Re: [OSM-talk] EuroVelo routes are out of date
On 2019-10-03 10:55, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Maarten Deen wrote: Is it an idea to create some kind of ticketing system for this? I think we already have this: - create notes on osm.org, including the word "eurovelo" - search for "eurovelo" on https://ent8r.github.io/NotesReview/ Great, if only it was used like that a bit more... Regards, Maarten ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] EuroVelo routes are out of date
Maarten Deen wrote: > Is it an idea to create some kind of ticketing system for this? I think we already have this: - create notes on osm.org, including the word "eurovelo" - search for "eurovelo" on https://ent8r.github.io/NotesReview/ Richard -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] EuroVelo routes are out of date
On 2019-10-03 10:27, Richard Fairhurst wrote: EuroVelo routes are not in a great state in OSM. Many of them appear to have been armchaired years ago when routes were "in development", and not updated since to reflect the correct route. A handful of examples: …and there are lots more. I'm sure I'm not saying anything new when I say that this is a general problem with routes in OSM. Is it an idea to create some kind of ticketing system for this? Maybe put this all in Trac? Because someone who notices this may not always be someone who can check it. And you give a few examples now, but leave out the lots more that may be close to where other people can check. Regards, Maarten ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] EuroVelo routes are out of date
EuroVelo routes are not in a great state in OSM. Many of them appear to have been armchaired years ago when routes were "in development", and not updated since to reflect the correct route. A handful of examples: [France] https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12!49.2876!2.655 EV3 should follow the new cycleway along the Oise, not the busy D932a [Czech Republic] https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=11!49.9195!14.4621 EV7 is completely wrong in OSM from the south of Prague to Nahoruby, including unrideable tracks and a suggestion that cyclists use a “ferry” that in reality is a tourist boat that only operates at weekends [Spain] https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!41.9486!3.1467 EV8 now follows the Pirinexus alignment …and there are lots more. I realise people are preoccupied with tagwanking over relation tagging [1] and sorting [2] and editor snobbery [3], but there’s not a lot of point fretting over how pretty the tagging is on the route relation if the route is actually wrong in the first place. Could I encourage people to check the EuroVelo routes in their home countries and update them where necessary? Richard [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-August/047790.html [2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-August/047258.html [3] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/042154.html ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
