhere needs to start a
page called something like www.accidentswaitingtohappen.com to
chronicle and allow folks worldwide to post precise locations of all
stretches where they know there are such bad-design problems, because
we all know the powers that be can take their sweet time waiting for
one or more deaths and costly accidents before they do something about
such problems.]

I will never be fully compensated for the lost time and stress that
I've had in dealing with this issue (where there wasn't even a medical
issue to deal with thank goodness).  

What I want to say though is that I think it would be worthwhile to
pursue various types of automation for vehicle steering and powering,
beyond what we have already done.  I do not suggest that this be
implemented with a heavy-hand, but that gradually, going forward, we
continue to seek this out and not pooh-pooh it as though it is never
worthwhile to try to improve our vehicle technology with something new
and futuristic.  As computers and controlls improve and as the auto
industry continues to have some competitiveness, I'm hoping that at
some point one can enter a vehicle and read a paper as it does the
driving even more safely than oneself.  That probably will not happen
in my lifetime, except perhaps in a special-designed community
isolated for that entire purpose, but I don't think you can reach
these sort of things unless you spell out why you think it might be
worthwhile.

Driving is the most dangerous thing most of us do in our normal daily
lives and while I agree with asking if it would be worth the cost to
develop car-self-driving-mechanisms, and other associated useful aids
to conventional driver-steered systems, in the end I do think it would
be financially worthwhile, particularly in light of the reduction in
medical and property and other costs to our lives and the lives of our
associates (such as when we miss work or have to deal with auto or
paperwork hassles) of auto collisions.

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Eliminating Truth

2003-03-30 Thread Hakan Falk


I am looking at the coverage from the Iraq war and they have found
some gas masks and gas protection equipment for the Iraqi troops.
The say that it proves that Iraq have chemical weapon capacity. I do
not want to take a stand on the question if Iraq still have chemical
weapons capacity, but the argument seems to me as pathetic and
a result of the desperation of the fact that they did not found any yet.

Almost all countries have training for protection from chemical warfare.
since WWI. Sweden have never had chemical or biological weapons,
but when I did military service 40 years ago, we had standard training
in protection against chemical attacks. During the Iraq - Iran war, they
used chemical weapons on both sides, the Iraqi was supplied by US.
I cannot see any proof in the training of Iraqi troops.

Maybe they will find weapons at the end and maybe they will be able
to produce some kind of proof. The kind of propaganda that we now
are subject to, might be a result of wishful thinking. Because if they
do not find hard evidence in large volumes, Bush/Blair  Co are in
a very difficult situation. At least Blair and maybe some others can
end up in front of the war crime tribunal, Bush will never be able to
leave US soil.

Hakan


At 02:03 PM 3/30/2003 +0900, you wrote:
 Maybe your insight could help us to explain what makes George W. Bush tick?
 
 http://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm

Er, yes. Heh!

These below might help too - both sent to me off-list by American
list members, just to preclude a whole lot of silly yelling over
USA-bashing. The second especially, as Jennifer seems to think that
a journalist somehow loses credibility by interviewing Saddam Hussein
(and Osama bin Laden, in Robert Fisk's case), extremely strange view.

Best

Keith


   - Original Message -
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 5:57 AM
   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Eliminating Truth
 
 
   lol..this is the most leftist BS i have ever seen, and quoting Robert 
 Fisk,
   is like quoting The Globe or The National Enquierer or the
   star...mainstream media is actually IN the units fightingright on the
   front lines! Isn't Robert Fisk the 1 who interviewed Saddam like he was
   interviewing Mother Theresa?..and i used to think LArry King gave easy
   interviews?...Where were questions like So how manu of your own 
 people have
   you gassesd to death this month? ..
 
 
 Jennifer
 
 http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=21ItemID=3346
 Eliminating Truth
 The Development Of War Propaganda
 by David Miller
 March 28, 2003


http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,902793,00.html
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | The Saddam and George show

The Saddam and George show

Ignoring the fact that George Bush declined Saddam Hussein's
challenge to a televised debate, Tim Dowling exclusively reveals what
could have happened had they met

Tuesday February 25, 2003

Tony Blair, moderator: Welcome to the first televised debate between
George W Bush and Saddam Hussein, live from United Nations
headquarters in New York. We will begin with a brief opening
statement from each of you.

Bush: First of all I would just like to welcome my evil friend to the
UN, one of the great American institutions for the propulsion of
freedom throughout the world.

Saddam: Thank you, Great Satan. I hope that in today's debate we may
find some common ground between the Iraqi people's commitment to
peace and human progress and America's desire to destroy the Middle
East.

Bush: Do I answer that?

Blair: No. The first question is quite simply this: do you have any
links with al-Qaida?

Bush: I do not.

Blair: The question is for President Saddam.

Saddam: As I told Mr Tony Benn clearly and simply, if I had links
with al-Qaida and I enjoyed those links then I would not be ashamed
to tell the world, but since I am ashamed to tell the world of this,
it follows that I have no such links.

Bush: Neither do I.

Blair: The second question is for Mr Bush. Mr Bush, if America and
Iraq were to go to war tomorrow, who would win?

Bush: That's easy. America, right?

Saddam: Even I knew that one.

Bush: That's because the great United American States of America are
on the side of rightliness and Americanity, against an evil Axis of
Evil made up of Iraq, North Korea and... how many are in an axis?
Three?

Blair: I think you're allowed as many as you like.

Bush: OK, Iraq, North Korea and France.

Saddam: I will tell you frankly and directly that Iraq is not part of
any Axis of Evil.

Bush: Who am I thinking of then? Irania?

Blair: Let's move on. Saddam, are you willing to destroy your
stockpile of Samoud 2 missiles in accordance with UN weapons
inspectors' orders?

Saddam: I explain to you now that if Iraq possessed these so-called
weapons, we would never destroy them, but since we do not have any
such weapons, we are happy to comply, even though these non-existent

Re: [biofuel] Global Warming - CO2 from coal, gasoline, diesel fuel

2003-03-30 Thread MH

 I thought it would be interesting if we compared
 CO2 output given the same Btu output per pound (lb)
 for   Coal, Gasoline and Diesel Fuel

 Using   19,167 Btu/lb of Gasoline   as a reference point
 we'll compare CO2 output for coal, gasoline and diesel fuel.  

 Coal
   3.4 lbs CO2 per 19,167 Btu of - bituminous/anthracite  [19,167/12,250*2.2 = 
3.4 lbs CO2 per pound of gasoline]
   4.2 lbs CO2 per 19,167 Btu of - lignite/sub-bituminous  [19,167/7,350*1.6 = 
4.2 lbs CO2 per pound of gasoline] 
 Gasoline
   3.3 lbs CO2 per 19,167 Btu 
 Diesel  No.1, No.2, No.4 Fuel Oil
   3.3 lbs CO2 per 19,167 Btu   [19,167/18,643*3.2 = 3.3 lbs CO2 per pound of 
gasoline] 

 using the information below.  
 NOTE: numbers have been averaged and rounded off. 

 -

Form EIA-1605, Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases,
 Instructions, 2002, Appendices B and C. [page 51,52] 
 74 page, 1.8MB PDF ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/pub/oiaf/1605/cdrom/pdf/1605INST02.pdf
 after doing the math -- 

 Coal CL
Anthracite AC 3,852.16 lbs per short ton (2000 lbs) 
  [3852.16/2000 = 1.926 lbs. CO2 per pound of fuel] 
   1.926 lbs. CO2 per pound of fuel  
Bituminous BC 4,931.30 lbs per short ton 
   2.465 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel  
 [average 2.2 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel] 

Subbituminous SB 3,715.90 lbs per short ton 
   1.858 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel 
Lignite LC 2,791.60 lbs per short ton 
   1.396 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel 
 [average 1.6 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel] 

 Motor Gasoline MG  19.564 lbs per US gallon
  [20/6 = 3.333 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel] 
   3.333 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel

 Distillate Fuel (No. 1, No. 2, No.4 Fuel Oil and Diesel)
 DF  22.384 lbs per US gallon 
  [22.4/7 = 3.2 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel]
   3.2 lbs CO2 per pound of fuel  

 -

 Energy Conversion Facts
 http://bioenergy.ornl.gov/papers/misc/energy_conv.html

 Gasoline: US gallon = 115,000 Btu
115,000/6 = 19,167 Btu/lb 

 Petro-diesel = 130,500 Btu/gallon
130,500/7 = 18,643 Btu/lb

 Coal - bituminous/anthracite = 11,500-13,000 Btu/lb[average 12,250 Btu/lb]
 Coal - lignite/sub-bituminous = 6,500-8,200 Btu/lb   [average   7,350 
Btu/lb]  

 Note that the energy content (heating value) per unit mass varies greatly 
between
 different ranks of coal. Typical coal (rank not specified) usually means
 bituminous coal, the most common fuel for power plants (27 GJ/t). 



 ___

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Fear Factor...

2003-03-30 Thread Neoteric Biofuels Inc

-- But if thought is to become the possession of many, not the 
privilege of
the few, we must have done with fear. It is fear that holds men back -
fear lest their cherished beliefs should prove delusions, fear lest the
institutions by which they live should prove harmful, fear lest they
themselves should prove less worthy of respect than they have supposed
themselves to be. (Bertrand Russell, from Principles of Social
Reconstruction, 1916. Quoted Erich Fromm, On Disobedience and Other
Essays, Routledge  Kegan Paul, 1984, pp.34-5)



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Eliminating Truth

2003-03-30 Thread Darryl McMahon

Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am looking at the coverage from the Iraq war and they have found
 some gas masks and gas protection equipment for the Iraqi troops.
 The say that it proves that Iraq have chemical weapon capacity. I do
 not want to take a stand on the question if Iraq still have chemical
 weapons capacity, but the argument seems to me as pathetic and
 a result of the desperation of the fact that they did not found any yet.
 
I think I saw a bit of that coverage, or something similar, and it left me very 
confused.  There was nothing to say the gas protection gear was recovered from 
captured troops.  For some reason, I had the impression the gear was abandoned 
as 
Iraqi troops retreated.  I am not a military tactician, but it seems to me that 
if 
I was an Iraqi soldier, and I thought my side was planning on using chemical or 
biological weapons, I would not leave my gas protection gear behind when 
retreating.  

On the other hand, as an Iraqi soldier, I might well know the provenance of gas 
weaponry used on Kurds in the past.  However, if I had expected the invading 
force 
to use chemical weapons, and they had not yet done so, such gear might seem to 
have 
less value.

So, as for the discovery of gas protection gear in Iraq as evidence that the 
Iraqis 
have chemical or biological weapons at their disposal, well, it seems just as 
likely the Iraqis are worried about the U.S. using chemical weapons in Iraq.  
In 
fact, I think Rumsfeld referred to potential use of non-lethal gas agents by 
the 
U.S. as a possibility, evoking memories of Putin's recent use of non-lethal 
gas 
at the Moscow theatre hostage taking.  Non-lethal meaning it doesn't kill 
everybody, judging by the results there (one of 117 survived).

Re: Rumsfeld's musings on use of gas in Iraq.

UPI
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030205-051852-7247r

Counterpunch
http://www.counterpunch.org/hammond02072003.html

Christian Science Monitor
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0214/p02s01-usmi.html

NewsMax.Com
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/2/5/192247.shtml

Summary (mine)

Iraq denies that they have chemical weapons.

Years of U.N. inspections have found no Iraqi chemical, biological or nuclear 
weapons, even with assistance of U.S. intelligence information in last couple 
of 
months.

U.S. admits to having nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, have supplied 
chemical weapons to Iraq in the past, and U.S. Secretary of Defense has 
publicly 
mused on use of non-lethal chemical weapons in Iraq in the past two months.

U.S. discovery of gas protection gear in abandoned Iraqi positions, but no 
actual 
evidence of chemical weapons, leads U.S. administration to conclude that this 
is 
proof that Iraq has chemical weapons.

I still don't see how the logic leads to this conclusion.

Darryl McMahon



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Rent DVDs Online-No late fees! Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YKLNcC/oEZFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Mixing fuels

2003-03-30 Thread al_ameen13

What would happen if I tried mixing WVO with standard fossil-diesel? 
Would the two mix and stay mixed? And what would the viscosity be 
like? 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] Water injection

2003-03-30 Thread Keith Addison

Looked ever where.. can't find the Varijectection, any where. They stopped
making'em 10 years ago.
See any used one's around???The idea sounds good..wish I could find one..
Thanks
Jerry

Did you see this Jerry?

Ron Novak's Do-It-Yourself Water Injection System
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/ethanol_motherearth/me3.html

Have a look in the list archives for more information - search for 
Novak (without the quotes):
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Best

Keith


  -Original Message-
  From: robert luis rabello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:33 PM
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] Water injection




  water_jerry wrote:

   I have been looking for any and all info about water injection for
   gas engines.

  I used water injection for high compression gasoline and propane
engines
  for many years.  The unit I owned was an Edelbrock VariJection model
that
  relied on a vacuum signal and engine rpm to determine how much water got
  injected into the engine.

  It was very effective at controlling detonation, and there seemed to
be
  some improvement in power between 2 500 and 3 000 rpm.  (I never push an
  engine faster than this. . .)  However, this is not quantifiable because I
  never put my vehicles on a dyno to test engine power.

  As far as fuel economy was concerned, you'll do just as well, if not
  better, by making sure your tires are properly inflated.  Water cools down
  the combustion temperatures--if you want more efficiency, you have to burn
  hot.


  robert luis rabello
  The Edge of Justice
  Adventure for Your Mind
  http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/9782


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] thought for the weekend...

2003-03-30 Thread paul van den bergen

Believe it or not this occured to me in the shower...

I was thinking about centrifugal filtering/seperation of BCBs, especially fine 
ones, from BD (well, grease in general, but BD too)

it occured to me that if the mixture of animal and vegitable fats will 
seperate out at low T due to gelling on the animal fats, then there is an 
immiscibiliity between the two phases, or atleast a phase seperation. Either 
way, one should be able to either seperate the gell particles from the 
non-gelled liquid, or if all liquid it may be that the higher functional 
(bulkier, more FFA bearing) molecules , which would be more viscous, would 
also be removed by a certifugal processing to remove BCBs.

mind you, this may be true, but I bet it is not simple... I will have to 
investigate this further with some friencds who know more about centrifical 
seperation than I

-- 
Dr Paul van den Bergen
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
caia.swin.edu.au
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM:bulwynkl2002
It's a book. Non-volatile storage media. Everyone should have one.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Mixing fuels

2003-03-30 Thread Steve Spence

you'd have a clogged filter and possible a damaged pump.

Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
 Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
http://www.green-trust.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: al_ameen13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 6:12 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Mixing fuels


 What would happen if I tried mixing WVO with standard fossil-diesel?
 Would the two mix and stay mixed? And what would the viscosity be
 like?




 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/

 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Rent DVDs Online-No late fees! Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YKLNcC/oEZFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Eliminating Truth

2003-03-30 Thread Steve Spence

please supply evidence that the US supplied gas to Iraq.

Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
 Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
http://www.green-trust.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Eliminating Truth



 Hi Darryl,

 What I wanted to say was that all soldiers get training since
 WWI and also in using the injection kit, but with salt water.

 All military have equipment for their soldiers also. Finding
 storage of gear, does not say anything. In Iraq's case their
 soldiers could even have the equipment, if they do not trust
 US (LOL), because they know that US have the gas. US
 was the supplier of the gas they used against Iran and
 against his own people.

 Hakan


 At 05:48 PM 3/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
 Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   I am looking at the coverage from the Iraq war and they have found
   some gas masks and gas protection equipment for the Iraqi troops.
   The say that it proves that Iraq have chemical weapon capacity. I do
   not want to take a stand on the question if Iraq still have chemical
   weapons capacity, but the argument seems to me as pathetic and
   a result of the desperation of the fact that they did not found any
yet.
  
 I think I saw a bit of that coverage, or something similar, and it left
me
 very
 confused.  There was nothing to say the gas protection gear was recovered
 from
 captured troops.  For some reason, I had the impression the gear was
 abandoned as
 Iraqi troops retreated.  I am not a military tactician, but it seems to
me
 that if
 I was an Iraqi soldier, and I thought my side was planning on using
 chemical or
 biological weapons, I would not leave my gas protection gear behind when
 retreating.
 
 On the other hand, as an Iraqi soldier, I might well know the provenance
 of gas
 weaponry used on Kurds in the past.  However, if I had expected the
 invading force
 to use chemical weapons, and they had not yet done so, such gear might
 seem to have
 less value.
 
 So, as for the discovery of gas protection gear in Iraq as evidence that
 the Iraqis
 have chemical or biological weapons at their disposal, well, it seems
just as
 likely the Iraqis are worried about the U.S. using chemical weapons in
 Iraq.  In
 fact, I think Rumsfeld referred to potential use of non-lethal gas agents
 by the
 U.S. as a possibility, evoking memories of Putin's recent use of
 non-lethal gas
 at the Moscow theatre hostage taking.  Non-lethal meaning it doesn't kill
 everybody, judging by the results there (one of 117 survived).
 
 Re: Rumsfeld's musings on use of gas in Iraq.
 
 UPI
 http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030205-051852-7247r
 
 Counterpunch
 http://www.counterpunch.org/hammond02072003.html
 
 Christian Science Monitor
 http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0214/p02s01-usmi.html
 
 NewsMax.Com
 http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/2/5/192247.shtml
 
 Summary (mine)
 
 Iraq denies that they have chemical weapons.
 
 Years of U.N. inspections have found no Iraqi chemical, biological or
nuclear
 weapons, even with assistance of U.S. intelligence information in last
 couple of
 months.
 
 U.S. admits to having nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, have
supplied
 chemical weapons to Iraq in the past, and U.S. Secretary of Defense has
 publicly
 mused on use of non-lethal chemical weapons in Iraq in the past two
months.
 
 U.S. discovery of gas protection gear in abandoned Iraqi positions, but
no
 actual
 evidence of chemical weapons, leads U.S. administration to conclude that
 this is
 proof that Iraq has chemical weapons.
 
 I still don't see how the logic leads to this conclusion.
 
 Darryl McMahon




 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/

 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
DVD Rentals with No Late Fees - Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ZKLNcC/pEZFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] measuring fluid quantities

2003-03-30 Thread Jack Kenworthy

I didn't hear from anyone about sourcing out a flow meter for measuring large 
quanities of heated WVO and methanol into the reaction tank, so perhaps such 
things aren't used.  How do folks typically measure the amount of WVO and 
methanol they are putting into the reactor for largish batches, say 100 gallons?
Thanks.
jk
Jack Kenworthy
Sustainable Systems Director
The Cape Eleuthera Island School
242-359-7625 ph. 954-252-2224 fax
www.islandschool.org

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
DVD Rentals with No Late Fees - Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ZKLNcC/pEZFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains Momentum

2003-03-30 Thread paul van den bergen

On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 08:06 pm, Jerry wrote:
 What is wrong with you people?? You really think that a boycott would make
 any difference??

actually, if the war etc. really is based on oil (personally I find the US$ as 
fiat oil currency arguement pretty strong and compelling), then the use of 
biodiesel is perhaps the most effective personal boycott one can think of...

-- 
Dr Paul van den Bergen
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
caia.swin.edu.au
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM:bulwynkl2002
It's a book. Non-volatile storage media. Everyone should have one.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains Momentum

2003-03-30 Thread John Mullan

This war stuff is all nuts.

Lately it has been my misfortune to be Canadian.  Don't get me wrong, Canada
is great.  But lately, things like eBay's boycott on allowing Canadian bids
seems a little childish.

If there really is a terrorism/WMD threat to the US, great.  Go eliminate
the threat.  Canada has always been ready to help the US defend it's rights
and I (and a great many other Canadians) back this philosophy.  Naturally,
there are those here that feel different and I can't speak for them.

However, I personally feel that as an offensive move, the US makes it's own
choice.  They definitely have the strength and power to accomplish their
task.  Hell, we can't even keep helicopters in the sky or keep our subs from
leaking!!!  Let's not pick on the '90lb weakling' neighbour.

Make no mistake.  Should, for whatever reason, the tables turned and things
turn to a defensive mode Canada will be in there like white over rice.

I have many friends in the US and they don't boycott me.  We do have a
couple of asses in office that make stupid remarks and you can better your
higher-valued dollar that they don't get elected again.  The little guys
(voters) can only bitch-slap those kinds of politicians by using the almight
vote.

Just my rantings.

-Original Message-
From: Jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 30, 2003 9:28 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains
Momentum


Roger That!! Thanks  for sitting me straight...Shame on them...I will go on
a 1 mile run as soon as I finish
imported steak (LOL), and freedom wineHoorar  (82 Airborne word)'
Jerry
  -Original Message-
  From: Hakan Falk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:22 AM
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains
Momentum



  Jerry,

  I think you misunderstood it, it is in foreign countries that a movement
  is growing now to boycott American companies/products. It is a reaction
  on the unjust war and maybe the pictures of Americans emptying fine
  French wine in the gutter, a waste that is criminal. If anyone want to
  get rid of good French wine, please send it to me. But I think that the
  parents to those who did it, are angry now and are stocking up again.

  I talked to young people in Spain, Germany and Sweden and they want
  to boycott what they see as American interests. Not always smart, but
  a healthy reaction on something that they see as unjust war. They do
  not trust the altruistic songs from Bush  Co.

  It is expected that the PP party in Spain will loose a lot of votes on
this.
  Although  Bush get a lot of support for the war in the polls, a majority
  says that they would not vote for him again. So he stand a far chance
  of joining his father in being one of the very few presidents who lost a
  reelection. The support for Blair show a similar tendency.

  Boycotts are sometimes efficient, but I agree that it very seldom hurts
  the ones that they are aimed for. Look at the US led UN boycott against
  Iraq and the hundreds of thousands of children who died because of it.

  Personally I think that McDonalds is a part of the US chemical warfare
  and since I do not eat their stuff, I cannot boycott them. Maybe we will
  get some healthier youngsters as a result of the war and that is positive.
  I stopped to drink Coca Cola, but that was for health reasons also. I
  have a similar thing with French Fries (Freedom Fries, LOL), stopped
  eating that too, because if you do a chemical analysis, they are very
  easy mistaken for paper products. Jerry, we are both retired and have
  to think about our health.

  Hakan


  At 04:06 AM 3/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
  What is wrong with you people?? You really think that a boycott would
make
  any difference??
  The economy is gone to hell now, and you want to boycott American
products
  and or business!!
  Seems to me that you are trying to shoot yourself in the foot, with all
this
  boycott stuff.
  I really don't care;I'm retired and do not relay on a job or the economy,
  but you knotheads had better wake up!!!
  The people in charge are going to do what ever it takes to line their
  pockets(oil) and you can't do a damn thing about it,
  and not buying McDonalds(meat shipped in from another country) and or
  K-mart(made in China) is not going to
  hurt anyone in those countries, only the poor working slob here in
  america...
  Good Luck
  I do admire your basic idea.
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 6:15 PM
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War
Gains
  Momentum
  
  
 Hi Darryl,
  
 What about McDonalds/Budweiser/Texaco/Miller?
  
 dD
  
 biofuel@yahoogroups.com wrote:
  
 
   The boycotts cut both ways.
 
 
 

Re: [biofuel] Eliminating Truth

2003-03-30 Thread Keith Addison

please supply evidence that the US supplied gas to Iraq.

Long since supplied. Do an archive search for Halabja (without the quotes).
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Best

Keith


Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
 Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
http://www.green-trust.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Eliminating Truth


 
  Hi Darryl,
 
  What I wanted to say was that all soldiers get training since
  WWI and also in using the injection kit, but with salt water.
 
  All military have equipment for their soldiers also. Finding
  storage of gear, does not say anything. In Iraq's case their
  soldiers could even have the equipment, if they do not trust
  US (LOL), because they know that US have the gas. US
  was the supplier of the gas they used against Iran and
  against his own people.
 
  Hakan
 
 
  At 05:48 PM 3/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
  Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
I am looking at the coverage from the Iraq war and they have found
some gas masks and gas protection equipment for the Iraqi troops.
The say that it proves that Iraq have chemical weapon capacity. I do
not want to take a stand on the question if Iraq still have chemical
weapons capacity, but the argument seems to me as pathetic and
a result of the desperation of the fact that they did not found any
yet.
   
  I think I saw a bit of that coverage, or something similar, and it left
me
  very
  confused.  There was nothing to say the gas protection gear was recovered
  from
  captured troops.  For some reason, I had the impression the gear was
  abandoned as
  Iraqi troops retreated.  I am not a military tactician, but it seems to
me
  that if
  I was an Iraqi soldier, and I thought my side was planning on using
  chemical or
  biological weapons, I would not leave my gas protection gear behind when
  retreating.
  
  On the other hand, as an Iraqi soldier, I might well know the provenance
  of gas
  weaponry used on Kurds in the past.  However, if I had expected the
  invading force
  to use chemical weapons, and they had not yet done so, such gear might
  seem to have
  less value.
  
  So, as for the discovery of gas protection gear in Iraq as evidence that
  the Iraqis
  have chemical or biological weapons at their disposal, well, it seems
just as
  likely the Iraqis are worried about the U.S. using chemical weapons in
  Iraq.  In
  fact, I think Rumsfeld referred to potential use of non-lethal gas agents
  by the
  U.S. as a possibility, evoking memories of Putin's recent use of
  non-lethal gas
  at the Moscow theatre hostage taking.  Non-lethal meaning it doesn't kill
  everybody, judging by the results there (one of 117 survived).
  
  Re: Rumsfeld's musings on use of gas in Iraq.
  
  UPI
  http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030205-051852-7247r
  
  Counterpunch
  http://www.counterpunch.org/hammond02072003.html
  
  Christian Science Monitor
  http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0214/p02s01-usmi.html
  
  NewsMax.Com
  http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/2/5/192247.shtml
  
  Summary (mine)
  
  Iraq denies that they have chemical weapons.
  
  Years of U.N. inspections have found no Iraqi chemical, biological or
nuclear
  weapons, even with assistance of U.S. intelligence information in last
  couple of
  months.
  
  U.S. admits to having nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, have
supplied
  chemical weapons to Iraq in the past, and U.S. Secretary of Defense has
  publicly
  mused on use of non-lethal chemical weapons in Iraq in the past two
months.
  
  U.S. discovery of gas protection gear in abandoned Iraqi positions, but
no
  actual
  evidence of chemical weapons, leads U.S. administration to conclude that
  this is
  proof that Iraq has chemical weapons.
  
  I still don't see how the logic leads to this conclusion.
  
  Darryl McMahon


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] I'll shoot Yanks to save Iraq

2003-03-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/politics/peoplefight.htm

Now you say you are bombing us into democracy. Yet since you've 
unloaded thousands of missiles on us I don't feel more democratic.


Daily Mirror, London, March 30, 2003, Page 7

I'll shoot Yanks to save Iraq

Now all that is left in the Baghdad sitting room is a sagging 
armchair - and an automatic rifle resting on enough ammunition to 
kill a hundred men.

The weapon is more than 20 years old, a relic from the Iran-Iraq war. 
But when the Americans come rolling into town, Ghazwan Al-Mukhtar 
will using it to kill as many as he can.

The more of those American Bastards I get the happier I will be,  
says the father of three.

Ghazwan Al-Mukhtar doesn't feel more democratic since Bush started to 
bomb Baghdad into democracy. He wants to kill Americans and Brits.

Ghazwan, 59, is no ardent supporter of Saddam Hussein. He loves 
English pubs and American diners, often visited the UK and points out 
he was even educated in the US.

He is no friend of the Iraqi regime. He just hates George Bush and 
Tony Blair more. Ask why, and you get a one word answer: sanctions. 
...

The sanctions were supposed to make Saddam's people rise up against 
him. But as Ghazwan furiously says: You stupid fools have done the 
exact opposite.  ...

Even when confronted with a litany of Saddam Hussein's human rights 
abuses, torture chambers and secret police, he holds firm. You say 
Saddam Hussein has killed many people - I say the UN sanctions have 
killed our children. Does Saddam Hussein kill children? No.

Bitterly, he adds: You weren't calling him a ruthless dictator in 
the Eighties when this place was dripping with money.

Now you say you are bombing us into democracy. Yet since you've 
unloaded thousands of missiles on us I don't feel more democratic.

You give me the choice between Saddam Hussein or George Bush. I take 
Saddam Hussein every time. 

This is why, when our troops come to liberate him, he will be shooting to kill.

His gun may be a museum piece compared to the Allied tanks. But, with 
his family sent away, this former Iraqi soldier means to fight. And 
the is not on his own.


http://www.nycap.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=3992group=webcast

The Lion, On His Den

by Joe Quandt

Dec 3 '02

Ghazwan Al-Muktar is an is an Iraqi, denizon of Baghdad. He an 
American educated engineer and former medical equipment supplier who 
now devotes his energies to writing and speaking the truth about life 
under Saddam as well as the realities behind American foreign policy 
in the Middle East. Ghazwan spent time in conversation with local 
writer, activist Joe Quandt during the latter's stay in Baghdad with 
Voices in the Wilderness.

The Lion, On His Den

President Sukarno of Indonesia once said, 'We silence the enemies of 
freedom.'

Ghazwan Al-Mukhtar slumps back in his chair, silently gauging the 
effect of that absurdly ironic statement on his listeners.

And Ghazwan is an Iraqi who lives his ironies: a denouncer of Saddam 
regime inequities who continues to live in Iraq; a man who worked 
hard to provide for his family and his retirement, only to have his 
assets frozen in foreign banks as a result of U.N. Resolution 687; a 
heart attack-age guy who's trying to quit smoking, but liberally 
helps himself to my cigarettes all thru 2 separate conversations; a 
well spoken professional who peppers his gravel-voiced diatribes with 
pungent American profanities.

He's been asked to join the Voices in the Wilderness Writers Project, 
a unique attempt to give Iraqis an Internet forum. VitW is the 
Chicago-based group that has been working since '96 to end the 
economic sanctions against Iraq. I give him a call, and he agrees to 
meet me in the dining room of the Al-Fanar Hotel, Voices' 
headquarters in Baghdad.

Ghazwan studied geophysics at Cal Berkley, and graduated with an 
engineering degree from Marquette in '67. For most of his career, he 
sold medical supplies to hospitals. He says he has too scientific a 
mind to be a writer, yet he has written dozens of articles over the 
years, critical not only of the U.N. sanctions against his country, 
but also the current regime in Baghdad.

I never wrote until I had to vent my frustration. Iraq is being 
singled out for punishment. I don't complain about my own condition, 
I'm comfortable, but I'm thinking about how the people are hurting, 
their lack of a future.

Iraq, once boasted the highest standard of medical care in the Middle 
East outside of Israel. He bemoans the 12-year information gap that 
the sanctions created when they cut Iraq off from world developments 
in the medical field. Compounding the problem, thousands of health 
care professionals have been lost to death or emigration. Altogether, 
2 million people have left Iraq since the sanctions were imposed.

Are they political refugees? Are they economic refugees? If they 
leave, they must claim political asylum because no country will 
recognize 

[biofuel] consumer education

2003-03-30 Thread kirk

A friend of mine took a Saturday job as an attendant at a service station
and had a customer come in yesterday and ask that their cruise control be
set to 65.

He said he was gobsmacked.

Kirk


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Hello all

2003-03-30 Thread Greg and April

Just wanted to let everyone know I'm back. My computer locked up in the middle 
of a backup, and the drive went out.  Now I'm back on line.

Greg H.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Arab TV Crew Says Found 40 Dead US Soldiers

2003-03-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.rense.com/general36/40.htm

Arab TV Crew Says Found 40 Dead US Soldiers

The following appeared in the letters section of WhatReallyHappened.com
3-26-3

Sanwa ata Mosahra reporting. A film crew from al-Minar TV, a 
television network of Lebanon, stumbled across the bodies of about 40 
US soldiers scattered in the desert outside Maseriah. Ali Fawsua a 
camera man for al-Minar said It was obvious the soldiers had been in 
a major battle as there was empty ammunition casing everywhere.
 
We searched around but could not find any dead Iraqi soldiers and 
must be thinking they took their dead and injured away from the 
battle he added.
 
We called on our satellite phone to our base camp and told them what 
we had found and they told the Americans where we were located.
 
Soon some American helicopters came to us and the Americans took all 
our camera and recording equipment and smashed it. They told us to 
leave the area and say nothing of this finding.
 
When we arrived back at our base to the south there were American 
military police everywhere and they destroyed all of our equipment 
and told us to leave Iraq immediately.
 
al-Minar has lodged a complaint with the IJCO and US with a claim for 
compensation for the many thousands dollars of destroyed equipment.


http://www.irna.com/en/head/030324191644.ehe.shtml
Islamic Republic News Agency ( I R N A )HeadLines News
USWAR/Some 40 US soldiers killed, injured or missed in Naseriah

  Tehran, March 24, IRNA -- Some 40 US soldiers have been killed,
injured or missed in Naseriah, said Lebanese TV al-Minar on Monday.
 Al-Minar said dead bodies of the US soldiers had been found near
Naseriah.
 Meanwhile, Qatari al-Jazeera TV put number of Iraqi losses in
Monday bombardment of Baghdad at five, including a woman.
BG/JB
End


http://www.aljazeerah.info/29%20op%20eds/Nassiriya%20turns%20into%20a% 
20nightmare,%20by%20Peter%20Baker%20%20aljazeerah.info.htm

Nassiriyah Turns Into a Nightmare
Peter Baker, The Washington Post

CAMP VIPER, Southern Iraq


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12788046method 
=fullsiteid=50143
Mirror.co.uk

Death Alley

Mar 30 2003

Prayers for fallen, then back to war


http://www.aljazeerah.info/29%20op%20eds/City%20buildings%20may%20prov 
e%20to%20be%20jungles%20of%20Iraq,%20by%20Christopher%20Bellamy%20%20a 
ljazeerah.info.htm

City buildings are the jungles of Iraq
Christopher Bellamy, The Independent

LONDON, 29 March 2003


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48265-2003Mar29.html

Report: Rumseld Ignored Pentagon Advice on Iraq
Reuters
Saturday, March 29, 2003; 5:33 PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld repeatedly 
rejected advice from Pentagon planners that substantially more troops 
and armor would be needed to fight a war in Iraq, New Yorker Magazine 
reported.

... Hersh, however, quoted the former intelligence official as saying 
the war was now a stalemate.

Much of the supply of Tomahawk cruise missiles has been expended, 
aircraft carriers were going to run out of precision guided bombs and 
there were serious maintenance problems with tanks, armored vehicles 
and other equipment, the article said.

The only hope is that they can hold out until reinforcements 
arrive, the former official said...


http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNewsstoryID=2473036
Reuters | Latest Financial News / Full News Coverage

U.S. Land Advance Could Pause for Weeks-Military
Sun March 30, 2003 06:14 AM ET

CENTRAL IRAQ (Reuters) - Some U.S. troops said on Sunday they had 
been told a pause in land advances from the south toward Baghdad 
could be extended by several weeks because of overstretched supply 
lines and stiff Iraqi resistance.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] 'Warmonger' explains to 'Peacenik' why we are at war

2003-03-30 Thread Keith Addison

http://ladyday.foobar.fi/~pjh/Iraq.html

'Warmonger' explains to 'Peacenik' why we are at war

By Victor Forsythe
Dedicated to the Love it or Leave it crowd

(A fictitious interview that matches with reality)

Peacenik (PN): Why did you say we are invading Iraq?

Warmonger (WM): We are invading Iraq because it is in violation of 
security council resolution 1441. A country cannot be allowed to 
violate security council resolutions.

PN: But I thought many of our allies, including Israel, were in 
violation of more security council resolutions than Iraq.

WM:
It's not just about UN resolutions. The main point is that Iraq could 
have weapons of mass destruction, and the first sign of a smoking gun 
could well be a mushroom cloud over NY.

PN:
Mushroom cloud? But I thought the weapons inspectors said Iraq had no 
nuclear weapons.

WM:
Yes, but biological and chemical weapons are the issue.

PN:
But I thought Iraq did not have any long range missiles for attacking 
us or our allies with such weapons.

WM:
The risk is not Iraq directly attacking us, but rather terrorists 
networks that Iraq could sell the weapons to.

PN:
But couldn't virtually any country sell chemical or biological 
materials? We sold quite a bit to Iraq in the eighties ourselves, 
didn't we?

WM:
That's ancient history. Look, Saddam Hussein is an evil man that has 
an undeniable track record of repressing his own people since the 
early eighties. He gasses his enemies. Everyone agrees that he is a 
power-hungry lunatic murderer.

PN:
We sold chemical and biological materials to a power-hungry lunatic murderer?

WM:
The issue is not what we sold, but rather what Saddam did. He is the 
one that launched a pre-emptive first strike on Kuwait.

PN:
A pre-emptive first strike does sound bad. But didn't our ambassador 
to Iraq, Glaspie, know about and green-light the invasion of Kuwait?

WM:
Let's deal with the present, shall we? As of today, Iraq could sell 
its biological and chemical weapons to Al Qaida. Osama Bin Laden 
himself released an audio tape calling on Iraqis to suicide attack 
us, proving a partnership between the two.

PN:
Osama Bin Laden? Wasn't the point of invading Afghanistan to kill him?

WM:
Actually, it's not 100% certain that it's really Osama Bin Laden on 
the tapes. But the lesson from the tape is the same: there could 
easily be a partnership between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein unless we 
act.

PN:
Is this the same audio tape where Osama Bin Laden labels Saddam a 
secular infidel?

WM:
You're missing the point by just focusing on the tape. Powell 
presented a strong case against Iraq.

PN:
He did?

WM:
Yes, he showed satellite pictures of an Al Qaeda poison factory in Iraq.

PN:
But didn't that turn out to be a harmless shack in the part of Iraq 
controlled by the Kurdish opposition?

WM:
And a British intelligence report...

PN:
Didn't that turn out to be copied from an out-of-date graduate student paper?

WM:
And reports of mobile weapons labs...

PN:
Weren't those just artistic renderings?

WM:
And reports of Iraqis scuttling and hiding evidence from inspectors...

PN:
Wasn't that evidence contradicted by the chief weapons inspector, Hans Blix?

WM:
Yes, but there is plenty of other hard evidence that cannot be 
revealed because it would compromise our security.

PN:
So there is no publicly available evidence of weapons of mass 
destruction in Iraq?

WM:
The inspectors are not detectives, it's not their JOB to find 
evidence. You're missing the point.

PN:
So what is the point?

WM:
The main point is that we are invading Iraq because resolution 1441 
threatened severe consequences. If we do not act, the security 
council will become an irrelevant debating society.

PN:
So the main point is to uphold the rulings of the security council?

WM:
Absolutely. ...unless it rules against us.

PN:
And what if it does rule against us?

WM:
In that case, we must lead a coalition of the willing to invade Iraq.

PN:
Coalition of the willing? Who's that?

WM:
Britain, Turkey, Bulgaria, Spain, and Italy, for starters.

PN:
I thought Turkey refused to help us unless we gave them tens of 
billions of dollars

WM:
Nevertheless, they may now be willing.

PN:
I thought public opinion in all those countries was against war.

WM:
Current public opinion is irrelevant. The majority expresses its will 
by electing leaders to make decisions.

PN:
So it's the decisions of leaders elected by the majority that is important?

WM:
Yes.

PN:
But George B . . .

WM:
I mean, we must support the decisions of our leaders, however they 
were elected, because they are acting in our best interest. This is 
about being a patriot. That's the bottom line.

PN:
So if we do not support the decisions of the president, we are not patriotic?

WM:
I never said that.

PN:
So what are you saying? Why are we invading Iraq?

WM:
As I said, because there is a chance that they have weapons of mass 
destruction that threaten us and our allies.

PN:
But the inspectors have 

[biofuel] Elements Of Frasca Rotary Engine Design, the complete work.

2003-03-30 Thread kirk

  Mechanical engineering is not my forte. Perhaps someone better qualified
would like to review this and comment?

 http://www.frascapublications.com/pdf-index.htm


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] seals.pdf

2003-03-30 Thread kirk

  Navy manual about seals
 
 http://www.metalwebnews.org/seals.pdf

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYxFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] seals.pdf

2003-03-30 Thread paul van den bergen

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 02:19 pm, kirk wrote:
   Navy manual about seals

navy seal? Arp! arp!

-- 
Dr Paul van den Bergen
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
caia.swin.edu.au
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM:bulwynkl2002
It's a book. Non-volatile storage media. Everyone should have one.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains Momentum

2003-03-30 Thread bratt

I think this Don Lancaster has a moronic streak.  He has a bunch of
information and cans it in PDF files.  If anything deserves boycotting its
PDF files.

PDF is antiquated, slow, and totally unsuitable for large volume publication
use.  I had to scan s-l-o-w-l-y through hundreds of pages to find
information because there is no way to relate the index of the manuscript to
the pdf page numbers, which makes the six page index absolutely worthless.

They should stick their pdf files wher the sun don't shine, or shelve it
along with the hammer and chisel, clay tablets, and sidewalk chalk.

Ed
- Original Message -
From: kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:56 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains
Momentum


 Don Lancaster (computer guru and other nom de plume) www.tinaja.com
 on page 2 of his http://www.tinaja.com/glib/myebays.pdf EBay secrets says
no
 foreign bidders, not just Canadian.
 Why? Because it is a hassle.
 BTW -- The Canadian postal service can be downright moronic.

 Kirk



 -Original Message-
 From: John Mullan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 6:25 PM
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains
 Momentum


 This war stuff is all nuts.

 Lately it has been my misfortune to be Canadian.  Don't get me wrong,
Canada
 is great.  But lately, things like eBay's boycott on allowing Canadian
bids
 seems a little childish.

 If there really is a terrorism/WMD threat to the US, great.  Go eliminate
 the threat.  Canada has always been ready to help the US defend it's
rights
 and I (and a great many other Canadians) back this philosophy.  Naturally,
 there are those here that feel different and I can't speak for them.

 However, I personally feel that as an offensive move, the US makes it's
own
 choice.  They definitely have the strength and power to accomplish their
 task.  Hell, we can't even keep helicopters in the sky or keep our subs
from
 leaking!!!  Let's not pick on the '90lb weakling' neighbour.

 Make no mistake.  Should, for whatever reason, the tables turned and
things
 turn to a defensive mode Canada will be in there like white over rice.

 I have many friends in the US and they don't boycott me.  We do have a
 couple of asses in office that make stupid remarks and you can better your
 higher-valued dollar that they don't get elected again.  The little guys
 (voters) can only bitch-slap those kinds of politicians by using the
almight
 vote.

 Just my rantings.

 -Original Message-
 From: Jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: March 30, 2003 9:28 AM
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains
 Momentum


 Roger That!! Thanks  for sitting me straight...Shame on them...I will go
on
 a 1 mile run as soon as I finish
 imported steak (LOL), and freedom wineHoorar  (82 Airborne word)'
 Jerry
   -Original Message-
   From: Hakan Falk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:22 AM
   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: RE: [biofuel] EU: Boycott of American Goods Over Iraq War Gains
 Momentum



   Jerry,

   I think you misunderstood it, it is in foreign countries that a movement
   is growing now to boycott American companies/products. It is a reaction
   on the unjust war and maybe the pictures of Americans emptying fine
   French wine in the gutter, a waste that is criminal. If anyone want to
   get rid of good French wine, please send it to me. But I think that the
   parents to those who did it, are angry now and are stocking up again.

   I talked to young people in Spain, Germany and Sweden and they want
   to boycott what they see as American interests. Not always smart, but
   a healthy reaction on something that they see as unjust war. They do
   not trust the altruistic songs from Bush  Co.

   It is expected that the PP party in Spain will loose a lot of votes on
 this.
   Although  Bush get a lot of support for the war in the polls, a majority
   says that they would not vote for him again. So he stand a far chance
   of joining his father in being one of the very few presidents who lost a
   reelection. The support for Blair show a similar tendency.

   Boycotts are sometimes efficient, but I agree that it very seldom hurts
   the ones that they are aimed for. Look at the US led UN boycott against
   Iraq and the hundreds of thousands of children who died because of it.

   Personally I think that McDonalds is a part of the US chemical warfare
   and since I do not eat their stuff, I cannot boycott them. Maybe we will
   get some healthier youngsters as a result of the war and that is
positive.
   I stopped to drink Coca Cola, but that was for health reasons also. I
   have a similar thing with French Fries (Freedom Fries, LOL), stopped
   eating that too, because if you do a chemical analysis, they are