Re: [talk-au] Copying address from business website?

[Kim Oldfield]

Graeme: It's nice to know that I'm not the only one who has done this. 
This particular change caused me to reconsider how appropriate it is as 
it was all sourced from the website so I used source=website which, when 
viewed superficially, appears to contradict guidelines for where to 
source map data.


Andrew: It is nice to know that this is generally considered OK for 
individual facts.


Adrian: As part of manually adding these facts I check that the address 
I'm adding is for this physical location, ie at least the street adjoins 
the business being tagged.


On 22/7/19 3:28 pm, Adrian Hobbs wrote:

Might be issues where contact address (e.g. head office) being copied is 
different to physical location on map.
Adrian Hobbs

⁣Sent from BlueMail ​

On 22 Jul. 2019, 15:21, at 15:21, Andrew Harvey  
wrote:

This has come up a few times on the mailing lists, and the advise
usually
given is it's okay to source a few facts here and there like the
address or
contact number, but just don't start taking a whole database of venues
and
copy that database.

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Kim Oldfield 
wrote:


Is it acceptable to copy a street address (and other contact details)
from a business's webpage?

For example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72452124 (what
changed is easier to see at
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/705884944 ) I added

the

street address as listed on their website.

If this isn't acceptable, what is an acceptable way of getting an
address if it is not obvious during a site survey?

Regards,
Kim

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au





___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Copying address from business website?

[Adrian Hobbs]

Might be issues where contact address (e.g. head office) being copied is 
different to physical location on map.
Adrian Hobbs

⁣Sent from BlueMail ​

On 22 Jul. 2019, 15:21, at 15:21, Andrew Harvey  
wrote:
>This has come up a few times on the mailing lists, and the advise
>usually
>given is it's okay to source a few facts here and there like the
>address or
>contact number, but just don't start taking a whole database of venues
>and
>copy that database.
>
>On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Kim Oldfield 
>wrote:
>
>> Is it acceptable to copy a street address (and other contact details)
>> from a business's webpage?
>>
>> For example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72452124 (what
>> changed is easier to see at
>> https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/705884944 ) I added
>the
>> street address as listed on their website.
>>
>> If this isn't acceptable, what is an acceptable way of getting an
>> address if it is not obvious during a site survey?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kim
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>
>
>
>
>___
>Talk-au mailing list
>Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Copying address from business website?

[Andrew Harvey]

This has come up a few times on the mailing lists, and the advise usually
given is it's okay to source a few facts here and there like the address or
contact number, but just don't start taking a whole database of venues and
copy that database.

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Kim Oldfield 
wrote:

> Is it acceptable to copy a street address (and other contact details)
> from a business's webpage?
>
> For example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72452124 (what
> changed is easier to see at
> https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/705884944 ) I added the
> street address as listed on their website.
>
> If this isn't acceptable, what is an acceptable way of getting an
> address if it is not obvious during a site survey?
>
> Regards,
> Kim
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Copying address from business website?

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Kim Oldfield 
wrote:

> Is it acceptable to copy a street address (and other contact details)
> from a business's webpage?
>

I certainly do exactly that all the time!

Make note of the shop name, or pull it off my dash-cam footage, search that
name & suburb & enter all relevant details.

Can't see it being a problem myself?

Thanks

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] Copying address from business website?

[Kim Oldfield]

Is it acceptable to copy a street address (and other contact details) 
from a business's webpage?


For example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72452124 (what 
changed is easier to see at 
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/705884944 ) I added the 
street address as listed on their website.


If this isn't acceptable, what is an acceptable way of getting an 
address if it is not obvious during a site survey?


Regards,
Kim

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-GB] Newish user causing damage-...

[Andy Townsend]

This user's back again, had to be reverted again (thanks southglos!) and 
I've blocked them again https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3033 - 
this time for a period of time with a request to email the DWG about 
what they're trying to do.


Best Regards,

Andy (from the DWG)


On 23/06/2019 18:10, Colin Smale wrote:


Thanks Phil.

On 2019-06-23 18:59, Philip Barnes wrote:


On Sun, 2019-06-23 at 16:50 +0100, Andy Townsend wrote:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2922
(apologies for terseness - sending from pub beer garden)

Thank you Andy.
I have reverted this, I had already reverted their previous changes.
Must admit I thought they had given up.
Phil ( trigpoint )

*From:* colin.sm...@xs4all.nl
*Sent:* 23 June 2019 16:21
*To:* talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* [Talk-GB] Newish user causing damage-...

User JS0102 has 17 changesets to their name, and many of them
have critical comments against them. The earlier 16 changesets
were reverted, but this afternoon it was the turn of
Gloucestershire to get cleaned out, and half the River Wye has
been turned into a culvert.

Can someone block this user until they understand what they are
doing?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JS0102

Thanks.

___

Talk-GB mailing list

Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

  


https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

  



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing "Wikiproject" prefix from place pages

[dcapillae]

Thank you, Tobias!

I'm going to follow your recommendations. I am also contacting local
communities one by one to encourage them to collaborate.

Greetings from Spain.

Regards,
Daniel



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing "Wikiproject" prefix from place pages

[dcapillae]

Hi, Harry!

Thank you for your comments.

I don't like the "WikiProject" prefixes on country pages either. I have
contacted many local communities and they all liked the idea (except Spain,
my country, where initially there was a resistance to abandon the
"WikiProject" prefix, for sentimental reasons, I think, but I explained the
advantages and finally they also liked the idea). There is already a lot of
country pages without prefix "WikiProject" in the wiki.

I have contacted the Canadian community and we will remove the prefix
"WikiProject" next week. The communities in the UK, Germany and France are
very important. If I can help, I offer my help, although it would be great
if volunteers from these communities were encouraged to remove the prefix
"Wikiproject" for themselves.

Thank you for the links. Very useful!

Greetings from Spain.

Regards,
Daniel



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it] Mancata attribuzione OpenStreetMap - Cuneo24

[liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu]

Il 21/07/19 21:14, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu ha scritto:
> Il 21/07/19 21:08, Francesco Ansanelli ha scritto:
>> Buonasera,
>>
>> segnalo, come da oggetto, che è stato omesso (dall'immagine ritagliata dal
>> sito OpenStreetMap) il copyright impresso sulla mappa.
>> Ecco il link all'articolo:
>>
>> https://www.cuneo24.it/2019/07/la-terra-trema-in-valle-stura-2-35983/
>>
>> In cc c'è anche la redazione (redazi...@cuneo24.it) per loro verifica,
>> Saluti,
>> Francesco
> 
> penso che l'abbiano preso dal sito dellingv, come sempre in caso di
> terremoti, in quella pagina è correttamente riportata la licenza.
> 
> http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/event/22715761
> 
> 

Tra laltro anche la pagina dell'INGV in basso riporta che i suoi dati
richiedono l'attribuzione (CC-BY 4.0), per cui segnalerei a INGV
l'avvenuta mancata attribuzione nei loro confronti e mancata licenza OSM
da riportare.


-- 
_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
Simone Girardelli

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Mancata attribuzione OpenStreetMap - Cuneo24

[liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu]

Il 21/07/19 21:08, Francesco Ansanelli ha scritto:
> Buonasera,
> 
> segnalo, come da oggetto, che è stato omesso (dall'immagine ritagliata dal
> sito OpenStreetMap) il copyright impresso sulla mappa.
> Ecco il link all'articolo:
> 
> https://www.cuneo24.it/2019/07/la-terra-trema-in-valle-stura-2-35983/
> 
> In cc c'è anche la redazione (redazi...@cuneo24.it) per loro verifica,
> Saluti,
> Francesco

penso che l'abbiano preso dal sito dellingv, come sempre in caso di
terremoti, in quella pagina è correttamente riportata la licenza.

http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/event/22715761


-- 
_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
Simone Girardelli

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-it] Mancata attribuzione OpenStreetMap - Cuneo24

[Francesco Ansanelli]

Buonasera,

segnalo, come da oggetto, che è stato omesso (dall'immagine ritagliata dal
sito OpenStreetMap) il copyright impresso sulla mappa.
Ecco il link all'articolo:

https://www.cuneo24.it/2019/07/la-terra-trema-in-valle-stura-2-35983/

In cc c'è anche la redazione (redazi...@cuneo24.it) per loro verifica,
Saluti,
Francesco
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] simples pictogrammes vélo, pas de voies dédiées [était: Uniformiser le wiki "Bicycle"]

[Phyks]

En effet, les cas M3a et S1 mériteraient d'être mieux documentés je pense.

> Alors, est-ce que ça serait correct de préciser :
> S1 : highway=* + oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no + ...
> et pictogrammes : ... + cycleway:both=shared_lane +
cycleway:lane=pictogram

Je comprends pas très bien l'intérêt du cycleway:lane=pictogram en
complément du shared_lane. Ne serait-ce pas expliciter une valeur par
défaut ? (j'ai du mal à imaginer un cycleway=shared_lane avec autre
chose qu'une valeur cycleway:lane=pictogram).

Dans ton cas, j'aurais mis

highway=* + oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no (si pannonceaux, cf plus bas)
+ cycleway:both=shared_lane + cycleway:left:oneway=-1.



Au passage, d'une discussion récente sur talk-fr, j'avais retenu :

* cycleway > infrastructure
* oneway:bicycle > droit d'accès

Donc, dans le cas idéal (DSC marqué et pannonceaux sous les sens
interdits) : cycleway:left=lane (ou shared_lane),
cycleway:lane:oneway=-1 et oneway:bicycle=no.

S'il n'y a pas de pictogrammes au sol, pas de tags cycleway (mais
éventuellement oneway:bicycle=no).

S'il n'y a pas de pannonceaux sous les sens interdits, pas de tag
oneway:bicycle=no (mais éventuellement des cycleway).

C'est bien ça ? On le détaille comme ceci dans la page FR:Bicycle ?
-- 
Phyks

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Demande de retours sur l'analyse Osmose d'intégration de la base Sirene

[Phyks]

> Des avis sur la question sont bien venu.
> 
> […]
>
> Il faut remonter ça pour améliorer le mapping, et avoir moins de faux
> positifs.

Ce n'est pas remonté quelque part quand on clique sur le bouton "faux
positif" ?

Au passage, je viens de voir que tous les faux positifs que j'avais
marqué sont réapparus… Est-ce normal ?

>> Il y a pas beaucoup de choses intéressantes une fois ceci filtré,
>> notamment pour les professions libérales (dentistes etc).
>>
>> Deux remarques sur la forme :
>>
>> * dans le frontend, le numéro SIRET est cliquable mais renvoie
>> systématiquement vers une page d'erreur. Ce n'est pas le plus pratique,
>> et j'avais toujours un autre onglet pour chercher les SIRET du coup.
> 
> Normalement c'est déjà corrigé depuis mercredi. Il peut en manquer mais
> ça en trouve aussi.

Je confirme, super !

>> * serait-il possible de systématiquement afficher le nom de l'entreprise
>> dans les erreurs dans le frontend Osmose ? On pourrait économiser
>> quelques clics / recherches sur le SIRET comme ça.
> 
> Quand il y un nom c'est affiché.

Par exemple, https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/error/29754498711 n'a
aucun nom affiché dans l'erreur. Pourtant, chez societe.com (par
exemple), il y a un nom
https://www.societe.com/etablissement/bluebretzel-49172436500029.html.

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[Talk-ko] 주간OSM #469 미리보기 및 사견

[Dongha Hwang]

지지난주에 보낸 #477은 #467이 맞고, 지난주에 보낸 #469는 #468이 맞습니다. 피곤하다 보니까 연속으로 실수를 하네요...

> .

.

1. 오픈스트리트맵 텔레그램 그룹의 매퍼들이 설문 조사를 진행하고 있습니다.

> .

설문 조사는
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdpap1IL57VtGb_LojUg_g01fmMK7i6XATA7AKGVtfNnQXp1w/viewform
에서
할 수 있습니다.

> .

.

2. FOSS4G Korea 2019가 10월 10일부터 11일까지 부산에서 개최됩니다.

> .

정말 간만에 찾아낸 한국 관련 소식입니다.

> .

.

3. 좌표에서 소수의 중요성을 보여 주는 삽화가 xkcd에 게재되었습니다.

> .

주간OSM 안에 전문을 번역해 놓았습니다. xkcd는 주간OSM의 라이선스와 호환되지 않기 때문에, 라이선스는 별도로 고지를 해
놓았습니다.
ᐧ
___
Talk-ko mailing list
Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko

Re: [Talk-de] Gesuch: Trufi Association sucht Mapper und Städte #öpnv

[Christoph Hanser]

Hi Martin,

das war noch mal eine gute Zusammenfassung:

- Wenn es eine starke lokale Community gibt, dann bringen wir die Routen
nach OSM.
- Wenn wir keine lokale Community haben (aber aus irgendeinem Grund doch
Routen), dann bringen wir sie nicht gezwungenermaßen nach OSM.

Alles andere wäre auch merkwürdig, weil wir ja die App meistens für Städte
zur Verfügung stellen, die schon ihre Routen nach OSM gebracht haben (wie
jetzt in Accra).

In La Paz können wir die Routen also gut nach OSM bringen, weil wir Locals
fürs Review haben.

Im Grunde ist das allerdings auch immer unser Wunsch, weil unsere App ja
nur so gut ist wie die Routen, die in der App benutzt werden. Deshalb haben
wir in Cochabamba die OSM-Community erweitert (von 1 auf 5 ;)).

Wenn wir Routen nach OSM bringen und in der App nutzen, sollte das sowieso
noch einen Verbesserungs-Effekt haben: In der App kann man eine Änderung
der Route vorschlagen. Zurzeit per Feedback-Mail, in Zukunft per getracktem
Geo-Schnippsel. Den müssen wir uns anschauen und dann, wenn es mehrere
Wünsche dieser Art gibt, nach OSM mergen. Insofern haben wir dort m.E.
groundtruth vom Feinsten.

Weiß denn jemand von euch von Städten und Communities, in denen formeller
public transport vorherrscht und die eine solche App gerne hätten?

Viele Grüße,
Christoph

Viele Grüße,
Christoph



El sáb., 20 de jul. de 2019 a la(s) 15:53, Martin Koppenhoefer (
dieterdre...@gmail.com) escribió:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 20. Jul 2019, at 09:19, Christoph Hanser 
> wrote:
> >
> > Wir dachten nur bisher, dass sich
> > alle freuen, wenn wir die Routen nach OSM bringen, insofern war das
> bisher
> > unser "open data"-Ansatz. Ist das nicht so?
>
>
> Kommt drauf an.
> wenn vor Ort eine Community entsteht oder es sonst einen backchannel gibt,
> um die Daten bei Fehlern zu korrigieren, und Updates zu machen, dann ist es
> ggf. besser, die Sachen in OpenStreetMap zu haben, wenn das aber sowieso
> nicht stattfindet bzw. die Qualität nicht den Standards entspricht, dann
> lieber parallel ;-)
>
> Unsere Stärke ist groundtruth, Menschen die dort wo sie sich auskennen
> (oder wo sie hinkommen) das eintragen, was ihnen wichtig vorkommt.
>
> Gruß Martin
>
>
> ___
> Talk-de mailing list
> Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
>
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-cl] Reunión de Voluntarios OSM Chile - Junio de 2018

[Julio Costa Zambelli]

Hola Cristian,

Como dice Ignacio puedes convertir a GPX (Por ejemplo, con un sitio como
https://mygeodata.cloud/converter/shp-to-gpx).

Otra opción es convertir desde SHP a OSM usando ogr2osm (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ogr2osm) y luego abrir el archivo .OSM
usando JOSM. De todas maneras soy de la opinión de que es importante que un
humano revise el trabajo, en parte para cumplir con
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines y
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct.

Saludos,

Julio Costa Zambelli
Fundación OpenStreetMap Chile

julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl

https://www.openstreetmap.cl/
Cel: +56(9)89981083


On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 17:10, Cristian Alvarez Ocares 
wrote:

> Muchas gracias Ignacio, lo intentaré y te contare, crees que pueda hacer
> lo mismo con los limites de los parques?  y ultima consulta, como deberia
> etiquetar los senderos que existen pero  no estan  habilitados?
>
> Saludos
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:58 PM ignacio abé 
> wrote:
>
>> Hola Cristián
>>
>> El modo más fácil que conozco es tranformar los senderos a GPX y subirlos
>> al editor ID o a JOSM. Esto se puede hacer con QGIS, o quizás con alguna
>> otra página web.
>>
>> Con ID, simplemente arrastras el archivo GPX al editor y luego dibujas
>> encima, ya que no se pueden importar los vectores directo. Si necesitas
>> algo de ayuda con las conversiones me avisas.
>>
>> Saludos
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> *Ignacio AbéArquitecto+ 56 9 82895523*
>>
>>
>> El vie., 19 de jul. de 2019 a la(s) 17:35, Cristian Alvarez Ocares (
>> cristal...@gmail.com) escribió:
>>
>>> Estimados, tengo los shapes actualizados de todos las Areas Silvestres
>>> Protegidas de la Región de Los Ríos, como tambien toda la red de senderos
>>> incluyendo los contruidos el 2018-2019, alguien podría ayudarme a subirlos
>>> a la plataforma OSM por favor.
>>>
>>> Saludos
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:21 AM Julio Costa Zambelli <
>>> julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl> wrote:
>>>
 Hola Msilikale,

 Intentaremos hacer streaming como en la última reunión.

 Saludos,

 Julio Costa Zambelli
 Fundación OpenStreetMap Chile

 julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl

 https://www.openstreetmap.cl/
 Cel: +56(9)89981083


 On Fri, 25 May 2018 at 13:57, Msilikale Msilanga <
 msilikalemsila...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Listo, Yo participaré en la distancia. No estoy seguro si eso está
> permitido. Soy de Tanzania pero trabajo en Finlandia ahora. Avísame si 
> será
> posible.
>
> Saludos,
>
> Msilikale
>
> On 25 May 2018, at 8:52 PM, Julio Costa Zambelli <
> julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl> wrote:
>
> Estimados,
>
> El sábado 2 de Junio realizaremos la Reunión de Voluntarios de
> OpenStreetMap Chile - Junio de 2018 en Santiago. Inscripciones en:
> https://goo.gl/forms/jnHFMEVzVL7IXQHv1
>
> ¡Gracias a Continuum por recibirnos!
>
> Saludos,
>
> Julio Costa Zambelli
> Fundación OpenStreetMap Chile
>
> julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.cl/
> Cel: +56(9)89981083
>
> ___
> Talk-cl mailing list
> Talk-cl@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl
>
>
> ___
 Talk-cl mailing list
 Talk-cl@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl

>>> ___
>>> Talk-cl mailing list
>>> Talk-cl@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl
>>>
>>
___
Talk-cl mailing list
Talk-cl@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 469,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12246/

Enjoy! 

Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in 
to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about 
how to write a post here: 
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm 

weeklyOSM? 
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-br] semanárioOSM Nº 469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[theweekly . osm]

Bom dia,

O semanárioOSM Nº 469, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, 
está publicado *em português* : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/12246/

Aproveite!

Você sabia que também pode enviar mensagens para o OSM semanal/semanárioOSMſ 
sem ser membro? Basta fazer login em https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login com 
sua conta OSM e usar a conta de convidado. Leia mais sobre como escrever um 
post aqui: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm

semanarioOSM? 
Quem?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
Onde?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 469,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12246/

Enjoy! 

Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in 
to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about 
how to write a post here: 
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm 

weeklyOSM? 
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[OSM-talk-ie] weeklyOSM #469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 469,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12246/

Enjoy! 

Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in 
to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about 
how to write a post here: 
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm 

weeklyOSM? 
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 469,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12246/

Enjoy! 

Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in 
to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about 
how to write a post here: 
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm 

weeklyOSM? 
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 469,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12246/

Enjoy! 

Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in 
to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about 
how to write a post here: 
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm 

weeklyOSM? 
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 469,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12246/

Enjoy! 

Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in 
to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about 
how to write a post here: 
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm 

weeklyOSM? 
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-africa] weeklyOSM #469 2019-07-09-2019-07-15

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 469,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12246/

Enjoy! 

Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in 
to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about 
how to write a post here: 
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm 

weeklyOSM? 
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-africa mailing list
Talk-africa@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-africa

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] simples pictogrammes vélo, pas de voies dédiées [était: Uniformiser le wiki "Bicycle"]

[Axel Listes]

Le 21/07/2019 à 12:14, althio a écrit :
> J'imagine que S1 est la configuration qui représente bien la
> situation

En fait, les pictogrammes c'est juste de l’esthétique, ce qui fait foi
ce sont les panneaux verticaux.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d5/Cycle_contraflow_Rennes_2.jpg

Donc logiquement oui il s'agit bien du cas S1.

-- 

Tu utilises un service GAFAM ? Tu migres quand pour me protéger ?

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Wochennotiz Nr. 469 09.07.2019–15.07.2019

[Wochennotizteam]

Hallo,

die Wochennotiz Nr. 469 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der
OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da:

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2019/07/wochennotiz-nr-469/

Wusstet ihr, dass ihr auch selbst Meldungen für die Wochennotiz
einreichen könnt, ohne Mitglied zu sein?  Einfach auf
https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login mit eurem OSM-Benutzerkonto
anmelden und dann den Gastzugang benutzen.

Viel Spaß beim Lesen

Euer Wochennotizteam
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Retrouver facilement le changeset ayant supprimé un objet

[Brice MALLET]

Le 18/07/2019 à 22:32, marc marc a écrit :

Le 18.07.19 à 19:31, Brice MALLET a écrit :

Comment retrouver, *facilement*, le changeset qui a supprimé cette
polyligne ?


Merci pour les différentes réponses, il faut croire que ce bâtiment 
n'avait pas été importé


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [talk-cz] Vysychající potoky

[jzvc via talk-cz]

A labe v Usti tak oznacit nebo ne? Da se 20cm jeste oznacit za reku? ;D

Ona totiz pomerne velka spousta tech "nevysychajicich" toku je udrzovana 
umele. Nebyt vsemoznych hrazi/jezu a prehrad, tak tam casto netece vubec 
nic.


Jinak bych rek, ze drtiva vetsina naimportovanych vodnich toku, 
predevsim tech bez nazvu, je po drtivou vetsinu roku jen prazdnym korytem.


Dne 19.7.2019 v 12:04 Miroslav Suchy napsal(a):

Chtěl bych otevřít téma vysychajícíh toků - zejména potoků.

V českým mapách na značení vysychajících toků nejsme rozhodně zvyklí, ale jak 
jste si asi sami všimli, tak hodně -
zejména malých potoků - přes léto vysychá.

Pokud na nějaký takový potok narazíte, tak ho prosím označte

intermittent=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent

Je otázkou, co už označit jako vysychající. Osobně tak značím části toku, kde 
už několik sezón po sobě - tj. alespoň dva
roky - neteče souvislý proud vody. Tj. i když tam jsou občas kaluže nebo tůňky, 
i když je půda vlká. Ale není vidět
souvislý proud vody.

Mirek

___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz




___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[OSM-talk-fr] simples pictogrammes vélo, pas de voies dédiées [était: Uniformiser le wiki "Bicycle"]

[althio]

Phyks  :
> Je viens de refaire une passe sur la page FR:Bicycle et ma proposition
> actuelle (avec les diffs visibles dans l'historique de la page) est sur
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Phyks/FR:Bicycle
>
> J'ai tenté d'harmoniser les descriptions entre elles et avec la version
> anglaise.

Bonjour et merci pour le boulot de documentation et harmonisation.

J'ai une question sur une configuration : Sens unique, double-sens
cyclable, simples marquages avec pictogrammes des 2 côtés, mais pas
ligne pour voies dédiées.

Qu'est-ce qui s'applique ?

left:
Double-sens cyclable, dont une bande côté gauche de la route dans le
sens opposé uniquement. (= M3a)
Mais pas de voie dédiée, de simples marquages ou/et panneaux de
signalisations. (= S1)
right:
Bande cyclable du côté droit dans le sens de circulation générale. (= M1/M2a)
Mais pas de voie dédiée, de simples marquages ou/et panneaux de
signalisations. (= S1)

M1 : highway=* + oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no + cycleway:both=lane
M2a : highway=* + oneway=yes + cycleway:right=lane
M3a : highway=* + oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no + cycleway:left=lane
+ cycleway:left:oneway=-1
S1 : highway=* + oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no

J'imagine que S1 est la configuration qui représente bien la
situation, mais il semble possible aussi d'utiliser d'autres clefs :
"La clef cycleway:lane=* permet de préciser si la bande cyclable est
matérialisée par une ligne continue ou discontinue, ou de simples
pictogrammes."
Et là je découvre une autre page Key:cycleway:lane, avec des clefs
jamais utilisées dans le tableau de FR:Bicycle :
cycleway=shared_lane + cycleway:lane=pictogram

Alors, est-ce que ça serait correct de préciser :
S1 : highway=* + oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no + ...
et pictogrammes : ... + cycleway:both=shared_lane + cycleway:lane=pictogram

Est-ce que ça vaut le coup d'ajouter ce genre de configurations dans
le tableau, déjà long mais bien pratique, de FR:Bicycle ?

-- althio

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Sotm Heidelberg : on y va ensemble ?

[Liozone]

Oui merci pour le rappel !

Je suis inscrit.

Bonne journée

liozone

Le 19/07/2019 à 11:23, Christine Karch a écrit :

Bonjour,

le moment il y a "Early Bird" chez SotM. Vous pouvez acheter les tickets
pour la communauté à EUR 75. Le prix régulier pour la communauté est EUR
120. Early Bird va se terminer le 21 juillet.

Christine

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-es] Añadir capa con trazado del metro, cercanías y metro ligero de Madrid, España

[Cyttorak]

Otra cosa,
En google maps hacen que las lineas de cercanías no se superpongan, de
manera que se ven todas bien.
¿hay alguna manera de hacer eso automáticamente?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:29 PM Cyttorak  wrote:

> Genial, cada vez más cerca (pego abajo mi código)
>
> Ahora el problema es que como en algunos tramos del cercanías pasan varias
> lineas no se como que color ponerle :P
> También veo que si deshaces zoom llega un momento que algunas lineas
> parecen discontinuas, es decir, desaparecen trozos, ¿por que puede ser esto?
> Lo otro que tengo pendiente es quedarme solo con un trayecto (no necesito
> que marque el camino de ida y vuelta cuando estos son paralelos).
>
> [out:json][timeout:25];
> // gather results
> area["ISO3166-2"="ES-MD"]->.a;
> relation["type"="route"]["route"="subway"]["network"="Metro de
> Madrid"](area.a);
>   way(r);
>   way._["railway"="subway"];
>   out body geom;
> relation["type"="route"]["route"="subway"]["network"="Metro de
> Madrid"](area.a);
>   node(r);
>   node._["public_transport"="stop_position"];
>   out body geom;
> relation["type"="route"]["route"="train"]["network"="Cercanías de
> Madrid"](area.a);
>   way(r);
>   way._["railway"="rail"];
>   out body geom;
> relation["type"="route"]["route"="train"]["network"="Cercanías de
> Madrid"](area.a);
>   way(r);
>   node._["public_transport"="stop_position"];
>   out body geom;
> relation["type"="route"]["route"="light_rail"]["network"="Metro Ligero de
> Madrid"](area.a);
>   way(r);
>   way._["railway"="light_rail"];
>   out body geom;
> relation["type"="route"]["route"="light_rail"]["network"="Metro Ligero de
> Madrid"](area.a);
>   way(r);
>   node._["public_transport"="stop_position"];
>   out body geom;
> {{style:
> node[public_transport=stop_position]{
>   symbol-size: 2;
> }
>
> way[ref=L1]{
>   color:#30a3dc;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L2]{
>   color:#cd031f;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L3]{
>   color:#ffe114;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L4]{
>   color:#944248;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L5]{
>   color:#96bf0d;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L6]{
>   color:#9fa4a6;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L7]{
>   color:#faa64a;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L8]{
>   color:#f27ca2;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L9]{
>   color:#a3228d;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L10]{
>   color:#084594;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
> way[ref=L11]{
>   color:#008b43;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[ref=L12]{
>   color:#a49a00;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
>
> way[name=C-1]{
>   color:#66aede;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-2]{
>   color:#008a29;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-3]{
>   color:#d3187d;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-4]{
>   color:#002d9a;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-5]{
>   color: #fab700;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-7]{
>   color:#d8001d;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-8]{
>   color:#d8001d;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-9]{
>   color:#f85900;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=C-10]{
>   color:#8fbe00;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
>
> way[name=ML1]{
>   color:#3a7dda;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=ML2]{
>   color:#a60084;
>   opacity:1;
> }
> way[name=ML3]{
>   color:#ed1c24;
>   opacity:1;
> }
>
>
> way:placeholder {
>   fill-opacity:0;
>   opacity:0;
> }
>
>  }}
>
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

[Talk-at] Weiterer Sockenpuppenaccount durch "Problemuser"

[gppes_osm]

Hallo,

im Forum taucht jetzt ein weiterer Sockenpuppenaccount des aktuellen 
Import-Problemusers auf:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66865

Name: "beautifulplaces"

Leute, es wird ohne eine Sperre (wie schon vorgeschlagen: drei Monate 
"Sommerpause") nicht gehen! Ich bin wirklich satt!

Lg, Gppes

___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at