[OSM-talk-be] covered or tunnel
Hello, With Keep Right, there is the following error: http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=72error=25113833 The error text is: This node is a junction of ways on different layers: #38962740http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740 (-1),#116844652 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/116844652(0) It is because the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740 has the tag tunnel=yes When I look at the wiki for the tunnel definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel And the one of covered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered I presume that tunnel shall be replaced by covered as this way is a galerie at the same ground level as the 2 streets it connects to. So I looked at other galeries I know in Bxl to see how they're tagged. I see that galerie louise has also tunnel=yes http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31001460 And galerie de la reine doesn't have anything. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/87501645 What should I do? I would believe put covered everywhere, and replace tunnel when it is used. Or I can do it only for the error of Keep Right? Or anything else you would suggest. Cheers, Marc ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] covered or tunnel
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:36:53PM +0100, marc bessieres wrote: Hello, With Keep Right, there is the following error: http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=72error=25113833 The error text is: This node is a junction of ways on different layers: #38962740http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740 (-1),#116844652 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/116844652(0) It is because the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740 has the tag tunnel=yes As far as I know tunnel=yes doesn't imply layer=-1, which keepright seems to be doing. I think keepright is wrong to assume that. But then Key:layer says that for bridges and tunnels that are at level 0 you should explicitly put the layer. When I look at the wiki for the tunnel definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel And the one of covered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered I presume that tunnel shall be replaced by covered as this way is a galerie at the same ground level as the 2 streets it connects to. There is also tunnel=building_passage, which might be more clear then just yes. It's also very explicit in saying that it should have the same layer as the buildings (none/0). As far as I understand it, covered means that there aren't 2 walls on each side and so that it's open, which as far as I know isn't the case. Kurt ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] covered or tunnel
2013/11/3 Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:36:53PM +0100, marc bessieres wrote: Hello, With Keep Right, there is the following error: http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=72error=25113833 The error text is: This node is a junction of ways on different layers: #38962740http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740 (-1),#116844652 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/116844652(0) It is because the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740has the tag tunnel=yes As far as I know tunnel=yes doesn't imply layer=-1, which keepright seems to be doing. I think keepright is wrong to assume that. But then Key:layer says that for bridges and tunnels that are at level 0 you should explicitly put the layer. I suppose keepright uses both pieces of information. So I could put the layer=0. When I look at the wiki for the tunnel definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel And the one of covered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered I presume that tunnel shall be replaced by covered as this way is a galerie at the same ground level as the 2 streets it connects to. There is also tunnel=building_passage, which might be more clear then just yes. It's also very explicit in saying that it should have the same layer as the buildings (none/0). But I think this is better, I missed it when I read the wiki. So I would go mapping the galeries of Bxl I know like that. Would that be ok? As far as I understand it, covered means that there aren't 2 walls on each side and so that it's open, which as far as I know isn't the case. Ok, I understand the difference now. I think there is such a path on way to the Mont des Arts from the Central station. Thank you Kurt, Marc ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
