Re: [OSM-ja] Plateauインポートの進め方と再開について
hayashiです 私のほうで第一段階まで完了した生成物をサイトに公開しております。 http://surveyor.mydns.jp/osm-data/ １メッシュ単位で作業ができるように分割しているので作業に取り掛かりやすいと思います。 2023年9月12日(火) 8:51 Satoshi IIDA : > > ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
Re: [OSM-talk] When two bots go to war
On 15/09/2023 10:43, Paul Norman wrote: They have edited it back with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141281494. I've left a changeset discussion comment asking why, and asking for a link to the required documentation and consultation. Maybe I'm being over-cynical, but I suspect that that may not work :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15054 That's just "until a human reads it" - I've asked the bot to forward it to their tame human :) . When one does, they can hopefully take the action required and document things properly, and we can point them at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18539679 to address any other issues in their data. Best Regards, Andy (from the DWG) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] When two bots go to war
Hi, aside from these apparently being undocumented bot edits, I'm also somewhat skeptical of their "healthcare:speciality" tag. It sounds terribly like advertising. It essentially covers everything you would expect a dentist to do - so why is healthcare=dentist not sufficient? Bye Frederik On 15.09.23 11:43, Paul Norman wrote: They have edited it back with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141281494. I've left a changeset discussion comment asking why, and asking for a link to the required documentation and consultation. On 2023-09-14 12:36 a.m., Cj Malone wrote: On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 15:06 +0200, Snusmumriken via talk wrote: My speculation is that Distriktstandvården (a chain of dental clinics) has taken "ownership" of "their" nodes and once a day check that the values in osm database correspond to that of their internal database. I've added a more specific website tag to test this. If they restore it (Probably 03:00) to the generic home page I agree with you. They need to be informed that 1) there data needs improving (eg covid opening hours, POI specific not brand specific contact details) 2) they don't own these nodes, other people can edit them. CJ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141243391 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] When two bots go to war
They have edited it back with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141281494. I've left a changeset discussion comment asking why, and asking for a link to the required documentation and consultation. On 2023-09-14 12:36 a.m., Cj Malone wrote: On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 15:06 +0200, Snusmumriken via talk wrote: My speculation is that Distriktstandvården (a chain of dental clinics) has taken "ownership" of "their" nodes and once a day check that the values in osm database correspond to that of their internal database. I've added a more specific website tag to test this. If they restore it (Probably 03:00) to the generic home page I agree with you. They need to be informed that 1) there data needs improving (eg covid opening hours, POI specific not brand specific contact details) 2) they don't own these nodes, other people can edit them. CJ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141243391 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] When two bots go to war
Is there a bot that does this or is someone prepared to write one? -- Andrew From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) Sent: 14 September 2023 10:39 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] When two bots go to war Maybe there should be a general good-practice recommendation / policy that bots running in this fashion to keep things in sync should only automatically add/update/remove a tag that they've previously set if the current state/value in OSM is unchanged from the last state/value that the bot set. This way, bots could be used to keep things up to date automatically, but would not automatically override any manually applied changes by other mappers between runs. (A sensible bot owner would have the bot send them a report of any tags that couldn't be updated for manual review.) Robert. On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 08:41, Cj Malone wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 15:06 +0200, Snusmumriken via talk wrote: > > My speculation is that Distriktstandvården (a chain of dental > > clinics) > > has taken "ownership" of "their" nodes and once a day check that the > > values in osm database correspond to that of their internal database. > > I've added a more specific website tag to test this. If they restore it > (Probably 03:00) to the generic home page I agree with you. They need > to be informed that 1) there data needs improving (eg covid opening > hours, POI specific not brand specific contact details) 2) they don't > own these nodes, other people can edit them. > > CJ > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141243391 -- Robert Whittaker ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
