Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-24 Thread Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Nick Hocking  wrote:
> Cam wrote
>
> "I'd prefer if all the maxspeed changesets be reverted now so atleast
> some odbl tools can show ways being green rather than mostly all orange."
>
> Hi Cam,
>
> I'm confident that these edits will change from orange to yellow in the
> very near future.
>
> This will mean that they are considered  harmless and you
> can turn the harmless ones off  which will then allow you
> to see the real orange problem areas.

The woodpeck_fixbot has been doing this, a good road to check is this
easy to find one (if you want to use several license checking tools)
near a pond south of Perth:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/61241911/history

Still looks yellow or orange on
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=14&lat=-32.14973&lon=115.94198&layers=B0T

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-09 Thread David Findlay
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:56:22 PM Nick Hocking wrote:
> PS - quite a few declines spent a lot of time just tracing " from
> nearmap but never bothered to go out and collect the information
> "on the ground" such as street names etc.

I've been gps surveying and getting a lot of street names and tagging the 
streets. Even if said streets disappear, at least I know what the names are 
and can re-add them after the reversion. 

David

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-09 Thread Nick Hocking
PS - quite a few declines spent a lot of time just tracing " from
nearmap but never bothered to go out and collect the information
"on the ground" such as street names etc.


Most of this is still untagged and since it will disappear in
April and needs survey anyway, maybe me should delete them
now as well. Once again this will help by focusing attention on
the real red areas.

We'd have to be careful of non residential roads since one decliner
has been removing names for quite a while now and putting them into
relations (which raises a whole new set of problems for us to fix.)

Nick
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-09 Thread Nick Hocking
Cam wrote

"I'd prefer if all the maxspeed changesets be reverted now so atleast
some odbl tools can show ways being green rather than mostly all orange."

Hi Cam,

I'm confident that these edits will change from orange to yellow in the
very near future.

This will mean that they are considered  harmless and you
can turn the harmless ones off  which will then allow you
to see the real orange problem areas.

One thing I intend to do, or get done, is to remove all "virgin"
ABS2006 boundaries (I.E. version 1 unedited.).

This will make a massive difference to the cleanup effort
since these red ways really mask out what work really needs
to be done to preserve OSM data before April.

Nick
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-09 Thread SomeoneElse

Steve Bennett wrote:

Btw, how does Potlatch etc determine whether an object is "tainted"?
Does it look at all the changesets that affect the object, or is it
able to determine the source of each key?


I believe that it uses Frederik's quick history service here:
http://wtfe.gryph.de/

One other thing worth mentioning is Ian Dees' excellent "deep diff" 
utility that makes it obvious what changes were made in each version.  
For example, here's a way in Rottnest that I've removed the maxspeed 
from (which is correct, because the maxspeed in Rottnest isn't 50):


http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=24349500

Cheers,
Andy


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Andrew Harvey
Good to see you reverted your changeset.

You should really have posted to this list before making the change (I
can't tell you off though, I did the same thing when I was very new).

As you can see by this object
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43991723/history your
changeset destroyed perfectly good information. Notably the
maxspeed=40 that Thorsten Engler added.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Richard Weait  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've removed the maxspeed tags from about 1000 roads in Redcliffe
> (Brisbane) with changeset
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10338587
>
> There were no maxspeed:source or source:maxspeed tags on these objects
> so it is possible that I have removed data that was carefully
> surveyed.  I apologize for that and for making a mass edit in a place
> I have yet to visit.  This is poor behaviour, I hope that it will be
> helpful as a demonstration.  I hope that this will clean the area up a
> bit in the quick history service so that other, more substantial
> issues with the data are apparent.
>
> If successful, perhaps mappers will find this a helpful technique in
> reconciling data in their area.
>
> Best regards,
> Richard

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Steve Bennett
Btw, how does Potlatch etc determine whether an object is "tainted"?
Does it look at all the changesets that affect the object, or is it
able to determine the source of each key?

The reason I ask is imagine an object like this:

v1: highway=residential
v2: highway=residential, maxspeed=50, maxspeed:source=default
residential max speed
v3: highway=residential, maxspeed=50, maxspeed:source=default
residential max speed, name=Wilson Drive
v4: highway=residential, name=Wilson Drive [ie, removing the maxspeed tags]

Presumably John Smith's edit would still be in the history, and it
would be problematic for something like Potlatch. What we need to
actually do is remove the unwanted changeset somehow.

(But maybe you knew all that. I'm actually not that clear on how
changesets are managed, or how the proposed deletion of data will
ork.)

Steve

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Ross Scanlon  wrote:
> On 09/01/12 13:47, Richard Weait wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Ross Scanlon  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/01/12 11:51, Richard Weait wrote:

 Shall I revert?
>>
>>
>>> I think it would be best if you reverted.
>>
>>
>> Done.  You want to take a go at clearing some of these up?
>
>
>
> Are they maxspeed:source?
>
> I just search for:
>
> "maxspeed:source"=*
>
> (quotes required)
>
> in josm and change it to source:maxspeed
>
> Or maybe do what you did before but instead of deleting the maxspeed=*
> change maxspeed:source to source:maxspeed
>
> Cheers
> Ross
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Ross Scanlon

On 09/01/12 13:47, Richard Weait wrote:

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Ross Scanlon  wrote:

On 09/01/12 11:51, Richard Weait wrote:

Shall I revert?



I think it would be best if you reverted.


Done.  You want to take a go at clearing some of these up?



Are they maxspeed:source?

I just search for:

"maxspeed:source"=*

(quotes required)

in josm and change it to source:maxspeed

Or maybe do what you did before but instead of deleting the maxspeed=* 
change maxspeed:source to source:maxspeed


Cheers
Ross


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Richard Weait
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Ross Scanlon  wrote:
> On 09/01/12 11:51, Richard Weait wrote:
>> Shall I revert?

> I think it would be best if you reverted.

Done.  You want to take a go at clearing some of these up?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Ross Scanlon

On 09/01/12 11:51, Richard Weait wrote:

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Ian Sergeant  wrote:

On 9 January 2012 13:12, Richard Weait  wrote:



I've removed the maxspeed tags from about 1000 roads in Redcliffe
(Brisbane) with changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10338587



Hi,

Can you just explain this a little bit further?  My understanding is it is a
pretty specific set of these maxspeed changes we are currently targetting,
all of which have maxspeed:source as it was added by the same bot.


I thought it was said earlier that the bot did not add the
source:maxspeed(etc) tags in all cases.

Shall I revert?


The bot added

"maxspeed:source=default residential speed limit in Australia"

 not source:maxspeed.

I've manually changed dozens (hundreds) to source:maxspeed.

I think it would be best if you reverted.

Cheers
Ross


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Richard Weait
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Ian Sergeant  wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 13:12, Richard Weait  wrote:
>>
>>
>> I've removed the maxspeed tags from about 1000 roads in Redcliffe
>> (Brisbane) with changeset
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10338587
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you just explain this a little bit further?  My understanding is it is a
> pretty specific set of these maxspeed changes we are currently targetting,
> all of which have maxspeed:source as it was added by the same bot.

I thought it was said earlier that the bot did not add the
source:maxspeed(etc) tags in all cases.

Shall I revert?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Ross Scanlon

I've removed the maxspeed tags from about 1000 roads in Redcliffe
(Brisbane) with changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10338587


Hi,

Can you just explain this a little bit further?  My understanding is it
is a pretty specific set of these maxspeed changes we are currently
targetting, all of which have maxspeed:source as it was added by the
same bot.

Ian


As Ian suggested it was the maxspeed:source changes that are the problem 
not the ones with maxspeed=* only on them.


Cheers
Ross

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] maxspeed removal

2012-01-08 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 9 January 2012 13:12, Richard Weait  wrote:

>
> I've removed the maxspeed tags from about 1000 roads in Redcliffe
> (Brisbane) with changeset
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10338587
>
>
Hi,

Can you just explain this a little bit further?  My understanding is it is
a pretty specific set of these maxspeed changes we are currently
targetting, all of which have maxspeed:source as it was added by the same
bot.

Ian
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au