[OSM-talk-ie] Townland Sheets Request (Donegal West)

2014-11-04 Thread Conor Jones
Hi folks,

Requesting sheets:

- 14/39 SE
- 17/39 SW


If you want or have time, you could throw up all of sector 17/39, perhaps
sector 20/39 and any remaining in 14/39 and I'll work on getting them
rectified



Many thanks,

Conor / idnoc
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Townland boundaries on lake shores

2014-10-25 Thread Conor Jones
Hi Brian,

Would I be correct in saying that the boundary should follow the new
shore-line of the lake as I imagine when the boundaries were originally
drawn, they used the prominence of the shore-line as the boundary and not
the location of the shore-line... if that makes sense?

Might someone add?

C
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Townland boundaries on lake shores

2014-10-25 Thread Conor Jones
Paddy,

Perhaps natural=wetland and then wetlands=*

- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=wetland

- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wetland

I tend to try map to the median water mark as the lake/water and then draw
the remaining wetland as a separate area

I recently done a lake with a changing boundary:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/54.6427/-8.6681

I used wetland=tidalflat which in hind-sight probably isn't the most
suitable


C


On 25 October 2014 14:42, pcasey pca...@clareroots.org wrote:

 How does one map the outlines of turloughs ? They flood and drain with the
 seasons and with also changes in precipitation (heavy rainfall - drought).

 Paddy

 -Original Message-
 From: Conor Jones [mailto:co...@malinbeg.com]
 Sent: 25 October 2014 14:34
 To: talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Townland boundaries on lake shores

 Hi Brian,

 Would I be correct in saying that the boundary should follow the new
 shore-line of the lake as I imagine when the boundaries were originally
 drawn, they used the prominence of the shore-line as the boundary and not
 the location of the shore-line... if that makes sense?

 Might someone add?

 C
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie




-- 
Conor Jones
* E:*  co...@malinbeg.com
* M:* +353 (0)86 200 8884
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Query

2010-08-03 Thread Conor Jones
Hey all, just to introduce myself here, I'm Condi on OSM (Conor), from Donegal 
and only started mapping about 6 months ago.

I noticed that mapping activity around Letterkenny sky-rocketed a month ago 
from virtually a blank canvas to every detail imaginable - and it looks damn 
spectacular even if the source is questionable. On a side point, I spent an 
evening with keepright (http://keepright.ipax.at/) correcting errors around the 
county of Donegal, but it would take hours to sort errors in Letterkenny alone 
and the situation has since deteriorated big-time.

Has anyone contacted the user yet? Hopefully the source is legitimate and not 
infringing any copyrights as the work done is a great boost.

Regards,

Conor

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie