Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Saturday meeting.
There is also generally free parking in the area on a sat, and there is normally spaces. TOG can be hard to find. It is on OSM and google maps. The building is in the middle of a couple of buildings and labelled Camino Ways. Our spaces are labelled Camino ways, feel free to park in Camino ways spaces or on the street. https://www.tog.ie/location/ On 20/10/2017, Jeffrey Roewrote: > There are 6 spaces. > https://www.tog.ie/location/ > Jeffrey Roe, > www.tog.ie > > > On 20 October 2017 at 23:17, Donal Hunt wrote: >> Quick check: is there parking at TOG or am I better taking public >> transport? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Donal >> >> On 19 Oct 2017 18:56, "Brian Hollinshead" wrote: >> >>> Hi Dave >>> I will be there as well. >>> >>> >>> On 19 October 2017 at 17:38, Dave Corley wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Everything is still planned to go ahead, 10am to 4pm. >>> > >>> > Between Facebook, the site booking form and a few private messages, >>> > it's >>> > looking like there will be about 20 attending, possibly more. >>> > >>> > I have a load of office supplies bits already that'd I think we'll need >>> > (post-its, pens, paper). If you want to bring additional supplies, >>> > bring >>> > them. If they're not used you can always take them away with you again >>> > >>> > Dave >>> > >>> > On 19 Oct 2017 16:56, "Donal Diamond" wrote: >>> > >>> > > John good luck! >>> > > >>> > > https://xkcd.com/705/ >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Donal >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 19 October 2017 at 14:17, John Ronan wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi Guys, >>> > > > >>> > > > I won't be able to make the meeting Saturday. In work, we were 18 >>> hours >>> > > > on Generator Monday night/Tuesday, another 4 hours this morning and >>> > > > I >>> > > > expect we will be again on Saturday. So I expect I'll be here. >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Apologies, >>> > > > >>> > > > John (jpronans) >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > ___ >>> > > > Talk-ie mailing list >>> > > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >>> > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >>> > > > >>> > > ___ >>> > > Talk-ie mailing list >>> > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >>> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >>> > > >>> > ___ >>> > Talk-ie mailing list >>> > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >>> > >>> ___ >>> Talk-ie mailing list >>> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >>> >> ___ >> Talk-ie mailing list >> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > > ___ > Talk-ie mailing list > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Saturday meeting.
There are 6 spaces. https://www.tog.ie/location/ Jeffrey Roe, www.tog.ie On 20 October 2017 at 23:17, Donal Huntwrote: > Quick check: is there parking at TOG or am I better taking public transport? > > Thanks! > > Donal > > On 19 Oct 2017 18:56, "Brian Hollinshead" wrote: > >> Hi Dave >> I will be there as well. >> >> >> On 19 October 2017 at 17:38, Dave Corley wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Everything is still planned to go ahead, 10am to 4pm. >> > >> > Between Facebook, the site booking form and a few private messages, it's >> > looking like there will be about 20 attending, possibly more. >> > >> > I have a load of office supplies bits already that'd I think we'll need >> > (post-its, pens, paper). If you want to bring additional supplies, bring >> > them. If they're not used you can always take them away with you again >> > >> > Dave >> > >> > On 19 Oct 2017 16:56, "Donal Diamond" wrote: >> > >> > > John good luck! >> > > >> > > https://xkcd.com/705/ >> > > >> > > >> > > Donal >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 19 October 2017 at 14:17, John Ronan wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Guys, >> > > > >> > > > I won't be able to make the meeting Saturday. In work, we were 18 >> hours >> > > > on Generator Monday night/Tuesday, another 4 hours this morning and I >> > > > expect we will be again on Saturday. So I expect I'll be here. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Apologies, >> > > > >> > > > John (jpronans) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ___ >> > > > Talk-ie mailing list >> > > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >> > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >> > > > >> > > ___ >> > > Talk-ie mailing list >> > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >> > > >> > ___ >> > Talk-ie mailing list >> > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >> > >> ___ >> Talk-ie mailing list >> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >> > ___ > Talk-ie mailing list > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Saturday meeting.
Quick check: is there parking at TOG or am I better taking public transport? Thanks! Donal On 19 Oct 2017 18:56, "Brian Hollinshead"wrote: > Hi Dave > I will be there as well. > > > On 19 October 2017 at 17:38, Dave Corley wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Everything is still planned to go ahead, 10am to 4pm. > > > > Between Facebook, the site booking form and a few private messages, it's > > looking like there will be about 20 attending, possibly more. > > > > I have a load of office supplies bits already that'd I think we'll need > > (post-its, pens, paper). If you want to bring additional supplies, bring > > them. If they're not used you can always take them away with you again > > > > Dave > > > > On 19 Oct 2017 16:56, "Donal Diamond" wrote: > > > > > John good luck! > > > > > > https://xkcd.com/705/ > > > > > > > > > Donal > > > > > > > > > > > > On 19 October 2017 at 14:17, John Ronan wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > I won't be able to make the meeting Saturday. In work, we were 18 > hours > > > > on Generator Monday night/Tuesday, another 4 hours this morning and I > > > > expect we will be again on Saturday. So I expect I'll be here. > > > > > > > > > > > > Apologies, > > > > > > > > John (jpronans) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > Talk-ie mailing list > > > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > > > > > > > ___ > > > Talk-ie mailing list > > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > > > > > ___ > > Talk-ie mailing list > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > > > ___ > Talk-ie mailing list > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
[Talk-it] volontari cercasi per organizzazione State of the Map 2018
Ciao lista, la macchina organizzativa di SOTM (come quella di FOSS4G-it) è già in moto. Iniziare 10 mesi prima dall'appuntamento la dice lunga sull'impegno che occorrerà impiegarci. E' per questo che sono a chiedere alla comunità se qualcuno di voi può dedicare poche ore la settimana per permetterci di organizzare il più bel State of the Map possibile. Le figure ancora mancanti sono: - Assistant (to take minutes of meetings, to support the chairperson on keeping on top of record keeping). In questo periodo ci aggiorniamo via skype una volta al mese. Man mano che ci si avvicinerà la data la call avverranno con maggiore frequenza. Ovviamente è richiesta una buona conoscenza dell'inglese. - Communications (email newsletter, blog). Qualcuno/a che dia supporto alla nostra communication manager Francesca nel gestire i vari canali di comunicazione (twitter, Facebook, il blog e la newsletter); anche un lavoro di traduzione è molto utile. Anche in questo caso nei primi mesi ci sarà un blando impegno che aumenterà un poco all'approssimarsi e durante l'evento. Chi se la cava bene con la comunicazione è ultrabenvenuta/o. - Sponsorship (organise a team of 3 people to send out sponsorship emails, payment via Dorothea). Anche questa è un'attività che porta via poco tempo: principalmente sarà da rispondere e inoltrare mail da e verso gli sponsor. - Ticket sales system (help set-up and answer email queries related to sales). Per la vendita dei biglietti viene utilizzata una piattaforma on line; diverse persone avranno però domande o richieste di assistenza a cui dare risposta o nel caso in cui non si sappia cosa rispondere girare la palla a qualcun altro (qui c'è almeno una persona della Foundation che ci lavora dietro). - Local services (find companies to provide catering, social event, hotel, etc). Qui servirebbe una persona di Milano. Il catering dovrebbe già essere organizzato; per gli hotel abbiamo già una lista di una trentina di posti, servirebbe trovarne alcuni non troppo distante da Piola a prezzi relativamente economici; per la serata social io sto già lavorando per avere una bella sede, occorre però organizzare un minimo la serata. - Scholarship (assist scholarship process) Solitamente si invitano una ventina di persone da paesi in via di sviluppo offrendo loro tutto il pacchetto viaggio, alloggio, biglietto gratuito. Nel 99% dei casi sono persone che necessitano di un ingresso VISA. Qui cerchiamo due/tre persone che abbiano un minimo di dimestichezza con disbrighi burocratici. Sarebbe poi il massimo se parlassero anche (ma non è indispensabile) una lingua tra inglese, francese o spagnolo. Questo è probabilmente il punto in cui abbiamo più bisogno di aiuto. - Aiuto per la stampa dei materiali: dovremo stampare e a volte creare (per le cose più semplici) banner, adesivi, badge personali, rollup, libretti col programma, minilibretti di aiuto per le scholarship (info su Milano per non perdersi e altre info di base in inglese, francese, spagnolo), ecc... Si tratta di lavori di grafica, richiesta di preventivi e, se c'è qualcuno di Milano, qualche ritiro di adesivi, badge e cordini, nelle settimane e giorni precedenti SOTM. - Aiuto nei tre giorni precedenti SOTM, dal 25 al 27 luglio, durante i quali un pò di braccia e un'auto tra Porta Genova e Piola sarebbero un grande aiuto. Anche qualche persona in ufficio in Via Tortona per gestire telefonata, check-list, chiudere e marcare scatole. Il 27 luglio dovremo portare il materiale rimanente al POLIMI e al pomeriggio iniziare a disporre tavoli per reception e altre attività. Anche se pensate di avere la metà della disponibilità di una delle figure indicate va bene lo stesso, quasi tutte le attività possono essere gestite da più persone col coordinamento di WMI. Per domande e chiarimenti sono sempre disponibile. Spero rispondiate numerosi. Un grosso grazie anticipato da me, da WMI e dallo staff della OSM Foundation che ogni anno lavora dietro le quinte per organizzare SOTM. Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 20:33 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > On 20/10/17 18:51, Gregrs wrote: > > I think it makes sense for both fhrs:id and addr:postcode to be on > > the same entity, whether that's the boundary or a building. In some > > cases schools might have more than one building with an fhrs:id, > > but it's possible that these would have a different postcode e.g. > > the different houses at Rugby School (http://www.openstreetmap.org/ > > way/363617437). > > The majority of UK schools will only have the one catering facility > and > it's unlikely that this will not be the same place as school premises > and involve a single postcode although with the unstable ownership of > schools these days, we may well see private food outlets inside > 'academies'? Although central catering facilities feeding several > schools also messes up the picture. > It probably not that unusual for schools to have separate catering facilities for the sixth form. The school I attended in the 1970s did just that and a small amount of research suggests my local school now has the same. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On 20/10/17 18:51, Gregrs wrote: > I think it makes sense for both fhrs:id and addr:postcode to be on the same > entity, whether that's the boundary or a building. In some cases schools > might have more than one building with an fhrs:id, but it's possible that > these would have a different postcode e.g. the different houses at Rugby > School (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363617437). The majority of UK schools will only have the one catering facility and it's unlikely that this will not be the same place as school premises and involve a single postcode although with the unstable ownership of schools these days, we may well see private food outlets inside 'academies'? Although central catering facilities feeding several schools also messes up the picture. Bigger collage complexes may well have additional catering outlets across multiple campuses which need separate objects for each campus, building and potentially each identifiable outlet. It should not be a problem identifying each outlet and since the FHRS data is open licence http://ratings.food.gov.uk/enhanced-search/en-GB/Rugby%20School/Rugby/Relevance/0/%5E/%5E/1/1/20 provides every inspection point and the raw data can be download from http://ratings.food.gov.uk/OpenDataFiles/FHRS319en-GB.xml and a couple of the 8 entries for Rugby School are at the same postcode. So one needs separate objects to hold these fhrs:id records rather than the campus boundary. Bottom line ... there should be separate objects where that is necessary and it would be nice if the larger operations such as Rugby School helped with detailed campus maps as many of the collage and university sites have been doing? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 18:43 +0100, Dave F wrote: > I've been putting it on the boundary as it covers the whole school > which > can include domestic science (or whatever it's called now) & the > school > fête barbecue as well as the canteen. > Interestingly I have since been looking at FHRS stuff locally and within the area for the local comprehensive school there are three objects listed with different postcodes and FHRS IDs. I am guessing first to fifth form, 6th form and the the boarding section, its quite an unusual state comprehensive with a very long history. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #378 2017-10-10-2017-10-16
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 378, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9548/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #378 2017-10-10-2017-10-16
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 378, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9548/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[OSM-talk-ie] weeklyOSM #378 2017-10-10-2017-10-16
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 378, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9548/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #378 2017-10-10-2017-10-16
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 378, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9548/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[Talk-in] weeklyOSM #378 2017-10-10-2017-10-16
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 378, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9548/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #378 2017-10-10-2017-10-16
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 378, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9548/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
Hi Dave, On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:43:25PM +0100, Dave F wrote: In my LA they have pre/post school 'clubs' listed separately. I've been adding them as nodes within the school as amenity=club. I'm open to suggestion if there's something better for them. You could add all the FHRS IDs to the school boundary separated by semicolons but I'm afraid this isn't yet supported by the comparison tool: https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/11. One advantage of what you're currently doing is that the clubs get mapped as an amenity too. Thanks, Greg -- Twitter: @gregrs_uk http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org PGP key ID: 64907C8A Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8 592E 6490 7C8A signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
Hi Colin, On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:17:49PM +0100, Colin Spiller wrote: Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant building within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is that the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the wiki anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! Thanks for raising this, Colin. This GitHub issue is partly relevant: https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/42#issuecomment-272649433. As of January, it was more common to add the addr:postcode tag to the school boundary rather than a relevant building. I think it makes sense for both fhrs:id and addr:postcode to be on the same entity, whether that's the boundary or a building. In some cases schools might have more than one building with an fhrs:id, but it's possible that these would have a different postcode e.g. the different houses at Rugby School (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363617437). The comparison tool should cope with the fhrs:id tag being on either the boundary or building, as long as both fhrs:id and addr:postcode tags are on the same entity. It will suggest matches based on the centroid of the school boundary but will pick up existing matches on either. Thanks, Greg -- Twitter: @gregrs_uk http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org PGP key ID: 64907C8A Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8 592E 6490 7C8A signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
I've been putting it on the boundary as it covers the whole school which can include domestic science (or whatever it's called now) & the school fête barbecue as well as the canteen. In my LA they have pre/post school 'clubs' listed separately. I've been adding them as nodes within the school as amenity=club. I'm open to suggestion if there's something better for them. DaveF. On 20/10/2017 15:17, Colin Spiller wrote: I've recently been catching up with some fhrs:id tags. I've found several (most?) of the local schools have entries in the Food Standards agency lists. I must have missed something, because I'm now confused. Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant building within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is that the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the wiki anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! Thanks in advance Colin --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-it] Attività della lista
Il 20/10/2017 11:14, Alessandro Palmas ha scritto: Il 20/10/2017 07:33, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: Non penso sia un buon primato, in special modo visto che poi quando si organizzano eventi pochi partecipano e quando si devono fare attività sono sempre gli stessi a farle (grazie mille), la maggior parte delle discussioni è su come mappare un determinato oggetto e spesso non si arriva ad una conclusione condivisa... Secondo me il numero di mail non rappresenta la qualità della comunità ma nel nostro caso l'italianità, parlare tanto ma fare poco, a differenza dei tedeschi, poco chiacchere e tanto fare. Questa è la mia visione e non risponderò ad altre mail sull'argomento (per non alimentare il nostro primato :-) ) Ben conscio che questa mail aumenterà il contatore sono completamente d'accordo con Luca. Come avevo già scritto forse un paio di mesi fa se togliamo dal conteggio le discussioni su tutti gli oggetti che messi assieme non raggiungono lo 0,001% del totale questi numeri calano drasticamente. Sarà forse l'effetto Facebook che sta travolgendo la società (il fuffapower lo definirei)? Direi che un peso non indifferente su questo discutibile primato potrebbe averlo il fatto che in sostanza questa mailing list è l'unico punto di contatto per noi mapper italici. Altrove usano molto di più il forum o altri sistemi. E se non sbaglio sono anche più organizzati a livello di liste locali. Per dire, imho, se ci fosse una ML lombarda forse talk-it già non sarebbe prima... ciao Paolo M ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-dk] [OpenStreetMap] Hjart har kommenteret på et af dine ændringssæt
Ok, jeg fik ikke fuldendt sætningen, men ville blot gøre opmærksom på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things On fredag den 20. oktober 2017 17.56.07 CEST Sonny B. Andersen wrote: > Sendt fra Mail til Windows 10 > > Fra: Sonny B. Andersen > Sendt: 20. oktober 2017 17:43 > Til: OpenStreetMap > Emne: SV: [OpenStreetMap] Hjart har kommenteret på et af dine ændringssæt > > Tja, sådan er det at være skrivebordsmapper. - Det kan da kun være en > fordel, at man kan søge på alle 4 funktionsnavne plus selve bygningens, og > så har jeg endda udeladt udstillingslokalerne!! > > > > > Hilsen, > Sonny > > Fra: OpenStreetMap > Sendt: 20. oktober 2017 12:45 > Til: s...@bukhmark.dk > Emne: [OpenStreetMap] Hjart har kommenteret på et af dine ændringssæt > > OpenStreetMap Hej sba-dk, > Hjart har efterladt en kommentar på et af dine ændringssæt, oprettet > 2017-10-20 10:45:07 UTC med kommentaren 'Bibliotek m.m.' Bemærk at det > anbefales ikke at tilføje beskrivelser og andet info der ikke direkte er en > del af det egentlige navn Flere oplysninger om ændringssættet kan findes på > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53092221. For at afmelde > opdateringer til dette ændringssæt, kan du besøge > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53092221 og klikke "Afmeld". > OpenStreetMap ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
Re: [Talk-dk] adressering af butikker m.m.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:15:24 +0200 Michel Coenewrote: > Jeg vil vil sige at hele pointen med et kort er at relatere til den > fysiske verden. OSM er ikke en telefon bog. OSM er jo faktisk også en telefonbog. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/stN > Din cykel forretning er > en fysisk bygning, ikke en adresse. Det er en forretning, placeret i en bygning. Der kan være mange forretninger i den samme bygning. > Hvis kommunen omdøber gaden, Og det gør de: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24665342 > eller laver nummer 13 om til 13a, flytter cykel forretningen sig ikke. Jo, men derfor er adressen jo stadig en attribut for cykelforretningen. Ligesom telefonnumre, navne, brands, osv. Hvis den bliver solgt får den også et nyt navn, vi skal rette. Nogen gange har man brug for at kende adressen på en knude i OSM, fx hvis når man skal fortælle den til en taxa, sende et brev, osv. Tit kan man bruge de importerede OIS adresser. Nogle klienter, fx Osman kan med mere eller mindre held gætte en adresse ud fra en position eller en knude i OSM. Men det virker ikke altid. Og der er ikke en en-til-en relation mellem det vi tagger på OSM og de importerede adresseknuder. Nogle steder fylder mere end een adresse og så skal man vide, hvor man vil hen. Da jeg engang lagde to lejligheder sammen blev der indgang fra to trappeopgange i den nye og så kunne jeg selv vælge min adresse. Hvis jeg nu indrettede en tandlægeklinik, advokatkontor, eller lignende og kom det på OSM, skulle kunderne vide, hvor de skulle ringe på. Der er også importerede adresser, der har mange adresser med butikker på forskellige etager, stadepladser, til højre, venstre osv. Selvom man kan tagge level så kan man have brug for en adresse. Men i øvrigt er der adresser med etager og højde i AWS. Det er nok for meget at importere. Men det vil være en stor hjælp til fx at sætte building:levels. > Derfor gør jeg det aldrig. Men det er klart at vi er i flueknæpperi > afdeling. Smag og behag vil jeg sige. > Michel > > Op 19-okt.-2017 22:28 schreef "Henrik Puukka-Sørensen" < > hen...@puukka-sorensen.dk>: > > > Hej > > > > Når jeg mapper butikker og tankstationer har jeg oftest skrevet > > adressen på butikken. Jeg begyndte med det i forbindelse med > > registrering af cykelforretninger for en del år siden. Men jeg kan > > nu se, at der er mange brugere, der sletter disse adresser igen. > > Hvad er egentlig rigtigt at gøre? > > > > Jeg har i flere tilfælde set, at det ville være en fordel med > > adressen så butikken kommer til at ligge det rigtige sted. Hvis det > > nu igen bliver i orden at skrive adressen skal det så være den > > adresse butikken angiver, det kan jo i nogen tilfælde være 37-39? > > > > venlig hilsen > > Henrik Puukka-Sørensen > > > > > > ___ > > Talk-dk mailing list > > Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk > > > > -- Niels ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
Re: [Talk-dk] [OpenStreetMap] Hjart har kommenteret på et af dine ændringssæt
Sendt fra Mail til Windows 10 Fra: Sonny B. Andersen Sendt: 20. oktober 2017 17:43 Til: OpenStreetMap Emne: SV: [OpenStreetMap] Hjart har kommenteret på et af dine ændringssæt Tja, sådan er det at være skrivebordsmapper. - Det kan da kun være en fordel, at man kan søge på alle 4 funktionsnavne plus selve bygningens, og så har jeg endda udeladt udstillingslokalerne!! Hilsen, Sonny Fra: OpenStreetMap Sendt: 20. oktober 2017 12:45 Til: s...@bukhmark.dk Emne: [OpenStreetMap] Hjart har kommenteret på et af dine ændringssæt OpenStreetMap Hej sba-dk, Hjart har efterladt en kommentar på et af dine ændringssæt, oprettet 2017-10-20 10:45:07 UTC med kommentaren 'Bibliotek m.m.' Bemærk at det anbefales ikke at tilføje beskrivelser og andet info der ikke direkte er en del af det egentlige navn Flere oplysninger om ændringssættet kan findes på http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53092221. For at afmelde opdateringer til dette ændringssæt, kan du besøge http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53092221 og klikke "Afmeld". OpenStreetMap ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
[Talk-dk] Busstoppesteder
Hej, Forleden dag, da jeg stod og ventede ved et busstoppested, undrede det mig, at det ikke fremgik på min Osmand+. Der var tale om stoppestedet "Vejlands Allé (Englandsvej)" på Englandsvej: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.64290/12.59871 Jeg kan se, at der tilsyneladende mangler rigtig mange busstoppesteder, men omvendt er der også mange, som er registreret. Er der noget automatik involveret her, eller kræver det simpelhen at man går i gang med at få indtegnet busttoppested nodes, hvis man ønsker, at OSM indeholder sådanne? Spurgt på en anden måde: Er det spild af tid, hvis man begynder at indtegne busstoppesteder? (Sjovt nok kan jeg se, at rejseplanen.dk benytter OSM i kortvisningen af ruter, og dén kender i hvertfald busstoppesteder.) -- Troels ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 15:17 +0100, Colin Spiller wrote: > I've recently been catching up with some fhrs:id tags. I've found > several (most?) of the local schools have entries in the Food > Standards > agency lists. I must have missed something, because I'm now confused. > > Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. > However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant > building > within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - > expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is > that > the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the > wiki > anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! > In most cases I would just stick with putting the fhrs:id on the boundary as we do not have the necessary information to identify individual buildings. There may be a few where there is more than one fhrs:id for different facilities but that will be a very small number and is not something we can survey. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Grandissimo! E pure in rapida evoluzione! Complimenti. Come si fà a cercare il tag specifico che dall'elenco appare chiaramente sbagliato o da correggere. Esempio i: woman 2 nodes women 8 nodes women 1 relations Sarei proprio curioso di sapere dove sono. Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 15:19, Simone Savioloha scritto: > Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 09:51, Simone Saviolo > ha scritto: > >> Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 06:44, Fabrizio Tambussa >> ha scritto: >> >>> È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: >>> http://stats.openstreetmap.it >>> >> >> Non è che su http://osmit3.wmflabs.org si potrebbe mettere un indice dei >> siti presenti, per favore? >> > > Già fatto, bravissimi! E grazie per gli ottimi servizi :) > > Ciao, > > Simone > > ___ > Talk-it mailing list > Talk-it@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it > > ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
I've recently been catching up with some fhrs:id tags. I've found several (most?) of the local schools have entries in the Food Standards agency lists. I must have missed something, because I'm now confused. Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant building within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is that the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the wiki anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! Thanks in advance Colin -- Colin Spiller co...@thespillers.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 09:51, Simone Savioloha scritto: > Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 06:44, Fabrizio Tambussa > ha scritto: > >> È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: >> http://stats.openstreetmap.it >> > > Non è che su http://osmit3.wmflabs.org si potrebbe mettere un indice dei > siti presenti, per favore? > Già fatto, bravissimi! E grazie per gli ottimi servizi :) Ciao, Simone ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.4.0
Dear all, Today, v4.4.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet (the default stylesheet on openstreetmap.org) has been released. Changes include: Major changes - Rendering inland water areas and labels from z0 - Rendering island and islet labels earlier Changes - Rendering of amenity=marketplace - Rendering of landuse=religious - Rendering shop=pastry like shop=confectionery - Rendering of addr:unit - Rendering natural=bare_rock earlier - Rendering elevation also on polygon alpine_hut and shelter - Introducing Noto Sans Arabic - Rendering icon for slipway ways - Better minimal distance between housenumbers - Moving aeroways to their own layer - Creating amenity POI categories - Some other documentation and code cleaning Thanks to all the contributors for this release, including tpikonen, a new contributor. For a full list of commits, see https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/compare/v4.3.0...v4.4.0 As always, we welcome any bug reports at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues -- "My method is uncertain/ It's a mess but it's working" [F. Apple] ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
molto bello Sbiri, grazie! Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 13:29, Lorenzo "Beba" Beltrami < lorenzo.b...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Bellissimo! Grazie! > Il titolo è fantastico e mi ricorda "Signore Dei Dischi" degli Skiantos! xD > > Ho notato che building=* appare due volte nella lista. > > Lorenzo > > Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 06:44, Fabrizio Tambussa> ha scritto: > >> È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: >> http://stats.openstreetmap.it >> Raccoglie i conteggi di alcuni tipi di oggetti creati a partire dal 1 >> agosto scorso, suddivisi per utente. >> Ogni settimana al computo si aggiungono gli oggetti creati, non >> modificati o cancellati, e si aggiorna la classifica. >> Saluti >> Fabrizio >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-it mailing list >> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it >> >> > > ___ > Talk-it mailing list > Talk-it@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it > > -- Michele Ferretti ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém
Můžeš to porovnat s jejich mapou: http://www.rychlebskestezky.cz/cs/ Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Milan CernyKomu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 20. 10. 2017 14:24:02 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém "Zajímavé, podle Strava heatmap to musí být opravdu hojně navštěvované místo. http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=MAPNIK=14.60/17.1858/50.2863 Na to jaký je tam provoz to zas tak moc dobře zmapované není. Nebo je tam hodně oblíbených "ilegálek" :) __ > Od: majka > Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic > Datum: 20.10.2017 14:00 > Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém > >No, ona ta debata ukázala něco kapku jiného - jak to, že se to vůbec >do OSM dostalo? Podle té debaty to fyzicky v terénu bylo na jeden den >(dobrá, počítejme týden), beru že účastník akce to zmapuje, i když ve >chvíli, kdy se to dostalo do mapy to pravděpodobně již nebyla pravda, >ale 2 roky si nikdo nevšimne, že v terénu nic není? Přitom je tam >provoz natolik velký, že je s tím problém? >Jeseník ani Lipová nejsou velkoměsta, ale Lipová se coby lázně >poslední dobou probírá, a fakt tam nikdo nenakoukne častěji? > >2017-10-20 13:40 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral : >> Tak nakonec se to zdá v pořádku. > >___ >Talk-cz mailing list >Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz > > ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz "___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] železniční dopravny
Díky za link, nastuduji o víkendu, je to složitější než se zdá. Milan __ > Od: Michal Pustějovský> Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic > Datum: 20.10.2017 10:17 > Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] železniční dopravny > >Ahoj, > >Zkus >http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProjekt_%C4%8Cesko/Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_kolejov%C3%BDch_trat%C3%AD, > >Případně schéma OpenRailwayMap. > >Snad pomůže, Michal > >-- > >___ >Talk-cz mailing list >Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz > > ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Bellissimo! Grazie! Il titolo è fantastico e mi ricorda "Signore Dei Dischi" degli Skiantos! xD Ho notato che building=* appare due volte nella lista. Lorenzo Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 06:44, Fabrizio Tambussaha scritto: > È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: > http://stats.openstreetmap.it > Raccoglie i conteggi di alcuni tipi di oggetti creati a partire dal 1 > agosto scorso, suddivisi per utente. > Ogni settimana al computo si aggiungono gli oggetti creati, non modificati > o cancellati, e si aggiorna la classifica. > Saluti > Fabrizio > > > ___ > Talk-it mailing list > Talk-it@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it > > ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém
Ono se to nezdá, ale ČR, i když je malá, tak na počet mapperů je vlastně docela velká. Loni na podzim jsme třeba byli o prodlouženém víkendu v Jeseníku a okolí jsme si trochu prošli, ale šli jsme na opačnou stranu (Zlatý Chlum) a další den pak Lesní bar. Moc jsme toho nestihli. Pokud aktivně nemapuje někdo místní, tak může trvat docela dlouho, než se něco aktualizuje. Nedávno mi volala nějaká dáma (na netu si na mně dokonce našla číslo), že jim někdo na jejich pozemku zakreslil parkoviště. Prý kdo je za to zodpovědný. Nakonec jsem zjistil, že před lety půjčili na jednu sezónu kousek pozemku místnímu soukromému ZOO, než si vybudují vlastní parkoviště. No a někdo tam byl, parkoviště zmapoval, ale ani po otevření oficiálního parkoviště nikdo to dočasné nesmazal. Zřejmě neměl důvod tam jezdit. No a po pěti letech tam to parkoviště stále bylo, i když už to dávno nebyla pravda. Takže bych se vůbec nedivil, pokud dané stezky někdo ze závodníků opravdu stihl zakreslit. I kdyby byl ten závod jednodenní, tak příprava určitě jeden den netrvala. Muselo se to naplánovat, vyznačit, upravit. Mohly se tam jet nějaké tréninky a testovací jízdy. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: majkaKomu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 20. 10. 2017 14:05:57 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém "No, ona ta debata ukázala něco kapku jiného - jak to, že se to vůbec do OSM dostalo? Podle té debaty to fyzicky v terénu bylo na jeden den (dobrá, počítejme týden), beru že účastník akce to zmapuje, i když ve chvíli, kdy se to dostalo do mapy to pravděpodobně již nebyla pravda, ale 2 roky si nikdo nevšimne, že v terénu nic není? Přitom je tam provoz natolik velký, že je s tím problém? Jeseník ani Lipová nejsou velkoměsta, ale Lipová se coby lázně poslední dobou probírá, a fakt tam nikdo nenakoukne častěji? 2017-10-20 13:40 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral : > Tak nakonec se to zdá v pořádku. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz "___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém
Zajímavé, podle Strava heatmap to musí být opravdu hojně navštěvované místo. http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=MAPNIK=14.60/17.1858/50.2863 Na to jaký je tam provoz to zas tak moc dobře zmapované není. Nebo je tam hodně oblíbených "ilegálek" :) __ > Od: majka> Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic > Datum: 20.10.2017 14:00 > Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém > >No, ona ta debata ukázala něco kapku jiného - jak to, že se to vůbec >do OSM dostalo? Podle té debaty to fyzicky v terénu bylo na jeden den >(dobrá, počítejme týden), beru že účastník akce to zmapuje, i když ve >chvíli, kdy se to dostalo do mapy to pravděpodobně již nebyla pravda, >ale 2 roky si nikdo nevšimne, že v terénu nic není? Přitom je tam >provoz natolik velký, že je s tím problém? >Jeseník ani Lipová nejsou velkoměsta, ale Lipová se coby lázně >poslední dobou probírá, a fakt tam nikdo nenakoukne častěji? > >2017-10-20 13:40 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral : >> Tak nakonec se to zdá v pořádku. > >___ >Talk-cz mailing list >Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz > > ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:13:12PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Frederik: > > > I am appalled that after your abysmal OSM editing history where you more > > often than not ignored existing customs rules, while *claiming* to > > follow them, you're now building a service that entices others to do the > > same. > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:09 AM Christoph Hormannwrote: > >> This is a tool to perform automated edits as per the automated edits > >> policy. A resposible developer of such a tool should inform its users > >> that making automated edits comes with certain requirements and that > >> not following these rules can result in changes being reverted and user > >> accounts being blocked. > >> > > > 2017-10-14 13:06 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan : > > > Christoph, I looked around Osmose and MapRoulette, and I don't see any > > such warnings . Could you elaborate how you would like these kinds of tools > > to promote good editing practices? Any UI ideas? I'll be happy to improve > > our tools on making sure they meet community expectations. > > > > > I agree with Christoph and Frederik, that this is oviously a tool to > perform (crowdsourced) automated edits, and although it is designed in a > way to make them look like individual contributions, the automated editing > guidelines should apply. I agree with Yuri that there is also (to some > lesser extent, as the editing is not performed by the tool) some > problematic potential in other QA tools like Osmose or "remote batch > fixing" tools like MapRoulette. it could be used as an automated editing tool but perhaps this was not the intention of the author? Because - if you wanted to do automated editing there are much easier and quicker methods. Of course therer are many ways the tool should be improved before it is used. Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém
No, ona ta debata ukázala něco kapku jiného - jak to, že se to vůbec do OSM dostalo? Podle té debaty to fyzicky v terénu bylo na jeden den (dobrá, počítejme týden), beru že účastník akce to zmapuje, i když ve chvíli, kdy se to dostalo do mapy to pravděpodobně již nebyla pravda, ale 2 roky si nikdo nevšimne, že v terénu nic není? Přitom je tam provoz natolik velký, že je s tím problém? Jeseník ani Lipová nejsou velkoměsta, ale Lipová se coby lázně poslední dobou probírá, a fakt tam nikdo nenakoukne častěji? 2017-10-20 13:40 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral: > Tak nakonec se to zdá v pořádku. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém
Tak nakonec se to zdá v pořádku. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Marián KyralKomu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 20. 10. 2017 12:47:17 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém "Ahoj, tak nám zase mažou data z OSM, protože se někomu nelíbí: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jan%20Mach%C3%A1%C4%8Dek/history#map=14/ 50.2812/17.1688 > Rychlebské stezky have problems with people riding off the marked trails. One of the sources about these non-marked trails is OSM. Forest owners push us to stop this phenomenom otherwise they can slow down our development or even close our trail centre. Pod changeset 53093133 jsem přidal komentář: http://www.openstreetmap.org/ changeset/53093133 Navrhuji počkat na reakci, pak revert a případně nastavit "bicycle=no". Co myslíte? Marián ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz "___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-cz] Rychlebské stezky mají s OSM problém
Ahoj, tak nám zase mažou data z OSM, protože se někomu nelíbí: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jan%20Mach%C3%A1%C4%8Dek/history#map=14/ 50.2812/17.1688 > Rychlebské stezky have problems with people riding off the marked trails. One of the sources about these non-marked trails is OSM. Forest owners push us to stop this phenomenom otherwise they can slow down our development or even close our trail centre. Pod changeset 53093133 jsem přidal komentář: http://www.openstreetmap.org/ changeset/53093133 Navrhuji počkat na reakci, pak revert a případně nastavit "bicycle=no". Co myslíte? Marián___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSRM-talk] error: undefined reference to 'boost::re_detail::cpp_regex_traits_implementation::transform
On 19 October 2017 at 23:42, Patrick Niklauswrote: > Hey, > > the primary difference to our build environment on Travis CI is that > we build on Ubuntu 14.04 using boost 1.54: > https://travis-ci.org/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/jobs/290183596#L1573 > It could be that this is a specific issue with boost 1.58 that was > introduced by using a new symbol on `master`. Possibly > The error in question looks really weird. A wild guess might be there > are two version of libboost on your system and OSRM picks up the wrong > headers. I removed all libboost* from the environment, reinstalled Boost 1.58. I also took care to ensure there is no Boost in known locations in the host Windows. I added to CMakeLists.txt dumping of the Boost CMake variables: -- BOOST_BASE_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_date_time.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_chrono.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_filesystem.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_iostreams.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_thread.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_system.so -- Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS=/usr/include No change. Anyhow, I'm leaving this issue on backburnre until I have time to investigate it myself. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Il 20/10/2017 06:44, Fabrizio Tambussa ha scritto: Ã attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: http://stats.openstreetmap.it Raccoglie i conteggi di alcuni tipi di oggetti creati a partire dal 1 agosto scorso, suddivisi per utente. Ogni settimana al computo si aggiungono gli oggetti creati, non modificati o cancellati, e si aggiorna la classifica. Saluti Fabrizio Grazie. -- _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| Simone Girardelli ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Attività della lista
Il 20/10/2017 10:50, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 Non mi ricordavo del forum, grazie, utile da leggere, per il resto seguo sicuramente la mailing list. -- _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| Simone Girardelli ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Attività della lista
Il 20/10/2017 07:33, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: Non penso sia un buon primato, in special modo visto che poi quando si organizzano eventi pochi partecipano e quando si devono fare attività sono sempre gli stessi a farle (grazie mille), la maggior parte delle discussioni è su come mappare un determinato oggetto e spesso non si arriva ad una conclusione condivisa... Secondo me il numero di mail non rappresenta la qualità della comunità ma nel nostro caso l'italianità, parlare tanto ma fare poco, a differenza dei tedeschi, poco chiacchere e tanto fare. Questa è la mia visione e non risponderò ad altre mail sull'argomento (per non alimentare il nostro primato :-) ) Ben conscio che questa mail aumenterà il contatore sono completamente d'accordo con Luca. Come avevo già scritto forse un paio di mesi fa se togliamo dal conteggio le discussioni su tutti gli oggetti che messi assieme non raggiungono lo 0,001% del totale questi numeri calano drasticamente. Sarà forse l'effetto Facebook che sta travolgendo la società (il fuffapower lo definirei)? Per le statistiche mi concentrerei più sul risibile numero di eventi italiani http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Current_events E' facile dire che gli oggetti vanno mappati sul posto ma vedo ancora che in grosse città manca una straccio di comunità locale (che la si ottiene organizzando eventi grandi o piccoli, non necessariamente mapping party): visto che a moltissimi piace leggere le statistiche guardate il numero di POI nelle varie città e immediatamente saprete se lì è presente una comunità. Ora in altro topic mi accingevo a rinnovare l'invito di collaborazione per l'organizzazione di SOTM2018: la prima mail del 22 agosto non ha avuto risposta, speriamo questa vada meglio. Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Activity Updates
Hi Rob No need for thewalkthrough everyhting was very intuitive and easy to find. The only downer is the inability to select multiple objects and perform one tagging Problems for bus routing software (Mentz Diva) were caused by: incorrect complex junction configuration not permitting the desired route through; turn restriction rather than an access restriction; ambiguous access restriction; bus stop with incorrect route_ref regards Brian On 19 October 2017 at 22:47, Rob Nickersonwrote: > Great news. > > Can I enquire about two things: First did you use the iD walkthrough and > if yes, how was it? Did it provide a full introduction or did you need to > help with extra support too? > > And second, what sort of oddities did you get on the TfWM bus route > plotting software? And how were they typically solved? > > Thanks, > > *Rob* > > On 19 October 2017 at 16:43, Brian Prangle wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> 1. I'm back training Probation Pay Back Attendees with Anawim. I've >> currently assigned our first new trainee the SE corner of Nuneaton to add >> buildings and improve road alignments. Latest version of id is much >> improved! >> 2. I now have a direct link into TfWM's maintainer of NaPTAN bus stops >> and we're working on a process for regular updates. I'll keep you uppdated >> as to progress >> 3. TfWM now plot their bus routes using a piece of software that uses OSM >> data.It sometimes produces weird results that need some unentangling f the >> OSM data, so we had good fun this week solving some of them >> >> Regards >> >> Brian >> >> ___ >> Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list >> Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands >> >> > > ___ > Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list > Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands > > ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
> > > È anglo-piemontese, traducibile con "classifica così". > saluti > > Grazie, sia per la scelta del nome che per i contenuti. Penso sarebbe utile se la colonna user contenesse il nome sotto forma di link alla rispettiva user page. Che dici ? Ciao ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Attività della lista
sent from a phone > On 20. Oct 2017, at 07:33, Luca Delucchiwrote: > > Secondo me il numero di mail non rappresenta la qualità della comunità ma nel > nostro caso l'italianità, parlare tanto ma fare poco, a differenza dei > tedeschi, poco chiacchere e tanto fare. il numero di mail dimostra l’attività della comunità, però va detto, in altri paesi si usano anche altri mezzi di comunicazione, per esempio in Germania per il periodo da 2015, si usa soprattutto il forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 ci sono dei posts con più di 1000 risposte e centinaia di migliaia di visualizzazioni ciascuno... Altri usano facebook, telegram etc. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
2017-10-20 6:44 GMT+02:00 Fabrizio Tambussa: > È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: > http://stats.openstreetmap.it > Raccoglie i conteggi di alcuni tipi di oggetti creati a partire dal 1 > agosto scorso, suddivisi per utente. > Ogni settimana al computo si aggiungono gli oggetti creati, non modificati > o cancellati, e si aggiorna la classifica. > Grazie Sbiri, ma grazie soprattutto per #impararci il piemontese con osm :) -- -S ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Ottimo lavoro! Però oltre alle classifiche "per argomento" ci starebbe bene anche una classifica generale, che permetta di capire l'attività degli utenti non solo relativa ad un particolare tipo di oggetto. Ciao! Max -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] železniční dopravny
Ahoj,Zkus http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProjekt_%C4%8Cesko/Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_kolejov%C3%BDch_trat%C3%AD,Případně schéma OpenRailwayMap.Snad pomůže,Michal___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Addresses and Postcodes
On 20/10/17 06:05, Marc Gemis wrote: > The full information that Nominatim knows for "WR12 7EP, United > Kingdom" is shown on : > http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=180306705 > It does list a collection of streets. What you see on osm.org is just > a small set, which does not include the list of streets. The number of > streets in a postal code really depends on the country, it might be a > small number in the UK, but is large in e.g. Germany. Actually http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=65620674 is of more interest in this discussion. Should I have added a postcode to the highway object? Also should each house have a name tag in addition to the house number? The information on houses is complete in my book, but do we need to create additional tags so that Nominatim lists the equivalent of the PAF file addresses? If I add the names then the rendering becomes messy which is why I only added the house number. And I must update the postbox collection times ... that change some time back :( ... but if those details were pulled from a secondary source ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Il giorno 20 ottobre 2017 06:44, Fabrizio Tambussaha scritto: > È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: > http://stats.openstreetmap.it > Non è che su http://osmit3.wmflabs.org si potrebbe mettere un indice dei siti presenti, per favore? Ciao, Simone ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?
2017-10-20 9:22 GMT+02:00 Mikoláš Štrajt: > > V praxi se za koncem vesnice setkávám se smíšeným účelem, např. lesní/polní > cesty, které jsou zároveň příjezdovky k chatovým oblastem. To přece nepopírám a o tyhle cesty nejde. Mě ale zajímá cesta ve vesnici či městě, nadto v území zdůrazněném jako obytná zóna (tenhle výklad "landuse=residential" je samozřejmě můj a nepřesný), průmyslová či obchodní zóna. A v katastru to může být klidně jako užitková komunikace, ostatní komunikace nebo rovnou jen ostatní plocha. @jzvc: Ať wiki zkoumám jak zkoumám, česky nebo anglicky, "Tuto značku nepoužívejte pro zakreslování veřejných nezpevněných cest v zastavěných oblastech" z toho jednoznačně čtu. Fakt jsem NIKDE nenašla nic jiného, a hledala jsem poctivě co to dalo. V Pravidlech pro Česko "track" řešený není. Zcela upřímně by mě odkaz správným směrem potěšil. A prosím Tě, kde bydlíš a pohybuješ se, že očekáváš, že ulice (residential) nebude kvalitou polňačka mezi barákama, o chodnících nemluvě? Sice se hodně změnilo a mění, ale tohle opravdu není všude ani vzdáleně pravda. A opravdu nemusíš daleko na venkov - vím o dost takových v místech dosažitelných MHD krajského města, stačí kousek popojít mimo hlavní silnici. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?
Ahoj, z tohoto předpokladu taky vycházím když občas taguju track uvnitř residential. Definice na wiki sice naznačuje že to má být mimo sídla, ale reálně si člověk spojí track s tím že je to krpál a stav cesty se řídí podle počasí, v kontrastu s kvalitní vozovkou jinde. To mi přijde jako víc zásadní informace než je/není uvnitř polygonu X. Kde cesta leží totiž poznám z mapy _bez ohledu na tagování_ - právě to že to vlastně _není_ residential je ta informace kterou potřebuji/potřebujeme... V. "Pricemz od ulice (residential) v CR se ocekava, ze to rozhodne nebude polnacka mezi barakama. Dokonce pro CR plati, ze obvykle (tzn ne vzdy ale vetsinou) ma i chodnik(y). "___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-it] qualità dei dati OSM nel territorio italiano
Grazie Gianfranco! Anche a tutti gli altri per le utili informazioni Marcello On Thursday, October 19, 2017 5:17 PM, gianfranco gwrote: Ciao Marcello.Il tuo riferimento alle aree rurali rende la risposta alla tua domanda ancora più difficile. Tutti gli strumenti usualmente sviluppati sono indirizzati alle aree urbane.Pochi lavori puntano la loro attenzione alle aree extraurbane più che altro tendono a vedere la qualità di mappe di uso del suolo o la popolarità di elementi naturali. Nessun lavoro di quelli che conosco io è stato fatto in Italia o su dati Italiani. Sono principalmente Tedeschi e Irlandesi. Ciao Gianfranco On 19 Oct 2017 09:58, "Marcello Parisini" wrote: Ciao,premetto che non sono un esperto di openstreetmap ma per una attività di ricerca legata alle aree rurali in italia sto valutandone l'impiego. Ho già cercato online qualcosa che spiegasse i processi o le migliori pratiche che sono attualmente in vigore nel chapter italiano di OSM per le considerazioni legate alla qualità dei dati ma non ho trovato un granché. Anche nell'archivio della lista, a parte qualche scambio di consigli nell'utilizzo dei tag non ho trovato nulla che trattasse l'argomento.Ho quindi le seguenti domande per coloro che sono più esperti e navigati in questi ambiti: - esistono dei materiali dove si mostrano analisi sullo stato dei dati di OSM in Italia (possibilmente sia geografici che dei relativi tag) - esistono procedure automatizzate specifiche che effettuano alcuni controlli per garantire il rispetto dei formalismi sui tag di base, ovvero cosa sappiamo di certo essere affidabile e cosa no? - esistono localmente iniziative per migliorare la qualità di quanto ad oggi presente? - esiste un elenco di organizzazioni pubbliche e private che ufficialmente impiegano OSM e che curano i propri contenuti su di esso ? (anche estere a patto che lavorino su dati nel territorio italiano) Grazie,Marcello __ _ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap. org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] železniční dopravny
Výhybna by podle wiki měla být railway=crossover, viz http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProjekt_%C4%8Cesko/Zna%C4%8 Den%C3%AD_kolejov%C3%BDch_trat%C3%AD#Prvky_.C5.BEelezni.C4.8Dn.C3.AD_stanice OpenRailwayMap by to měla vykreslovat, ale asi budeš první, kdo to v čechách zaznačil. -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Milan CernyKomu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 20. 10. 2017 9:20:44 Předmět: [Talk-cz] železniční dopravny "Ahoj, aktuálně se v mém okolí přestavuje železniční stanice na dopravnu bez možnosti odbavení cestujících. Samostatná zastávka bude o kus dál na trati, podobně jako Praha - Bubeneč / Podbaba. Jak takovou dopravnu otagovat? Z dopravního pohledu to stanice je, tedy railway=station, k tomu něco jako public_transport=no. Jde o to, aby se stanice nezobrazovala v seznamu stanic pro osobní dopravu. Stejně tak nejsou tagy pro "malé" dopravny typu hradlo, hláska, nakladiště nebo odbočka. V mapě je často jen jméno na budově, či výhybce, což není úplně to pravé. Milan ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz "___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?
-- Původní e-mail -- Od: MajkaKomu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 19. 10. 2017 22:04:55 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential? " "highway=track" přece není nezpevněná, úzká nebo rozsekaná cesta, ale "silnice pro zemědělství, lesnictví atd." - " Tuto značku nepoužívejte pro zakreslování veřejných nezpevněných cest v zastavěných oblastech" - to v uvozovkách je z wiki." to je teorie. V praxi se za koncem vesnice setkávám se smíšeným účelem, např. lesní/polní cesty, které jsou zároveň příjezdovky k chatovým oblastem. Nebo "lesní cesta" po který vesele jezdí jak lesáci tak obyvatelé chatky, která je na mýtině v lese. Tenhle případ je zajímavý tím, že v tom lese jsou závory (pro moto-houbařům) i na těch lesáckých asfaltkách a tady zrovna je ta závora je záměrně odmontovaná. Nebo "polní cesta" spojující dvě vesnice, kde většinou jezdí spíš traktory (na pole), ale občas tam projíždí i nějaký místní občan, chatař nebo dokonce kamion vezoucí dřevo na pilu (vtipné je, že u pily se špatně otáčí, tak jede z jedné vesnice přes pole až do druhé).___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-cz] železniční dopravny
Ahoj, aktuálně se v mém okolí přestavuje železniční stanice na dopravnu bez možnosti odbavení cestujících. Samostatná zastávka bude o kus dál na trati, podobně jako Praha - Bubeneč / Podbaba. Jak takovou dopravnu otagovat? Z dopravního pohledu to stanice je, tedy railway=station, k tomu něco jako public_transport=no. Jde o to, aby se stanice nezobrazovala v seznamu stanic pro osobní dopravu. Stejně tak nejsou tagy pro "malé" dopravny typu hradlo, hláska, nakladiště nebo odbočka. V mapě je často jen jméno na budově, či výhybce, což není úplně to pravé. Milan ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Confermo :-) Complimenti Fabrizio...ottimo lavoro. Il 20/10/2017 08:04, Fabrizio Tambussa ha scritto: Il 20/Ott/2017 07:40, "Federico Cortese"> ha scritto: 2017-10-20 6:44 GMT+02:00 Fabrizio Tambussa >: > È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: > http://stats.openstreetmap.it Grazie Fabrizio, ottimo lavoro! Ma perchè il titolo "Hit Parei"? È anglo-piemontese, traducibile con "classifica così". saluti ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it -- Gianluca Boero ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contact
Le 20/10/2017 02:31, Philippe Verdy a écrit : > N'oublie pas de demander la mise en place d'une page web sur > l'événement, à ajouter vite dans le calendrier du wiki ! Et dans l'Agenda du libre avec le tag openstreetmap https://www.agendadulibre.org https://www.agendadulibre.org/tags/openstreetmap Bonne journée JC -- Le logiciel libre, comment ça marche ? http://www.apitux.org/index.php?2008/04/08/230-le-logiciel-libre-comment-ca-marche ==APITUX : le choix du logiciel libre== APITUX - Jean-Christophe Becquet BP 32 - 04001 Digne-les-Bains Cedex 06 25 86 07 92 - j...@apitux.com - http://www.apitux.com SIRET : 452 887 441 00031 - APE : 6202A === ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo sito statistiche
Il 20/Ott/2017 07:40, "Federico Cortese"ha scritto: 2017-10-20 6:44 GMT+02:00 Fabrizio Tambussa : > È attivo il nuovo sito di statistiche: > http://stats.openstreetmap.it Grazie Fabrizio, ottimo lavoro! Ma perchè il titolo "Hit Parei"? È anglo-piemontese, traducibile con "classifica così". saluti ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it