Re: [talk-au] Hume/Hovell route

2012-07-05 Thread Lachlan Rogers

 I think it's a cool idea to invent these routes and document them
 somewhere - and I really hope there is a good way to do this that
 somehow links with OSM. But actually putting them in the main OSM
 database isn't right.


Have a look at bikely.com .  It is a great place to document and share
personal cycling routes, and it has the OSM Cycle Layer as one of the
display map options.  This gives the best of both worlds: tag cycling
infrastructure and official routes in OSM, but then share personal
favourites overlayed on OSM maps.

- Lachlan
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Tagging for unofficial Cycle routes in Lake Macquarie?

2012-04-23 Thread Lachlan Rogers
Thanks for your wise comments, Ian.  I do clearly see the problem with
individuals tagging up their own favourite routes into OSM.  I will put
my personal rides on bikely, and keep adding objective data to OSM.

This afternoon I have discovered a cycle planning document from Newcastle
City Council that outlines existing and proposed routes.  They even use the
regional and local terminology, so tagging current routes should be
straightforward.  I am baffled by how difficult it is to find information
of this kind from Lake Macquarie and Newcastle councils.  They are keen to
brag about the Fernleigh track, but seem intent on hiding all other cycling
info!

I have also found a map of what LM Council considers to be existing cycle
routes.  Some of these must be fairly faint on the ground in terms of
cycle infrastructure or signage, but I will follow their map closely and
tag existing routes.

There is one more project that I have only just discovered: the NSW
Coastline Cycleway.  Apparently cycleway routes exist for about 300 kms of
the 1400 already, but I can't find anywhere that lists them.  I have
learned that the Fernleigh Track is part of this state route, but that's
about it.  I will continue researching, because that is something that CAN
go on OpenStreetMap and it would be really useful.

I am pleased to discover that these councils are thinking about cycle
routes, but I wish they would make the info more accessible.

- Lachlan


On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.

 I agree with Ian.

 Routing sites should be able to connect up disconnected SUPs in a sensible
 manner.

 As an aside, it would be nice if sites like Bikely supported OSM as a
 background.

   - Ben.
  On Apr 23, 2012 9:07 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:

 I can see your argument, and no doubt having useful cycle routes
 available is a good thing.

 However, I don't think personal ad-hoc cycle routes should be added to
 OSM.  It is a slippery slope, and OSM can't accommodation everyone's ideal
 connecting route.

 Instead, I'd add the information (speed limits, road widths, residential
 nature, cycle facilities (lanes, etc)) that would allow a typical cycle
 router to be able to identify the connecting route between the two
 cycleways.

 Personally, I think long term this is a better way to go anyway.  Some of
 the official cycle routes (particularly in Sydney) have poor cycle
 facilities, and in the case of the currently tagged Concord to CBD cycleway
 IMO is downright deadly.  So many people have different opinions on what
 makes a good cycle route for them, lets identify the features and get them
 all into OSM, and then lets optimise the software to find the best way.

 There are lots of services to map personal favourite rides (bikely,
 mapmyride, etc).

 Ian.

 On 22 April 2012 22:09, Lachlan Rogers lach...@rogers.name wrote:

 I've recently moved back to Lake Macquarie after some years in Canberra,
 and I'm delighted to find that there are more cycle paths around the
 central coast and Lake Macquarie than I was previously aware of.
 Unfortunately many of them are either incomplete or disconnected from each
 other.

 I am wanting to scout out optimal on-road routes to connect cycle paths
 into excellent recreational routes.  For instance the recently opened
 Fernleigh (Rail trail) Track ends in Belmont, and just a few kms away there
 is a great path around Green Point.  I want to tag a route (probably as
 lcn) through the streets of Belmont so that viewers can see how best to
 join these rides together.  To my knowledge there is no official
 council-endorsed cycle route.

 I recognise some people may have a philosophical aversion to this,
 because it is tagging based on usefulness rather than on what is actually
 on the ground.  I feel, however, that we have an opportunity to scout out
 optimal connections and start using them for cycling now, while we lobby
 councils to make such routes official.  I would choose a tagging scheme
 along the lines of network=lcn with status=unofficial or something so
 that these routes could be located by a search algorithm if needed.

 I've spent a while looking around the web, and there are no decent
 cycling maps of the region to be found.  OSM and OpenCycleMap would be a
 superb resource if we took the liberty of tagging desired routes such as
 I have outlined.

 How do you feel about this suggestion?

 - Lachlan

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Tagging for unofficial Cycle routes in Lake Macquarie?

2012-04-22 Thread Lachlan Rogers
I've recently moved back to Lake Macquarie after some years in Canberra,
and I'm delighted to find that there are more cycle paths around the
central coast and Lake Macquarie than I was previously aware of.
Unfortunately many of them are either incomplete or disconnected from each
other.

I am wanting to scout out optimal on-road routes to connect cycle paths
into excellent recreational routes.  For instance the recently opened
Fernleigh (Rail trail) Track ends in Belmont, and just a few kms away there
is a great path around Green Point.  I want to tag a route (probably as
lcn) through the streets of Belmont so that viewers can see how best to
join these rides together.  To my knowledge there is no official
council-endorsed cycle route.

I recognise some people may have a philosophical aversion to this, because
it is tagging based on usefulness rather than on what is actually on the
ground.  I feel, however, that we have an opportunity to scout out optimal
connections and start using them for cycling now, while we lobby councils
to make such routes official.  I would choose a tagging scheme along the
lines of network=lcn with status=unofficial or something so that these
routes could be located by a search algorithm if needed.

I've spent a while looking around the web, and there are no decent cycling
maps of the region to be found.  OSM and OpenCycleMap would be a superb
resource if we took the liberty of tagging desired routes such as I have
outlined.

How do you feel about this suggestion?

- Lachlan
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Overland Track added

2010-02-28 Thread Lachlan Rogers
Beat me to it!

I hiked the Overland Track in January, and recorded a trace of most of
it - but the busy getting-back-into-life-after-the-holidays has
prevented me from adding it to OSM.

I'll be able to provide confirmation of your track.

- Lachlan


On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
 Steve Bennett wrote:

 Garmin Oregon 550.

 I see that's got a barometric altimeter too.  Very good.

 Ah. What is GPS-derived altitude though, exactly - does it rely on a
 model of the earth's surface, or is it effectively computing the
 distance from the satellites?

 Purely from satellites, definitely.  Others on the list are likely much
 more up to speed with the technicalities.

 Anyway, my recorded elevation for Mt Ossa is 1613m, and the Acropolis
 is 1477m. Wikipedia gives Mt Ossa as 1614, and the Acropolis as 1481m.
 Maybe this method is more accurate than I was expecting...

 OTOH, I'm still not convinced that all this is necessary. Surely using
 figures from an authoritative source would serve everyone a lot
 better...

 Yes, the figure from a proper survey should have an accuracy of a few
 centimetres.  One of my many jobs (back in the 70s) was a chainman
 (surveyor's assistant).  With modern electronic gear, I believe there's
 no such job any more.

 John H


 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au