[Talk-cz] WeekklyOSM CZ 304

[Tom Ka]

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 304 týdeníku weeklyOSM:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/7523

Téma čísla: Založení organizace OSM CZ

* Missing Maps v Praze.
* UNICEF importuje do OSM.
* Mapy jednoduše s MapContrib.
* Nástupce CartoCSS
* Google a OSM pro OH 2016.

Pěkné počtení...

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts

[Eugene Alvin Villar]

Hi Erwin,

This QC Risk Atlas is interesting. The barangay boundaries depicted here
are different in several places from a map published by QC previously that
was the source of the QC barangay boundaries that are now in OSM.

~Eugene

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Erwin Olario  wrote:

>
> @Eugene
> That was too long ago.
>
> Anyway, check out Quezon City's Risk Atlas for interesting geospatial data:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwSM5MRaKxejOG05N0lUUHdXdEk/view
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:21 AM Eugene Alvin Villar 
> wrote:
>
>> Manila's administrative and legislative districts boundaries were mapped
>> because the data or information about them is available.
>>
>> Manila's administrative districts are defined by law in R.A. 409, which
>> is the Revised Charter of the City of Manila. For example, here's the
>> description of the boundary of the district of Quiapo:
>>
>> Beginning at the intersection of the center lines of Calle Azcarraga and
>>> Estero de Quiapo; thence along the center lines of Calle Azcarraga, Legarda
>>> and E. Mendiola, Estero de San Miguel, the Pasig River, Puente Colgante,
>>> Calles Norzagaray and Regidor, and Estero de Quiapo, to the point of
>>> beginning.
>>>
>>
>> It's then just a simple matter of determining which modern streets
>> correspond to which old street name (Calle Azcarraga is C.M. Recto Avenue,
>> while Puente Colgante is now Quezon Bridge, etc.)
>>
>> Manila's legislative districts are defined in the Ordinance section of
>> the 1987 Philippine Constitution. For example, here's the description of
>> the boundary of the 5th district:
>>
>> Barangays Nos. 649-828 N - Mouth of Pasig River inland to point Paz M.
>>> Guanzon Street extending to Estero de Pandacan; NE - Estero de Pandacan up
>>> to Pedro Gil Street to Tejeron Street up to boundary of Manila and Makati;
>>> SE - City boundary between Manila and Makati up to Estero de Tripa de
>>> Gallina; S - City boundary between Pasay and Manila down to Roxas Boulevard
>>> up to edge of reclaimed areas westward to Manila Bay; W - Manila Bay up to
>>> mouth of Pasig River.
>>>
>>
>> ~Eugene
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jherome Miguel >> > wrote:
>>>
 As a side note, Manila's districts are not obviously marked (possibly
 the same as the case of Quezzn City), but official boundaries assigned by
 the City of Manila has been mapped (the districts of Manila are officially
 designated). Possibly those district boundaries are mapped based on
 physical features and place addresses.

 On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jherome Miguel <
 jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I created the Cubao boundary by extrapolating some data from
> boundaries of barangays that may possibly form part of Cubao.
>
> Although "general areas", the approximate boundaries can be mapped.
> Also, some barangays are inside a certain district, and a ground survey on
> addresses of places on those barangays can be used to verify them.
>
> A few can be defined by surrounding streets (e.g. Santa Mesa Heights
> district boundaries are formed by its surrounding roads,like Quezon 
> Avenue,
> Araneta Avenue, Del Monte Avenue, and Mayon Avenue). and water bodies like
> rivers, or both (Diliman looks like to be one example. The Diliman Creek
> forms one part of the approximate boundary, while roads, like Katipunan
> Avenue, Commonwealth Avenue, North Avenue, West Avenue, a part of Quezon
> Avenue, Don A. Roces Avenue, and a portion of Tomas Morato Avenue forms 
> the
> rest.
>
> Hope this advice helps.
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar  > wrote:
>
>> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I
>> can tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating
>> these districts.
>>
>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel <
>> jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete,
>>> with every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still 
>>> missing,
>>> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for 
>>> those
>>> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and
>>> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map
>>> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the
>>> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz"
>>> area)?
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>
>>>
>>
>

>>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> 

Re: [Talk-it] Confini Parco Regionale Monti Simbruini

[Croce Domenico]

Il confine definisce l'area all'interno della quale si mappa il parco di
nostro interesse.

Non conoscendolo, ma provando comunque a mappare la zona, si rischia di
lasciare degli spazi vuoti non mappati.
Questo perchè pur conoscendo la zona, si rischia di non sapere esattamente
dove finisce il parco, e quindi di saltare qualche zona.

Il giorno 12 giugno 2016 00:08, Martin Koppenhoefer 
ha scritto:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 15:14, Croce Domenico <
> croce.domenic...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > Non solo non si rischia più ogni singola volta di incappare nei diritti
> di licenza,
>
>
>
> se prendi le fonti originali (leggi) oppure fai rilievi in campo, non ci
> sono problemi di licenza
>
>
> > ma sarebbe poi anche un ottimo punto di partenza per riempire i "vuoti"
> che inevitabilmente si creano all'interno dei vari parchi.
>
>
> questo non capisco, perché si crea un vuoto quando aggiungi il confine di
> un'area protetta?
>
>
>
> Ciao,
> Martin
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Confini Parco Regionale Monti Simbruini

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 15:14, Croce Domenico 
>  ha scritto:
> 
> Non solo non si rischia più ogni singola volta di incappare nei diritti di 
> licenza,



se prendi le fonti originali (leggi) oppure fai rilievi in campo, non ci sono 
problemi di licenza


> ma sarebbe poi anche un ottimo punto di partenza per riempire i "vuoti" che 
> inevitabilmente si creano all'interno dei vari parchi.


questo non capisco, perché si crea un vuoto quando aggiungi il confine di 
un'area protetta?



Ciao,
Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-de] Verwendung von Markenlogos in Karten?

[gmbo]

Am 11.06.2016 um 22:05 schrieb Eifelhunde:



Am 11.06.2016 um 14:20 schrieb gmbo:

Aber ich habe noch eine allgemeine Frage zu den Icons für den Stil.
Gibt es eine Beschreibung wie die optimal gebaut sein sollen.
Dateiformat möglichst SVG sonst eventuell PNG.


warum als Bitmap und nicht als Vektorgrafik?
OSM ist doch auch ne Vektorgrafik, oder?

___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
SVG ist soweit ich weiß, das bevorzugte Format und das ist Vektorgrafik. 
Aber mangels Vektorlogos wird wohl teilweise auch PNG als Bitmap benutzt.

Es wird aber daran gearbeitet die PMG Icons durch SVG Icons zu ersetzen.
Gruß
Gisbert

___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

[Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

inoltro questo call dalla lista inglese...

sent from a phone

(Inizio messaggio inoltrato)

> Da: Sebastiaan Couwenberg 
> Data: 11 giugno 2016 13:11:41 CEST
> A: t...@openstreetmap.org, d...@openstreetmap.org
> Oggetto: [OSM-talk] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after OSM 
> data, tools and writes documentation is needed
> 
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after
> OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed
> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:06:11 +0200
> From: Astrid Emde 
> To: Live Demo 
> 
> Hello OSM enthusiasts,
> 
> this is a mail from the OSGeo-Live team [1]. OSGeo-Live is a linux based
> distribution of open source geospatial software which is handed out at
> conferences around the world, and used as the foundation for open source
> geospatial training courses.
> 
> We use OSGeo-Live to teach enthusiasts how to create geospatial data
> with free tools.
> 
> At the moment, we include an extract of OSM data, and how to use Mapnik,
> but we'd love to be doing a better job of promoting OSM which in turn
> should attract motivated geospatial people into the OSM community.
> 
> The catch is that we need some help understanding OSM tools, and keeping
> these tools and docs up to date, which is where you (the OSM community)
> comes in.
> 
> We are hoping to find one or two people who can help us write
> Application Overview [2] and 10-15 min Quickstart docs, and act as a
> point of contact to advise on OSM as we build each release.
> 
> This is what we are looking for. Are you interested to help? It could be
> a single person or a team. And the OSGeo-Live team is also supporting,
> when help is needed.
> 
> This is what you have to do - don't worry, it should not be too much work ;)
> * provide the up-to-date software every half a year when a new version
> of OSGeo-Live is coming out
> * check the documentation (Overview and Quickstart)  -> is there
> anything to update
> * provide new up-to-date OSM data (f.e. for version 10.0 we will provide
> data from Bonn where FOSS4G 2016 will be in august)
> * provide a quickstart (tutorial to help people to get to know OSM and
> make the first steps) - this quickstart does not exist at the moment and
> has to be written
> * OSM covers data and OSM tools (like JOSM) which are not documented yet
> ** we only have a documentation for Mapnik
> http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/mapnik_overview.html
> 
> Are you interested? If yes - please let us know. (subscribe to the
> OSGeo-Live (Live-demo) mailing list [4] or write to astrid_e...@osgeo.org)
> 
> Regards
> 
> Astrid from OSGeo-Live PSC
> 
> [1] http://live.osgeo.org
> [2] OSM Overview http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/osm_dataset_overview.html
> [3] OSGeo-Live Dokumentation in the OSGeo wiki
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
> [4] Live-demo mailing list
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> 
> ___
> talk mailing list
> t...@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bonnes et moins bonnes visibilités OSM

[JB]

Et le triplon était sur l'hôtel (tourism=hotel).

JB.


Le 11/06/2016 à 21:45, Romain MEHUT a écrit :

Le doublon était sur l'adresse qui existait déjà...

Romain

Le 11 juin 2016 à 17:59, Philippe Verdy > a écrit :


Là ce n'est pas méchant il n'y a pas d'erreur c'est juste que la
mention de la ville et du code postal peut éventuellement être
déduite.
Attention de ne pas être trop exigeant sur les champs d'adresse,
d'autant que nombre de communes ont fusionné mais les adresses
sont parfois ambigues et qu'il est difficile de se repérer sur le
nom de la nouvelle commune; l'acnienne commune conservant en fait
son nom local la plupart du temps, il n'y a pas d'impact sur les
adresses.




___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] MAPS.ME maggior diffusione OSM inizio nuovi problemi... Seri!

[Cascafico Giovanni]

Solo nella mia zona il 20% dei changeset è firmato maps.me. Questa query
restituisce 100 changeset nel "mio" grado quadrato...

https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changesets?bbox=13,45,14,46

Il giorno 4 giugno 2016 09:35, Andrea Lattmann 
ha scritto:

> Ciao ragazzi, come da oggetto, con le/la nuova versione di MAPS.ME da la
> possibilità di effettuare modifiche ad OSM. Per ora non permette la
> cancellazione (per fortuna). Questo ha introdotto un aumento di note sulla
> mappa, molte volte criptiche, perché l' utente non lascia commenti, e
> peggio ancora modifiche di questo genere [1].
> Il name del Duomo di Milano è già stato modificato 3 volte ed il nostro
> amico Alecs01 ha ripristinato il name. Come possiamo correre ai ripari?
> Contattiamo tutti gli utenti MAPS.ME?? Rischiamo dei danni seri.
> Grazie
>
> [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290222578
>
> Andrea Lattmann
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-de] Verwendung von Markenlogos in Karten?

[Eifelhunde]

Am 11.06.2016 um 14:20 schrieb gmbo:

Aber ich habe noch eine allgemeine Frage zu den Icons für den Stil.
Gibt es eine Beschreibung wie die optimal gebaut sein sollen.
Dateiformat möglichst SVG sonst eventuell PNG.


warum als Bitmap und nicht als Vektorgrafik?
OSM ist doch auch ne Vektorgrafik, oder?

___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-cz] aktualizace počtu fotografií rozcestníků na OSMhicheck

[Marián Kyral]

Zase mu tam někdo natlačil do databáze non UTF-8 znaky?

Marián

Dne 11.6.2016 v 20:53 Tom Ka napsal(a):
> Jo, walley to ma opet nejake rozbite
>
> Dne 11. června 2016 5:54 Zdeněk Pražák  napsal(a):
>> Podle mne se asi neaktualizuje počet rozcestníků s přidanou fotografií,
>> včera jsem přidal asi 10  fotek a koukal jsem, že přidávali i další ale
>> sumární počet rozcestníků s fotkou zůstal stejný 6007
>> pražák
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-cz mailing list
>> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz


___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bonnes et moins bonnes visibilités OSM

[Romain MEHUT]

Le doublon était sur l'adresse qui existait déjà...

Romain

Le 11 juin 2016 à 17:59, Philippe Verdy  a écrit :

> Là ce n'est pas méchant il n'y a pas d'erreur c'est juste que la mention
> de la ville et du code postal peut éventuellement être déduite.
> Attention de ne pas être trop exigeant sur les champs d'adresse, d'autant
> que nombre de communes ont fusionné mais les adresses sont parfois ambigues
> et qu'il est difficile de se repérer sur le nom de la nouvelle commune;
> l'acnienne commune conservant en fait son nom local la plupart du temps, il
> n'y a pas d'impact sur les adresses.
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-cz] aktualizace počtu fotografií rozcestníků na OSMhicheck

[Tom Ka]

Jo, walley to ma opet nejake rozbite

Dne 11. června 2016 5:54 Zdeněk Pražák  napsal(a):
> Podle mne se asi neaktualizuje počet rozcestníků s přidanou fotografií,
> včera jsem přidal asi 10  fotek a koukal jsem, že přidávali i další ale
> sumární počet rozcestníků s fotkou zůstal stejný 6007
> pražák
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

[Talk-us] Separate sidewalk vs crossing in the middle of 45 mph road

[Roman Yepishev]

Hello,

As per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separa
te_way I started mapping the sidewalks that run along the main roads,
but are physically separated from the carriage with more than a curb - 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/gKo

Should the highway=* with separate highway=footway/footway=sidewalk be
tagged as sidewalk=no?

Now, routing via Grasshopper and Mapzen will direct you to the road
without a sidewalk just because you want to turn before the crossing
(instead of going a safer route via pedestrian crossing with traffic
signals):

https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=42.506496%2C-83.42391=42.4836
81%2C-83.417076=en-
US=foot=fastest=true=Omniscale

http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=mapzen_foot=42.505
9%2C-83.4242%3B42.4837%2C-83.4172#map=17/42.49893/-83.41971

The sidewalk "islands" are in the real world as well, forcing you to
seek alternative route through the grass/bushes or cross a 45 mph
street.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-br] Interdição Rio de Janeiro - Pça da Republica

[Arlindo Pereira]

Sim, a via continua em obras para implantação do VLT.

[]s

2016-06-11 12:28 GMT-03:00 Erick de Oliveira Leal <
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com>:

> Alguém está sabendo se esta via continua interditada
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203430661 ?
>
> ___
> Talk-br mailing list
> Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
>
>
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br

Re: [Talk-cz] Cykloznačení - puntík se stříškou

[Petr Vozdecký]

Pavle, diky za reakci. Muzu te poprosit o rozvedeni te vety "pravdepodobne 
je to spatny napad"? Takhle je to jen jakysi nekonkretni vykrik...



-- Původní zpráva --

Od: Pavel Machek 

Datum: 11. 6. 2016 v 08:55:33

Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Cykloznačení - puntík se stříškou



On Thu 2016-06-09 09:59:57, Petr Vozdecký wrote: > ahoj, > odpovim sireji v 
jinem mailu > zde jen reakce na Petrovu poznamku > > NAVRZENE SCEMA 
NEROZBIJE MTBMAP > > z nekolika duvodu: > 1) s autorem MTBmap jsme navrh 
noveho schematu diskutovali > 2) MTBmap neni vubec zavisla na kct_barva=* a 
kontroluje tuto hodnotu jen > tam, kde neni osmc:symbol > 3) jakakoliv 
"hromadna akce" ve zmene tagovani by nebyla provedena bez > konzultace 
minimalne s Martinem Tesarem (MTBmap) a Petrem Vejsadou (poloha. > net), 
tedy temi, kdo vytvareji "primarni" zdroje (rendery) sledujici a > 
espektujici realny stav znacenych tras v CR Jakakoliv automaticka "hromadna 
zmena" tagovani potrebuje vyrazne vetsi konzultace, viz pravidla importu. A 
velmi pravdepodobne je to spatny napad. Pavel -- (english) http://www.
livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.
cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _
__ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.
openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-it] reti di sentieri e parchi

[Alfredo Gattai]

Ciao Martin,

in realta' il problema e' proprio quello che solo una parte dei sentieri
CAI (e non perche' ce ne sono anche della FIE da noi) fanno parte della
Rete Escursionistica Ligure percio' da qui' il bisogno di identificarli.
In effetti pero' non e' una reference ma un name, quindi non potendo usare
semplicemente "name" cambiero' il tag in rwn_name=Rete Escursionistica
Ligure.

Quella nazionale (REI) credo che alla fine non serva usarla perche' se e'
nella rete regionale automaticamente e' in quella nazionale.

Per quanto riguarda is_in in effetti non piace un granche' neanche a me,
per ora salvo bisogni particolari lo lascerei perdere, magari ci si
specializza in query poligonali usando i bordi del parco...

Ciao
Alfredo

2016-06-11 18:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 17:48, Alfredo Gattai <
> alfredo.gat...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > wn_ref=Sentieri dello Sciacchetra'
>
>
> questo per me non è un ref ma un nome, userei il tag "name"
>
>
> > rwn_ref=Rete Escursionistica Ligure (REL)
>
>
> se tutti i sentieri in una regione ne fanno parte, allora non c'è
> informazione (quindi non lo metterei), altrimenti si
>
>
> > nwn_ref=Rete Escursionistica Italiana (REI)
>
>
> dito
>
>
>
> > is_in=Parco Nazionale delle 5 Terre
>
>
> non c'è bisogno, siamo una mappa, si vede
>
>
> ciao,
> Martin
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Stampare una mappa uMap

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 11 giu 2016, alle ore 10:15, EugPez  ha scritto:
> 
> Non ho ancora avuto modo di provare Mapnik + Nik4, ma ho dato priorità alla
> prova di QGIS per l'emissione in PDF,


direi che mapnik e nik4 sono molto più complessi da installare (perché hanno 
una serie di dipendenze come postgres e postgis, dove devi caricare dati ecc.), 
Qgis è molto più facile e immediato per ottenere risultati 


ciao,
Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] reti di sentieri e parchi

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 17:48, Alfredo Gattai 
>  ha scritto:
> 
> wn_ref=Sentieri dello Sciacchetra'


questo per me non è un ref ma un nome, userei il tag "name"


> rwn_ref=Rete Escursionistica Ligure (REL)


se tutti i sentieri in una regione ne fanno parte, allora non c'è informazione 
(quindi non lo metterei), altrimenti si


> nwn_ref=Rete Escursionistica Italiana (REI)


dito



> is_in=Parco Nazionale delle 5 Terre


non c'è bisogno, siamo una mappa, si vede


ciao,
Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Liens Wikidata (Était : ERDF (et RFF) ont changé de nom)

[Christian Quest]

Il faut par contre bien faire attention à l'objet sur lequel ces tags 
sont mis (comme les tags wikipedia d'ailleurs).


Un tag wikidata=* ne devrait logiquement exister qu'une seule fois dans 
la base OSM.


Pas contre, des tags liant une propriété de l'objet (par exemple son 
nom, son opérateur, etc) peuvent exister autant de fois que nécessaire.



Le 10/06/2016 à 12:22, Christian Rogel a écrit :


Le 9 juin 2016 à 09:27, François Lacombe > a écrit :


Tenez, ça va dans le bon sens : iD vient juste d'être mis a jour avec 
cette fonctionnalité intéressante


https://twitter.com/bhousel/status/740567649894031369?s=09

François



Sur la liste anglophone, l’annonce de l’ajout automatique d’une 
référence Wikidata mérite un peu plus d’explications :
la dernière version d’iD crée automatiquement le binôme clé- valeur 
wikidata = Qnn si le « name » est trouvé comme titre d’un article 
du Wikipedia.


La discussion s’est focalisée sur les noms de lieu administratifs, 
mais, cela inclut bien d’autres choses comme les monuments, gares et 
autres équipements.


Frederick Ramm s’est demandé, si ce n’était pas un « mechanical 
edit », mais, Simon Poole a répondu que cela n’est pas un import massif.


L’auteur de l’implémentation, Minh Nguyen a précisé qu’il y a, en ce 
moment, 1 778 365 références Wikidata pour des « human settlements » 
et au dessus, dans la hiérarchie, 2 225 880

« administrative terrtorial entitiy ».

L’avantage de llier un objet géographique à Wikidata est de fournir un 
ancrage plus stable (labilité des OSM ID).


Bryan Housel, mainteneur de iD a dit espérer que cette fonctionnaité 
serait ajoutée aux autres éditeurs OSM. Si cela arrive, c’est une 
évolution très importante d’OSM.



Christian R.


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr



--
Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] "Google et la SNCF cartographient les gares de l'Euro 2016"

[Philippe Verdy]

Note qu'on n'interdit pas la revente des données, cependant je ne vois
jamais Google créditer autre chose que les sources de données qu'il a
directement acquises. Bref que la SNCF revende les données dérivées à
Google, elle peut le faire (on parle de collaboration avec la SNCF, c'est
aussi pour qu'elle puisse disposer des données et les rediffuser à qui elle
veut), Google peut les rediffuser aussi, mais on devrait s'attendre aussi à
ce que Google nous crédite sur ses fonds de carte.
Maintenant Google n'est peut-être pas en faute si la SNCF a omis des termes
contractuels avec Google.
Quand je regarde les fonds de carte Google en fait je vois très peu de
crédits affichés, il acquière des données agrégées de diverses sources par
des sociétés tierces, et ne mentionne alors que cette société tierce. Les
aggrégateurs peuvent être le problème s'ils omettent d'inclure les crédits
nécessaires: combien de liens doit-on consulter et où les chercher, ce
n'est pas toujours clair dans les mentions très floues données par Google.



Le 11 juin 2016 à 16:17, Charles Nepote  a écrit :

> Le 10/06/2016 21:28, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
>
>> C'est complémentaire, soit ! Mais en attendant il y a eu un partenariat
>> entre OSM et la SNCF pour le Francilien, qui a bénéficié du travail des
>> OSMeurs pour améliorer ses propres données. Et dans le dos, la SNCF
>> revend ces données à Google dans une forme propriétaire.
>>
>
> Tu veux dire que des données co-produites par la communauté OSM sont
> revendues par la SNCF à Google ?
> [_] Oui.
> [_] Non.
> [_] Je ne sais pas trop j'ai dit ça comme ça...
> (Pas la peine de trop détailler.)
>
> Charles.
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] "Google et la SNCF cartographient les gares de l'Euro 2016"

[Philippe Verdy]

En plus la mention du nom de la rue n'est pas une erreur, car il n'y a pas
de relation associated street, et le noeud en question n'est pas
directement sur le tracé de la voie mais à côté ...
Cela facilite même le rapprochement à défaut de relation associatedStreet;
la recherche par proximité ne marche pas toujorus et avec sous les
logiciels, et en plus on peut avoir besoin de mentionner plusieurs POI à la
même adresse, le noeud d'adresse étant sur aucun des POIs.

Le 11 juin 2016 à 16:17, Charles Nepote  a écrit :

> Le 10/06/2016 21:28, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
>
>> C'est complémentaire, soit ! Mais en attendant il y a eu un partenariat
>> entre OSM et la SNCF pour le Francilien, qui a bénéficié du travail des
>> OSMeurs pour améliorer ses propres données. Et dans le dos, la SNCF
>> revend ces données à Google dans une forme propriétaire.
>>
>
> Tu veux dire que des données co-produites par la communauté OSM sont
> revendues par la SNCF à Google ?
> [_] Oui.
> [_] Non.
> [_] Je ne sais pas trop j'ai dit ça comme ça...
> (Pas la peine de trop détailler.)
>
> Charles.
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bonnes et moins bonnes visibilités OSM

[Philippe Verdy]

Là ce n'est pas méchant il n'y a pas d'erreur c'est juste que la mention de
la ville et du code postal peut éventuellement être déduite.
Attention de ne pas être trop exigeant sur les champs d'adresse, d'autant
que nombre de communes ont fusionné mais les adresses sont parfois ambigues
et qu'il est difficile de se repérer sur le nom de la nouvelle commune;
l'acnienne commune conservant en fait son nom local la plupart du temps, il
n'y a pas d'impact sur les adresses.

Le 11 juin 2016 à 16:30, Romain MEHUT  a écrit :

> Le 11 juin 2016 à 06:01, JB  a écrit :
>
>> Finir par demander un blocage ou un revert en règle ?
>>
> Tu ne crois pas si bien dire cf.
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39883461
>
> Romain
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] Stampare una mappa uMap

[Cascafico Giovanni]

> Nik4 fa un buon lavoro e se si ha la necessità di aggiungere della
grafica come logo, aggiunta di foto con didascalie ecc ecc. si può aprire
con inkscape (programma di grafica vettoriale) ed uno si sbizzarrisce e
salva in PDF.

Più che altro il composer di qgis permette la generazione di elementi che
devono essere legati tra loro: creazione automatica della legenda , barra
di scala, reticoli, rotazioni, bussola, cose che danno al risultato in
aspetto professionale.

IMHO può già valer la pena se sì mette in preventivo di fare 3-4 mappe, poi
lo sforzo di apprendimento non credo sia di molto superiore al nik4
Fare qualcosa con un editor svg risulterebbe più permeabile agli errori.
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-br] Interdição Rio de Janeiro - Pça da Republica

[Erick de Oliveira Leal]

Alguém está sabendo se esta via continua interditada
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203430661 ?
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bonnes et moins bonnes visibilités OSM

[Romain MEHUT]

Le 11 juin 2016 à 06:01, JB  a écrit :

> Finir par demander un blocage ou un revert en règle ?
>
Tu ne crois pas si bien dire cf.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39883461

Romain
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] "Google et la SNCF cartographient les gares de l'Euro 2016"

[Charles Nepote]

Le 10/06/2016 21:28, Philippe Verdy a écrit :

C'est complémentaire, soit ! Mais en attendant il y a eu un partenariat
entre OSM et la SNCF pour le Francilien, qui a bénéficié du travail des
OSMeurs pour améliorer ses propres données. Et dans le dos, la SNCF
revend ces données à Google dans une forme propriétaire.


Tu veux dire que des données co-produites par la communauté OSM sont 
revendues par la SNCF à Google ?

[_] Oui.
[_] Non.
[_] Je ne sais pas trop j'ai dit ça comme ça...
(Pas la peine de trop détailler.)

Charles.


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-de] Verwendung von Markenlogos in Karten?

[gmbo]

Am 11.06.2016 um 13:21 schrieb Eifelhunde:



Am 08.06.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Sven Geggus:
Nun sind dies Logos aber natürlich alles registrierte Marken das 
heißt es

dürfte illegal sein, diese in einer öffentlichen karte zu verwenden.


Wikipedia verwendet die auch über die Jahre ohne das sich wer 
beschwert hat.



___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
In Wikipedia dürfen die Logos nur dort verwendet werden, wo der Artikel 
eindeutig nur über die Marke geschrieben ist. Also ein eindeutiger 
Zusammenhang zur Marke besteht.


Da ist es bei der Karte nicht so einfach. Im Normalfall wird das 
Markenlogo zwar richtig verwendet, aber Wie ich scon schrieb müsste dann 
wirklich Eindeutigkeit herschen.

Und die ist bei unserem Tagging nicht gegeben.
Wir können nicht unterscheiden ist es Aldi Nord oder Süd. Gut hier wäre 
es möglich beide Logos zu einem  zu machen.

Bei Netto und Netto Marken Discount geht es aber nicht.

Ob ein Laden noch existiert oder Ende des letzten Jahres zugemacht hat, 
sieht das Renderingprogramm nicht wenn es noch nicht umgetaggt ist, 
dürfte aber erst Probleme machen wenn die Konkurenz hier einen Laden 
eröffnet.


Auch wenn ich die Logos in der Karte gut fände, ich glaube nicht an eine 
Realisierbarkeit ohne neue Tags wie brand:logo=*.
Wir könnten die Logos in der Karte warscheinlich verwenden, müssten aber 
mit einem Widerspruch der Markeninhabers rechnen, einmal weil wir z.B. 
nicht die genauen Farben oder das richtige Seitenverhaltnis verwenden, 
es kann natürlich auch wir möchtrn das nicht sein, weil die Marke nicht 
erkennbar ist.
Dann müssten wir es herausnehmen, da wir selbst wenn wir es rechtlich 
dürften, keine Geldmittel für einen Rechtsstreit hätten.


Aber ich habe noch eine allgemeine Frage zu den Icons für den Stil.
Gibt es eine Beschreibung wie die optimal gebaut sein sollen.
Dateiformat möglichst SVG sonst eventuell PNG.
Größe bei 16x16 px oder ?
Farben ?
gibt es sonst noch etwas wichtiges zu berücksichtigen.

Gruß
Gisbert









___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-it] Stampare una mappa uMap

[Andrea Lattmann]

>NIK 4 sembra che emetta solo in PNG

No anche in altri formati,  tipo in vettoriale SVG (lo apri con inkscape)

Gestisce anche i layer, e se uno vuole...

"You can export a map to PDF and be done with it, but often you'd want to do 
some postprocessing: move labels away from roads, highlight features, draw 
additional labels and arrows. For that I recommend processing the SVG file with 
mapnik-group-text, which would allow for easier label movement."

Comunque rimane il fatto che QGIS sia uno strumento potentissimo, ma se uno 
vuole qualche cosa di meno "ingombrante" perché ne ha necessità ogni morte di 
vescovo, Nik4 fa un buon lavoro e se si ha la necessità di aggiungere della 
grafica come logo, aggiunta di foto con didascalie ecc ecc. si può aprire con 
inkscape (programma di grafica vettoriale) ed uno si sbizzarrisce e salva in 
PDF.


Andrea Lattmann

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk] Lybian territorial waters

[Christoph Hormann]

On Saturday 11 June 2016, gianfranco g wrote:
> Is the Gulf of Sidra or Sirte correctly mapped?
> I am not into territorial waters delimitation, can someone more
> expert than me cast a sight on it?
> Looks like (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Sidra) there is
> represented an internationally illegal territorial claim.

Maritime boundaries are inherently non-verifiable so in OSM they are 
generally mapped based on claims, ideally the UNCLOS declarations.  For 
Libya:

http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/STATEFILES/LBY.htm

Such claims can of couse be disputed, conflicting with others or be 
frivolous to a varying degree.  But there is not really an objective 
way to distinguish between 'real' and 'non-real' territorial waters or 
legal and illegal territorial claims.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-de] Verwendung von Markenlogos in Karten?

[Eifelhunde]

Am 08.06.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Sven Geggus:

Nun sind dies Logos aber natürlich alles registrierte Marken das heißt es
dürfte illegal sein, diese in einer öffentlichen karte zu verwenden.


Wikipedia verwendet die auch über die Jahre ohne das sich wer beschwert hat.


___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

[OSM-talk] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after
OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:06:11 +0200
From: Astrid Emde 
To: Live Demo 

Hello OSM enthusiasts,

this is a mail from the OSGeo-Live team [1]. OSGeo-Live is a linux based
distribution of open source geospatial software which is handed out at
conferences around the world, and used as the foundation for open source
geospatial training courses.

We use OSGeo-Live to teach enthusiasts how to create geospatial data
with free tools.

At the moment, we include an extract of OSM data, and how to use Mapnik,
but we'd love to be doing a better job of promoting OSM which in turn
should attract motivated geospatial people into the OSM community.

The catch is that we need some help understanding OSM tools, and keeping
these tools and docs up to date, which is where you (the OSM community)
comes in.

We are hoping to find one or two people who can help us write
Application Overview [2] and 10-15 min Quickstart docs, and act as a
point of contact to advise on OSM as we build each release.

This is what we are looking for. Are you interested to help? It could be
a single person or a team. And the OSGeo-Live team is also supporting,
when help is needed.

This is what you have to do - don't worry, it should not be too much work ;)
* provide the up-to-date software every half a year when a new version
of OSGeo-Live is coming out
* check the documentation (Overview and Quickstart)  -> is there
anything to update
* provide new up-to-date OSM data (f.e. for version 10.0 we will provide
data from Bonn where FOSS4G 2016 will be in august)
* provide a quickstart (tutorial to help people to get to know OSM and
make the first steps) - this quickstart does not exist at the moment and
has to be written
* OSM covers data and OSM tools (like JOSM) which are not documented yet
** we only have a documentation for Mapnik
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/mapnik_overview.html

Are you interested? If yes - please let us know. (subscribe to the
OSGeo-Live (Live-demo) mailing list [4] or write to astrid_e...@osgeo.org)

Regards

Astrid from OSGeo-Live PSC

[1] http://live.osgeo.org
[2] OSM Overview http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/osm_dataset_overview.html
[3] OSGeo-Live Dokumentation in the OSGeo wiki
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
[4] Live-demo mailing list
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-de] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed

[Astrid Emde (FOSSGIS e.V.)]

Hello OSM enthusiasts,

this is a mail from the OSGeo-Live team [1]. OSGeo-Live is a linux based 
distribution of open source geospatial software which is handed out at 
conferences around the world, and used as the foundation for open source 
geospatial training courses.


We use OSGeo-Live to teach enthusiasts how to create geospatial data 
with free tools.


At the moment, we include an extract of OSM data, and how to use Mapnik, 
but we'd love to be doing a better job of promoting OSM which in turn 
should attract motivated geospatial people into the OSM community.


The catch is that we need some help understanding OSM tools, and keeping 
these tools and docs up to date, which is where you (the OSM community) 
comes in.


We are hoping to find one or two people who can help us write 
Application Overview [2] and 10-15 min Quickstart docs, and act as a 
point of contact to advise on OSM as we build each release.


This is what we are looking for. Are you interested to help? It could be 
a single person or a team. And the OSGeo-Live team is also supporting, 
when help is needed.


This is what you have to do - don't worry, it should not be too much 
work ;)
* provide the up-to-date software every half a year when a new version 
of OSGeo-Live is coming out
* check the documentation (Overview and Quickstart)  -> is there 
anything to update
* provide new up-to-date OSM data (f.e. for version 10.0 we will provide 
data from Bonn where FOSS4G 2016 will be in august)
* provide a quickstart (tutorial to help people to get to know OSM and 
make the first steps) - this quickstart does not exist at the moment and 
has to be written

* OSM covers data and OSM tools (like JOSM) which are not documented yet
** we only have a documentation for Mapnik 
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/mapnik_overview.html


Are you interested? If yes - please let us know. (subscribe to the 
OSGeo-Live (Live-demo) mailing list [4] or write to 
astrid_e...@osgeo.org)


Regards

Astrid from OSGeo-Live PSC

[1] http://live.osgeo.org
[2] OSM Overview 
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/osm_dataset_overview.html
[3] OSGeo-Live Dokumentation in the OSGeo wiki 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
[4] Live-demo mailing list 
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo



___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

[OSM-talk] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed

[Astrid Emde (OSGeo)]

Hello OSM enthusiasts,

this is a mail from the OSGeo-Live team [1]. OSGeo-Live is a linux based 
distribution of open source geospatial software which is handed out at 
conferences around the world, and used as the foundation for open source 
geospatial training courses.


We use OSGeo-Live to teach enthusiasts how to create geospatial data 
with free tools.


At the moment, we include an extract of OSM data, and how to use Mapnik, 
but we'd love to be doing a better job of promoting OSM which in turn 
should attract motivated geospatial people into the OSM community.


The catch is that we need some help understanding OSM tools, and keeping 
these tools and docs up to date, which is where you (the OSM community) 
comes in.


We are hoping to find one or two people who can help us write 
Application Overview [2] and 10-15 min Quickstart docs, and act as a 
point of contact to advise on OSM as we build each release.


This is what we are looking for. Are you interested to help? It could be 
a single person or a team. And the OSGeo-Live team is also supporting, 
when help is needed.


This is what you have to do - don't worry, it should not be too much 
work ;)
* provide the up-to-date software every half a year when a new version 
of OSGeo-Live is coming out
* check the documentation (Overview and Quickstart)  -> is there 
anything to update
* provide new up-to-date OSM data (f.e. for version 10.0 we will provide 
data from Bonn where FOSS4G 2016 will be in august)
* provide a quickstart (tutorial to help people to get to know OSM and 
make the first steps) - this quickstart does not exist at the moment and 
has to be written

* OSM covers data and OSM tools (like JOSM) which are not documented yet
** we only have a documentation for Mapnik 
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/mapnik_overview.html


Are you interested? If yes - please let us know. (subscribe to the 
OSGeo-Live (Live-demo) mailing list [4] or write to 
astrid_e...@osgeo.org)


Regards

Astrid from OSGeo-Live PSC

[1] http://live.osgeo.org
[2] OSM Overview 
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/osm_dataset_overview.html
[3] OSGeo-Live Dokumentation in the OSGeo wiki 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
[4] Live-demo mailing list 
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-at] OSGeo-Live team needs help: Someone who looks after OSM data, tools and writes documentation is needed

[Astrid Emde (FOSSGIS e.V.)]

Hello OSM enthusiasts,

this is a mail from the OSGeo-Live team [1]. OSGeo-Live is a linux based 
distribution of open source geospatial software which is handed out at 
conferences around the world, and used as the foundation for open source 
geospatial training courses.


We use OSGeo-Live to teach enthusiasts how to create geospatial data 
with free tools.


At the moment, we include an extract of OSM data, and how to use Mapnik, 
but we'd love to be doing a better job of promoting OSM which in turn 
should attract motivated geospatial people into the OSM community.


The catch is that we need some help understanding OSM tools, and keeping 
these tools and docs up to date, which is where you (the OSM community) 
comes in.


We are hoping to find one or two people who can help us write 
Application Overview [2] and 10-15 min Quickstart docs, and act as a 
point of contact to advise on OSM as we build each release.


This is what we are looking for. Are you interested to help? It could be 
a single person or a team. And the OSGeo-Live team is also supporting, 
when help is needed.


This is what you have to do - don't worry, it should not be too much 
work ;)
* provide the up-to-date software every half a year when a new version 
of OSGeo-Live is coming out
* check the documentation (Overview and Quickstart)  -> is there 
anything to update
* provide new up-to-date OSM data (f.e. for version 10.0 we will provide 
data from Bonn where FOSS4G 2016 will be in august)
* provide a quickstart (tutorial to help people to get to know OSM and 
make the first steps) - this quickstart does not exist at the moment and 
has to be written

* OSM covers data and OSM tools (like JOSM) which are not documented yet
** we only have a documentation for Mapnik 
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/mapnik_overview.html


Are you interested? If yes - please let us know. (subscribe to the 
OSGeo-Live (Live-demo) mailing list [4] or write to 
astrid_e...@osgeo.org)


Regards

Astrid from OSGeo-Live PSC

[1] http://live.osgeo.org
[2] OSM Overview 
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/osm_dataset_overview.html
[3] OSGeo-Live Dokumentation in the OSGeo wiki 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
[4] Live-demo mailing list 
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo



___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

[OSM-talk] Lybian territorial waters

[gianfranco g]

Is the Gulf of Sidra or Sirte correctly mapped?
I am not into territorial waters delimitation, can someone more expert than
me cast a sight on it?
Looks like (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Sidra) there is
represented an internationally illegal territorial claim.

Thank you

Gianfra
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it] MAPS.ME maggior diffusione OSM inizio nuovi problemi... Seri!

[Cascafico Giovanni]

Scusa, ho visto ora la tabella (in ufficio google docs è censurato)
E' possibile fare un crontab per questi utilissimi dati? Magari solo per
l'Italia...

Il giorno 5 giugno 2016 18:59, Andrea Albani  ha scritto:

> Ho ricavato qualche dato sull'utilizzo di MAPS.ME che vorrei condividere
> con voi.
>
> Sono partito dalla lista dei changesets pubblicata su planet.osm.org.
> Ho estratto i changesets creati dal 1/4/16 fino al 30/5/16.
> Di questi ho isolato quelli creati dalle applicazioni di MAPS.ME
> guardando il bundle_id.
>
> Se volete sollazzarvi ulteriormente trovate i dati in forma tabellare qui
> [0] con tanto di changeset ID.
>
> A voi i commenti... io vedo un'esercito di "casual mappers"  :-) che
> genera un sacco di modifiche incontrollabili.
>
> Ciao
>
> [0]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wGpYZcJX8lEv1ket0ucRRE3pdlisxUDG33mBt2IqeXE/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-cz] Cykloznačení - puntík se stříškou

[Marián Kyral]

Dne 11.6.2016 v 08:03 Pavel Machek napsal(a):
> On Thu 2016-06-09 09:59:57, Petr Vozdecký wrote:
>> ahoj,
>> odpovim sireji v jinem mailu
>> zde jen reakce na Petrovu poznamku
>>
>> NAVRZENE SCEMA NEROZBIJE MTBMAP
>>
>> z nekolika duvodu:
>> 1) s autorem MTBmap jsme navrh noveho schematu diskutovali
>> 2) MTBmap neni vubec zavisla na kct_barva=* a kontroluje tuto hodnotu jen 
>> tam, kde neni osmc:symbol
>> 3) jakakoliv "hromadna akce" ve zmene tagovani by nebyla provedena bez 
>> konzultace minimalne s Martinem Tesarem (MTBmap) a Petrem Vejsadou (poloha.
>> net), tedy temi, kdo vytvareji "primarni" zdroje (rendery) sledujici a 
>> espektujici realny stav znacenych tras v CR
> Jakakoliv automaticka "hromadna zmena" tagovani potrebuje vyrazne
> vetsi konzultace, viz pravidla importu. A velmi pravdepodobne je to
> spatny napad.
>   Pavel
>
Na Slovensku to jde bez kct_xxx. Tak proč by u nás nešlo?

Pokud se bude postupovat stylem: doplním tagy dle existujícího schématu
a staré označím za zastaralé/nedoporučované a nebudu je nově používat,
tak se existující trasy nerozbijí a autoři renderů budou mít šanci se
adaptovat na nové schéma.

Marián


___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-it] Violazione licenza OSM - Ediciclo

[Cascafico Giovanni]

La editrice Ediciclo sembra piuttosto importante: alcuni giorni fa ho
ascoltato la trasmissione Farhrenait su radio tre, dove presentavano un
loro libro in tema di sentieri, che a questo punto sarebbe da controllare
;-)

Mi sono ricordato quindi di questa discussione "appesa". Ci sono novità ?


Il giorno 7 gennaio 2016 18:31, Volker Schmidt  ha
scritto:

> Ho un contatto diretto. Me ne posso occupare io. Al momento sono
> all'estero, lo farò dopo il mio rientro.
>
> Volker
>
>
> 2016-01-07 18:25 GMT+01:00 Cascafico Giovanni :
>
>> > Ho provato a cercare l'autore e vedere se ha un sito, ma è un nome
>>
>> La cartografia é di Federico Pedrazzoli.
>>
>> Ho visto in internet che Ediciclo ha pubblicato una collana [1] di cui fa
>> parte il titolo che ho sfogliato. Se qualcuno nelle librerie del nordest
>> puó dare un'occhiata...
>>
>> [1] http://www.ibs.it/collana/Cicloguide/Ediciclo/cicloguide.html
>>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-it] Stampare una mappa uMap

[EugPez]

Ciao Andrea.

Avevo letto il tuo suggerimento.
Non ho ancora avuto modo di provare Mapnik + Nik4, ma ho dato priorità alla
prova di QGIS per l'emissione in PDF, per le ragione che ho spiegato, mentre
NIK 4 sembra che emetta solo in PNG.
In ogni caso fra oggi e domani proverò anche questo questa possibilità.
Devo considerare anche l'aspetto della semplicità d'uso, non essendo l'unico
nella mia associazione che avrà necessità di stampare mappe. 

Grazie





--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Stampare-una-mappa-uMap-tp5875135p5875238.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Stampare una mappa uMap

[Cascafico Giovanni]

Interessante, lo proverò. Però mi sembra che sei hai bisogno di più strati,
com'è il caso che ha aperto la discussione, sia più semplice qgis... Almeno
non devi compilare degli script.
Inoltre già qualche anni fa quando producevo mappe cartacee, ho notato che
la sezione compositore di stampe era molto articolata. Immagino l'abbiano
ulteriormente migliorata.

--
cascafico.altervista.org
twitter.com/cascafico
Il 10/giu/2016 18:43 "Andrea Lattmann"  ha
scritto:

> Può essere utile questo?
>
> https://github.com/Zverik/Nik4/blob/master/README.md
>
>
>
> Andrea Lattmann
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[OSM-talk-fr] A89: Bordeaux - Brive-la-Gaillarde

[News]

Excuses du français pauvre(faible)

Je n'ai pas vérifié tout cela mais au moins un peu d'A89 de Bordeaux à 
Brive-la-Gaillarde est étiqueté comme pas une route à péage mais je 
pense que ce tous devraient être une route à péage. Peut quelqu'un sur 
plaît ici vérifient et correct si nécessaire


Merci

Paul

Apologies for the poor french

I have not checked all of this but at least some of the A89 from 
Bordeaux to Brive-la-Gaillarde is tagged as not a toll road but I think 
that this all should be a toll road. Can someone on here please verify 
and correct if necessary


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] Stampare una mappa uMap

[Andrea Lattmann]

>1,5 Gb di spazio occupato su disco siano uno sproposito per fare solo
>delle
>stampe ogni tanto. 

E' per questo che ti avevo consigliato Nik4
(This is a mapnik-to-image exporting script...)

Andrea Lattmann

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-us] New York City Watershed Recreation Areas

[Kevin Kenny]

The import of the New York City Watershed Recreation Areas is now
complete. Thanks to all who assisted in the effort!

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-cz] Cykloznačení - puntík se stříškou

[Pavel Machek]

On Thu 2016-06-09 09:59:57, Petr Vozdecký wrote:
> ahoj,
> odpovim sireji v jinem mailu
> zde jen reakce na Petrovu poznamku
> 
> NAVRZENE SCEMA NEROZBIJE MTBMAP
> 
> z nekolika duvodu:
> 1) s autorem MTBmap jsme navrh noveho schematu diskutovali
> 2) MTBmap neni vubec zavisla na kct_barva=* a kontroluje tuto hodnotu jen 
> tam, kde neni osmc:symbol
> 3) jakakoliv "hromadna akce" ve zmene tagovani by nebyla provedena bez 
> konzultace minimalne s Martinem Tesarem (MTBmap) a Petrem Vejsadou (poloha.
> net), tedy temi, kdo vytvareji "primarni" zdroje (rendery) sledujici a 
> espektujici realny stav znacenych tras v CR

Jakakoliv automaticka "hromadna zmena" tagovani potrebuje vyrazne
vetsi konzultace, viz pravidla importu. A velmi pravdepodobne je to
spatny napad.
Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz