Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?

2015-07-13 Thread Rory McCann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13/07/15 14:49, Colm Moore wrote:
> It would be useful if fields for post code and county could be
> added.

I've submitted a patch/pull request to add the postcode/eircode to iD.
addr:county doesn't seem to be used a lot (only ~600 according to
taginfo). We store counties as separate objects, people can use that
if they need to calculate the county for a point/address, right?

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/2729

Rory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVo86QAAoJEOrWdmeZivv2R4QH/36QEsev2KQAohD39EjY2Mzr
N0pl9qHI7bW+o6ZqTnjtH+YHEWtoT/jNpYJBqvVpVtVk2FoNW7R9tuSMzLWyLfPa
3oDW7+YI2u02nPYfvM6ZWaP1VgQaCEjXoZKJPxUTpb+xf5aB/1stV8EnHib8Ax3v
dqcmYn2Gsnk5fGSsRbjH+5iHaaWHn61OElfHk5+5HxESmyFkDEzbtgomfluFnMgZ
h0j07ly69LfePxRFRjOVEekBZxAzom3rbw3eTWkfaskyePcwfGEfZbf5Jgz0i6f8
3NbymchIItBy7KCkMdPbXVqGOjTNEfF/KL/Ts3y1EfiOizivWbRNWNf5tQ04w48=
=M/TT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?

2015-07-14 Thread moltonel


On 14 July 2015 18:47:21 GMT+01:00, Colm Moore  wrote:
>> addr:county doesn't seem to be used a lot (only ~600 according to
>> taginfo). 
>
>I think part of the reason addr:county (646) is populated so little
>compared to addr:city (20404) is that there is a field presented for
>city, but not county.

More than that, there is no reason to set addr:county anywhere in Ireland, for 
the same reason that addr:country is not needed: because the countr?y 
multipolygons cover the whole territory. Adding an addr:country/county/city tag 
is only usefull for addresses not inside the corresponding MP. 

Revently, rather than adding addr:city everywhere, I added 
a city MP around Kilkenny for that reason (I hadn't done that before because 
there's no official city boundary that i onow of, but an approximation is 
better than nothing).

Concerning Eircode, I wonder about the sanity of attempting to replicate that 
db in osm by puting addr:postcode on every node (indeed I dont think that 
eircode is sane to begin with). Is maping only eircode postal districts 
(as polygons) useful ? It'd be comparatively trivial.
-- 
Vincent Dp

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?

2015-07-14 Thread Dave Corley
The size of those polygons would be too large to be of much use to anyone
for anything I fear.

I had a play around on the eircode site tonight and it's honestly going to
be a mess to ever make use of the data especially when it comes to
apartment buildings where you will have dozens of Eircodes inside it.

They did well designing it this way, ensures that it will be such a costly
burden to maintain that it's unlikely to ever be opened up. Future revenues
guaranteed.

Dave
On 14 Jul 2015 22:23, "moltonel"  wrote:

>
>
> On 14 July 2015 18:47:21 GMT+01:00, Colm Moore 
> wrote:
> >> addr:county doesn't seem to be used a lot (only ~600 according to
> >> taginfo).
> >
> >I think part of the reason addr:county (646) is populated so little
> >compared to addr:city (20404) is that there is a field presented for
> >city, but not county.
>
> More than that, there is no reason to set addr:county anywhere in Ireland,
> for the same reason that addr:country is not needed: because the countr?y
> multipolygons cover the whole territory. Adding an addr:country/county/city
> tag is only usefull for addresses not inside the corresponding MP.
>
> Revently, rather than adding addr:city everywhere, I added
> a city MP around Kilkenny for that reason (I hadn't done that before
> because there's no official city boundary that i onow of, but an
> approximation is better than nothing).
>
> Concerning Eircode, I wonder about the sanity of attempting to replicate
> that db in osm by puting addr:postcode on every node (indeed I dont think
> that eircode is sane to begin with). Is maping only eircode postal districts
> (as polygons) useful ? It'd be comparatively trivial.
> --
> Vincent Dp
>
> ___
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?

2015-07-14 Thread moltonel


On 14 July 2015 22:51:42 GMT+01:00, Dave Corley  wrote:
>The size of those polygons would be too large to be of much use to
>anyone for anything I fear.

The routing key alone can in theory help uniquify an adress, but I  dont know 
how often that's true.

>I had a play around on the eircode site tonight and it's honestly going
>to
>be a mess to ever make use of the data especially when it comes to
>apartment buildings where you will have dozens of Eircodes inside it.

Yeah, and of course all the letterboxes in those appartments will be labeled 
with their coresponding eircode to avoid confusion... Or one could write the 
name of the recipcient (madness !) and that way any of the building's eircodes 
can be used to reach any of the buiding's appartments :p

>They did well designing it this way, ensures that it will be such a
>costly
>burden to maintain that it's unlikely to ever be opened up. Future
>revenues guaranteed.

There's still hope that the crapyness is obvious enough that eventually nobody 
will continue using eircode. Next time I'm sending a snailmail I'll put an 
openpostcode on the envelope.
-- 
Vincent Dp

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?

2015-07-15 Thread Gill Weyman
Hello,Please can you remove me from OSM discussions.Many thanks.Gill

Gill Weyman 



> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:51:42 +0100
> From: davecor...@gmail.com
> To: talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?
> 
> The size of those polygons would be too large to be of much use to anyone
> for anything I fear.
> 
> I had a play around on the eircode site tonight and it's honestly going to
> be a mess to ever make use of the data especially when it comes to
> apartment buildings where you will have dozens of Eircodes inside it.
> 
> They did well designing it this way, ensures that it will be such a costly
> burden to maintain that it's unlikely to ever be opened up. Future revenues
> guaranteed.
> 
> Dave
> On 14 Jul 2015 22:23, "moltonel"  wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On 14 July 2015 18:47:21 GMT+01:00, Colm Moore 
> > wrote:
> > >> addr:county doesn't seem to be used a lot (only ~600 according to
> > >> taginfo).
> > >
> > >I think part of the reason addr:county (646) is populated so little
> > >compared to addr:city (20404) is that there is a field presented for
> > >city, but not county.
> >
> > More than that, there is no reason to set addr:county anywhere in Ireland,
> > for the same reason that addr:country is not needed: because the countr?y
> > multipolygons cover the whole territory. Adding an addr:country/county/city
> > tag is only usefull for addresses not inside the corresponding MP.
> >
> > Revently, rather than adding addr:city everywhere, I added
> > a city MP around Kilkenny for that reason (I hadn't done that before
> > because there's no official city boundary that i onow of, but an
> > approximation is better than nothing).
> >
> > Concerning Eircode, I wonder about the sanity of attempting to replicate
> > that db in osm by puting addr:postcode on every node (indeed I dont think
> > that eircode is sane to begin with). Is maping only eircode postal districts
> > (as polygons) useful ? It'd be comparatively trivial.
> > --
> > Vincent Dp
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-ie mailing list
> > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> >
> ___
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
  
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?

2015-07-15 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 15/07/2015, Gill Weyman  wrote:
> Hello,Please can you remove me from OSM discussions.Many thanks.Gill

You need to do this yourself, click on the link at the bottom of each
email (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie) at you have
an "unsubscribe" option at the bottom.

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie