Re: [biofuels-biz] ultracaps

2003-09-20 Thread Ken Gotberg

Hi Murdoch

I don’t know about drag racing and the last drag race
I went to was when I was a kid growing up in Detroit.

Here’s a pretty good Japanese site that describes
ultracaps in a readable manner.  

http://www.okamura-lab.com/ultracapacitor/index.htm

It seems to me that they have the potential of being
used for structural components owing to their laminar
structure.  Could replace the roof, hood (bonnet)
trunk lids etc with something like this.  The site
above talks a lot about safety issues, power, energy
capacity, etc.  There are some experimental cars,
trucks and busses being used in Japan.

 Here’s what’s on their news page.

http://www.okamura-lab.com/ultracapacitor/ecsnews2Eng.htm

News 


 
Shizuki Electric has expanded thier Ultracapacitor
UPS --- 2003/04/10

Shizuki Electric Co. started selling together with
Densei Lambda Co., their smaller version of
Ultracapacitor UPS, 30kVA, 20kVA, and 10kVA added to
the present models of 200kVA, 100kVA, and 50kVA.
Guaranteed back up time is 5 seconds with options of
up to 60 seconds. Larger models of 500 kVA to 2 MVA
are scheduled in the near term. 

 
Capacitor Hybrid Truck Wins Grand Prize for Energy
Conservation --- 2003/1/23

A capacitor hybrid truck developed and sold by Nissan
Diesel Motor Co. has been awarded the Grand Prize for
Energy Conservation 2002. The vehicle is regarded as
the world's first commercial medium-size truck with a
capacitor storage hybrid system. The vehicle utilizes
the advantages of a capacitor storage, such as long
life, high efficiency and large output power. Fuel
mileage has been improved 1.5 times and CO2 generation
is only 33% compared with the same class of diesel
trucks. 

 
Honda FCX - Fuel-cell Capacitor Hybrid Car have been
delivered --- 2002/12/03

Honda Motor Co. has delivered the world first
commercial fuel cell capacitor hybrid passenger
vehicle to Japanese government on December 2. American
Honda Motor Co., Inc., has also delivered the vehicle
to the city of Los Angeles on the same day. The both
ceremonies were televised over the US and Japan. 

 
Capacitor Hybrid Truck is Displayed at Tokyo Motor
Show 2002 --- 2002/10/30

Nissan Diesel Motor Co. displayed the world first
commercial capacitor hybrid truck in Tokyo Motor Show,
held at Makuhari Messe, Japan. The truck has started
selling on last June and the first car delivered to
the customer is already running at Tokyo-Yokohama
area. 

 
City of Los Angeles became the first customer of Honda
FCX in US --- 2002/10/07

Mayor Jim Hahn announced today an agreement between
the City of Los Angeles and American Honda Motor Co.,
Inc., to make Los Angeles the first U.S. retail
customer for a capacitor hybrid fuel cell car. The
City will take delivery of the first of five
production vehicles before the end of 2002. 

 
Okamura Lab. joined as a member of Electricity Storage
Association (ESA) --- 2002/09/17

Okamura Laboratory has announced that the company has
joined as a member of Electricity Storage Association,
USA. This provides mutual links between both websites,
and easy access to member organizations linked to both
sites. 

 
Consortium for Building Research and Development
Established --- 2002/07/25

For stimulating research and development in the area
of buildings and houses, related industries and public
research organizations in various fields joined to
start Consortium for Building Research and
Development (http://www.conso.jp). Among the topics,
R  D in Capacitor Storage Systems for Building Power
Supply was posted as one of five themes. 

 
Honda Fuel Cell Vehicle First to Receive Certification
--- 2002/07/24

The Honda FCX became the first fuel cell vehicle in
the world to receive government certification, paving
the way for the commercial use of fuel cell vehicles.
The capacitor hybrid four seater, hydrogen-fuelled FCX
is planned to be sold in the US and Japan within 2002.


 
ECS is renamed ECaSS (Energy Capacitor Systems) ---
2002/07/15

ECS, or Energy Capacitor System, has been renamed
ECaSS by Okamura Lab., Inc. in order to avoid
confusion between other organizations such as the
Electro Chemical Society, because this capacitor
storage system is spreading world-wide. Trade name
application has been made for ECaSS. 

 
Capacitor Hybrid Truck Appears on the Market in Japan
--- 2002/06/24

Nissan Diesel Motor Co. debuted the world's first
commercial capacitor hybrid truck, with test rides of
the vehicle and a tour of their capacitor factory. The
vehicle utilizes capacitors for storage and parallel
hybrid operation with a diesel engine, aiming at
practical application in the area where CNG is not
provided. 

 
200 kVA to 50 kVA UPSs using EDLC are Real Products
--- 2002/04/01

Last November Shizuki Electric Co., in Japan started
selling practical UPSs in 200, 100 and 50 kVA models.
In April, the company set up one whole division to
fully devote itself to related products and 

[biofuels-biz] Report on external costs of electricity and transport released by EC

2003-09-20 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.dieselnet.com/news/0309ec.html

Report on external costs of electricity and transport released by EC

September 11, 2003

The European Commission has released a research report titled 
External Costs: Research results on socio-environmental damages due 
to electricity and transport. The report-prepared by the ExternE 
(External costs of Energy) European Research Network-attempts to 
quantify the full socio-environmental cost of different methods of 
transport and electricity generation. The ExternE study results could 
provide a guidance to impose eco-taxes on the most damaging fuels and 
technologies or to encourage those with lower socio-environmental 
costs.

Socio-environmental, or external, costs from activities such as 
electricity generation are said to arise when the social or economic 
activities of one group of persons have an impact on another group 
and when that impact is not fully accounted, or compensated for, by 
the first group. Seven major types of damages have been considered, 
the main categories being human health (fatal and non-fatal effects), 
effects on crops and materials. Moreover, damages caused by global 
warming provoked by greenhouse gases have been assessed on a global 
level within ExternE; however the range of uncertainty was much 
higher for global warming impacts than for other damages.

When analyzing transportation technologies, the study generally found 
that gasoline (petrol) passenger cars were associated with less 
external costs than diesel cars, in both urban and extra-urban 
passenger transport. Diesel urban buses had lower cost per passenger 
per kilometer (pkm) than gasoline cars in all cities with the 
exception of London.

Diesel cars scored poorly due to high air pollution costs attached to 
the particulate matter (PM) emissions. The study, however, was based 
on Euro 2 (1996) engine technology, which is no longer representative 
for today's vehicle fleets. PM emission limits from Euro 2, Euro 3 
(2000), and Euro 4 (2005) technologies are 0.10 g/km (DI), 0.05 g/km, 
and 0.025 g/km, respectively (Euro 4 vehicles are already available 
in areas which offer tax incentives for their early introduction).

The highest air pollution costs were found in urban areas, where 
exposure to air pollution is high due to population density and 
climate conditions. The costs were dominated by the car use component 
(tailpipe pollution), with little contribution from vehicle 
production, fuel production, or infrastructure. In cities with 
unfavorable climate conditions (Athens) the air pollution costs for 
diesel cars were almost Û5 per 100 pkm. Under more favorable 
conditions of Amsterdam, the costs for diesel and gasoline cars were 
similar, both below Û1 per 100 pkm. In extra-urban driving the costs 
were lower, from about Û1.2 to less than Û0.2 per 100 pkm, due to low 
population exposure to pollution. The cost sources in extra-urban 
driving were also shifted from vehicle use to vehicle/fuel production 
and infrastructure.

In goods transport, the highest external cost was calculated for 
heavy-goods vehicles (over Û10 per TEU-km, where TEU stands for 20 
feet equivalent unit), followed by container ship, barge, and goods 
train (about Û2 per TEU-km). The pollution component, however, from 
heavy-goods vehicles was actually less than that from the container 
ship and barge (but higher than from the train). The highest external 
cost component in heavy-goods vehicles was accidents.

Source: European Commission


Full report - Acrobat file, 3.3Mb
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/energy/pdf/externe_en.pdf


http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWSACTION=DSES 
SION=RCN=EN_RCN_ID:20861
CORDIS: News service

New Commission report counts the social cost of transport and 
electricity generation
[Date: 2003-09-09]

The European Commission has carried out new research aimed at 
quantifying the full socio-environmental cost of different methods of 
transport and electricity generation, the results of which could be 
used impose eco-taxes on the most damaging technologies.

Socio-environmental, or 'external', costs from activities such as 
electricity generation are said to arise when: 'the social or 
economic activities of one group of persons have an impact on another 
group and when that impact is not fully accounted, or compensated 
for, by the first group.'

In the foreword to a report containing the findings of the ExternE 
study, Research Commissioner Philippe Busquin says that the study 
allows different fuels and technologies for the electricity and 
transport sectors to be compared: 'Policy actions could therefore be 
taken to tax the most damaging fuels and technologies or to encourage 
those with lower socio-environmental costs.'

The types of impacts analysed in the report include human health, 
damage to buildings, crops and ecosystems, global warming and noise 
pollution. The research employs a bottom-up methodology by measuring 

Re: [biofuel] Washing Machine as Processor

2003-09-20 Thread Pieter Koole

Hi Maud,
55 gallon drums don't grow on trees in Holland either, but there are plenty
of them to get for the free.
You might be able to get one in a workshop where cars are repaired or ask
for one at Unilever or Henkel, where they use thousands of them in the
soap-industrie. In Holland these drums are considered as chemical waste, and
most buisenisses are pleased when you come to get the drums. Another
possibility could be : Just buy 200 liters of methanol, which is delivered
in a 55 gallon ( 200 liter ) drum.
I make BD in a plastic1000 liter container. You can buy these (used)
containers in Holland for about  45,= ( which is about $ 45,= ) all over
the country.
You could also call an oil company like Shell. They have millions of these
drums, and may be one of them can become lucky enough to contain BD in the
future in stead of fossile oil.
All the best !!

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Pieter Koole
Netherlands.



The information contained in this message (including attachments) is
confidential, and is intended for the addressee(s)
only.  If you have received this message in error please delete it and
notify the originator immediately.  The unauthorized use, disclosure,
copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. We will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or
consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this
message by a third party or in case of electronic communications as a result
of any virus being passed on.


- Original Message -
From: Maud Essen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:06 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Washing Machine as Processor


My washing machine is also modern, so I think I would risk having the
same experience you had, Pieter. Around here, wringer washers are
considered antiques and sell for a lot of money. 55-gallon drums
don't grow on trees and our water is so hard that water heaters are
lined with calcium deposits. Home heating oil tanks turn out to be
265 gallons...a bit large for the novice! Surely I'll think of
something to use as an appropriately sized processor soon!


Maud
St. Louis, MO

Ok,
Sorry if I have send you useless information. I have tried it with a rather
new washing machine ( 8 years old or so ) and had the problems I described.
Maybe the older ones are better for making BD (people were closer to nature
anyway at that time ).

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Pieter Koole
Netherlands


The information contained in this message (including attachments) is
confidential, and is intended for the addressee(s)
only.  If you have received this message in error please delete it and
notify the originator immediately.  The unauthorized use, disclosure,
copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. We will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or
consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this
message by a third party or in case of electronic communications as a
result
of any virus being passed on.


- Original Message -
From: Neoteric Biofuels Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Washing Machine as Processor


  Our old wringer washer processor has not leaked, and has had many
  batches of biodiesel in it for over 3 years. They made them right, back
  in th 40's., I guess! It cost $1 at an auction, has legs, lid, bottom
  drain, agitator. Did not have a wringer attached, that is why it was so
  cheap. We did not need the wringer.

  ;-)


  On Sunday, September 14, 2003, at 04:39 PM, Pieter Koole wrote:

   Hi Maud,
   Besides the danger of unwanted fire, the rubbers in the washing
   machine will
   solube.
   I have this experience.
  
   Met vriendelijke groeten,
   Pieter Koole
   Netherlands.
  
   The information contained in this message (including attachments) is
   confidential, and is intended for the addressee(s)
   only.  If you have received this message in error please delete it and
   notify the originator immediately.  The unauthorized use, disclosure,
   copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. We will
   not be
   liable for direct, special, indirect or
   consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this
   message by a third party or in case of electronic communications as a
   result
   of any virus being passed on.
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Washing Machine as Processor
   
   
The manufacturer warns about making sure you don't put anything
   flammable in them, I'd be careful and check any possibilities of
   arcing
   from relays or motors.
  
   Maud Essen wrote:
  
   If one were to fashion a gasket to seal the lid, would an
   apartment-sized washing machine work as a small biodiesel processor?
   Would there be a down side?
  
   Thanks!
  
   

[biofuel] hi!!

2003-09-20 Thread -- VASANTH --

 
hi! 
 can any one tellme different process of preparing biodiesel
 and the most economical of all those
vasanth!!!



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
Easily record your favorite shows!
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WUMW7B/85qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] WVO burners...

2003-09-20 Thread Hakan Falk


Mike,

Then I understand you a lot better and think it is a very good idea.
Otherwise the 20 gallon/month will just be enough for the need of hot
water for a family of 8-10 persons. If it is to rise temperature or
backup in a solar system it is an other thing. The waste incinerator
will give you quite a lot more, if you use it to heat water at the
restaurant.

By already having the large hot water storage, that is normal for solar,
you only have to fire up the burner once, when needed. This make
it more feasible, since you otherwise have to design a control system
also, with automatic start/stop of the burner.  Now you can have a
simple thermostat-clock-bell, who tells you at a specified time if the
storage temperature is too low and that you need to fire up.

Hakan

At 01:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
Salui Hakan!
What I really should have said is that we have installed solar, but I was
thinking of WVO as a backup as opposed to electric heating.
I also thought of providing the same restaurant with hot water, so they will
get a better grease removal from the plates

Mike
JAMAICA


- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] WVO burners...


 
  Hi Mike,
 
  Reading your posting, I cannot avoid making a few reflections.
 
  20 gallons of WVO per month is far to valuable to use it for heating
  of water in Jamaica, you do have the perfect location for using solar
  panels for that. For the hot water to bungalows, salt water distillation,
  etc., solar panels must be the most economical alternative. Vehicle
  fuel and waste incineration (do use the heat for pasteurise), is the
  best for the WVO. At such a location, always preheat with the sun
  which directly give you more than 80% of what you need and to an
  unbeatable cost. This way, your 20 gallons will go a long way.
 
  Hakan
 
  At 05:24 PM 9/19/2003, you wrote:
  Thanks Keith,
  
  I must say I am honored to hear from you, as I have always been a silent
  admirer of your work.
  I have been amazed at what you have done, and moreso I find your site
  interesting as I used to live and work that side of the world too.
  
  I would like to use the waste oil from a sucessful fish fry restaurant
for
  heating some bungalows water as well as to provide heat for waste
  incineration, and for heating water to pasteurise substrate for mushroom
  growing, herb drying, and also I am thinking along the lines of
wastewater
  reduction, or even saltwater destillation for a barren area I work in...
  
  I can get about 10 gallons of oil every 2 weeks... which I think is a lot
  from just one site.
  This is my first attempt at this.
  I am truly inspired by your website and your devotion to it. I would rank
it
  as one of the most informative and easy to browse sites I have ever been
to!
  I will let you know of my progress.
  
  Is your impressions about Babington simply a feeling, as you imply, or is
it
  based on some experiences you heard of?? Please let me know I am
willing
  to try the Turk burner...
  
  I was thinking of casting some pipes into a 45 gallon drum  along the
sides
  with pipes in the refrac. concrete, to use a primitive boiler.
  
  Any further ideas?
  
  
  
  Sincerely..
  
  Mike Barnett
  JAMAICA.
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:06 AM
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] WVO burners...
  
  
 Hi, Im new to this list, and interested in WVO burners. I have
strated
  to
collect WVO from a restaurant, and would like to build a babington
style
burner.

Anyone with experiences willing to share?

Mike
JAMAICA
   
Hello Mike, welcome
   
You don't say what you want to use it for. The Babington gives you a
hot flame you can use for heating whatever you want heated, if you
can ever get the thing to work properly. This one:
MOTHER's Waste Oil Heater
   
  
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/ethanol_motherearth/me4.htmlhttp://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/ethanol_motherearth/me4.htmlht
tp://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/ethanol_motherearth/me4.html
... is for space heating, like a furnace (very useful for those
frozen winters you get in Jamaica!).
   
This one:
   
  
http://ww2.green-trust.org:8383/2000/biofuel/turk/http://ww2.green-trust.org:8383/2000/biofuel/turk/http://ww2.green-trust.o
rg:8383/2000/biofuel/turk/
Turk Burner
... also give you a hot flame, like the Babington, but this is what
John Archibald (Babington guru) says about it at that site:
   
I think this is what you might call a Turbo Mother Earth News
Burner. The oil in the pan is supposed to be fed by a simple tube
and valve set up. He just used free standing oil in his crude
experiments. No valves yet incorporated. The simplicity of the design
is 

[biofuel] Hydrogen Economy

2003-09-20 Thread Ken Gotberg

Hi

Here’s my two cents worth on the hydrogen economy. 
Electrolysis of water is what will happen and the car
companies are promoting plugging into your home at
night to charge up for the morning commute.

How much extra capacity will power companies need to
install to charge up all these hydrogen cars? Let’s
say your car averages 20-horsepower (~15kW) for an
hour a day = 54MJoules/day.  I read somewhere that an
average house uses 0.75kW and if this means 24 hours
per day, 65MJoules/day.  It would interesting if
anyone has an “average” electric bill for comparison. 


A lot of energy will be needed to charge up all those
millions of hydrogen cars and where will it come from?

Best regards,

Ken


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Remanufactured Ink Cartridges  Refill Kits at MyInks.com for: HP $8-20. 
Epson $3-9, Canon $5-15, Lexmark $4-17. Free s/h over $50 (US  Canada).
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=6351
http://us.click.yahoo.com/0zJuRD/6CvGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] What Is Synthetic Oil Made Of?

2003-09-20 Thread Alan Petrillo

Maud Essen wrote:
 My new 1984 Mercedes 300DT is going to need an oil change right away. 
 Naturally I would like to consider using a non-petroleum-based oil.

Same with my little old truck.  I've been looking into vegetable based 
motor oils, and not having much luck.  It seems that not much work has 
been done on them since the GWB administration took office.  (surprize, 
surprize!)

 What are synthetic oils made of? Snips and snails and puppy-dog 
 tails? Sugar and spice and all things nice?
 
 In other words, are any/some/all synthetic oils non-petroleum? Are 
 any particular brands better than others?

All of the ones I'm aware of use petroleum products as raw materials.

 If I use synthetic oil (which I believe is much more expensive) 
 should I Get Real about one of those bypass filtering systems that 
 were recently discussed?

Definitely!

I'm looking into Shells brand of Rotella Synthetic, or perhaps Amsoil. 
And definitely with a bypass filter.  One of the toilet paper roll 
filters, like a Frantz or Motorguard.  I'm leaning a little toward the 
Motorguard, because they're less expensive, and I like their design 
better.


AP


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
Easily record your favorite shows!
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WUMW7B/85qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen Economy

2003-09-20 Thread Hakan Falk


Hi Ken,

Now you are a bad boy!

It is not meant to question this dreams with silly things
as capacity, energy sources or security,

Hydrogen dreams and ready for use fuel economies, an introduction.
http://energy.saving.nu/resources/scamartists.shtml

When you start poking, you find holes that are large enough
to drive all the Trucks in US trough them.

Initially Hydrogen will come from US coal reserves and then
central production with huge Nuclear Power Stations. To
diversify from this, to consumer level is at best a naive dream
and probably a deliberate attempt of scam.

To hook up your car for consumer production of one of the
most difficult gases to handle, cannot be a realistic dream.
Osama bin Laden would be happy to know that the Americans
will blow up themselves at the end.

Maybe they are now building arguments for Bush to take the
taxpayers money and pay for the upgrade of the grid.

Hakan

At 08:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
Hi

Here's my two cents worth on the hydrogen economy.
Electrolysis of water is what will happen and the car
companies are promoting plugging into your home at
night to charge up for the morning commute.

How much extra capacity will power companies need to
install to charge up all these hydrogen cars? Let's
say your car averages 20-horsepower (~15kW) for an
hour a day = 54MJoules/day.  I read somewhere that an
average house uses 0.75kW and if this means 24 hours
per day, 65MJoules/day.  It would interesting if
anyone has an average electric bill for comparison.


A lot of energy will be needed to charge up all those
millions of hydrogen cars and where will it come from?

Best regards,

Ken



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
Easily record your favorite shows!
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WUMW7B/85qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Synthetic Oil

2003-09-20 Thread A Wilkins

Martin,

I believe we are in agreement on this issue.  I know a few people who use 
Amsoil and they have significant miles on their vehicles 400,000 + km, but I 
also know people with 400, 000 + km who only used regular oil ( my father and 
father in law).  I strongly believe that the most important thing is to change 
your oil and filter on a regular basis.  I also know a few people that only 
change their oil once or twice a year and their vehicles do not last.  If you 
are using Mobil 1 and getting 17, 000 km or so out of an oil change then you 
are spending your money wisely.  For those that pay 2 -3 times the cost for 
Mobil 1 vs regular oil and still change it every 5, 000 km I question how rich 
they must be.

As for engines being more exact today, tight tolerances will not save your 
oil, but it will help a little to extend the life.  Oil is destroyed by engine 
blow-by (unavoidable) and heat.  Engine blow-by is the reason diesel engine oil 
looks black the first few hundred miles you put on it.  Now I may be wrong on 
this point, but I have not seen a modern diesel engine that didn't have black 
oil in the first few hundred miles.  Although I am sure someone on the list can 
answer that question for me.

As for the overly frequent oil change it has ended for me.  Recently I 
bought a Saturn and it has a built in computer that recommends when you change 
your oil (based on heat, mileage, and RPM's).  It is not telling me to change 
my oil till 7, 500 km.  As I only drive on a major highway at steady speeds I 
am not very abusive on my engine.  Therefore I can go longer on an oil change.  
This really annoys the dealership though.  :)

Now some may ask what this has to do with this group, well let me put it 
this way if all of the vehicles are changing their oil @ 5, 000 km what would 
happen if they all changed theirs @ 10, 000 or even 15, 000 km.  There would be 
a whole lot more oil left at the end of every day.


Aidan Wilkins
Co-Owner
MotorKote of Canada
(519)-768-0948
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Klingensmith 
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 12:19 AM
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] Synthetic Oil


  It doesn't. Unless it's Amsoil the manufacturer still wants you to buy
  their oil every 3000 miles.
  http://www.amsoil.com/lit/lng_article/

  http://www.mobil1.com/why/myths.jsp
  While Mobil 1 has given excellent results in extended oil drain tests,
  ExxonMobil prefers to remain conservative with oil drain recommendations.
  ...
  Oil change intervals can be as short as 3,000 miles or as long as 15,000
  miles on some new cars.

  I use Mobil 1 and change the filter at regular intervals. You can't
  believe a the marketing department who tells you when to change your oil.
  Changing your oil at 3,000 miles is unnecessary in an engine built to the
  exacting specifications that they are now. It's also wasteful.
  -Martin Klingensmith

   Martin,
  
   I say nothing because I sell something.  I say what I believe based on
   what I know and have found out about the industry.
  
   I would like to ask you one thing about synthetic working much better
   much longer:  Where on the bottle does it say you can go longer
   between oil changes when you run synthetic?
  
  
   Aidan Wilkins
   Co-Owner
   MotorKote of Canada
   (519)-768-0948
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
  ADVERTISEMENT
 
   
   

  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/

  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Remanufactured Ink Cartridges  Refill Kits at MyInks.com for: HP $8-20. 
Epson $3-9, Canon $5-15, Lexmark $4-17. Free s/h over $50 (US  Canada).
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=6351
http://us.click.yahoo.com/0zJuRD/6CvGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen Economy

2003-09-20 Thread murdoch

Initially Hydrogen will come from US coal reserves and then
central production with huge Nuclear Power Stations. To
diversify from this, to consumer level is at best a naive dream
and probably a deliberate attempt of scam.

To some extent I think it will also come from natural gas reformed at
the level of the home (and let us remember that H2 is presently
usually made from Natural Gas... about 90% I think).  And, as Ken
points out, from simple electrolysis using electricity delivered to
the home.

If they must have their H2 economy, I'd like to see H2 made from other
sources, such as methane made from biomass, if they want to establish
a sustainable economy of H2, but what do I know.

To hook up your car for consumer production of one of the
most difficult gases to handle, cannot be a realistic dream.
Osama bin Laden would be happy to know that the Americans
will blow up themselves at the end.

Maybe they are now building arguments for Bush to take the
taxpayers money and pay for the upgrade of the grid.

Hakan

At 08:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
Hi

Here's my two cents worth on the hydrogen economy.
Electrolysis of water is what will happen and the car
companies are promoting plugging into your home at
night to charge up for the morning commute.

How much extra capacity will power companies need to
install to charge up all these hydrogen cars? Let's
say your car averages 20-horsepower (~15kW) for an
hour a day = 54MJoules/day.  I read somewhere that an
average house uses 0.75kW and if this means 24 hours
per day, 65MJoules/day.  It would interesting if
anyone has an average electric bill for comparison.


A lot of energy will be needed to charge up all those
millions of hydrogen cars and where will it come from?

Best regards,

Ken




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
ReplayTV: CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
Instant Replay  Pause live TV.
Special Sale: 50% off!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UUMW7B/.5qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Synthetic Oil

2003-09-20 Thread Hakan Falk


Dear Adian,

The first thing we have to realize is, that the clear use of recommended 
intervals for service and oil change. For the automotive industry, this is 
the secure budgetary garage income. It has very little to do with technical 
questions and very much to do with building a secure and easy forecasted 
revenue stream. That the oil companies also benefit and support it, is not 
surprising.

The single and major wear on the engine is the cold start and the time it 
takes to build up the pressures in the lubricant layers. Distance driven is 
a very bad measurement to judge oil changes and does not really relate to 
realities. It is however very good for revenue forecasting.

Getting in to oil qualities and distance discussions, assumes that it is 
some correlation between them and I cannot really see the technical 
argument. This especially after my youth as taxi driver. I still have to 
see the cab owner who can afford to follow recommended service intervals or 
who would argue that it was needed. You cannot bring your cab in for 
service and pay every two weeks and it is not necessary either, with a 
vehicle the runs almost all the time. The engine is not a problem, it is 
all the other parts that needs grease, but even here the constant use give 
larger intervals. Quality of the grease is more important than motor oil. 
Modern cars is also less dependent on grease.

Hakan



At 03:41 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
Martin,

 I believe we are in agreement on this issue.  I know a few people who 
 use Amsoil and they have significant miles on their vehicles 400,000 + 
 km, but I also know people with 400, 000 + km who only used regular oil ( 
 my father and father in law).  I strongly believe that the most important 
 thing is to change your oil and filter on a regular basis.  I also know a 
 few people that only change their oil once or twice a year and their 
 vehicles do not last.  If you are using Mobil 1 and getting 17, 000 km or 
 so out of an oil change then you are spending your money wisely.  For 
 those that pay 2 -3 times the cost for Mobil 1 vs regular oil and still 
 change it every 5, 000 km I question how rich they must be.

 As for engines being more exact today, tight tolerances will not save 
 your oil, but it will help a little to extend the life.  Oil is destroyed 
 by engine blow-by (unavoidable) and heat.  Engine blow-by is the reason 
 diesel engine oil looks black the first few hundred miles you put on 
 it.  Now I may be wrong on this point, but I have not seen a modern 
 diesel engine that didn't have black oil in the first few hundred 
 miles.  Although I am sure someone on the list can answer that question for 
 me.

 As for the overly frequent oil change it has ended for me.  Recently 
 I bought a Saturn and it has a built in computer that recommends when you 
 change your oil (based on heat, mileage, and RPM's).  It is not telling 
 me to change my oil till 7, 500 km.  As I only drive on a major highway 
 at steady speeds I am not very abusive on my engine.  Therefore I can go 
 longer on an oil change.  This really annoys the dealership though.  :)

 Now some may ask what this has to do with this group, well let me put 
 it this way if all of the vehicles are changing their oil @ 5, 000 km 
 what would happen if they all changed theirs @ 10, 000 or even 15, 000 
 km.  There would be a whole lot more oil left at the end of every day.


Aidan Wilkins
Co-Owner
MotorKote of Canada
(519)-768-0948
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   - Original Message -
   From: Martin Klingensmith
   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 12:19 AM
   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Synthetic Oil


   It doesn't. Unless it's Amsoil the manufacturer still wants you to buy
   their oil every 3000 miles.
 
http://www.amsoil.com/lit/lng_article/http://www.amsoil.com/lit/lng_article/

   http://www.mobil1.com/why/myths.jsp
   While Mobil 1 has given excellent results in extended oil drain tests,
   ExxonMobil prefers to remain conservative with oil drain recommendations.
   ...
   Oil change intervals can be as short as 3,000 miles or as long as 15,000
   miles on some new cars.

   I use Mobil 1 and change the filter at regular intervals. You can't
   believe a the marketing department who tells you when to change your oil.
   Changing your oil at 3,000 miles is unnecessary in an engine built to the
   exacting specifications that they are now. It's also wasteful.
   -Martin Klingensmith

Martin,
   
I say nothing because I sell something.  I say what I believe 
 based on
what I know and have found out about the industry.
   
I would like to ask you one thing about synthetic working much better
much longer:  Where on the bottle does it say you can go longer
between oil changes when you run synthetic?
   
   
Aidan Wilkins
Co-Owner
MotorKote of Canada
(519)-768-0948
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




 Yahoo! 

Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen Economy

2003-09-20 Thread Hakan Falk


I would agree with you, if it was higher R/P values for natural gas. With the
current 7 years for US, the demands of independence of import becomes an
even a more impossible dream. I do not have to describe the current US
situation on NG again. Hydrogen from NG achieve nothing and the best
bet is coal/nuclear at the end. It is already feverish activities in US to 
build
a lot more nuclear power stations.

Hydrogen production at home? That will make Osama bin Laden happy.

Hakan


At 06:27 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
 Initially Hydrogen will come from US coal reserves and then
 central production with huge Nuclear Power Stations. To
 diversify from this, to consumer level is at best a naive dream
 and probably a deliberate attempt of scam.

To some extent I think it will also come from natural gas reformed at
the level of the home (and let us remember that H2 is presently
usually made from Natural Gas... about 90% I think).  And, as Ken
points out, from simple electrolysis using electricity delivered to
the home.

If they must have their H2 economy, I'd like to see H2 made from other
sources, such as methane made from biomass, if they want to establish
a sustainable economy of H2, but what do I know.

 To hook up your car for consumer production of one of the
 most difficult gases to handle, cannot be a realistic dream.
 Osama bin Laden would be happy to know that the Americans
 will blow up themselves at the end.
 
 Maybe they are now building arguments for Bush to take the
 taxpayers money and pay for the upgrade of the grid.
 
 Hakan
 
 At 08:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
 Hi
 
 Here's my two cents worth on the hydrogen economy.
 Electrolysis of water is what will happen and the car
 companies are promoting plugging into your home at
 night to charge up for the morning commute.
 
 How much extra capacity will power companies need to
 install to charge up all these hydrogen cars? Let's
 say your car averages 20-horsepower (~15kW) for an
 hour a day = 54MJoules/day.  I read somewhere that an
 average house uses 0.75kW and if this means 24 hours
 per day, 65MJoules/day.  It would interesting if
 anyone has an average electric bill for comparison.
 
 
 A lot of energy will be needed to charge up all those
 millions of hydrogen cars and where will it come from?
 
 Best regards,
 
 Ken




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
ReplayTV: Control live television
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/aUMW7B/A6qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen Economy

2003-09-20 Thread Hakan Falk


By the way, we are tricked into a serious technical discussion here
and the only thing they want is the taxpayers money for upgrading
the grid. Since I do not pay tax in US, it does not matter for me. I
am only reacting on the way to do things.

Hakan

At 07:02 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:

I would agree with you, if it was higher R/P values for natural gas. With the
current 7 years for US, the demands of independence of import becomes an
even a more impossible dream. I do not have to describe the current US
situation on NG again. Hydrogen from NG achieve nothing and the best
bet is coal/nuclear at the end. It is already feverish activities in US to
build
a lot more nuclear power stations.

Hydrogen production at home? That will make Osama bin Laden happy.

Hakan


At 06:27 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
  Initially Hydrogen will come from US coal reserves and then
  central production with huge Nuclear Power Stations. To
  diversify from this, to consumer level is at best a naive dream
  and probably a deliberate attempt of scam.
 
 To some extent I think it will also come from natural gas reformed at
 the level of the home (and let us remember that H2 is presently
 usually made from Natural Gas... about 90% I think).  And, as Ken
 points out, from simple electrolysis using electricity delivered to
 the home.
 
 If they must have their H2 economy, I'd like to see H2 made from other
 sources, such as methane made from biomass, if they want to establish
 a sustainable economy of H2, but what do I know.
 
  To hook up your car for consumer production of one of the
  most difficult gases to handle, cannot be a realistic dream.
  Osama bin Laden would be happy to know that the Americans
  will blow up themselves at the end.
  
  Maybe they are now building arguments for Bush to take the
  taxpayers money and pay for the upgrade of the grid.
  
  Hakan
  
  At 08:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
  Hi
  
  Here's my two cents worth on the hydrogen economy.
  Electrolysis of water is what will happen and the car
  companies are promoting plugging into your home at
  night to charge up for the morning commute.
  
  How much extra capacity will power companies need to
  install to charge up all these hydrogen cars? Let's
  say your car averages 20-horsepower (~15kW) for an
  hour a day = 54MJoules/day.  I read somewhere that an
  average house uses 0.75kW and if this means 24 hours
  per day, 65MJoules/day.  It would interesting if
  anyone has an average electric bill for comparison.
  
  
  A lot of energy will be needed to charge up all those
  millions of hydrogen cars and where will it come from?
  
  Best regards,
  
  Ken



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
Easily record your favorite shows!
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WUMW7B/85qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: Hydrogen Economy

2003-09-20 Thread Bruce Crowder

Hi,

I'm an engineer at a company that designs fuel reformers to convert 
hydrocarbons into hydrogen, mostly for fuel cell applications but 
also for other applications.  I'm not necessarily advocating this as 
a solution to our dependence on fossil fuels, but there are a couple 
factors that many people fail to consider when discussing these 
options.  First, fuel cell systems that run on hydrogen are much 
more efficient than internal combustion engines.  For example, a 
fuel cell car that runs on hydrogen reformed from gasoline will get 
about 50% more miles per gallon than a typical automobile.  Same 
fuel goes into the tank but less is used for the same amount of 
work.  Secondly, the current administration is having very little 
impact on the development of this technology. The $1.2 billion that 
Bush promised for fuel cell development is a tiny fraction of what 
would be required to spur industry to refocus efforts towards a new 
technology.  In the end, the technology that makes the most economic 
sense and earns the highest level of confidence from the public will 
win.

I've got my money on biodiesel as the fuel of the future.

-Bruce

--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I would agree with you, if it was higher R/P values for natural 
gas. With the
 current 7 years for US, the demands of independence of import 
becomes an
 even a more impossible dream. I do not have to describe the 
current US
 situation on NG again. Hydrogen from NG achieve nothing and the 
best
 bet is coal/nuclear at the end. It is already feverish activities 
in US to 
 build
 a lot more nuclear power stations.
 
 Hydrogen production at home? That will make Osama bin Laden happy.
 
 Hakan
 
 
 At 06:27 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
  Initially Hydrogen will come from US coal reserves and then
  central production with huge Nuclear Power Stations. To
  diversify from this, to consumer level is at best a naive dream
  and probably a deliberate attempt of scam.
 
 To some extent I think it will also come from natural gas 
reformed at
 the level of the home (and let us remember that H2 is presently
 usually made from Natural Gas... about 90% I think).  And, as Ken
 points out, from simple electrolysis using electricity delivered 
to
 the home.
 
 If they must have their H2 economy, I'd like to see H2 made from 
other
 sources, such as methane made from biomass, if they want to 
establish
 a sustainable economy of H2, but what do I know.
 
  To hook up your car for consumer production of one of the
  most difficult gases to handle, cannot be a realistic dream.
  Osama bin Laden would be happy to know that the Americans
  will blow up themselves at the end.
  
  Maybe they are now building arguments for Bush to take the
  taxpayers money and pay for the upgrade of the grid.
  
  Hakan
  
  At 08:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
  Hi
  
  Here's my two cents worth on the hydrogen economy.
  Electrolysis of water is what will happen and the car
  companies are promoting plugging into your home at
  night to charge up for the morning commute.
  
  How much extra capacity will power companies need to
  install to charge up all these hydrogen cars? Let's
  say your car averages 20-horsepower (~15kW) for an
  hour a day = 54MJoules/day.  I read somewhere that an
  average house uses 0.75kW and if this means 24 hours
  per day, 65MJoules/day.  It would interesting if
  anyone has an average electric bill for comparison.
  
  
  A lot of energy will be needed to charge up all those
  millions of hydrogen cars and where will it come from?
  
  Best regards,
  
  Ken



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
Easily record your favorite shows!
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WUMW7B/85qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] GWB - Is It Good Politics ?

2003-09-20 Thread MH

  BOSTON (AP)
 The case for going to war against Iraq...
  By Steve Leblanc,
   Associated Press,
  9/18/2003  
 
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/261/nation/BOSTON_AP_The_case_for_going_t%3A.shtml
 

 BOSTON (AP) The case for going to war against Iraq was a fraud
 ''made up in Texas'' to give Republicans a political boost,
 Sen. Edward Kennedy said Thursday. 

 In an interview with The Associated Press, Kennedy also said the
 Bush administration has failed to account for nearly half of the
 $4 billion the war is costing each month.  He said he believes
 much of the unaccounted-for money is being used to bribe foreign
 leaders to send in troops. 

 He called the Bush administration's current Iraq policy ''adrift.'' 

 The White House declined to comment Thursday. 

 The Massachusetts Democrat also expressed doubts about how serious
 a threat Saddam Hussein posed to the United States in its battle
 against terrorism.  He said administration officials relied on
 ''distortion, misrepresentation, a selection of intelligence'' to
 justify their case for war. 

 ''There was no imminent threat.  This was made up in Texas,
 announced in January to the Republican leadership that war was
 going to take place and was going to be good politically. 
 This whole thing was a fraud,'' Kennedy said. 

 Kennedy said a recent report by the Congressional Budget Office
 showed that only about $2.5 billion of the $4 billion being
 spent monthly on the war can be accounted for by the Bush
 administration. 

 ''My belief is this money is being shuffled all around to
 these political leaders in all parts of the world,
 bribing them to send in troops,'' he said. 

 Of the $87 billion in new money requested by President Bush
 for the war, Kennedy said the administration should be
 required to report back to the Congress to account for the spending. 

 ''We want to support our troops because they didn't make the
 decision to go there ... but I don't think it should be open-ended. 
 We ought to have a benchmark where the administration has to come back
 and give us a report,'' he added. 

 Kennedy said the focus on Iraq has drawn the nation's attention
 away from more direct threats, including al-Qaida, instability in
 Afghanistan or the nuclear ambitions of North Korea. 

 ''I think all of those pose a threat to the security of the people
 of Massachusetts much more than the threat from Iraq,'' Kennedy said. 
 ''Terror has been put on the sidelines for the last 12 months.'' 

 Kennedy was one of 23 senators who voted last October against
 authorizing Bush to use military force to disarm Iraq. 

 Earlier this year, he supported a Democratic amendment that
 would have delayed most of the president's proposed tax cuts,
 and most spending increases, until the administration provided
 cost estimates for the Iraq war.  The amendment failed. 



 CRUDE  POLITICS from the right --

 Osama bin Forgotten
  September 8, 2003 
  By Paul Sperry 
 http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34472 

 WASHINGTON ö Why is Osama bin Laden still a threat to America two years
 after President Bush promised to capture him dead or alive? 

 Why does Bush continue to appease Pakistan, where bin Laden is hiding,
 even when Pakistan bars our military from joining the hunt for him
 there? 

 Why does the president continue to cover for the Saudis, despite
 mounting evidence of their complicity in 9-11? 

 And why did he take a sharp turn into Iraq in the middle of a war on
 al-Qaida, when his own intelligence dossier ruled out Iraqi sponsorship
 of any attacks against U.S. territory, including 9-11, and concluded
 Saddam Hussein wouldn't even try to join forces with al-Qaida unless
 sufficiently desperate and provoked by U.S. attack ? 

 My new book, Crude Politics: How Bush's Oil Cronies Hijacked the War on
 Terrorism, answers these disturbing questions and others, such as the
 ones raised by the principals at Barnes  Noble.com in their recent
 interview with me.  Here is the full exchange:[Continued]



 OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM
  Top Bush officials amend war claims
   Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz admit previous statements in error
   September 17, 2003
  By Paul Sperry 
 http://worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34642 

 WASHINGTON ö In the past week, three top Bush administration officials
 have backed off charges they made against Iraq, explaining they misspoke
 or overstated the facts.  [Continued] 



 Sticker shock and awe 
  by Kathryn Schulz - grist magazine 
   09.19.03 - For more environmental news and humor, sign up for
 Grist Magazine's e-mail list.   www.gristmagazine.com/signup/subgrist.asp
 http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=15663

 Add enough zeros to the end of any number -- say, 87 -- and it quickly
 becomes an abstraction.  I can imagine 87 years (my grandmother's age),
 or 87 miles (about the distance from my home in Brooklyn to outer Long
 Island), or $87 (which wouldn't go far out there 

[biofuel] Re: phosphoric acid in Foolproof method

2003-09-20 Thread Keith Addison

Hello Mark

I have to say I'm starting to change my mind about acid in the wash,
but I think it has to be used a bit more scientifically than just
'adding some' which is how homebrewers seem to use it.

Is that how they use it? I thought the usual way is to add acid until 
the wash water reads near neutral pH, or 7.5, or whatever, not just 
adding some.

Aleks Kac specifies a set amount to use for the acid-base method, 
which makes sense because you're using a set amount of catalyst in 
the first place.

That's the reason for using acid, after all, to neutralise the 
catalyst. Maybe the ones who just add some are the same ones who 
use it to make washing easier - they don't seem to be trying to 
neutralise the catalyst so much as cracking a galloping emulsion 
problem, they start bubblewashing and it froths over. I suppose the 
some that they add would be enough to stop it frothing. Adding acid 
may cure the symptom, but they need to get the process right (as 
you've said previously).

Prof. Michael Allen said this on the Biofuels-biz list recntly:

The purpose of the acid added to the wash-water after the 
transesterification is to break down any methoxide left in the ester 
and to neutralise it. Any strong acid would do for this. We use 
sulphuric acid to bring the wash water in contact with the methyl 
ester to a pH of not more  than 8. If you don't add acid, you may not 
break down all the methoxide and  there is a good chance that this 
will cause extra wear in an engine.

Water will also break down sodium or potassium methoxide but it will 
not  neutralise it. Maybe your teacher is right because your washing 
process is  very efficient at removing excess catalyst. We found that 
this efficiency can only be achieved if we use much more water. 
Perhaps you can give us  some details of your washing process...

As for how much soap will be reconverted to FFA by adding acid to the 
wash, to dissolve back into your biodiesel, Mark Schofield just gave 
a rather precise measure of it:

But remember the soap will return back to FFA. The pysical volume 
with respect to the final bio-diesel is very small indeed, maybe 
0.001% v/v.

I asked him how he'd arrived at that figure, but he hasn't responded. 
Michael Allen also said this on the Biofuels-biz list:

The acid increases its [the wash'water's] capacity to wash out 
excess soap formed by the break-down of excess methoxide. But while 
the something acid may be taking out the soap as a sodium something 
salt, some free fatty acid is formed as well. Maybe not too much if 
we keep the wash water at a pH of  7 to 8 because these fatty acids 
are very weak (poorly ionised). Some of this FFA will probably 
disperse in the soapy wash water anyway and be removed (but some 
won't!). The particular fatty acids in a particular oil  may have 
some effect on this too: For example, unsaturated fatty acids could 
perhaps be made water-soluble by the acid-washing process (I'm 
thinking of some of those sulphonates used in making shampoos here).

Too many variables for a precise figure? Anyway, very little, if you 
do it right - well within the limits, and a worthwhile trade-off for 
the advantages. We seldom do it, but I don't think there are valid 
reasons not to use acid in the wash. But yes, please, let's be a bit 
scientific about it.

Ive messed up
a batch while experimenting that way not too long ago, overdid it on
the HCL and a serious mess happened (it looked like emulsion and it
had a high acid number on a titration (1.5) which wouldn't wash out. I
eventually washed the hell out of it, and diluted it with a very high
percentage of good fuel before using). So I still don't recommend
acidulating as a matter of course, unless you know what you're doing.
It can be done right if you do a titration for soap/catalyst first to
find out how much acid to use (that HCL/ bromophenol blue indicator
titration that Juan described a week or so ago).

Why do a titration? Adding it slowly while monitoring the pH should do.

Industry does it, but
they also don't make particularly soapy biodiesel in the first place
(because of using new oil or using acid-base ffa pretreatment), so the
amount of ffa that is released when they acidulate isn't as large as
it could be in a really problematic batch made by one of us...

I want to make a comment on acid-base biodiesel, though- the one thing
about it is that is different than singlestage biodiesel, is that you
absolutely, positively must wash it. Think what you want about washing
in general but for this method it's not an option not to wash.  Fuel
made with acid pretreatment contains water-soluble sodium sulfate
formed by the neutralising of the sulfuric acid by some of the
catalyst, and until you wash that stuff out, it's sulfur in your
tailpipe emissions. For those wondering about how much of a danger it
is that some sulfur might be left (I hear this question all the time)-
well, the commercial guys who make fuel this way, pass the ASTM 

[biofuel] Report on external costs of electricity and transport released by EC

2003-09-20 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.dieselnet.com/news/0309ec.html

Report on external costs of electricity and transport released by EC

September 11, 2003

The European Commission has released a research report titled 
External Costs: Research results on socio-environmental damages due 
to electricity and transport. The report-prepared by the ExternE 
(External costs of Energy) European Research Network-attempts to 
quantify the full socio-environmental cost of different methods of 
transport and electricity generation. The ExternE study results could 
provide a guidance to impose eco-taxes on the most damaging fuels and 
technologies or to encourage those with lower socio-environmental 
costs.

Socio-environmental, or external, costs from activities such as 
electricity generation are said to arise when the social or economic 
activities of one group of persons have an impact on another group 
and when that impact is not fully accounted, or compensated for, by 
the first group. Seven major types of damages have been considered, 
the main categories being human health (fatal and non-fatal effects), 
effects on crops and materials. Moreover, damages caused by global 
warming provoked by greenhouse gases have been assessed on a global 
level within ExternE; however the range of uncertainty was much 
higher for global warming impacts than for other damages.

When analyzing transportation technologies, the study generally found 
that gasoline (petrol) passenger cars were associated with less 
external costs than diesel cars, in both urban and extra-urban 
passenger transport. Diesel urban buses had lower cost per passenger 
per kilometer (pkm) than gasoline cars in all cities with the 
exception of London.

Diesel cars scored poorly due to high air pollution costs attached to 
the particulate matter (PM) emissions. The study, however, was based 
on Euro 2 (1996) engine technology, which is no longer representative 
for today's vehicle fleets. PM emission limits from Euro 2, Euro 3 
(2000), and Euro 4 (2005) technologies are 0.10 g/km (DI), 0.05 g/km, 
and 0.025 g/km, respectively (Euro 4 vehicles are already available 
in areas which offer tax incentives for their early introduction).

The highest air pollution costs were found in urban areas, where 
exposure to air pollution is high due to population density and 
climate conditions. The costs were dominated by the car use component 
(tailpipe pollution), with little contribution from vehicle 
production, fuel production, or infrastructure. In cities with 
unfavorable climate conditions (Athens) the air pollution costs for 
diesel cars were almost Û5 per 100 pkm. Under more favorable 
conditions of Amsterdam, the costs for diesel and gasoline cars were 
similar, both below Û1 per 100 pkm. In extra-urban driving the costs 
were lower, from about Û1.2 to less than Û0.2 per 100 pkm, due to low 
population exposure to pollution. The cost sources in extra-urban 
driving were also shifted from vehicle use to vehicle/fuel production 
and infrastructure.

In goods transport, the highest external cost was calculated for 
heavy-goods vehicles (over Û10 per TEU-km, where TEU stands for 20 
feet equivalent unit), followed by container ship, barge, and goods 
train (about Û2 per TEU-km). The pollution component, however, from 
heavy-goods vehicles was actually less than that from the container 
ship and barge (but higher than from the train). The highest external 
cost component in heavy-goods vehicles was accidents.

Source: European Commission


Full report - Acrobat file, 3.3Mb
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/energy/pdf/externe_en.pdf


http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWSACTION=DSES 
SION=RCN=EN_RCN_ID:20861
CORDIS: News service

New Commission report counts the social cost of transport and 
electricity generation
[Date: 2003-09-09]

The European Commission has carried out new research aimed at 
quantifying the full socio-environmental cost of different methods of 
transport and electricity generation, the results of which could be 
used impose eco-taxes on the most damaging technologies.

Socio-environmental, or 'external', costs from activities such as 
electricity generation are said to arise when: 'the social or 
economic activities of one group of persons have an impact on another 
group and when that impact is not fully accounted, or compensated 
for, by the first group.'

In the foreword to a report containing the findings of the ExternE 
study, Research Commissioner Philippe Busquin says that the study 
allows different fuels and technologies for the electricity and 
transport sectors to be compared: 'Policy actions could therefore be 
taken to tax the most damaging fuels and technologies or to encourage 
those with lower socio-environmental costs.'

The types of impacts analysed in the report include human health, 
damage to buildings, crops and ecosystems, global warming and noise 
pollution. The research employs a bottom-up methodology by measuring 

[biofuel] Alternative home heat

2003-09-20 Thread Grahams

double-walled SS things of various types, with a
firebox inside
What was that originally? I want one. ;)

Then there's a
constant 60+ deg C heat supply from two one-cubic-metre compost piles
(in series),

So how exactly are you harvesting this heat to heat a home?

I have an endless supply of wood chips I am trying to figure out how to 
use. Why do they have such things as pellet stoves  but not wood chip 
stoves?  I've never actually tried to burn them in the wood stove, but 
seems like if it would work well, everyone would use them rather than split 
and cut firewood.
So, how can  I turn these huge piles of chips into heat?  (I can 'premix 
them with chicken manure by using the animal house bedding too if this 
helps.)

Caroline


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
Easily record your favorite shows!
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WUMW7B/85qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Washing Machine as Processor

2003-09-20 Thread esbuck

Go to a store which caters to farmers.  They will have all sorts of metal and 
plastic containers, plus pumps, mixers, etc., which farmers use for mixing 
fertilizer, pesticides, etc.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Special Sale: 50% off ReplayTV
Easily record your favorite shows!
CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WUMW7B/85qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen Economy

2003-09-20 Thread robert luis rabello



Hakan Falk wrote:


 I would agree with you, if it was higher R/P values for natural gas.
 With the
 current 7 years for US, the demands of independence of import becomes
 an
 even a more impossible dream. I do not have to describe the current US

 situation on NG again. Hydrogen from NG achieve nothing and the best
 bet is coal/nuclear at the end. It is already feverish activities in
 US to
 build
 a lot more nuclear power stations.

No serious advocate of a hydrogen economy suggests that using a
single source of hydrogen production should be pursued.  The people who
are pushing hard for hydrogen would like to see a diversity of
resources, ranging from reforming natural gas and coal, to
methanogenesis of garbage, pyrolysis of biomass, algal production AND
electrolysis in situations that favor it, whether this is nuclear, wind
or any of the options explained below.

Using mass produced point focus solar collectors, whether stirling
or photovoltaic, WILL bring the price of electricity down low enough to
make hydrogen viable as an energy carrier.  Some people believe that
concentrated photovoltaics will eventually bring the price of
electricity down to less than 1 cent per kilowatt hour, and IF this can
be attained, a kilogram of hydrogen would cost less than what a current
gallon of gasoline is running in the United States--even if it the
hydrogen was taxed at the same level that gasoline is taxed.

http://www.mokindustries.com/pages/762107/index.htm

http://www.industrialsolartech.com/rmt.html

http://www.solarsystems.com.au/



 Hydrogen production at home? That will make Osama bin Laden happy.

I've made hydrogen at home.  No terrorist has ever approached me
about this!

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/9782



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
ReplayTV: CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
Instant Replay  Pause live TV.
Special Sale: 50% off!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UUMW7B/.5qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] 3 Questions NO ONE wants to answer

2003-09-20 Thread Brent S

I will reply to one of the questions. No I do not support nuclear energy. I 
don't think it is clean energy when it produces waste that is hazardess for 
hundreds of years.
Brent


From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [biofuel] 3 Questions NO ONE wants to answer
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:13:02 -

These questions are in reference to the energy crisis we are having
right now.

1) Do you support the concept of a Hydrogen Economy?

2) Do you support nuclear energy to generate electricity?

3) If you support the Hydrogen Economy concept, what energy source
will we use to make the hydrogen?

No candidate has responded to date.


_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
ReplayTV: CNet Ranked #1 over Tivo!
Instant Replay  Pause live TV.
Special Sale: 50% off!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UUMW7B/.5qGAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/