Re: [OSM-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

2010-07-24 Thread Frederik Ramm

Hi,

Richard Fairhurst wrote:

I look forward to Richard Fairhurst suing Richard Fairhurst for violating
the license on Richard Fairhurst's data.


I know that guy. He might be crazy enough to do it. Just to prove a point.

Bye
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

2010-07-24 Thread Richard Fairhurst

Heiko Jacobs wrote:
> A real ODBL-OSM can only be build with "home copies" of the 
> data of the contributors who said yes. They cannot copy their 
> own edits from CC-OSM, because this also will be a 
> condensation of CC-OSM ...

So if they violate the licence, they'll be sued by the copyright holder,
right?

I look forward to Richard Fairhurst suing Richard Fairhurst for violating
the license on Richard Fairhurst's data.

*facepalm*

cheers
Richard
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Re-License-Cut-over-and-critical-mass-tp5333864p5333989.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

2010-07-24 Thread Frederik Ramm

Hi,

Heiko Jacobs wrote:

A real ODBL-OSM can only be build with "home copies" of the data
of the contributors who said yes. They cannot copy their own edits
from CC-OSM, because this also will be a condensation of CC-OSM ...


I don't think so. Copyright is not based on the physical path that data 
has traveled. For example, there's dual-licensed software where you can 
either use it under GPL or pay for a commercial license. You don't have 
to re-download the software when you switch from GPL to commercial - you 
just pay the price and get a piece of paper that says you can now use 
the software under another license. Often there won't even be a separate 
download link.


It is perfectly sufficient if someone agrees to ODbL, we can then take 
his data from our existing database.


Bye
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

2010-07-24 Thread Heiko Jacobs

Richard Weait schrieb:

Data that is now CC-By-SA will always be CC-By-SA. Currently published planets,

> for example are CC-By-SA and will stay that way.  No data loss.
> The data is still there. Still CC-By-SA.

Yes indeed. Including ...


We'll each choose to allow our data to be promoted to OSM with the
license upgrade, or we will not. 


... the new planet which is called to be under ODBL.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode

But it isn'nt, because the contributors who said "yes" for change
don't give their "home copy" of their data a second time like in

"7.b ... Licensor reserves the right to release THE WORK under different
license terms"

"the work" = "their original work" and not a copy of it.

But the new "so called ODBL-OSM" is only an "vote-yes"-extract
of the old CC-OSM so ...

"1.b 'Derivative Work' means a work based upon the Work ... such as a
... condensation ..."

... is suitable, so ...

"4.b You may distribute ... a Derivative Work only under the terms of
this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements
as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same
License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Japan)."

... also a "so called ODBL-OSM" ist still under CC and only under CC.

A real ODBL-OSM can only be build with "home copies" of the data
of the contributors who said yes. They cannot copy their own edits
from CC-OSM, because this also will be a condensation of CC-OSM ...

Mueck


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] Map Party 消息!

2010-07-24 Thread Louis Liu
Hi! 各位 mapper,

 2010 8月7日中午起在台南,有一場小型的 Map Party。
 相關的資訊在這個 wiki 頁面:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan/2010,_August_7,_Tainan希望您能參與這項活動。

Cheers,
劉俊宏
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] Ideas for a workshop

2010-07-24 Thread andrzej zaborowski
Hi,

in a couple of weeks Creative Commons here is organising what they
call Culture 2.0 Camp and some of the organisers are very interested
in the digitalisation and archiving of the cultural heritage of the
village where the camp is hosted.  (An almost completely unmapped
place by the way).  They already had the workshops planned but now got
the idea to employ OSM too.  If you have any ideas on fun things that
can be done with OSM during a digitalisation workshop, beside basic
mapping party, please let me know!

I don't know all the details but there should be about 20 - 25 people
attending the digitalisation paert.  There's some budget for renting
bikes and buying some quality GPS receivers.  Device model suggestions
also appreciated (maybe ones that enable audio mapping, or maybe just
plain receivers), though the wiki already has good documentation.

There's a castle in the village, it's in Poland and there's a
German-speaking minority in the village.

Many thanks,

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk