Re: [OSM-talk-be] StreetView?
If you want to stick strictly to OSM best-practices, you CANNOT use data that you have collected from Google StreetView and use it in OSM. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1 Tim 2011/11/23 Sander Deryckere > Hello, > > Selon moi, on peut utiliser les immages seulement pour découvrir des > erreurs (et controler ces erreurs localement avant de télécharger les > corrections). > > 2011/11/23 eMerzh > >> Hello à tous, >> >> Ici en belgique, google viens de rendre disponible streetview je sais >> que en France ça fait un bout de temps que c'est disponible mais voila >> :) >> >> La question reviens naturellement sur l'utilisation de StreetView pour >> récolter des informations pour osm. >> >> Bien évidemment, les images ne sont pas toute jeune même c'est du même >> acabit que les images bing. >> >> Donc voilà, peut-on utiliser les images, dans quel mesure? ,.. >> >> >> Merci pour vos infos >> >> PS: communément sur la ML fr et be :) >> >> ___ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Verkeerstuin
I've certainly never seen one of these in my 20 years in the UK (though that doesn't mean they don't exist of course!). Do they exist in NL or DE? If so, they'll probably have been mapped so you could copy that? Tim --- On Thu, 11/8/11, Marc Gemis wrote: From: Marc Gemis Subject: [OSM-talk-be] Verkeerstuin To: talk-be@openstreetmap.org Date: Thursday, 11 August, 2011, 12:04 How do you map a "verkeerstuin" (I have no idea what the English or French words are).It's a place where young children learn the traffic code while riding a bicycle or a go-cart. You find one in the Vrijbroekpark in Mechelen and Rivierenhof in Deurne. m -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction
Interesting discussion here, and welcome to OSM Marc! The subject of abbreviated vs non-abbreviated names in OSM is addressed in the wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Street_Names, if you want the "official" (or accepted) party line (depends on how "official" one believes the wiki to be, of course!). On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ben Laenen wrote: > >> First it is asphalt (the part that was already in OSM before I started), >> > then it turns into this >> > >> > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-K27fcBJ/0/M/dsc_5067-S.jpg a >> > combination of sand and stones, mostly sand. A bit further more sand and >> > less stones (this part becomes muddy when it rains) >> > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-tk4DBqt/0/S/dsc_5068-S.jpg >> > >> > After the turn it is more grass and less sand >> > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-tk4DBqt/0/S/dsc_5068-S.jpg >> > > Corrected: > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-qzsfqWz/0/S/dsc_5070-S.jpg > > >> >> > >> > A bit further it is again a clearly track, grass in the middle sand + >> > little stones (kiezel) on the sides (no picture) >> > >> > So what do I do for that ? I know unpaved was the simple solution ;-) >> > >> > Another path looks like this: >> > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-tk4DBqt/0/S/dsc_5068-S.jpg >> > > Corrected : > http://xian.smugmug.com/Hobbies/Reet/i-MmSDn4H/0/S/dsc_5071-S.jpg > >> >> >> Can you resend this with the correct links? The last three links to the >> pictures are the same... >> > > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] tag street from calc file
One question: under what license has the data been released? On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Renaud MICHEL wrote: > On mardi 22 mars 2011 at 18:39, Jo wrote : > > cycleway=opposite (converted to the proper xml-format) and tag the way as > > modified. > > I don't think that tag is appropriate. > It implies that there is a real cycleway on the road, but in Liege (and > many > other places in wallonia) you simply have an exclusion to the oneway for > bicycles. > For those I use > oneway:bicycle=no > bicycle:oneway=no > (not sure which one is more appropriate, so I always add both, looking at > the wiki, the oneway:bicycle seems to be preferred) > > -- > Renaud Michel > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] associatedStreet
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jo wrote: > I don't really mind using nested relations, but some people seem to be very > much opposed to it. > > That said, I love this relatedStreet relation, as it takes away a lot of > duplication of data. Of course, then it seems a bit counterproductive to > still have the duplication of data on the relation level. And it is indeed > because JOSM complained about more than one street role, that I created 4 > relations. > > The relation combining the street parts, what type would that one be then? > > Jo > Can't remember that one, but I can point you to the relevant thread in talk-gb for you to read through: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2011-March/thread.html#11135 Tim ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] associatedStreet
Funnily enough we've just been having a similar discussion on the talk-gb list. As it currently stands, JOSM complains if more than one "street" member is included in the relation. However, there are people who are just ignoring this and adding all relevant highways for the particular street (i.e. all those with the same name) as "street" members. There are others who mentioned that maybe the highways that make up the street be in one relation, and then that relation is the "street" member in the associatedStreet relation. No decision has been made on the talk-gb list on this. Hope this helps, Tim On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jo wrote: > I also tagged a more complicated one: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481829/history > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481828/history > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481830/history > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481831/history > > I guess it can't be helped that several relations are needed? > > Jo > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] associatedStreet
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jo wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if I used the associatedStreet relation correctly: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481807/history > > I put all the common addr:-tags on the relation. Is that OK? > > Do the buildings still need an addr:street tag? > > I can't seem to find this information in the wiki. > > Jo > The wiki information is at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema#Using_relations_to_associate_house_and_street_.28optional.29 In theory, you don't need to tag the buildings with the addr:street tag if you use the relation. Tim ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] tool om foto's te koppelen aan gpx-track
For Ubuntu: GPSCorrelate. It's in the repo's. You'll probably also want gpscorrelate-gui if you don't like the command line. sudo apt-get install gpscorrelate gpscorrelate-gui Tim --- On Fri, 7/5/10, yanu wrote: From: yanu Subject: [OSM-talk-be] tool om foto's te koppelen aan gpx-track To: "OpenStreetMap Belgium" Date: Friday, 7 May, 2010, 12:23 Bestaat er een tool (met linux) om foto's, getrokken tijdens een track, via hun exif-gegevens te koppelen aan een gps-track? De bedoeling is om foto's van straatnamen, herkenningspunten, huisnr's, ... te trekken. Ik heb gehoord van http://www.i-gotu.com/ , maar heb er geen ervaring mee. Het schijnt te werken onder ubuntu https://launchpad.net/igotu2gpx , met minder opties dan onder windows. Hier kan het ook met google-maps: http://www.everytrail.com/ Ik merk dat gpsbabel ook iets kan doen met exif-data ... -- Groeten Lieven Baes aka yanu http://www.ubuntu-be.org/ http://nl.openoffice.org/ http://www.ginsys.be/odf_bestanden_openen_met_microsoft_office ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Belgian OSM Wiki
Woah, there is indeed some funky stuff going on with the images. I'll have a go tomorrow if it isn't fixed by then. Also, for images in a Wiki, the best place for examples: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Images. YMMV. Tim --- On Wed, 21/4/10, Karel Adams wrote: From: Karel Adams Subject: [OSM-talk-be] Belgian OSM Wiki To: talk-be@openstreetmap.org Date: Wednesday, 21 April, 2010, 21:56 To all and sundry! Kindly visit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Activities and check / correct recent updates. I have been working on it after the Deinze mapping party, but am not really proud of results. Particularly welcome would be some HTML-expertise to clean up the mess with the images - this pre-existed, but I have managed to make it much worse and could find no way to re-improve. TIA! KA ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
