Re: [Biofuel] Bush on matter

2005-04-29 Thread Kenny Dunn

The incredible thing to me is that half of those that voted for him did so
BECAUSE he is an idiot!  I know people who cast votes bad for him or that he
comes across as a Regular Joe.  Of course, these people don't seem to be able
to connect him back to GHW, Samuel Prescott, and Prescott.  Astounding!

Richard Littrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 The incredible 
 thing is not that he says these things but that we voted for him. 
 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


Re: [Biofuel] Acetone in fuel increases mileage by 15 -35%

2005-04-15 Thread Kenny Dunn

Except that the petro industry doesn't really have any interest in you getting
better mileage.  They certainly aren't telling us any ways to send them less
money.

$.02,
Ken

Michael Redler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 You're making sense Bob.

 bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 if it really worked, which I highly doubt, don't you think somebody 
 would be blending and selling the mix already?

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


Re: [Biofuel] US gas hogs and 40 mpg

2005-04-13 Thread Kenny Dunn

Good article!  Though, I think it still doesn't truly address the issue
entirely.  And I don't begin to believe that American society remotely
understands this issue.  But, the problem begins there.  

We have accepted and even encouraged poor fuel economy ourselves.  As far as I
can tell, fuel economy hasn't changed since the 1970's.  Yet, with all the
advancement in other technologies, we don't expect efficiency.  No, we expect
raw horsepower - and gadgets.  We expect safety but, how is it that when
discussing safety, clean air and healthy water don't fit into the equation?  I
owned a 1981 VW Rabbit diesel that I purchase because the engine in my '77 VW
camper blew.  I intended to run biodiesel in it but, never truly made the
effort (I'm guilty).  That 81 Rabbit got an advertised 51 mpg - it actually
got around 54.  Today you can buy a 2005 VW Beetle TDI that gets around 47
mpg.  That's a disgrace!  But, not near so disgraceful as that we as a society
allow it or again even encourage it.  My friends wouldn't have chuckled at me
had my 81 Rabbit have the power that the new TDI does but, that again
describes the problem - this is why the lobbying works.  In a culture that is
so closely tied to the romance of the automobile, and a society that prides
itself on power, in all forms, only necessity will change our driving habits.
 And 40 mpg ain't near enough!  Not for me anyway.

I have to wonder what would happen if we did all drive hybrid-diesels with
regenerative braking and beyond that, curbing our driving habits by reducing
the amount of hours we are on the road.  Imagine an auto industry trying to
stay afloat with a consumer base that purchases a vehicle with a power plant
that will last 300,000 miles while only driving 7,000 miles a year.  The car
would reasonably last for 40 years.  The only way that such a setting would
work would be for the auto industry to reduce the quality of the vehicle. 
This I expect to be a reality.  The lobbyist will make it so.  And as a
society, we will accept it.

There is a piece of the puzzle that amazes me when we discuss renewable
resources.  There is always that faction that says that renewables destabilize
the petro industry as a whole (the oil companies, the auto industry, textiles,
transportation, etc).  That it will cost money and people will lose jobs. 
However, these same people fail to mention that those folks who are left
without employment, will have opportunities in newly created and much safer
positions - jobs manufacturing, transporting, distributing, installing and
maintaining safe, friend, renewable products and services.  Same goes for
reducing emissions from power plants and factories.  It will cost too much
is the common argument.  But where is the money spent to perform the
reductions?  Hopefully, back to the U.S. economy.  But, the American public is
will to believe the arguments and accept it.  

It MIGHT be a different story when the American auto industry goes by the way
of the rest of the manufacturing industry.  Still, we will continue to
subsidize oil.  We will prop of the Big 3 with emergency protections when
necessary - in the interest of the American people.  And we will accept it.  

By the people, for the people doesn't mean much anymore does it?

Sorry for the rant! 

Do good things,
Ken


MH [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

  April 3, 2005 
  ADVICE: PERSONAL FINANCE
 
  Detroit boneheads still push gas hogs
  U.S. imports oil, risks its security on cars
  unsuited for rest of world
  By SCOTT BURNS
  Universal Press Syndicate
 
  HoustonChronicle.com 
  http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/mym/3114747 
 
  Nearly 35 years ago General Motors asked a consulting firm
  to examine a problem. Imported cars, mostly Japanese, had
  captured 25 percent of the California car market.
  GM management was worried. While the Big Three still had
  90 percent of the national market, the top brass at
  GM saw California as the future.
 
  So they had the problem studied.
 
  Today, General Motor's market share is
  down to 25 percent. The Big Three have seen
  their share shrink to 57 percent. Our domestic
  carmakers (including Chrysler) have lacked foresight and
  innovation for so long they are now fighting to hold
  market share in the big categories essential for survival:
  midsize cars, SUVs and minivans.
 
  Management will blame this on intractable labor costs.
  While labor costs are definitely a problem, it's time to
  consider a larger problem: intractable bonehead management.
 
  The same Japanese managements that are derided for their
  conformity and slow decision-making are eating Detroit's
  breakfast, lunch and dinner.
 
  Today, General Motors and Ford are well-positioned to be
  dinosaurs. So is Chrysler. Worse, they are threats to
  national security.
 
  Here are problems
 
  How is this happening? 
 
  Here are three main thrusts:
 
  • The industry has consistently lobbied against any changes to
  the Corporate Average 

[Biofuel] Biodiesel-powered Multi-fuel Camp Stove

2005-04-05 Thread Kenny Dunn

Hi all,

I am gearing up for my first test batch of biodiesel from virgin oil this
weekend.  A few have suggested that using a proven process and visual
observances should be satisfactory tests to verify that all went well.  Be
that as it may, I am still trying uncover any possible measures to help verify
my results.  So, I am wondering, has anyone used biodiesel in a backpacking
stove that is capable of burning petro-diesel?  Can I expect that if I use
biodiesel in one of these jobbies, should it burn the same as petro-diesel? 
Should I expect any difference in flame color?  Would this sort of test be
completely insignificant?  Either way, I would certainly feel better the next
time I'm out on the trail if I was heating my dinner with bio instead of petro.

Thanks in advance,
Ken
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


Re: [Biofuel] Lots of questions

2005-03-31 Thread Kenny Dunn

Hi Roy,

I have thought about that.  It seems that I can probably find one that had a
burned out element or an older low efficiency model and was replaced with a
new fancy one.  Also, any leak that isn't causing a deluge is probably
weldable.  Like I said, I'm keeping my eyes open for the best free option that
presents itself.  I have read that many people use standard old 55 gallon
drums.  That option won't work for me as my wife will not find the corrosion
acceptable.  She already needs a bit on convincing.  Do you have another
suggestion for a free/very cheap reaction vessle?

Thanks for your input,
Ken

ROY Washbish [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Ken
 Where do you get a SPENT hot water heater that doesn't leak. For me ... that
would be the reason to get rid of it.
 Thankks
 Wide open for ideas
 Roy
 
 Ken Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Darryl,
 
 Thanks for the suggestions.
 
 I am planning to process on the scale that presents itself (based on 
 whatever every free equipment finds me). However, I have been thinking 
 that spent hot water heaters seem to be the way to go for processors.
 
 Thanks again,
 Ken
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 
 
 
 Roy Washbish 
 Certified Health Coach 
 A HOME BUSINESS  PRODUCTS THAT WORK
 PRODUCTS  BUSINESS  HTTP://WWW.TRIVITA.COM/11393920
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 



-- 



___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


[Biofuel] Lots of questions

2005-03-30 Thread Kenny Dunn

Hi all,

I am sure this will be a highly redundant request to most - sorry.

I hope to soon be a fellow bio-brewer.  I have been doing a lot of research
and I am now prepared (mentally anyway) to begin refining test batch equipment
and procedures.  After I get titration and test batch processing conquered, I
plan to use the Foolproof method and would like to try to develop a hands-off
system.  The Supreme Commander requires that this be a low budget operation. 
That said, the immediate stumbling block is that of a quality affordable
scale.  Or maybe it's not.  Any recommendations on scales?  

From much of the information that I've read, acids and bases and catalysts are
generally a hardware store type item for someone just starting out.  Are there
other sources of these supplies that might reduce cost, packaging wastes and
trips to the Mega Hardware Hut and can provide these things on a scale
appropriate for me?

Once you've produced your first *quality* liter of biodiesel, what is your
test apparatus?  I have contemplated renting a diesel generator for this
purpose.  Is that a good idea?  Are there other functional tests that can be
performed prior to subjecting an engine to my fuel?

A bit of background (just a bit) - I live in Lancaster County, PA and would
like to tour an individual processor if someone is nearby.  I plan to
eventually replace my heating oil with B100 and also fuel my car with the
same.  I will be installing a solar hot water heater for DHW and radiant heat
later this year if anyone is interested in comparing notes for those sorts of
things.  I have also contemplated solar hot water as my heat source during
biofuel processing.  Has anyone successfully done this?

Thanks, in advance, for the bandwidth for you time,
Ken
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/