[Talk-de] Webcam
Hallo, hat openstreetmap ein tag für webcams, wie z.B. diese hier https://kachelmannwetter.roundshot.com/sonnenbuehl/ ? Passen da nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ Key:Surveillance und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance man_made=surveillance surveillance=webcam contact:webcam=https://kachelmannwetter.roundshot.com/sonnenbuehl/ Allerdings klingt Proposed on: 2008-07-08 nicht gerade ermutigend :-/ Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations in Schweiz, Österreich, Bayern und Baden-Württemberg
Hallo, ich habe mit dem maptool von Navit ein paar Karten prozessiert und ein paar kaputte Turn Relations gefunden: http://bokomoko.de/~rd/navit/broken_turn_relations_130501.log Erfreulicherweise sind es viel weniger als vor 2 Monaten. Viele Grüße Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Hallo, hier ist ein Update von Broken Turn Relations, wie sie von Navits maptool berichtet werden: http://bokomoko.de/~rd/broken_turn_relations_121125.log Es ist leider noch ein bug in maptool, der ein paar falsche Warnungen generiert: http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/1076 Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Danke, Franz. Rainer Am Sunday 25 November 2012 schrieb Franz vonGordon: Hallo, Deine Liste habe ich in unserem Wiki ergänzt [1], damit jeder seine korrigierten Restrictions dort abhaken kann. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction/Fehlerhafte_Abbi egebeschr%C3%A4nkungen Grüße, Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Hallo Eckhart, guter Punkt, da muss ich selbst nachfragen. Gruß Rainer Am Sunday 25 November 2012 schrieb Eckhart Wörner: Hallo Rainer, Am Sonntag, 25. November 2012, 18:25:58 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: hier ist ein Update von Broken Turn Relations, wie sie von Navits maptool berichtet werden: http://bokomoko.de/~rd/broken_turn_relations_121125.log OSM Warning: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2545313 turn restriction: to member not found Was ist die Bedeutung der Fehlermeldung hier genau? Die Relation sieht einwandfrei aus (und das schon seit dem 1. November). Eckhart ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Kaputte Turn Relations: Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz, Italien, Tschechien
Am Tuesday 09 October 2012 schrieb Eckhart Wörner: Hallo Rainer, Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2012, 20:18:51 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: habe hier eine lange Liste mit kaputten Turn Relations (Deutschland und Italien sind ca. 1 Woche alt, alle anderen sind von heute): http://bokomoko.de/~rd/broken_turn_relations_121007.log Grrr, immer noch mit Fehlalarm, z.B.: OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3659 turn restriction: multiple via member Hallo Eckhart, ich habe einen maptool bugreport geöffnet: http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/1076 Bitte kommentiere wenn möglich direkt dort, wenn ich das nicht korrekt oder vollständig dargestellt habe. Danke und Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Kaputte Turn Relations: Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz, Italien, Tschechien
Hallo, habe hier eine lange Liste mit kaputten Turn Relations (Deutschland und Italien sind ca. 1 Woche alt, alle anderen sind von heute): http://bokomoko.de/~rd/broken_turn_relations_121007.log Wenn hilfreich, lasse ich das ganze nächste Woche nochmal laufen. Viele Grüße Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Warnungen beim Erzeugen einer Navit Karte (Schweiz)
Am Sunday 22 July 2012 schrieb Tobias Knerr: Am 22.07.2012 21:34, schrieb aighes: Deutlich besser: Mach eine Liste draus, zerhacke sie in sinnvolle Paketgrößen und pack sie auf eine Wiki-Seite. Wie bei anderen ähnlichen Aktionen üblich. Würde ich auch besser finden. Ich halte solche Listen zwar grundsätzlich schon für hilfreich, aber habe jetzt natürlich keine Ahnung, ob schon jemand Einträge darauf abgearbeitet hat, und wenn ja welche. Sollte nächstes Mal besser wie eine der älteren Aktionen im Wiki aufgezogen werden: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aktionen Und dann _eine_ Mail mit Link auf die entsprechende Wikiseite schicken. Die Wiki-Seite aufsetzen schaffe ich vermutlich nicht alleine, gibt es Freiwillige die den Teil übernehmen können und wollen? Danke und Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[OSM-talk] Navit Map Conversion Warnings for Italy
points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30802976 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31877580 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/33906593 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/36433046 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37552795 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39887469 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/46428086 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/46428708 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/62822271 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/72309229 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/75894501 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/80647388 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/80647499 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/97778744 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/103505236 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/103611643 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/103611643 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/105472008 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/107076375 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/107076376 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/107076377 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/119396022 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/121561732 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/124768919 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/125341347 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/125872098 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/131288587 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/134240881 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/134630467 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/140014832 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/146540576 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/155329511 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/164649914 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/164649915 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/164649917 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165768866 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165768866 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165768894 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165768894 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165768901 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165768901 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169595917 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169595918 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169595919 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169595920 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/171293432 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/171958755 Broken polygon, area is 0 I hope the data are useful. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-de] OSM warning in navit map generation (Baden-Wuerttemberg)
/browse/way/56220631 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/58672257 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/66843876 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/67522818 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/70237522 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/72645365 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/85465123 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/91548383 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/120569054 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/127349569 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/133561522 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/135420931 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/136868271 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/147372065 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/147472550 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/147472556 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/156487748 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/158417479 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/158417480 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/160040522 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/160347932 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/161634453 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/164814408 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165381451 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165381452 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165381453 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169681060 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] OSM warning in navit map generation (Baden-Wuerttemberg)
Am Sunday 22 July 2012 schrieb Jörg Frings-Fürst: Am Sonntag, den 22.07.2012, 12:27 +0200 schrieb Chris66: Am 22.07.2012 10:05, schrieb Rainer Dorsch: Hello, I got some warnings in the navit map conversion process for Baden- Wuerttemberg. In case it is not useful, please let me know, and I will not post again theses kind of data turn restrictions: Hi, nützlich wäre es noch zu wissen ob Du hier Post- oder Pre-Redaction Data verarbeitet hast... ;-) Chris Hi, ist doch eigentlich egal. Bei den ersten beiden wurde doch beim letzten Edit von bigboss die from - rules entfernt, weil er den Weg gelöscht hat. Oder tarnt sich so jetzt der Redaction-Bot?? ;-)) Hallo, die Daten habe ich von http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/europe/germany/baden-wuerttemberg.osm.bz2 heute morgen gezogen. Bin nicht sich, wann der Bot lief/läuft. Danke und Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] OSM Warnungen beim Erzeugen einer Navit Karte (Bayern)
than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/120756966 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/124990790 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154088688 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169871770 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/171215530 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/171428242 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/172177634 Broken polygon, area is 0 Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Warnungen beim Erzeugen einer Navit Karte (Österreich)
Hallo, hier die Warnungen für die Österreich: turn restrictions: OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/92427 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/223509 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/241646 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/278859 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/278860 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/278862 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/302959 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/311734 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/535236 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1318143 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1476938 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1485409 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1492801 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1506472 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1527515 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1683246 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1696176 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1696177 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1733647 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1779147 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1790945 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1857345 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1866773 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2090704 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2130728 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1389144 turn restriction: from member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1389152 turn restriction: from member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2102804 turn restriction: to member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2182619 turn restriction: from member not found polygon Warnungen: OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34495781 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44840922 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/51852521 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/72765511 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/101693601 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/116909398 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/123449371 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/151237729 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/162979331 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/165962199 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169695178 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/171490446 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Warnungen beim Erzeugen einer Navit Karte (Schweiz)
Hallo, hier die Warnungen für die Schweiz: turn restrictions: OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/169051 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/169052 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/169053 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/410435 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/043 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1300520 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1300522 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1300523 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1300524 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1300525 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1342961 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1756112 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1832623 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2082534 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2082535 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2266273 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2296937 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1853786 turn restriction: from member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2019001 turn restriction: from member not found polygon Warnungen: OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38696067 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50759439 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50760438 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/159742530 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Warnungen beim Erzeugen einer Navit Karte (Schweiz)
Am Sunday 22 July 2012 schrieb Jochen Topf: Könnt ihr das bitte mal sein lassen, diese Fehler alle hier zu posten. Die allermeisten Leute auf dieser Liste interessiert das nicht die Bohne. Wenns sein muss, macht halt ne Wiki-Seite oder findet sonst einen Platz dafür. Jochen, entschuldige, aber kein Grund zur Sorge, ich habe keine weiteren Daten mehr :-) Da einige Leute Interesse an den Daten gezeigt haben, werde ich sie wenn immer ich welche habe (erwarte etwa alle 2 Monate im Schnitt) zur Verfügung stellen. Ich werde eine Summary-Mail mit Links schicken, anstelle von den Einzelmails. Viele Grüße Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Hello, I did some navit map conversions and maptool gives a number of warnings, not sure if they are useful. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/146483 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/288251 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/309657 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/386107 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/932415 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/932477 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/932483 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/933070 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/933073 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1103711 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1131894 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1312788 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1344608 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1362027 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1362936 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1363289 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1398251 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1421392 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1454808 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662117 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662136 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662138 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1737428 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1823545 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1905684 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1905691 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1964135 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1965333 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2088552 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2156390 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2170703 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2170704 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2170737 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2225346 turn restriction: via member missing -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Am Thursday 21 June 2012 schrieb Michael Bemmerl: Rainer Dorsch schrieb: I did some navit map conversions and maptool gives a number of warnings, not sure if they are useful. Thanks, I've fixed the obvious ones (like missing via's, double 'to' roles, etc.). Some additional ones for Switzerland: OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30147027 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30147029 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/35574899 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37056687 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37104618 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38696067 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44178424 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/45892924 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50759439 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50760438 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/76565202 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/104414041 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/117933873 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/122849577 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/129112162 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/140679701 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/151285613 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/159742530 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/163072084 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106309 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106310 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106311 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106901 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/107216 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/107217 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/147022 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/147025 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/409265 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/409266 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/450871 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/576191 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1103711 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1308609 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1320122 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704053 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704054 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704131 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1761853 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1857487 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1866218 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1963230 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2147921 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2153575 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2167096 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2169505 turn restriction: from member missing OSM
[Talk-de] Turn restriction Probleme in Baden-Württemberg
: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662070 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662151 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662941 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1663154 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713957 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713958 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713959 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713960 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713961 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713962 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713963 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713964 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713965 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713966 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713967 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713968 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713969 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713980 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1713981 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/544186 turn restriction: to member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/544187 turn restriction: from member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1558766 turn restriction: from member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1631501 turn restriction: from member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1641830 turn restriction: from member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1641836 turn restriction: to member not found OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1641840 turn restriction: to member not found Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Navigation on osm data
Hello, I am wondering if osm data contains information which helps rounting programs like navit to announce before a crossing which lane to take, when there are multiple lanes (e.g. one for turning left, one for straight or turning right). Deriving that simply from the angles the streets meet at the crossing does not work reliably As an example see the bug report, I opened against navit: http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/870 Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] OT: Navigation on osm data
Hello, I am wondering if osm data contains information which helps rounting programs like navit to announce before a crossing which lane to take, when there are multiple lanes (e.g. one for turning left, one for straight or turning right). Deriving that simply from the angles the streets meet at the crossing does not work reliably As an example see the bug report, I opened against navit: http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/870 Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] OT: Displaying Color Encoded Information in Track
Hello, I would like to display color encoded information in a track. In my particular case right now, I would like to record signal strength with my cellphone. The easiest way to collect the data is for me a gps track and a table containing time and signal strenght. My end goal is to have the signal strength encoded in the color of the track (similarly like josm may encode velocity in the color of the track). Any input how to achieve this is welcome. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Navigation on osm data
Hallo Kai, danke für die Antwort. Am Sunday, 5. June 2011 schrieb Kai Krueger: Rainer Dorsch wrote: I am wondering if osm data contains information which helps rounting programs like navit to announce before a crossing which lane to take, when there are multiple lanes (e.g. one for turning left, one for straight or turning right). Dazu gibt es gerade auch eine Diskussion im Forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=12554 Ein Vorschlag um Turn lanes zu mappen ist http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/turn_lanes Noch sind vermutlich sehr wenige Kreuzungen so getaged, aber wenn Navi programme wie Navit oder MapFactor Free[1] anfangen wuerden diese Tags zu unterstuetzen, waere die Motivation sicherlich hoeher unter mappern diese auch zu taggen. Das uebliche Henne und Ei problem. Ich werde die nächsten Tage mal eine Zusammenfassung der Antworten schreiben und dem navit bugreport anhängen. Bin nicht sicher, wann das implementiert wird, ich fürchte ich komme vor Herbst nicht dazu... Kai P.S. hatte es einen Grund warum die mail auf Englisch geschrieben wurde? Dann koente ich meine Antwort auch auf Englisch wiederholen. Nur Gewohnheit, poste sehr selten auf deutschen Listen. Danke nochmal und Gruß Rainer [1] http://forum.mapfactor.com/discussion/29/traffic-lane-assistant/p1 -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Navigation-on-osm-data-tp6442397p6442547.h tml Sent from the Germany mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Brunnen Taggen
Hallo, wie werden denn Brunnen wie dieser http://lh5.ggpht.com/_0ex2IC3iI6g/Sd6N6kWsz6I/Cds/XKGwW15DGAU/2009-04-05+Siebenmühlental+Schönbuch+071.jpg (es gibt noch viele mehr: http://www.seehagel.de/SB/brunnen.htm ) korrekt getagged? Ich habe natural=spring: Water flowing out of the ground. May have a fountain build around amenity=fountain: A fountain for cultural / decorational / recreational purposes. und auch amenity=drinking_water: For showing the location of a tap or other source of drinking water gesehen. Dann zum Thema Trinkwasser: drinkable=yes/no/mineral Soweit ich weiß wird der Brunnen nicht regelmäßig getestet und ist auch nicht explizit als Trinkwasser gekennzeichnet. Das Ding entspringt mitten im Wald, keine landwirtschaftliche Nutzung in der Nähe, ich habe keine Bedenken, daraus zu trinken. Insofern erscheint es mir trinkbar Ich habe die Tendenz amenity=fountain zu taggen und drinkable gar nicht (steht ja auch weder Trinkwasser noch kein Trinkwasser dran). Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] konqueror does not display openstreetmap anymore
Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010 schrieben Sie: On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 10:59 +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: Hello, I noticed that konqueror stopped displaying the openstreetmap maps some time ago. The page of http://www.openstreetmap.org/ is loaded, but the screen stays empty (see screenshot at http://bokomoko.de/~rd/osm.png ). Initially I thought that is until a problem at the server side is fixed, but it persists now for around two weeks. Other Openstreetmap based maps still work ok, like http://www.opencyclemap.org/ http://öpnvkarte.de/ ... Does anybody know what changed? What is your IP address? There is a chance that your IP might have been blocked if you had been using a utility to bulk download tiles. My IP address is dyanmically assigned from my network provider, so it changes. Also Firefox is able to display the maps. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] konqueror does not display openstreetmap anymore
Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010 schrieb Liz: On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Renaud MICHEL wrote: Le dimanche 18 avril 2010 à 10:59, Rainer Dorsch a écrit : I noticed that konqueror stopped displaying the openstreetmap maps some time ago. The page of http://www.openstreetmap.org/ is loaded, but the screen stays empty (see screenshot at http://bokomoko.de/~rd/osm.png ). No problem here with konqueror 4.4.2 and 4.3.2 working here which version Rainer? That is surprising, I expected all 3.x versions to be broken. I use 3.5.9. Does anybody know if there is a way to get debug output from konqueror? Also in the screenshot http://bokomoko.de/~rd/osm.png there is a black dot at the bottom right. Is that maybe the map, but for some reason shrinked down to a dot? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] konqueror does not display openstreetmap anymore
Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010 schrieb Cartinus: On Sunday 18 April 2010 13:23:38 Rainer Dorsch wrote: Does anybody know if there is a way to get debug output from konqueror? Using Debian Lenny and Konqueror 3.5.9 too I see the same problem. In the bottom right corner of the Konqueror window there is an icon of a bug. If you click on that you get a dialog for JavaScript Errors. The error it displays is: Error: http://www.openstreetmap.org/: RangeError: Exceeded maximum function call depth. I normally use Iceweasel 3.0.6 to view the openstreetmap.org site, so I didn't notice this before. Thanks for the reply. That might be the root cause of the problem. Although I enabled in Konqueror javascirpt settings to report errors, I cannot see the bug icon in konqueror though. Any thoughts why I do not see this myself? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-de] ÖPNV Linie überprüfen
Hallo, habe gerade eine Releation für eine Buslinie für die ÖPNV-Karte erstellt. Kann sich jemand mal bitte Relation 536822 anschauen, ob ich das Resultat (zumindest technisch) korrekt ist? Danke Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] ÖPNV Linie überprüfen
Am Sonntag, 28. März 2010 schrieb Klaus Hartmann: ...zudem fehlt Rückrichtung. Am Flughafen bspw. müsste der Bus eine andere Route zurück nehmen (wegen Einbahnstraßen). Die Elemente, die der Bus nur in eine Richtung befährt müssen mit forward bzw backward in der Elementrolle getaggt sein. Bspw. eine Einbahnstraße die in Vorwärtsrichtung befahren wird (meint: der Bus fährt in die Richtung, in die der Pfeil der Straße in JOSM zeigt) muss forward haben. Auf einer Straße die entgegen dieser Pfeilrichtung befahren wird (muss keine Einbahnstraße sein!) muss die Rolle backward sein. Problematisch ist, dass man nicht unbedingt eine konsistent durchlaufende Route erhält - dafür muss Hin- und Rückrichtung einzeln ge-relation-ed werden. Siehe dazu unter http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Oxomoa/%C3%96PNV-Schema#Linie Grundsätzliche Idee: Zwei Relationen für die Hin- und die Rückrichtung jeweils eine und eine Relation, die die beiden Relationen enthält. Wenn man dieses Schema anwendet muss jede Straße (Weg) eine Rolle haben (der Bus fährt ja immer nur in diese eine Richtung). Noch was, eine gute Erläuterung des praktischen Einsatz dieses Schemas, allerdings mit einigen Anpassungen findet sich unter http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aachen_Editing#Taggen_von_Buslinien_in_A achen_und_Umgebung Danke für die Links und Infos. Ich hatte vergessen zu erwähnen, dass die Relation nur um eine Richtung handelt (wollte ja nicht die gleichen Fehler auf Hin- und Rückrichtung fixen) zumal es auch noch Alternativ-Routen gibt (nicht jeder Bus fährt die gleiche Strecke auf der Linie). Was ist denn bei getrennten Relationen für Hin-und Rückrichtung, sowie Alternativrouten bei ref und nat_ref eingetragen werden? Wofür werden die verwendet? Kann ich eine URL für den Streckenfahrplan angeben? Gruß, Rainer Habe Eure -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] ÖPNV Linie überprüfen
Hallo, Am Sonntag, 28. März 2010 schrieb Fips Schneider: Ich persönlich mache die Haltestellen immer an den Anfang oder ans Ende einer Relation - dann ist es viel einfacher zu Pflegen. Auf die Auswertung macht das bisher auch keinen Unterschied, solange die Reihenfolge der Haltestellen unter sich stimmt. das ist ja spannend, wusste ich nicht. Wer wertet denn die Reihenfolge der Haltestellen aus? Danke Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Your whishlist for Debian Packages?
Am Dienstag, 30. Dezember 2008 schrieb Joerg Ostertag (OSM Tettnang/Germany): Repository for lenny (testing) /etc/apt/sources.list # Gpsdrive Packages deb http://www.gpsdrive.de/debian etch main deb-src http://www.gpsdrive.de/debian etch main Soll das wirklich etch (für lenny?) heißen? Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Your whishlist for Debian Packages?
Hallo Joerg, Am Sonntag, 28. Dezember 2008 schrieb Joerg Ostertag (OSM Tettnang/Germany): Hi, as most of you probably know I'm providing debian packages for the most common tools needed to work with OpenStreetMap. What I'd like to know is: - which additional tools from the osm-svn would you like to see added to the debian repository? - which other debian based platforms would you like to see suported? examples would be: debian-etch, Ubuntu-xx, ... Lenny, aber das scheint ja schon da zu sein. Da ist ja schon einiges da, das reicht mir erstmal :-) Ich habe auf Anhieb nicht die sources.list Zeile gefunden. Ist das Absicht? Danke für das Repository und Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Hi Ben, Am Freitag, 7. November 2008 schrieben Sie: On Thursday 06 November 2008, Rainer Dorsch wrote: JOSM could be extended to ask in the install : are you mapping in Germany or in Italy ? If germany, a track could be recorded as : highway=track motorcar=no In Italy, a track could be recorded as : highway=track motocar=yes I like this idea of having country specific presets in the editors instead of having renderers to be country sprecific. It's way too late for that for tags like highway=track. Access rules are already heavily country dependent (highway=trunk allowing pedestrians and bicycles or not for example; access=destination implying that cyclists and horse drivers always have access in some countries, destination traffic or not). The same with for example default maximum speeds. Tagging these default rules will be a nightmare if it's at some point decided in country X to change the rules. Good point. But I am wondering how often that happens. How many of these rule changes do you remember in the past for your country which would have affected osm tagging heavily? You don't know anymore whether the tag is there because it was added as default from JOSM or another editor, or because it was explicitly signed The way some country specific tags could work is to translate a concept from that country (e.g. an express road which may be something completely different in different countries and would need other tags). I am hesitant with different definitions/defaults in the meantime. I could imaging that a map in the future allows beyond showing the rendered data to let me see all tags on a way. If I travel into another country, it is a nightmare to read just plain tags (not talking about editing). Greetings, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Hi Nic, Am Freitag, 7. November 2008 schrieb Nic Roets: only... does that mean you're going to revisit all 30 tracks in Germany to check whether they allow cars or not? The project of No. A German track without a motorcar key will get motorcar=no added, assuming the original survey was correct. If the bot identifies itself properly, mappers will know that no new information was introduced. I like this solution. I just reviewed the restriction tags at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features#Restrictions and I am wondering what are the global defaults for motorcycle and psv on a track. I suggest for both no as default for Germany. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-de] path vs footway (war Mapnik Update)
Am Freitag, 7. November 2008 schrieb Claudius Henrichs: Vielleicht wäre als Denkanstoss bei der Diskussion path vs footway/cycleway auch mal die Idee ganz hilfreich, highway=path als Ergänzung und nicht als Ersatz zu sehen. Das mag vielen schon klar sein, einige scheinen aber auf ein entweder..., oder abzuzielen. Ich hatte auf der englischen Liste eine ähnliche Frage gestellt: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-November/031161.html Eine (wenn auch kontroverse) Antwort: There is no defined physical difference between footway and path. The difference is that footways are primarily or exclusively for use by foot traffic, while paths are not. http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-November/031164.html Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 schrieb sylvain letuffe: It may be better to let each country decide for itself in the end I guess. Well, I'm not so sure of that. I would prefere the editors to have the defaults defined depending on the country and record in the database a world wide established scheme Only in this way can we have a global randering, routing software that developpers don't need to tweak with 256 differtent country/interpretation JOSM could be extended to ask in the install : are you mapping in Germany or in Italy ? If germany, a track could be recorded as : highway=track motorcar=no In Italy, a track could be recorded as : highway=track motocar=yes I like this idea of having country specific presets in the editors instead of having renderers to be country sprecific. Frederik, what do yo think? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 schrieben Sie: If the closest way to click (tlat/tlon for yournavigation) falls next to an access=destination way, gosmore will assume that you have permission / will obtain permission at the appropriate time. So if the business park with the 2 entrances only allow visitors to enter at the main entrance, I suggest some pragmatic tagging at the second entrance : If visitors are allow to leave through it, tag it as oneway=true with the way pointing outwards. If visitors are not allowed to leave through it, tag it as either access=no or access=private (which is translated to access=no by gosmore). So gosmore will not always produce the answer that the employees in the park want, but they just run an extra query starting / ending just outside the second entrance. I see, for the example business park, the access=destination tag makes a lot of sense. For tracks I never got a special permission in areas where I would need a map or even routing. So doing routing over tracks would have been useless for me for far... For my personal usecase, my preference preference would be to have a tag which tells motorcars are not allowed (motorcar=no ?) and gosmore would route me closest to the clicked position on allowed ways and the rest by foot (or optimize travelling time). Not sure what others see as their typical usecase though Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] footway vs. path [Was: highway=track and motorcar=yes/no]
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 schrieb sylvain letuffe: But a highway=path is good for ways where cars are not allowed by the laws of physics :) We are not talking about a physical possibility, but about an access right motorcar=no implies that cars are not allowed, but not that tractors or emergency vehiculs aren't path implies access restriction but not physical restrictions (in what it is quite unclear, but I assume this as to be specified, or replaced by track ) I am wondering what is the difference between footway and path? sac_scale on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features seems to apply for both. Does that mean a mountain hiking path can be a path or a footway? Are paths larger than footways? Is it for paths required that any other vehicle/horse can use the path otherwise it is a footway? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 schrieb sylvain letuffe: But a highway=path is good for ways where cars are not allowed by the laws of physics :) We are not talking about a physical possibility, but about an access right motorcar=no implies that cars are not allowed, but not that tractors or emergency vehiculs aren't path implies access restriction but not physical restrictions (in what it is quite unclear, but I assume this as to be specified, or replaced by track ) What is the difference between access restriction and are not allowed ? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Sascha, Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieb Sascha Silbe: On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote: In Germany (Switzerland and Austria as well?) there are probably a very low fraction of tracks on which motorcars are allowed. That depends on the state (Bundesland). So there cannot be a global default, only a local one. I am just curious: which Bundesländer do typically allow motorcars on tracks? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieb Nic Roets:
Using the script below I found 219469 tracks of which 202630 did not have a
motorcar= tag.
My reasoning behind gosmore was that tracks not suitable for vehicles
should be tagged as footway.
I think many tracks here could technically be used by motorcars, but motorcars
are not allowed to use it (except for some special cases like if you own land
which is accessible only using such a track or if you have special
permission).
A footway and a track (which is not allowed for cars) makes a huge difference
for cyclists though. Therefore I would be hesitant to tag all tracks as
footways (which would also be against common practice in osm).
It's flawed because we so many unsurfaced way
types. Perhaps we can adopt the following scheme ?
highway=track defaults to motorcar=no
highway=unsurfaced defaults to motorcar=yes
highway=byway defaults to motorcar=yes
Looking at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features
I did not find highway=unsurfaced
How does it differ from the surface tag in Map_Features?
surfacepaved /cobblestone /unpaved way
Apply to all types of highways. If the tag is not present, it is assumed
surface=paved, excepted for highway=footway. (sealed/unsealed outside UK).
For byway I have no preference, I assume there should be very few in Germany.
For track I am in favor of defaulting to motorcar=no, but let's wait what
others think
Thanks,
Rainer
bzcat germany.osm.bz2 | awk '/way.*id.*timestamp.*/ { print hway, motor;
hway=; motor=}; /.*highway.*track.*/ { hway=t }; /.*motorcar.*/
{motor=$0}' |grep '^t'|sort |less -S
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering, if there is a default for motorcar defined for
highway=track
if motorcar=yes/no is not specified explicitly.
In Germany (Switzerland and Austria as well?) there are probably a very
low fraction of tracks on which motorcars are allowed.
This seems to be different in other countries, gosmore at least routes
cars over tracks. I am wondering if the default can be per countryor
how much
work it is to give all tracks a motorcar tag.
Can anybody find out easily how many tracks there are in Germany without
an motorcar tag?
Thanks,
Rainer
--
Rainer Dorsch
Lärchenstr. 6
D-72135 Dettenhausen
07157-734133
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E
Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Rainer Dorsch
Lärchenstr. 6
D-72135 Dettenhausen
07157-734133
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E
Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieb Nic Roets: (except for some special cases like if you own land which is accessible only using such a track or if you have special permission). Then it should be tagged with access=destination It's not yet supported in gosmore, but I've though about the logic already : Let's say an office park has 2 gates but you're only allowed inside if you work there or have an appointment. I'm intending to support 2 ways of tagging it : * Tag all the roads inside with access=destination. * Tag only the 2 entrances with access=destination. Some routing packages may then refuse to route you to an untagged roads within the office park (e.g. a cul-de-sac), but gosmore will get you there. Do I have a way to tell gosmore that I have a permission or would it also route me there when I want to do a short leissure walk there (maybe by selecting the destination with a click)? How would I tag that only motorcars have access=destination, but for bikes non-destination access is perfectly fine? Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=track and motorcar=yes/no
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieben Sie: surface paved /cobblestone /unpaved way Apply to all types of highways. If the tag is not present, it is assumed surface=paved, excepted for highway=footway. (sealed/unsealed outside UK). (IMHO surface=paved should not be assumed for highway=track either.) There is tracktype, grade1 is paved, grade2-5 are unpaved. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] highway=path not rendered in osmarender
Hello, I noticed that osmarender is not rendering ways with the highway=path tag. Although adding more ways to the map, makes it in some areas less nice, most paths are probably in mountain areas (e.g. sac_scale=mountain), where not much other paths are located. For me rendering paths would be a plus. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] highway=path not rendered in osmarender
Am Sonntag, 10. August 2008 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: Hello, I noticed that osmarender is not rendering ways with the highway=path tag. I mixed osmarender and mapnik: osmarender is rendering paths, mapnik does not. Although adding more ways to the map, makes it in some areas less nice, most paths are probably in mountain areas (e.g. sac_scale=mountain), where not much other paths are located. For me rendering paths would be a plus. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-de] Tags für Hütten/bewirteten Almen in den Alpen?
Hallo, gibt es einen Tag für Hütten, wie man sie oft in den Alpen findet? Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
[OSM-talk] Database Problems
Hello, I just saw that OSM has database problems. Is there a page where status information is published? Any projection, when these are fixed? Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-de] Datenbankserver down
Am Freitag, 20. Juni 2008 schrieb Dirk-Lüder Kreie: Thorsten Feles schrieb: Na super, ich hoffe nur, dass da noch ein paar Diff-Backups zurückgespielt werden. Etliche Bereiche die ich lezte Woche bearbeitet hatt sind total zerupft, ein bunte Mischung zwischen alt und neu, Ways doppelt, Nodes fehlen ... Von welcher Datenquelle redest du? Klingt seltsam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Platform_Status berichtet von Problemen mit der Netzwerkkarte des Servers. Kaum zu glauben, dass dabei die Datenbasis kaputt geht (?) Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk] Large Relation Vanished
Am Montag, 16. Juni 2008 schrieben Sie: Hallo Rainer, It is relation #9420, last edited by you on 2008-06-06 and then deleted on 2008-06-07 by user gomaddin. The user had deleted the ways 24395720, 4902770, and 4902773 which were part of the relation. I have restored these ways and the relation, but without checking whether my restoring them has now perhaps lead to a duplication of data. Many thanks. Can I find these ways myself (e.g. in OSM)? Ja, wenn Du sowas wie http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/way/24395720/full aufrufst, bekommst Du den Way mit allen dazugehoerigen Nodes und kannst die Datei in JOSM oeffnen (oder als Textfile ansehen). Many thanks again. Seems like gomaddin did some improvements in Rottenburg. Through that he deleted the three ways and replaced them by new ones. Somehow the relation got deleted through this. I removed the three ways properly from the relation and deleted it from the osm database. I contacted gomaddin to find out how the relation got deleted by have no response yet. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Large Relation Vanished
Hello, I created a pretty large relation (named Hohenzollern-Weg) for a national bike-route in Germany. Unfortunately it vanished in the past two weeks. Is there a way to restore it? Is there a way to find out who deleted it? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OT] OSM based photo catalogue
Hi Karl, Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 schrieb Karl Newman: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, this post is somewhat offtopic but people here could know: Is there a project with builds a picasaweb like integration of photos with GPS location information and the OpenStreetMap data? Many thanks, Rainer I'm the current maintainer of the Google Maps module for Gallery 2 [1]. It can parse location information from the EXIF header of photos. I know it doesn't help you now, but a future goal of mine is to refactor the code to allow it to use an OpenLayers setup as an alternative to Google Maps. That is really good news. Motivation enough for me to get my photo collection migrated from cthumb to gallery (though there are other reasons too). Thanks for all the replies and I hope to see eventually OSM integration in gallery :-) Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of tracktype
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 schrieb Frank Sautter: my idea of how this should be rendered is: grade1: just like highway=service grade2: continous brown line (maybe less bold than tracks are currently rendered) grade3: dashed brown line (the current style for tracks, maybe less bold) grade4: dash dotted brown line (appearing at higher zoom) grade5: dotted line (appearing at higher zoom) For me that would be very helpful. I am not an artist though and can't judge if that would make the maps uglier or just more useful. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of tracktype
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 schrieb Richard Fairhurst: Frank Sautter wrote: i agree with you! my idea of how this should be rendered is: grade1: just like highway=service [...] It's worth noting that tracktype is not a universally welcome tag - a lot of people think having an arbitrary scale isn't very OSM-like, and that it's better to tag specific characteristics. We don't necessarily have anything better, of course. I agree. In particular it does not reflect the diameter of the stones on the track. Having a track with large rocks (as it happens often in the Alps) or very small stones certainly makes a difference when you ride with your bikeNevertheless the tracktype information is much more useful than just knowing it is a track. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of tracktype
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 schrieb Andy Allan: On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Sven Geggus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's because the Mapnik layer aims to be a nice looking map and not one that has it all. Despite of this it would IMO be still much mor appropriate to render tracktype=grade1 in the same form as highway=service. If we don't want to have mapnik render different tracks differently we should at least have them in the cyclemap! Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offroad cycle routes as more important than the difference between tracktypes; ditto I am very happy to hear that this is on your list. I very rarely use cycle routes along roads, so I have a different opinion, but I am probably in a minority here. And at the end you do the work, so you decide :-) Thanks for the nice cyclemap. Rainer for distinguishing bicycle=yes/no on footpaths and so on. -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] [OT] OSM based photo catalogue
Hello, this post is somewhat offtopic but people here could know: Is there a project with builds a picasaweb like integration of photos with GPS location information and the OpenStreetMap data? Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Rendering of tracktype
Hello, I am wondering why mapnik is makeing no attempt to render the different tracktypes we have in our mapdata. What surprises me even more is that cyclemap is differentiate the tracktype in the renderer... This was probably discussed before, if yes, has anybody a pointer? Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Changes in Relations do not upload: 500 Internal Server Errror
Am Samstag, 12. April 2008 schrieb Robert Vollmert: On Apr 12, 2008, at 18:57, Rainer Dorsch wrote: I can upload normal changes to OSM, but I cannot upload changes in relations. I keep getting Error while parsing: An error occured: 500 Internal Server Error Is that a know problem? I've had this error message in JOSM when I tried uploading a relation with duplicate members. Not sure if this has been fixed, consider updating your version of JOSM. Robert, thanks for the quick reply, that solved the problem. Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] relationseditor in josm broken (?)
Hello, when I use the josm relations editor, I get a huge delete button and no space is left for the other buttons, see http://bokomoko.de/~rd/josm-relations.png for a screenshot. I am wondering if the josm relations editor is only broken for me and if yes, what did I do wrong? Many thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] relationseditor in josm broken (?)
Thanks for the quick response. In fact the lang-de plugin was causing the problem. Rainer Am Samstag, 5. April 2008 schrieb John07: Hi, someone had the same problem on the talk-de list. It appears if you use the german translation of JOSM. Jonas Rainer Dorsch schrieb: Hello, when I use the josm relations editor, I get a huge delete button and no space is left for the other buttons, see http://bokomoko.de/~rd/josm-relations.png for a screenshot. I am wondering if the josm relations editor is only broken for me and if yes, what did I do wrong? Many thanks, Rainer ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-de] Tübingen
Am Montag, 24. September 2007 07:05 schrieb Holger Issle: On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:00:07 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: Moin, Wer (ausser mir) bearbeitet denn Tübingen? Bitte mal melden zwecks Koordination. Nicht direkt Tü, aber Weil im Schönbuch, Feld- und Waldwege Richtung Schönbuch, und derzeit einiges Richtung Schwäbischer Alb. Habe vereinzelt auch schon in Tübingen was gemappt, aber v.a. Schönbuch und Dettenhausen. Komme in letzter Zeit aber zu nicht sehr vieljede Hilfe ist willkommen. Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] OSM im Fernsehen
Hallo Holger, ich sehe bei der URL nur zwei suchboxen. Was gibst Du da ein? Zentrum und Erfurt ergibt bei mir We couldn't find any results containing Zentrum. Search tips: Try similar words. For example, some sites may use film instead of movie. Make your search more general. For example, instead of using a specific product name, try typing the generic product category or manufacturer. Genau die gleiche Meldung bekomme ich auch mit anderen Suchausdrücken. Nutze allerdings hier einen Firefox und keine IE, vielleicht ist das das Problem??? Danke Gruß, Rainer Am Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2007 22:38 schrieb Holger Schrader: Hallo Sven, hallo Christoph, Wie die Ansicht bei kleineren Städten ist weis ich nicht. Bei Erfurt ist es so, dass wenn ich auf den Schalter Switch to bird´s eye view klicke eine noch größere und deutlichere Ansicht bekomme. Mit dem Schieberegler kann man sich dann noch weiter heranzoomen. Durch einen klick auf die Himmelsrichtungen unter dem Schalter Switch to bird´s eye view kann man sich zB. ein Haus von allen vier Seiten anschauen. Habe ich diese Funktion bei Google Maps übersehen? (Diese Frage ist nicht ironisch gemeint). Liebe Grüße Holger Sven Geggus schrieb: Holger Schrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ich habe unter http://maps.live.com/ ein Angebot von Microsoft entdeckt, wo es mich fast umgehauen hat. Es gibt da Luftbildaufnahmen in großer Auflösung und großer Schärfe zu sehen. Es ist echt der Hammer was mittlerweile durch das Internet möglich ist. Was genau ist daran jetzt besser als an Google Maps? Außer vielleicht dass das von Dir genannte Angebot in meinem schnellen Test im Gegensatz zu Google nichts über meine Heimatstadt findet :) Sven ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] name property Konflikt
Hallo, ich habe am Wochenende zum ersten mal zur Openstreetmap beigetragen. Stimmt es, dass der Staßenname, z.B. B27 oder L1184 als name property angegeben wird? Wenn ja, wenn die Straße innerhalb eines Ortes noch einen weiteren Namen hat, z.B. Stuttgarter Straße, wie kann ich diesen Konflikt lösen? Danke Gruß, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07032-359190 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
