2013/11/3 Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:36:53PM +0100, marc bessieres wrote: > > Hello, > > > > With Keep Right, there is the following error: > > http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=72&error=25113833 > > > > The error text is: > > This node is a junction of ways on different layers: > > #38962740<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740> > > (-1),#116844652 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/116844652>(0) > > > > It is because the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38962740has > > the tag tunnel=yes > > As far as I know tunnel=yes doesn't imply layer=-1, which > keepright seems to be doing. I think keepright is wrong to assume > that. But then Key:layer says that for bridges and tunnels that > are at level 0 you should explicitly put the layer. >
I suppose keepright uses both pieces of information. So I could put the layer=0. > > When I look at the wiki for the tunnel definition > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel > > > > And the one of covered > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered > > > > I presume that tunnel shall be replaced by covered as this way is a > > "galerie" at the same ground level as the 2 streets it connects to. > > There is also tunnel=building_passage, which might be more clear > then just yes. It's also very explicit in saying that it should > have the same layer as the buildings (none/0). > But I think this is better, I missed it when I read the wiki. So I would go mapping the "galeries" of Bxl I know like that. Would that be ok? > As far as I understand it, covered means that there aren't 2 walls > on each side and so that it's open, which as far as I know isn't > the case. > > Ok, I understand the difference now. I think there is such a path on way to the Mont des Arts from the Central station. Thank you Kurt, Marc
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
