Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-11 Thread Hugh Barnes
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:19:22 +1000
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:15 PM, John Smith
 deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
 

 
  Unless waste_basket=yes is an approved tag the likelihood of it
  being searched by anyone not using the tag is almost nil

So the bonus is that it works now and (arguably) isn't wrong.

 
 Hence the question about whether to put it on the wiki. 

Yeah, I don't know the best approach. I've seen all kinds of approaches
and they all end up in argument ~:|

 
 I guess this is one specific case of the broader problem of what to do
 when two separate entities are co-located (i.e. nodes would be right
 on top of each other).

Well, it depends what you're calling the bus stop. If you go with the
stop area approach, these problems go away.

 In this case I guess you could use
 highway=bus_stop *and* amenity=waste_basket (i.e. share a single
 node), but this becomes a problem when you want to tag two things with
 the same key, e.g. amenity=bench *and* amenity=shelter.

That old chestnut. That is schema fail, but the cabal won't see reason.
It's always popping up stopping us from representing the real world. Got
the t-shirt.

Cheers

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-11 Thread Roy Wallace
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Hugh Barnes list@hughbris.com wrote:

 I guess this is one specific case of the broader problem of what to do
 when two separate entities are co-located (i.e. nodes would be right
 on top of each other).

 Well, it depends what you're calling the bus stop. If you go with the
 stop area approach, these problems go away.

A waste_basket bolted to a bus_stop sign. I think it would still be an
issue. Unless you use the centre of the sign pole and the centre of
the hole in the top of the waste_basket...urgh time to move on :)

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-09 Thread Hugh Barnes
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:43:18 +1000
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:43 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com
 wrote:
 
  I've been doing that for a while (well, except waste_basket=*), so
  that's a +1 from me :)
 
 Any objections (from anyone) to adding these to
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop ?
 

Yep, hold your horses. There's been some excellent work by the transit
list people I need to research a little more to see where it's at. It
builds on this:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/unified_stoparea

but I think there is a tidier page somewhere.

Just let me make David's Redcliffe party cake or he will kill me.

Cheers

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-09 Thread Hugh Barnes
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:57:29 +1000
Hugh Barnes list@hughbris.com wrote:

  I need to research a little more to see where it's at. It
 builds on this:
 
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/unified_stoparea
 
 but I think there is a tidier page somewhere.

Bah, I can't be digging through the murky OSM records at this time of
night.

 
 Just let me make David's Redcliffe party cake or he will kill me.
 

At least he didn't get the satisfaction.

'night.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-08 Thread James Livingston
On 08/09/2009, at 8:57 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
 For tagging highway=bus_stop 's, in addition to the existing  
 shelter=yes/no, I'm planning to also use bench=yes/no and  
 waste_basket=yes/no, as these features are often installed as part  
 of the bus stop itself, in Brisbane.

 Tagging separate nodes with amenity=* is not ideal, as 1) i couldn't  
 really be bothered and, more importantly, 2) they are physically  
 part of the bus stop (e.g. bench built into the bus_stop shelter;  
 waste_basket bolted to the bus_stop sign) and therefore additional  
 nodes are not even semantically more correct.

I've been doing that for a while (well, except waste_basket=*), so  
that's a +1 from me :)

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-08 Thread Roy Wallace
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:43 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:

 I've been doing that for a while (well, except waste_basket=*), so
 that's a +1 from me :)

Any objections (from anyone) to adding these to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop ?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-07 Thread Roy Wallace
Gday,

For tagging highway=bus_stop 's, in addition to the existing shelter=yes/no,
I'm planning to also use bench=yes/no and waste_basket=yes/no, as these
features are often installed as part of the bus stop itself, in Brisbane.

Tagging separate nodes with amenity=* is not ideal, as 1) i couldn't really
be bothered and, more importantly, 2) they are physically part of the bus
stop (e.g. bench built into the bus_stop shelter; waste_basket bolted to the
bus_stop sign) and therefore additional nodes are not even semantically more
correct.

Any comments/support/reprimands?

Cheers,
Roy
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] bus_stop further details

2009-09-07 Thread Franc Carter
I agree, sounds sensible

cheers

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:

 Gday,

 For tagging highway=bus_stop 's, in addition to the existing
 shelter=yes/no, I'm planning to also use bench=yes/no and
 waste_basket=yes/no, as these features are often installed as part of the
 bus stop itself, in Brisbane.

 Tagging separate nodes with amenity=* is not ideal, as 1) i couldn't really
 be bothered and, more importantly, 2) they are physically part of the bus
 stop (e.g. bench built into the bus_stop shelter; waste_basket bolted to the
 bus_stop sign) and therefore additional nodes are not even semantically more
 correct.

 Any comments/support/reprimands?

 Cheers,
 Roy

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au