Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik style bug in railway=subway

[Maarten Deen]

On 2013-07-16 10:16, Christian Quest wrote:


railway=subway should not be on the route relation.


I'll delete that and see if it solves things.

Regards,
Maarten


2013/7/16 Maarten Deen :
I'm not sure where to report this, I hope someone here can point me 
in the

correct direction.
Have a look at the subwaylines here [1]

The middle one on the right of the marker is dashed, the top and 
bottom ones
are not. All are tagged with tunnel=yes, the only difference is that 
the two

that are not dashed have oneway=yes on them.
It appears that oneway=yes on railway=subway does not get it rendered 
as a

tunnel anymore. I think this should be corrected.

[1]


Regards,
Maarten


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik style bug in railway=subway

[Christian Quest]

It may be a data problem...

The dashed way is the following:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/207198651
The non dashed one is: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/207198652

This second way is also part of a relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2777287

To me, it looks like this relation is mixing 2 things:
- type=route + route=subway
- railway = subway

The route is fine, but the railway=subway is creating a duplicate with
the existing railway=subway that are on the ways themselves.
osm2pgsql thus created another "line" object for the whole subway line
which makes mapnik draw the dashed subway line twice... making it
looking as undashed in some parts.

railway=subway should not be on the route relation.


2013/7/16 Maarten Deen :
> I'm not sure where to report this, I hope someone here can point me in the
> correct direction.
> Have a look at the subwaylines here [1]
>
> The middle one on the right of the marker is dashed, the top and bottom ones
> are not. All are tagged with tunnel=yes, the only difference is that the two
> that are not dashed have oneway=yes on them.
> It appears that oneway=yes on railway=subway does not get it rendered as a
> tunnel anymore. I think this should be corrected.
>
> [1]
> 
>
> Regards,
> Maarten
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France
Un nouveau serveur pour OSM... http://donate.osm.org/server2013/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik style bug in railway=subway

[Andrew Errington]

Probably you should make an entry in TRAC:
https://trac.openstreetmap.org/

Best wishes,

Andrew

On 16 July 2013 16:43, Maarten Deen  wrote:
> I'm not sure where to report this, I hope someone here can point me in the
> correct direction.
> Have a look at the subwaylines here [1]
>
> The middle one on the right of the marker is dashed, the top and bottom ones
> are not. All are tagged with tunnel=yes, the only difference is that the two
> that are not dashed have oneway=yes on them.
> It appears that oneway=yes on railway=subway does not get it rendered as a
> tunnel anymore. I think this should be corrected.
>
> [1]
> 
>
> Regards,
> Maarten
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk