Re: [OSM-talk] complete documentation of JOSM advanced preferences

2017-07-07 Thread Paul Hartmann 

On 07.07.2017 14:05, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:

Hi,

I am looking for a documentation of JOSM advanced preferences.
[...]
I searched via Google and could not find a description. There are
several other preferences with similar values in square brackets. I am
trying to understand what these figures mean.


Most entries are just the backend storage for the GUI preferences, so 
there is no need to edit those by hand. Another group are settings that 
give access to "hidden" features, typically for tuning a hard-coded 
parameter.


There is no complete list of JOSM advanced preferences with 
descriptions. Some keys and their function are mentioned in a commit 
message or bug tracker comment. The best you can do is to find where the 
preference key is referenced in the JOSM source code and try to 
understand what it does.


Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] iD name suggestion index - asking non-English-speaking mappers to review

2015-05-19 Thread Paul Hartmann 

On 16.05.2015 20:51, nebulon42 wrote:

Another thing. Is this still active? There hasn't been much activity
lately and it has also open pull requests that could have been merged
already. I'm just asking because I spotted some things to correct, but I
want to make sure that I do not waste my time because a pull request
might not get merged.


I second that. We could use this index for JOSM, but unfortunately the 
reported issues don't get fixed and the overall quality is not good 
enough at the moment.


It would be nice if the original authors or someone else would maintain 
this project.


Paul



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM Tile Cache

2015-04-26 Thread Paul Hartmann 

Hi Mike,

There has been a major rework of the TMS cache back end in version 
8168-8186. If you can still reproduce this problem with the current 
development build or with the upcoming release, then please don't 
hesitate to report it directly on the JOSM bug tracker!


Paul

On 23.04.2015 22:58, Mike Thompson wrote:

I am using JOSM version 8109 on Windows 7.

I would like to flush JOSM's "OpenStreetMap (Mapnik)" tile cache. With the
"OpenStreetMap (Mapnik) layer displayed, I right clicked on the map, and
then clicked on "Flush Tile Cache", but I still see outdated tiles (when
compared to the openstreetmap.org website - I made sure both were on the
same zoom level). I also tried, in conjunction with the above, removing and
re-adding the "OpenStreetMap (Mapnik)" layer, as well as restarting JOSM.

Finally I tried renaming the "OpenStreetMap (Mapnik)" folder in the
following location: C:\Users\\AppData\Local\JOSM\cache\tms
  (this is the location the "imagery.tms.tilecache preference is set to).
Only after doing this were the tiles updated.

Does the "Flush Tile Cache" work? I saw a bug report[1] about something
like this, but it was closed four years ago as "fixed."  If it is working,
am I using it correctly?


Thanks,

Mike

[1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/6109



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] JOSM graphics contest

2014-07-19 Thread Paul Hartmann 

Hi,

JOSM needs your support! The developer team of the editor JOSM is 
looking for a new logo. Therefore we're holding a graphics contest.


* What's it about?
The current logo should be replaced completely by your design. It will 
be used in the software itself, on the website and in various other 
media related to JOSM.


* Why do we need a new logo?
Presently, we are still using the old OSM icon from 2011. Instead of a 
slight revision, we would like to abandon the concept "OSM-logo + coffee 
mug" and find a new, independent identification for the project.


* What are the rules?
Everyone can participate. You can submit your work till 30th of 
September 2014 to contest at josm.openstreetmap.de. The image should be 
in vector format (SVG) and still look okay at low resolution (16x16 
pixel). You can find further details on the wiki page:


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Graphic_Contest

We are looking forward to your contribution!

Paul Hartmann (for the JOSM team)

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Question on undelete/restore

2012-11-19 Thread Paul Hartmann 

On 11/19/2012 09:10 PM, Michael Krämer wrote:

Hi,

using OSM inspector's coastline view I came across a rather large
missing segement of the coastline. It turned out that a new user has
accidentially deleted it. He agreed to revert the change and I
volunteered to take care of it.

As it turns out the changeset (13910261) included more changes to roads
etc.- 92 ways overall - so reverting would include more than just the
coastline. To make things even worse there are also some following,
conflicting changesets. So using the reverter plugin causes quite a
number of conflicts that I have a hard time to resolve. But just to make
sure I have contacted the user again because it sounded like he wouldn't
mind to revert all changs. But the answer is still pending due to
different time zones.

So I tried to only undelete the way for the coastline using the
"undelete" plugin. Trying to do so gives an error on upload as the way
references deleted nodes. Sounds reasonable but doesn't really help.

Any suggestion how to best get this fixed again?


Have you tried Undelete plugin and then File > 'upload selection' just 
for the coastline way?


Paul


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Unauthorized mechanical edit - changeset 11913785 - amenity=airport->aeroway=aerodrome

2012-06-18 Thread Paul Hartmann 
2012/6/18 Jaakko Helleranta.com :
> No. Reverting does _not_ mean uploading old version.
> It means undoing your changeset completely or partially.

Technically, the reverter does pretty much that: Upload the version
before the problematic change (this creates a new version and extends
the object history like a normal changeset, there is no server magic
for reverting). One exception are objects that have been created in
the bad changeset: There is no previous version, so they are just
deleted by the reverter.

> See info about JOSM plugin Reverter (IIRC). .. And probably makes sense to 
> look into it a bit before actually reverting -- as you may mess up more when 
> reverting.

Whenever there are already changes by other users on top of the bad
changeset ("dirty revert"), you'll get notified by the plugin
(conflicts are created).
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

> As some commenter said, it's easier to revert sooner than later.

True. :)

Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Custom tile server in JOSM?

2012-03-29 Thread Paul Hartmann 
2012/3/29 Tomas Straupis :
>  Is there a possibility to add custom tileserver url to JOSM so that
> this tile server is used in "download map data" dialog?
>
> P.S. I do NOT mean the imagery layer behind the downloaded data.

All TMS from the imagery menu should also be available in the download
dialog. You can add custom TMS in the preferences.

Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] howto reverting one changeset?

2012-01-17 Thread Paul Hartmann 
On 01/17/2012 09:59 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:27 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Carsten Gerlach  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2012 schrieb valent.turko...@gmail.com:
 Any idea how to revert back this changeset I messed up:
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10333257
>>>
>>> Have a look at the JOSM reverter plugin
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter
>>>
>>> Greetings, Carsten
>>
>> Yes I have, it just lock-up josm and doesn't respond :(
>> Maybe somebody else can try out to revert my changeset and have more
>> luck than I?
>>
>> Please suggest any other ideas you have.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Valent.
> 
> Has anybody used revert scripts recently? Are they broken for others
> also? How can I revert this changeset?

JOSM reverter plugin is used frequently and should work without
problems. If not, please send a bug report.

http://josm.openstreetmap.de/newticket

Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass API: new version 0.6.93, a collection of bugfixes

2011-10-08 Thread Paul Hartmann 
On 10/07/2011 10:42 PM, Roland Olbricht wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> Overpass API goes a huge step forward for more stability. 
> ...
> A further detailed planning showed that there is still a long way to version 
> 0.7. Planned features are:
> ...
>   -- enabling around, bbox and area to handle way and relation geometries

Great, looking forward to bbox support for ways!

Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] all POIs within a specific radius

2011-08-02 Thread Paul Hartmann 
On 08/02/2011 01:05 PM, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> hi,
> 
> how would I get all POIs within a specific radius (in metres) from a
> specific point by querying the osm db?

Any kind of POI or a certain list of tags? Have you tried the Overpass API?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API#Around

Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Right angles and aspect ratio

2011-07-05 Thread Paul Hartmann 

On 07/05/2011 10:01 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:

Am 05.07.2011 03:30, schrieb Paul Hartmann:

On 07/05/2011 03:09 AM, Andrew Errington wrote:

Hello,

I have recently noticed that JOSM does not produce pleasing right angles
when I select "Orthogonalise Shape (Q)".
...


Maybe you have set the wrong projection? Try Mercator.

While that's true to avoid the problem: shouldn't be these tools
independent from the projection?


Do you mean geometry in 3D / on the sphere? This is quite complicated. 
E.g. if you draw a little "rectangle" on the sphere, each angel is 
slightly larger than 90 degrees. (Assuming the edges are the shortest 
lines from point to point on the sphere.) So you cannot really 
orthogonalize it.

A circle would be easy, though.


If that's willingly not independent, IMHO there should be a warning that
making circular does not make it circular on ground, but in the current
projection, that produces wrong angles.


It was suggested, that "Q" should use Mercator silently, no matter which 
projection is currently selected. But then it will look skew in JOSM, so 
maybe some kind of warning would be best.


Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Right angles and aspect ratio

2011-07-04 Thread Paul Hartmann 

On 07/05/2011 03:09 AM, Andrew Errington wrote:

Hello,

I have recently noticed that JOSM does not produce pleasing right angles
when I select "Orthogonalise Shape (Q)".
...


Maybe you have set the wrong projection? Try Mercator.

Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

2011-05-28 Thread Paul Hartmann 

Maarten Deen wrote:
Does Potlatch have access to better BING imagery? I'm looking at Walbeck 
in Germany 
 and 
in Potlatch 2 the imagery is a lot better than in JOSM. In the imagery 
settings I have bing:bing for Bing Sat.


Cannot reproduce, in Potlatch2, JOSM and on the Bing website [1] I get the same 
level 19 tiles.

[1] 


Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Leaflet - a new open source JavaScript library for maps by CloudMade

2011-05-15 Thread Paul Hartmann 

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 14:34, Vladimir Agafonkin
 wrote:


I'm Leaflet lead developer at CloudMade and I'll be happy to hear what you
think and answer any questions about the library here. :)


This library is very heavy on the GPU (as opposed to google maps),
which makes it really slow in e.g. vmware without GPU acceleration,
and presumably on platforms that don't have a GPU.

I've seen this before e.g. with some jQuery animations, which are
really slow without a GPU.

OpenLayers and Google Maps don't suffer from the same problem.


The animations are awesome though. On my system, they work in Chrome, but not 
in Firefox 3.6 or Opera 11.01 browser.

Normally I'd say it is good to have a little competition, but wouldn't it be so much 
easier to fork OL and rewrite the parts you don't like? A "friendly fork" could 
contribute some code upstream occasionally.

Paul

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk