[OSM-ja] 点字ブロックの区分についての質問です。

[Masataka Shinke]

初めまして広島県の新家です。

OSMを使った歩行支援を取り組んでいます。
そこで質問なのですが、
JIS規格（T9251）の点字ブロックには、大きく2種類があります、
一つは誘導ブロック（線状パターン）、二つは警告ブロック（点状パターン）です。
この二種類のうち、警告ブロックは、危険個所や誘導対象施設の位置を示すもので、階段の手前、交差点の手前、誘導ブロックの交差点などに敷設されるものです。
この警告ブロックの位置についてOSM上で表現する方法について事例などあれば教えていただきたく。
もし前例がなければ、新たに表現ルールを付け加えることは可能でしょうか？

以上、宜しくお願いいたします。
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [OSM-talk] [HOT] Slides and video of Wikimedia Foundation presentations at State of the Map US

[Enock Seth Nyamador]

Thanks for sharing Pine. Love this Wiki + OSM relationship :)

Best,

- Enock

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Pine W  wrote:

> Hi OSM,
>
> Here is the link to the slides that Katherine Maher presented at State of
> the Map US:
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katherine_Maher%27s_keynote_presentation_at_OSM_State_of_the_Map_US_2016.pdf
>
> Video of Katherine's presentation:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywGuz1586M0
>
> Here is the link to the slides that Yuri Astrakhan presented at State of
> the Map US:
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10D8Q0w8gwMqOvciDDFZSBuRKxFpGsdwM0D5QcBFmTyA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Video of Yuri's presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kscsp0YS7nw
>
> Regards,
>
> Pine
>
> Disclaimer: I'm a member of the Wikimedia community. I'm not employed by
> the Wikimedia Foundation and I don't speak for it. I have a grant from the
> Wikimedia Foundation that is a little related to OSM but OSM isn't a focus
> of the grant. I am interested in in developing the relationship between
> Wikimedia and OSM. The opinions of the Wikimedia Foundation may or may not
> reflect my own, and vice versa (:
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> h...@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-us] Slides and video of Wikimedia Foundation presentations at State of the Map US

[Pine W]

Hi OSM,

Here is the link to the slides that Katherine Maher presented at State of
the Map US:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katherine_Maher%27s_keynote_presentation_at_OSM_State_of_the_Map_US_2016.pdf

Video of Katherine's presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywGuz1586M0

Here is the link to the slides that Yuri Astrakhan presented at State of
the Map US:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10D8Q0w8gwMqOvciDDFZSBuRKxFpGsdwM0D5QcBFmTyA/edit?usp=sharing

Video of Yuri's presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kscsp0YS7nw

Regards,

Pine

Disclaimer: I'm a member of the Wikimedia community. I'm not employed by
the Wikimedia Foundation and I don't speak for it. I have a grant from the
Wikimedia Foundation that is a little related to OSM but OSM isn't a focus
of the grant. I am interested in in developing the relationship between
Wikimedia and OSM. The opinions of the Wikimedia Foundation may or may not
reflect my own, and vice versa (:
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[OSM-talk] Slides and video of Wikimedia Foundation presentations at State of the Map US

[Pine W]

Hi OSM,

Here is the link to the slides that Katherine Maher presented at State of
the Map US:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katherine_Maher%27s_keynote_presentation_at_OSM_State_of_the_Map_US_2016.pdf

Video of Katherine's presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywGuz1586M0

Here is the link to the slides that Yuri Astrakhan presented at State of
the Map US:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10D8Q0w8gwMqOvciDDFZSBuRKxFpGsdwM0D5QcBFmTyA/edit?usp=sharing

Video of Yuri's presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kscsp0YS7nw

Regards,

Pine

Disclaimer: I'm a member of the Wikimedia community. I'm not employed by
the Wikimedia Foundation and I don't speak for it. I have a grant from the
Wikimedia Foundation that is a little related to OSM but OSM isn't a focus
of the grant. I am interested in in developing the relationship between
Wikimedia and OSM. The opinions of the Wikimedia Foundation may or may not
reflect my own, and vice versa (:
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it] Cammino del beato Enrico, tag network.

[girarsi_liste]

Il 31/07/2016 16:08, Volker Schmidt ha scritto:
> Vedi anche:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mappare-un-sentiero-su-OSM-td5869267.html
> 
> Mi sembra che è ancora aperta la domanda di Martin Raifer, se il sentiero
> abbia o meno segnaletica sul terreneo.
> Se non c'è e se non è nemmeno prevista l'installazione di segnaltica per il
> vicino futuro (che richiederebbe il tag status=proposed) , la relazioen va
> tolta da OSM.
> 
> Volker
> 

Grazie per la risposta, manco me lo ricordavo di ver, addirittura,
risposto a quella discussione.

Comunque sì, sono d'accordo, in mancanza di certezze, tipo wikipedia,
segnaletiche o siti inerenti tal cammino, che ne descriva in maniera
precisa il percorso, direi di eliminarla da OSM, chi ne vuole far
propria fonte, lo può personalizzare su un proprio sito.


-- 
Simone Girardelli
_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|



___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Dubbi livelli amministrativi

[Fayor Uno]

Ho appena controllato e trovato altri casi di isolotti e scogli taggati solo 
come coastline, tra questi alcuni erano membri delle giuste relazioni 
amministrative, altri no. Ho provveduto ad aggiungere, dove mancati, i tag 
boundary=administrative e admin_level=4, oltre a city/province/region:left 
(forse sono diventati inutili come is_in, in tal caso si possono rimuovere)


Non so se è un errore o una ripetizione indicare admin_level nel confine quando 
c'è già nella relazione che lo contiene: è anche vero però che allo stesso 
confine possono riferirsi più relazioni con diversi admin_level.


Attualmente i confini sono taggati con boundary=administrative e admin_level 
uguale a quello dell'ente più importante.
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Villaggio turistico

[Aury88]

scratera wrote
> ..traducendo dice disegnare il contorno dei giardini e aggiungere il tag
> al nodo...non all'area..
> ...sono più propenso ad assegnare il tag tourism=hotel o al nodo o
> all'edificio

Onestamente anche io lo interpreto come lo interpreta Federico, comunque sia
cerco di mantenere uno stile il più omogeneo possibile tra i tag se è
possibile e l'applicare il tag tourism=hotel sulla way che delimita il
perimetro, come viene fatto per il tag amenity=school, permette di indicare
come asserviti all'hotel e ai suoi clienti tutta una serie di cose
(giardino, parcheggio, piscina...) che alla fine fanno parte dei servizi e,
quindi, anche dei costi di un hotel.

per il villaggio turistico io uso tourism=resort, sempre applicato sul
perimetro esterno



-
Ciao,
Aury
--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Villaggio-turistico-tp5879526p5879543.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Cammino del beato Enrico, tag network.

[Volker Schmidt]

Vedi anche:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mappare-un-sentiero-su-OSM-td5869267.html

Mi sembra che è ancora aperta la domanda di Martin Raifer, se il sentiero
abbia o meno segnaletica sul terreneo.
Se non c'è e se non è nemmeno prevista l'installazione di segnaltica per il
vicino futuro (che richiederebbe il tag status=proposed) , la relazioen va
tolta da OSM.

Volker


2016-07-31 15:51 GMT+02:00 girarsi_liste :

> Premesso che ho fatto ricerca, ma non trovo riferimenti utili
> dell'esistenza di questo percorso, mentre controllavo la validazione con
> josm (per mappatura di altre cose), mi è comparso questo warnig relativo
> alla mancanza del tag network sui dettagli della relazione in oggetto
> [0], perchè presumo ci va un lwn=iwn, però chiedo.
>
>
>
>
> [0] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6032965
> --
> Simone Girardelli
> _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
> |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose-QA : couverture mondiale

[Philippe Verdy]

Pour la couverture modiale, est-ce bien vrai ?

Visiblement je ne vois pas de contenu pour :
* le continent Antarctique (sauf une microscopique bande côtière avec
quelques points de temps en temps en Terre Adélie)
* et pour les eaux internationales (toutes meres et océans) : les ZEE ne
semblent pas être vérifiées par exemple

Peut-être est-ce lié au fait que la sélection des bounding box ne trouve
pas les points dans la zone affichée mais **en dehors** (bogue signalé
ici), et qu'on ne peut pas se positionner dessus pour en afficher les
détails.

La carte de couverture visible sur Osmose ne mentionne pas ces deux "zones"
et se limite aux terres (hors Antarctique) et eaux territoriales des pays
(reconnus ou pas à l'ONU ou contestés) Mais pourquoi pas alors
l'Antarctique et pourquoi alors inclure uniquement les eaux territoriales
de Terre Adélie ? alors que les eaux antarctiques au sud du Cap Horn (et la
péninsule avec ses îles) ont pas mal de choses à cartographier et pas mal
de bases installées.

Il y a aussi de l'intérêt certain pour la cartographie marine (par exemples
les zones de navigation et la météo) bien au delà des eaux territoriales
(que ce soient dans les ZEE ou pas d'ailleurs, ou dans les extensions du
plateau continental).

Et comment utiliser Osmose pour les bases antarctiques intracontinentales
(notamment la base américaine au pôle sud) ?

Le 31 juillet 2016 à 13:20, Frédéric Rodrigo  a
écrit :

> Bonjour,
>
> Je suis fier de vous annoncer que l'outil d'assurance qualité Osmose-QA
> couvre désormais tous les pays du monde avec l'ajout récent de grandes
> parties de l'Asie et l'Océanie.
>
> http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/
>
> Nous sommes toujours ouverts à la contribution sur le code de l'analyseur,
> pour des suggestions, sur l'amélioration de la documentation sur le wiki,
> sur la traduction ou tout autre chose.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Osmose
>
> https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-frontend
>
> https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend
>
>
> Nous tenons à remercier tous les contributeurs et toutes les personnes qui
> ont fait que cela soit possible après 8 années de travail. Tous les
> fournisseurs de serveurs aux Pays-Bas, en Allemagne, en Italie, en Islande,
> au Brésil et bien sûr en France. Merci également à nos sponsors la « Région
> Aquitaine » et MapBox.
>
> Frédéric.
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[Talk-it] Cammino del beato Enrico, tag network.

[girarsi_liste]

Premesso che ho fatto ricerca, ma non trovo riferimenti utili
dell'esistenza di questo percorso, mentre controllavo la validazione con
josm (per mappatura di altre cose), mi è comparso questo warnig relativo
alla mancanza del tag network sui dettagli della relazione in oggetto
[0], perchè presumo ci va un lwn=iwn, però chiedo.




[0] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6032965
-- 
Simone Girardelli
_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|



___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Villaggio turistico

[Federico Cortese]

On Jul 31, 2016 2:17 PM, "scratera"  wrote:
>
> ..traducendo dice disegnare il contorno dei giardini e aggiungere il tag
al
> nodo...non all'area..
> ...sono più propenso ad assegnare il tag tourism=hotel o al nodo o
> all'edificio
>
Veramente dice di disegnare l'intero perimetro del terreno e aggiungere il
tag tourism=hotel, quindi disegnare l'edificio e aggiungere il tag
building=hotel. Solo se le due cose coincidono aggiungere tutti e due i tag
all'edificio.
Non dice da nessuna parte di aggiungere il tag al nodo e non all'area,
chiaramente il nodo si può sempre usare se l'area non è ben definita,
altrimenti è sempre preferibile l'area.
Ciao
Federico
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Villaggio turistico

[scratera]

..traducendo dice disegnare il contorno dei giardini e aggiungere il tag al
nodo...non all'area..
...sono più propenso ad assegnare il tag tourism=hotel o al nodo o
all'edificio



--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Villaggio-turistico-tp5879526p5879532.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bogue: points non trouvés dans Osmose

[Philippe Verdy]

Ce tracker est inaccessible...

Le 31 juillet 2016 à 07:55, Jean-Claude Repetto  a écrit :

> On 30/07/2016 21:54, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>
>> Je constate depuis un certain temps qu'Osmose n'affiche pas les noeuds
>> les plus près du centre de la carte affichée, mais uniquement ceux qui
>> sont le plus près du coin supérieur gauche. (et donc les 3/4 trouvés se
>> sont même pas affichés du tout, ils sont hors de la zone visible, et
>> souvent même alors il n'affiche plus rien du tout, tous les noeuds
>> trouvés étant en dehors, plus au nord ou plus à l'est).
>>
>> Impossible de cliquer dessus correctement pour voire la bulle
>> complètement, qui disparait quand on essaye de bouger la carte, car
>> Osmose charge d'autres noeuds éloignés et supprime le noeud qu'on
>> voulait sélectionner.
>>
>> Y a-t-il moyen de corriger ça et refaire une recherche sur la position
>> correcte au centre de la carte ?
>>
>>
> Bonjour,
> Le bug tracker d'Osmose est là : http://trac.openstreetmap.fr/
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] Villaggio turistico

[Federico Cortese]

On Jul 31, 2016 12:50 PM, "scratera"  wrote:
>
> ...è estate e i villaggi turistici sono diventati attuali
> ...ora ho notato che in molti casi l'area viene taggata come tourism=hotel
> anche se sinceramente non mi sembra appropiata...se non erro il tag
> tourism=hotel va applicato all'edificio e non ad un
> areahttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
> ...qualche suggerimento?

Dalla wiki:
draw the outline of the hotel grounds and add the tags to the way. If not,
create a node at the centre of the area. In either case, the main tag to
use is tourism=hotel. Draw the building itself and add the tag
building=hotel. If the hotel grounds is comprised of only the building (ie,
there is no outside area or car park), both the tourism=hotel and
building=hotel tags can be applied to the same outline.

Quindi tourism=hotel può essere tranquillamente assegnato anche ad un'area.
Per il villaggio forse meglio tourism=resort anche se poco documentato.
Leisure=resort offre principalmente intrattenimento e solo in alcuni casi
pernottamento (può anche contenere tourism=hotel) quindi non mi sembra
appropriato per villaggio turistico.
Ciao
Federico
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-de] uMap und GPX für Laufstrecken

[Markus]

Liebe Umap-Spezialisten,

ich möchte eine Karte mit Laufstrecken erstellen.
Für jeden Ort möchte ich im Menü eine Überschrift.
Unter jeder Orts-Überschrift sollen die Strecken gelistet werden.

Beipiel:
- Ort_1
-- Strecke_1
-- Strecke_2
- Ort_2
...

Wenn ich uMap richtig verstehe, brauche ich dazu:
für jeden Ort eine neue Ebene
für jede Strecke eine GPX, die ich in die zugehörige Orts-Ebene hochlade
(auch POIs könnte man in die zugehörige Orts-Ebene hochladen)

Die GPX erstelle ich mit JOSM und exportiere sie.
Dabei wird jeder OSM-Streckenabschnitt als  aufgelöst, und
wenn der Weg-Abschnitt in OSM einen Namen hat, wird dieser im GPX hinter
 mit  bezeichnet.

Nun möchte ich aber nicht jeden Streckenanbschnitt einzeln darstellen,
sondern die /Strecke als Ganzes/ anzeigen und mit einem einzigen
Namen/Eintrag bezeichnen.

Beim Hochladen einer GPX in eine neue Ebene nimmt uMap den
GPX-Dateinamen als Ebenen-Namen.

Der Dateiname entspricht aber sinnvollerweise dem Namen der
Lauf-Strecke. Ich brauche aber den Orts-Namen im Umap-Menü.

Zwar kann man den Namen der Ebene in Umap händisch ändern, aber ich habe
keine Möglichkeit gefunden, diese Änderung für die Doku wieder zu
exportieren.

Linkskann ich mit "neue Ebene" zuerst eineneue Ebene anlegen,
und beim GPX-Import diesen der neuen ebene zuordnen. Wenn ich nun eine
weitere GPX-Datei in diese Ebene hinzufüge, werden nicht zwei Dateien
angezeigt, sondern die Inhalte der Dateien in eine zusammengemischt.

Beispiel: (so soll es aussehen)
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/test123_96328#15/49.6267/11.1310
Ort: Hetzles
Dateiname: Hetzles 3000 m Brandbach-Runde.gpx
Streckenname: Hetzles 3000 m Brandbach-Runde
Rundstrecke: Hetzles 2000 m Brandbach-Runde
Beschreibung: Brandbach-Runde 1x
Anschlussstrecke: Hetzles 500 m Anschluss an Brandbach-Runde
Beschreibung: Anschlussstrecke 2x

Wie muss ich die GPX ändern, dass uMap mir das so anzeigt?

Wenn ich eine neue Ebene "Hetzles" mache,
und dort die ungeänderten GPX-Dateien reinkopiere,
dann werden die die Dateien mit allesn Abschnitten aneinandergehängt
(append), statt wie gewünscht einzeln zur Auwswahl angezeigt.

Gruss, Markus

PS:
Kann ich der GPX auch gleich die gewünschte Anzeige-Farbe mitgeben? wie?
Wie kann ich in die GPX eine Beschreibung zu einem Abschnitt einfügen?
(die dann in Ump agezeigt wird)
Wie kann ich in die GPX einen Kommentar einfügen? (als interne Doku)

PPS: vielleicht hat ja jemand Lust, mir das mit TeamViewer zu zeigen?
(ist vermutlich einfacher als per Mail)

___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-it] Villaggio turistico

[scratera]

Andrea Musuruane wrote
> leisure=resort
> 
> Ciao,
> 
> Andrea
> 
> Il 31/lug/2016 12:50, "scratera" 

> pizpiz@

>  ha scritto:

...mmm...forse meglio tourism=resort
paolo



--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Villaggio-turistico-tp5879526p5879528.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[OSM-talk-fr] Osmose-QA : couverture mondiale

[Frédéric Rodrigo]

Bonjour,

Je suis fier de vous annoncer que l'outil d'assurance qualité Osmose-QA 
couvre désormais tous les pays du monde avec l'ajout récent de grandes 
parties de l'Asie et l'Océanie.


http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/

Nous sommes toujours ouverts à la contribution sur le code de 
l'analyseur, pour des suggestions, sur l'amélioration de la 
documentation sur le wiki, sur la traduction ou tout autre chose.


http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Osmose

https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-frontend

https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend


Nous tenons à remercier tous les contributeurs et toutes les personnes 
qui ont fait que cela soit possible après 8 années de travail. Tous les 
fournisseurs de serveurs aux Pays-Bas, en Allemagne, en Italie, en 
Islande, au Brésil et bien sûr en France. Merci également à nos sponsors 
la « Région Aquitaine » et MapBox.


Frédéric.


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] Villaggio turistico

[Andrea Musuruane]

leisure=resort

Ciao,

Andrea

Il 31/lug/2016 12:50, "scratera"  ha scritto:

> ...è estate e i villaggi turistici sono diventati attuali
> ...ora ho notato che in molti casi l'area viene taggata come tourism=hotel
> anche se sinceramente non mi sembra appropiata...se non erro il tag
> tourism=hotel va applicato all'edificio e non ad un
> areahttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
> ...qualche suggerimento?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Villaggio-turistico-tp5879526.html
> Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-it] Villaggio turistico

[scratera]

...è estate e i villaggi turistici sono diventati attuali
...ora ho notato che in molti casi l'area viene taggata come tourism=hotel
anche se sinceramente non mi sembra appropiata...se non erro il tag
tourism=hotel va applicato all'edificio e non ad un
areahttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
...qualche suggerimento?



--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Villaggio-turistico-tp5879526.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 109, Issue 24

[Timothy Ney]

There are now hundreds of websites devoted to the implementation of
GDA2020. Read here for a good summary of what is happening.

http://gda2020.com.au/

Each state authority has their own portals now showing their individuals
progress towards its implementation. Some people has asked about parameters
for the new datum. My understanding is they will be based upon a single
epoch, at 12.00.01 on January 2017, so until than will can only wait to see
the extent of che change, once the parameters are released.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[Talk-se] Edsviken och svenska kusten

[Jan Johansson]

Hej!

Utifrån ett OSMOSE-larm tänkte jag ansluta Igelbäcken[1] till
havet dock så undrar jag om inte Edsviken[2] borde vara en del av
den svenska kusten som idag slutar i vikens mynning i höjd med
[3].

Jag har tittat runt på en del andra vikar som alla verkar vara en
del av kusten, hur vet man ifall en vik skall vara med eller
inte?

Vänligen,
Jan J

[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5359587
[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125625989
[3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98330096


___
Talk-se mailing list
Talk-se@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se

[Talk-it] Dubbi livelli amministrativi

[Aury88]

Ciao a tutti.
Mi sono accorto mentre aggiungevo tag wikipedia che alcune isole minori e
scogli non avevano associato alcun tag amministrativo, come se non fossero
sotto alcuna amministrazione locale...per esempio questo caso[1] mi chiedevo
se fosse corretto così.


Ho notato anomalie anche per isole più grandi come l'isola di Lipari[2] con
tag di amministrazione livello 4 (regione siciliana) posto sulla way che è
anche membro della relazione amministrativa di livello 4  della regione
siciliana (di fatto una ripetizione).
è giusto così?

[1]http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54614095
[2]http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424985803#map=12/38.4814/14.9391



-
Ciao,
Aury
--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Dubbi-livelli-amministrativi-tp5879522.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 109, Issue 22

[Nyall Dawson]

On 31 July 2016 at 09:16, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/31/2016 5:58 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> On 30 Jul 2016 10:34 PM, "Timothy Ney"  wrote:
>>
>> I am a professional surveyor with knowledge of the changing coordinates.
>> What you are referring to is the adoption of MGA2020. To be implemented 1
>> January 2017. As mentioned below the new system we consider plate drift, at
>> approximately 7cm per year. The most important element is that the new
>> system will be earth centred using the ITRF whereas AMG66, AMG84 and GDA94
>> were plate centred. On 1 January 2017, all physical marks will be given a
>> new set of coordinates, up to about 1.6m different to GDA94. For a while,
>> two systems will run similtanously, the new plate and earth centred systems.
>> Eventually, the plate centred coordinates will be phased out. It is expected
>> that an adjustment will be conducted each year, and coordinates updated.
>
> I'm struggling to find any information about software support of GDA2020.
> The icsm FAQ has no mention of this, and I can't find anything relevant re
> GDA2020 and the widely used open source libraries like proj4 and GDAL.
>
> Can anyone help illuminate?
>
> Nyall
>

> Commercial proprietary software will probably not be publicised other than
> its capability to use earth centric datums. There will need to be an
> accepted storage format that incorporated the data of the measurement as
> well as the datum, that may come out publicly as a 'standard'.
> Free ware software will lag behind as usuall.

Well - I'm trying to avoid that situation. There's no reason it
*should* lag, and a huge number of projects rely on these open source
backends.

Is there even an EPSG code assigned to this new CRS yet?

Nyall

>
>>
>> Given that most modern GPS systems in phones, cars etc can only achieve
>> accuraries of 1-3 metres, it will be quite some time before old data will no
>> longer align with the GPS. It should also be noted that most systems
>> including Google use the ITRF, or some reference to it.
>>
>> In summary, the impact to most internet mapping systems will be minimal.
>> Even for surveyors, who is the coordinate information, the update will have
>> minimal impact, as we tend to work in small areas, where coordinates are
>> relative only. The big players are those doing broad scale mapping and other
>> regional wide work. See here for more information.
>>
>> www.icsm.gov.au/gda2020/faqs-2.html
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 at 10:03 PM, 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
>>> talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>1. Australia "changing coordinates" (Andy Mabbett)
>>>2. Re: Australia "changing coordinates" (Warin)
>>>3. Re: Australia "changing coordinates" (Andrew Harvey)
>>>4. Re: Australia "changing coordinates" (Warin)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:40:45 +0100
>>> From: Andy Mabbett 
>>> To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>>> Subject: [talk-au] Australia "changing coordinates"
>>> Message-ID:
>>>
>>> 

[talk-ph] Updated guidelines on power lines

[Jherome Miguel]

I updated the guidelines on power lines at the WikiProject Power
Systems/Philippines page. There are additional guidelines, like mapping
transmission lines, characterized by tubular towers and usually made of
wood, concrete, or metal and owned by Meralco and provincial electric
cooperatives/companies, and mapping minor power lines and utility poles,
including those having transformers. Yet, with some areas lacking quality
imagery for tracing, a survey and local knowledge about tubular power tower
and utility pole locations may be used to map them. Also, mapping
transmission lines on rural areas may be difficult to map because of lack
of imagery or low quality imagery.
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[OSM-talk-be] Traffic_sign Adding priority "right"

[Jakka]

Hi,

Meer en meer worden er in gemeentes woonwijken de voorrang rechts gebruikt.
Kan iemand die aan de Belgische plugin toevoegen.

(Jo indien je tijd hebt??)

De plus en plus les municipalités dans les zones résidentielles 
utilisent le priorité de droit.

Quelqu'un sait ajouter le sign dans le plugin Belge

highway= ???
traffic_sign=BE:B17


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/RoadSigns

http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/250-art67


http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/250-art67
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be