[OSM-ja] OpenStreetMap マッピングパーティ in 飯坂温泉
こんにちは、ikiyaです。 今週末4月15日（土）福島市の飯坂温泉でマッピングパーティーが開催されます。 桜の花は終わりかけ、昨日は荒天で雪が積もったりと、まだ寒さ残る福島です。古い温泉街を散策しながらのマッピングいかがでしょうか。 ぜひ、ご参加ください！ 【OpenStreetMap マッピングパーティ in 飯坂温泉】ゆふしろさん主催 https://connpass.com/event/278123/ 「飯坂温泉街を散策して、誰でも自由に編集できる OpenStreetMap の地図を書いていくイベントを開催します。 OpenStreetMap の編集の経験が無い方でも歓迎です！」 ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
Re: [OSM-ja] 組織的編集の提案: サービスエリア・パーキングエリアと、その駐車場の形状
岡田です。 相談事項に関して、私としては特に問題ないと思います。 2023年4月7日(金) 10:59 Satoshi IIDA : > > > いいだです。 > > 掲題の件ですが、先日やっと一段落しました。 > ご協力いただいた皆様、まことにありがとうございました。 > > 結果のサマリと、追加でいくつか作業を行いたいので、その相談です。 > > ■1. 結果サマリ > ■1.1. 作業対象と結果のサマリ > 当初作業予定SAPA数（ポリゴン）: 1012 > 現時点でOSM上に存在しているSAPA数（ポリゴン）: 966 > > 差異については、上下線が分割されていないSAPAが数多く存在していることに由来。 > > ■1.2. 道の駅について > いくつかのSAPAについては、道の駅と共用されている場合があり、ポリゴンの分割をすることができません。 > また、OSMでのタグについても 道の駅については highway=services を使うことになっています。 > > そのため、nameタグに、例えば > name = 名和PA;道の駅大山 恵みの里 > のような形で入力をしています。 > （個人的には、もうちょいうまい編集の仕方がありそうな気がしています） > > > ■2. 相談事項 > ■2.1. 追加作業について > 以下のSAPAについて、作業開始時のリストには存在せず、OSM上にのみ存在していました。 > こちらについても、今回の組織的編集と同じルールで編集を行おうと思っています。 > 来週か再来週（4月21日くらいまで）に行おうと思っていますので、懸念などありましたらお願いします。 > > かつらぎ西PA (上り) > かつらぎ西PA (下り) > 一ツ葉PA > 今津PA > 佐方SA (上り) > 佐方SA (下り) > 内津峠 簡易PA > 内津峠 簡易PA > 姫路SA > 峰山PA > 志雄PA(上り) > 志雄PA(下り) > 泉大津大型専用PA > 相原PA (下り) > 矢引PA (上り) > 矢引PA (下り) > 西山PA (上り) > 西山PA (下り) > 谷稲葉うぐいすPA > 逗葉新道PA(レストハウス逗葉) > 高松SA > 高松SA > 米山サービスエリア > 尾島パーキングエリア > 荒崎パーキングエリア > 観法寺パーキングエリア > 高萩パーキングエリア > > ■2.2 amenity=parkingポリゴンに対する parking:capacity:[standard|long]タグ > 以前、とあるかたよりメッセージをいただき、 > > amenity=parkingポリゴンに対してparking:capacity:[standard|long]タグは、 > parkingという情報が重複しているのではないか（要旨） > > というコメントを頂戴しました。 > > 確かに指摘は尤もで、LocationMindさんとも相談し、 > amenity=parkingに対して与えられている parking:capacity:[standard|long]タグを、 > capacity:[standard|long]タグに変更したいと思います。 > （SAPAが上下線で分割されていない箇所は、amenity=parkingに対してタグが付与されています） > > > こちらについても、来週か再来週くらいに変更をかけようと思っています。 > ご意見ありましたらいただけますと幸いです。 > > > OSM wikiにも追記したほうがよさそうですね。 > > > -- > Satoshi IIDA > mail: nyamp...@gmail.com > twitter: @nyampire > ___ > Talk-ja mailing list > Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja > -- 岡田常雄(OKADA Tsuneo) tsuneo.ok...@gmail.com ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
Re: [OSM-talk] Help with reverting a changeset (somebody deleted weeks and weeks of work)
I reverted the nodes and ways. I think that the relations should be edited carefully by someone who knows the content. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134706111 Pierre ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Help with reverting a changeset (somebody deleted weeks and weeks of work)
There /may/ be a way using josm's revert changeset. Load the changeset using the revert changeset tool. Use filters to select only the required data (start with layer<0). When you have only the objects you require, select them. Then go to the revert changeset dialog again & select the 'revet selection only & restore deleted object' option. Hopefully being underground the objects won't be attached to as many other objects & not cause too many conflicts. As suggested, try one or two objects first. Genuinely surprised it still loads in OSMcha https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#54488428 DaveF On 09/04/2023 16:47, Andy Townsend wrote: On 09/04/2023 12:55, Bjoern Hassler wrote: Hello everybody! I hope you're having a good weekend. I'm looking for help with reverting a changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54488428?way_page=6#map=14/51.5273/-0.1224. (Kings Cross, London) The changeset is labeled "Large correction of outdated information", and while the 'correction' was large, the information wasn't outdated at all. The editor mistook an extensive set underground paths (labeled correctly with level, leading to underground railways) for obsolete footpaths and stripped them all out - removing the entire underground structure. They hadn't noticed that the same user (me, bjohas) had put them all in only a year or so earlier (which took me weeks and weeks to do, sigh). Obviously a few edits have happened since, but the underground footpaths haven't been restored/re-added. I'd like to 'cautiously' revert/merge those edits. However, it does involve many many paths, nodes etc etc. While I'm a fairly experienced mapper / josm user (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bjohas), I feel that I'd best do this with support from somebody, to make sure that the initial destruction doesn't lead to more destruction... Given that it's 5 years ago that these were deleted, you're not going to be able to do a simple revert. What you could do is, where particular things are still missing, "undelete" the deleted paths one by one and then join up to any current features (checking for problems with the JOSM validator as you go). For "undelete" functionality you could use JOSM's "undelete" plugin or the perl revert scripts' "undo.pl". There may be other options too. You're going to have to do it one object at a time anyway, so perhaps do a couple first and then ask again to see if anyone can see any problems with what you've done? Best Regards, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Help with reverting a changeset (somebody deleted weeks and weeks of work)
On 09/04/2023 12:55, Bjoern Hassler wrote: Hello everybody! I hope you're having a good weekend. I'm looking for help with reverting a changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54488428?way_page=6#map=14/51.5273/-0.1224. (Kings Cross, London) The changeset is labeled "Large correction of outdated information", and while the 'correction' was large, the information wasn't outdated at all. The editor mistook an extensive set underground paths (labeled correctly with level, leading to underground railways) for obsolete footpaths and stripped them all out - removing the entire underground structure. They hadn't noticed that the same user (me, bjohas) had put them all in only a year or so earlier (which took me weeks and weeks to do, sigh). Obviously a few edits have happened since, but the underground footpaths haven't been restored/re-added. I'd like to 'cautiously' revert/merge those edits. However, it does involve many many paths, nodes etc etc. While I'm a fairly experienced mapper / josm user (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bjohas), I feel that I'd best do this with support from somebody, to make sure that the initial destruction doesn't lead to more destruction... Given that it's 5 years ago that these were deleted, you're not going to be able to do a simple revert. What you could do is, where particular things are still missing, "undelete" the deleted paths one by one and then join up to any current features (checking for problems with the JOSM validator as you go). For "undelete" functionality you could use JOSM's "undelete" plugin or the perl revert scripts' "undo.pl". There may be other options too. You're going to have to do it one object at a time anyway, so perhaps do a couple first and then ask again to see if anyone can see any problems with what you've done? Best Regards, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Help with reverting a changeset (somebody deleted weeks and weeks of work)
Hello everybody! I hope you're having a good weekend. I'm looking for help with reverting a changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54488428?way_page=6#map=14/51.5273/-0.1224. (Kings Cross, London) The changeset is labeled "Large correction of outdated information", and while the 'correction' was large, the information wasn't outdated at all. The editor mistook an extensive set underground paths (labeled correctly with level, leading to underground railways) for obsolete footpaths and stripped them all out - removing the entire underground structure. They hadn't noticed that the same user (me, bjohas) had put them all in only a year or so earlier (which took me weeks and weeks to do, sigh). Obviously a few edits have happened since, but the underground footpaths haven't been restored/re-added. I'd like to 'cautiously' revert/merge those edits. However, it does involve many many paths, nodes etc etc. While I'm a fairly experienced mapper / josm user ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bjohas), I feel that I'd best do this with support from somebody, to make sure that the initial destruction doesn't lead to more destruction... Would somebody be willing to look at this and advise? Björn ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-fr] hebdoOSM Nº 663 28/03/2023-03/04/2023
Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 663 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : https://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/16411/ Bonne lecture ! Saviez-vous que vous pouvez vous aussi soumettre des messages pour la note hebdomadaire sans être membre ? Il vous suffit de vous connecter sur https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login avec votre compte OSM. Pour en savoir plus sur la rédaction d'un article, cliquez ici: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où : https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #663 28/03/2023-03/04/2023
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 663, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of things happening in the openstreetmap world: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16411 Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about how to write a post here: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[Talk-tr] weeklyOSM #663 28/03/2023-03/04/2023
OSM ile ilgili haberlerin derlendiği ve OpenStreetMap dünyasındaki pek çok gelişmelerin paylaşıldığı haftalık bülten, 663. bölümüyle çevrimiçi ve Türkçe olarak erişilebilir durumda: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/tr/archives/16411/ İyi okumalar! weeklyOSM'e sizin de ekleme yapabileceğinizi biliyor muydunuz? Sadece https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login adresine OSM hesabınızla giriş yapın. Yeni bir haber yüklemek için yapmanız gerekenleri buradan öğrenebilirsiniz: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm weeklyOSM? Kim?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Nerede?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-tr mailing list Talk-tr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tr
[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #663 28/03/2023-03/04/2023
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 663, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of things happening in the openstreetmap world: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16411 Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about how to write a post here: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #663 28/03/2023-03/04/2023
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 663, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of things happening in the openstreetmap world: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16411 Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about how to write a post here: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #663 28/03/2023-03/04/2023
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 663, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of things happening in the openstreetmap world: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16411 Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about how to write a post here: https://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
