Re: [talk-ph] Metro Manila Postcodes Map

2022-04-13 Per discussione Ian Lopez via talk-ph
Jim,
There are queries that I used at some points in the past to retrieve postal 
codes in selected parts of Metro Manila, particularly Manila[0], Makati[1], 
Pasig[2] and Muntinlupa[3], that can be used in Overpass Turbo[4]. The queries 
can be modified to other parts of Metro Manila or Metro Manila itself. If you 
need assistance, please let me know as soon as you can.
[0] https://gist.github.com/ianlopez1115/a00b5bf4be4ada423b39835210c39b9c[1] 
https://gist.github.com/ianlopez1115/7a0b7392147bd00a907718ac0b166f3c[2] 
https://gist.github.com/ianlopez1115/9591bf857feecddc253109bbaa1b4b36[3] 
https://gist.github.com/ianlopez1115/df206b59472e2f8416de1af5705903c5[4] 
https://overpass-turbo.eu
-
 OpenStreetMap/Twitter/Telegram: ianlopez1115
Facebook/Messenger: ian.lopez 

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022, 02:17:26 PM GMT+8, Jim Morgan 
 wrote:  
 
 
Quick question: Does anyone know of the existence of a map of the postcodes of 
Metro Manila, showing their boundaries?

Either a pre-existing one in image form, or a method of querying OSM or some 
other database-driven map to get it. Or any other suggestions welcome.

My googling hasn't turned up anything yet.

Jim

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] DPWH bridge data attributes

2021-10-11 Per discussione Ian Lopez via talk-ph
I have no objections with adding data in connection to this request, but it 
would be helpful if the last checked date (date of most recent inspection or 
survey by DPWH and/or its contractors) is present in the DPWH bridge inventory. 
Nonetheless, I'm hopeful that the request will be fulfilled and that the data 
will be released in due time.
Regards,
Ian Lopez
-
 OpenStreetMap/Twitter/Telegram: ianlopez1115
Facebook/Messenger: ian.lopez 

On Monday, October 11, 2021, 09:41:48 AM GMT+8, Erwin Olario 
 wrote:  
 
 This is a re-post [0] of a query I made in the OSMph Telegram channel.

I made an FOI request [1] from DPWH re their bridge inventory on behalf of the 
local community. They have additional requirements  (i.e. writing in "official 
letterhead", etc) but before I proceed, I'd like to know if there are any 
objections or concerns about this request from this channel. 
Depending on the quality of the data and if we get the permission to use the 
dataset,  it may be used to validate the information already in OSM, or 
conflate additional attributes not yet in OSM.
/Erwin

[0]: https://t.me/OSMph/20310[1] 
https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHgsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEURQV0gtMjM2NjM0MzM2MjA4DA

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - » email: er...@ngnuity.xyz » mobile: 
https://t.me/GOwin» OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 
81CE 3A93 D56B___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] OSMPH Wiki Pages Edit-a-thon

2021-02-10 Per discussione Ian Lopez via talk-ph
Hello and good evening to all. The OpenStreetMap Philippines community will 
hold a mini edit-a-thon on Saturday (February 13, 2021) from 1 PM [1] to 5 PM 
[2].
The edit-a-thon aims to add and/or update the documentation of activities plus 
other undertakings of the OpenStreetMap Philippines community in the 
OpenStreetMap Wiki.
Participants are encouraged to read and review the "Editing the OpenStreetMap 
Wiki" module [3] and the OpenStreetMap Wiki Guidelines [4] prior to the 
edit-a-thon. Please take note that the activity is limited to OSM contributors. 
However, the post-event documentation will be made available in the community's 
local channels such as but not limited to the OpenStreetMap Philippines mailing 
list, the OpenStreetMap Philippines Facebook page and other platforms. For 
comments and queries, please feel free to contact the OSM PH Wiki Pages 
Edit-a-thon Telegram group [5] or by replying to this email.
[1] 
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210213T05=145=tz_et=136[2]
 
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210213T09=145=tz_et=136[3]
 
http://docs.inasafe.org/en/training/old-training/intermediate/osm/306-editing-wiki-osm.html[4]
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wiki_guidelines[5] 
https://t.me/osmphwikipages - link is temporary and may be revoked after the 
event
-
 
OpenStreetMap/Twitter/Telegram: ianlopez1115
Facebook/Messenger: ian.lopez
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Suggesting removing names from expressway ramps (but keep on junction nodes)

2019-11-05 Per discussione Ian Lopez via talk-ph
I personally prefer to retain exit/interchange names from expressway ramps but 
I have no problem with moving such names to motorway junctions.

Aside: Are we the only country that has exit/interchange names on expressway 
ramps?

Regards,

Ian Lopez

-
Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com/
OpenStreetMap/Twitter: ianlopez1115
Facebook: ian.lopez 

On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 6:40:22 AM GMT+8, Jherome Miguel 
 wrote:  
 
 I am suggesting removing exit/interchange names from expressway ramps 
(highway=motorway_link), so that the underlying destination info can be used 
for routing, while the common exit name (without the "Exit/Interchange" suffix) 
will be retained in the exit location node (highway=motorway_junction). This 
mapping will allow retaining the exit name on the map (as with the norm in the 
Philippines), while allowing destination info to be used for the router. 
Do anyone are okay about this? Further questions or 
comments?___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] Review of GlobalLogic edits in the Philippines

2019-01-03 Per discussione Ian Lopez
Hello and happy New Year to all.

In the wake of issues between OpenStreetMap contributors in Thailand and 
editors from GlobalLogic [1] I've decided to review a selection of edits in the 
Philippines done by the GlobalLogic team over the past 12 months.

As soon as I started my review, I immediately spotted at least one iffy 
changeset [2] which deleted all roads in Carnasa/Carnaza Island in northern 
Cebu. The said changeset was reverted afterwards [3]. In addition, I saw a bad 
practice, which is deleting and re-creating a feature, as what happened to the 
area around the Magellan Shrine in Lapu-Lapu City [4]. However, not all edits 
are destructive as new roads were added in places such as Pampanga [5]

>From what I've seen so far, there is a common theme among GlobalLogic edits, 
>such as addition, reclassification and modification of streets. In fact, most 
>of the edits revolve around highway data.

For those interested in reviewing the edits made by the GlobalLogic team, I 
left a link at the bottom of this email [6].

[1] as documented in 
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s4/client/snv?noteGuid=9b42fabf-eed1-4e60-a576-894d8cb4d635¬eKey=048c3a2daac0289b=https://www.evernote.com/shard/s4/sh/9b42fabf-eed1-4e60-a576-894d8cb4d635/048c3a2daac0289b=Response%2Bto%2BGrab%2527s%2BResponse%2Bon%2BOSM
[2] see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65332385, visualization at 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65332385
[3] see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65913856, visualization at 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65913856. Prior to the deletion, an 
editor from the GlobalLogic team added roads in the island 
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64226169, visualization at 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=64226169)
[4] see 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=59139193=18=10.31114=124.01558=B00TTTFT
 for visualization
[5] see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62328028, visualization at 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=62328028[6] see 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/filters?aoi=ffa1c52a-9020-4bd1-8d20-6cbb70bcd5be, URL 
only works when logged in to an existing OpenStreetMap account 
-Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com/
OpenStreetMap/Twitter: ianlopez1115
Facebook: ian.lopez
 ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] How to tag Subdivisions - Villages ?

2009-10-23 Per discussione ian lopez
I basically tag notable (read: large to extremely large) subdivisions and 
villages as place=hamlet. If they don't meet the criteria, 
landuse=residential. Remember that place=village is mostly used for barangays.

--- On Sat, 10/24/09, Totor totor_...@yahoo.com wrote:

From: Totor totor_...@yahoo.com
Subject: [talk-ph] How to tag Subdivisions - Villages ?
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 9:50 AM

Hi everybody,

I'm not really happy with my Subdivision name tags in Cebu City.

I'm currently using place=suburb wich seems the smallest city sub-division.
The name already appears on low zoom levels and will
 clutter the map. 
(The name appears on the map like barangays, 
making it difficult to differentiate both.)

http://osm.org/go/4tRHqMU--

The lower sub-division of cities would be a locality, 
but this is for An unpopulated, named place. 
It doesn't seem much used also.

I used to map Subdivisions as  place=subdivision. 
A tag that seems to be used in the Philippines ;

http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Philippines/En/keystats_place.html

Unfortunately this is not part of the official tags, 
and then the name never appears on any map

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/255051865


Any ideas or suggestions? How do you tag (private)
 subdivisions?


Regards,

Totor


      


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] Postponing the mapping party

2009-10-05 Per discussione ian lopez
Since the recent storms, I felt that the mapping party should be postponed to a 
latter date, preferably between November 2009 and January 2010. Some of our 
OSMers should need more time to recover from the damage that Ondoy and Peping 
brought to our shores.

Weekends for November 2009 - January 2010 (Friday-Sunday)

November: 6-8; 13-15; 20-22; 27-29
December: 4-6;11-13; 18-20; 25-27
January: 1-3; 8-10; 15-17; 22-24; 29-31

(Note: December 25-27 and January 1-3 are not recommended for a mapping party, 
since those days are holiday weekends)



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Postponing the mapping party

2009-10-05 Per discussione ian lopez
I haven't been there since May. Speaking of Laguna Lake (or places near it), 
Santa Cruz, Laguna is underwater as of the moment. I presume that Hsing is okay.

--- On Mon, 10/5/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Postponing the mapping party
To: ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com
Cc: OSM-PH talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 4:34 PM

In the meantime, please update roads around Laguna Lake.  FYI, some
people are now adding more problem reports in the disaster reporting
webmap:

http://osb.maps.jsintl.org/osb-cgi/getRSSfeed?b=14.27692t=14.89492l=120.71024r=121.36599


On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM, ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Since the recent storms, I felt that the mapping party should be postponed to 
 a latter date, preferably between November 2009 and January 2010. Some of our 
 OSMers should need more time to recover from the damage that Ondoy and Peping 
 brought to our shores.

 Weekends for November 2009 - January 2010 (Friday-Sunday)

 November: 6-8; 13-15; 20-22; 27-29
 December: 4-6;11-13; 18-20; 25-27
 January: 1-3; 8-10; 15-17; 22-24; 29-31

 (Note: December 25-27 and January 1-3
 are not recommended for a mapping party, since those days are holiday weekends)


 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph




--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Tropical Storm Ondoy: are you guys ok?

2009-09-26 Per discussione ian lopez
Maybe we should do something - probably re-activate the Humanitarian OSM Team. 
Also, I realized that GMANews.TV used Google Maps for their interactive map, 
supposedly showing the location of areas that have persons trapped in the 
flood. It also has an accompanying description of such locations and that is AN 
EPIC FAIL, to quote some humor site.

What could we learn from this? Aside from the obvious, maybe we should add more 
housenumbers. And teach our media not to use a FAIL map, to quote a twitter 
update. Let's just hope that Maning, Ed, and the rest are OK.

--- On Sun,
 9/27/09, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
Subject: [talk-ph] Tropical Storm Ondoy: are you guys ok?
To: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 1:10 AM

Maning, Ed, Rally and others in Marikina, Pasig, Cainta, etc. are you guys ok?



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?

2009-09-25 Per discussione ian lopez
I'm not available on October 10 (since I have a commitment on that date), 24 
and 25 (another commitment).

Suggestions for mapping: We could join a Carlos Celdran tour, or map one or two 
cemeteries within Metro Manila that are known for the sites where some notable 
people are/were buried.

Just to go a bit closer to the edge, some of us could map some roads under 
construction. Especially those that could help decongest Metro Manila. The pro 
side of it is that this could enhance our coverage and beat other online and 
dead tree maps in terms of coverage for the said road. The con side of it is 
that we might end up trespassing, and possibly put some of our lives at risk.

--- On Fri, 9/25/09, Nacario Neil nbnaca...@yahoo.com wrote:

From: Nacario Neil
 nbnaca...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?
To: OSM-PH talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Friday, September 25, 2009, 9:25 PM

I also prefer saturdays.

From: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
To: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Cc: OSM-PH talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Sent:
 Friday, September 25, 2009 8:56:20 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?


I'm good with Oct 10, 17 and 24. I prefer Saturdays. :-)

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:33 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com 
wrote:

October weekends

4

11

18

25



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?

2009-09-19 Per discussione ian lopez
The roads in Ortigas Center core area are complete. The only thing
missing are the details in the service roads of Shangri-la Plaza Mall
and Edsa Shangri-la Hotel. What is needed are buildings just like what
Neil did with the Makati CBD.

That was my point. And we don't have The Podium (as a building way; see 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.58658lon=121.05978zoom=17layers=B000FTF 
)

The roads in Filinvest Corporate City is pretty up-to-date. The only
major area not covered is the Palms Pointe subdivision, which is
understandable
because it is private (but I haven't tried going in).

At least have a road stub for its entrance/s, then access=private on the road/s 
within that area. Maybe one of us can try taking aerial images through flying 
RC helicopters
with cameras (or with baloons or small blimps) without having to go through 
gates, barriers and entrances (and denying our access through those areas).



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] please revert this user's edit (Re: Fwd: [OSM-talk] RR8 - Possible International Vandal(assistance required in various countries))

2009-09-18 Per discussione ian lopez
Regarding cleaning up and/or removing some tainted data, it could be a tricky 
one. I did some cleanup in Ashton Fields in Calamba (and 

added landuse and a road stub for future reference); Ponte Verde near the STAR 
tollway interchange in Santo Tomas (where there used to 

be some edits from maning); most of downtown Tiaong and the nearby market area 
(which can be recovered by making an actual GPS 

trace in the area, more if necessary); Dolores, Quezon (where I could go and 
make some GPS traces, if my schedule isn't that busy); and the 

Avida residences in the Tayabas/Lucena boundary area (someone had previously 
made an edit over the area). I also made some cleanup 

in the Bicol area - along the stretch of the Pan-Philippine Highway 
(specifically in Naga City, where it is hard to edit when using the online 

editor - epecially if one's computer is very slow and 8 years old and above), 
and some places in Albay.

The problem with some of Anthony's edits is that they have too many nodes in a 
certain way, which is probably bad for routing. The problem 

with some of Deck's edits is that some of the edits he made were probably done 
previously by other contributors (which is the other problem 

caused by some of Anthony's edits). If we are to activiate the revert script on 
those edits, madadamay ang ibang mga edits (other edits will 

be affected by it). For me, It would be best to retrace, remove or transfer 
tags, then delete the questionable nodes and ways, if there were 

some previous edits placed in that area, so that the older (and probably less 
tainted) edits will be there, although under a new node/way 

identification number.

BTW, we're lucky that we don't have to deal with people like RR8. Instead, all 
we need now is some understanding and consensus.



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?

2009-09-17 Per discussione ian lopez
We could try a simultaneous mapping party in Manila and in Davao (and possibly 
in some place within the Philippines) sometime between November of this year
and February of next year. Just a question: Was there an event that sounds like 
a simultaneous mapping party in multiple locations (possibly in the same area)
in the same day/week?

BTW, there are other spots with cloud cover and/or old data in Yahoo's 
Satellite Images:

* Teachers Village, some areas in North  East Triangle and Piñahan (since the 
images for the SM North EDSA-Trinoma-Eton Centris areas
are out of date since possibly the early to middle part of the 2000's), a spot 
somewhere in the PhilAm-West Triangle-Del Monte area,
Roxas District, Barangay Santol, some areas near New Manila, and some areas in 
the UP Campus-New Era-Culiat area in Quezon City
* Some areas in Sampaloc and Santa Mesa, BASECO in Manila
* Southern and central San Juan City (though most of the roads are already laid 
out, I believe that we might have missed some streets)
* The northern part of Ortigas Center (Barangay San Antonio) in Pasig City
* (possibly) the Filinvest Corporate City/Filincity area in Muntinlupa City

To be honest, I just hope that at least 12 or so experienced contributors 
will join the said mapping party, and share their experiences with each other 
(and possibly
with potential contributors).

--- On Thu, 9/17/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Time for another mapping party?
To: George Tujan gtu...@gmail.com
Cc: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 2:39 PM

venue for:
1. pre-mapping party lecture and demostration - need pc's or at least
a good internet connectivity
2. mapping party proper - good beer :)

any other ideas?

On 9/17/09, George Tujan gtu...@gmail.com wrote:
 @maning: the venue can also be the sponsor para isa na lang, and if you can
 have media converage mas ok :)


 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:59 AM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 When we have a date and place, is it OK if I try sending some sponsor
 request to people?
 What specific things do we need for the mapping party (food, fuel,
 venue)?


 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:31 AM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
  so I think it's time we
  do another one and I suggest that this time we do it in Metro Manila
  to
 get
  more participants. (And try to better the event management skills of
 the
  Davao pips when they did their Davao Mapping Party. ;-)
  Some things that worked for Davao:
  1. Enough time and announcement before the event.
  2. A separate tutorial session on how to map, before the event.
  3. Sponsors, banners, etc.
 
 
  While Metro Manila is covered by Yahoo! imagery, there are plenty of
 places
  where a virgin GPS survey is possible. Here are some places I can
 think
  of:
 
  1. Ortigas Home Depot and Metro Walk. The Yahoo! imagery here is
 outdated so
  this is a good spot to survey. The problem is that this spot is too
 small.
  But we could fill in the time with presentations if we were to target
  newbies.
 
  2. McKinley Hills in Taguig (near Bonifacio Global City). Yahoo!
 imagery is
  outdated too. Same concerns as above.
 
  3. Mandaluyong around Shaw Blvd. This area is covered by clouds in
 Yahoo! so
  GPS surveying is definitely needed.
 
  4. Combine all of the above as separate slices if the number of
 participants
  is high.
 
  Any other suggestions?



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Suggestion for unbarricaded one-way street corners

2009-09-16 Per discussione ian lopez
First, sorry for screwing up some edits that I made over the past month in 
Pampanga (since I was trying to add the Pan-Philipine Highway relation ( 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/115372 ) from the Dolores flyover 
[which you've mentioned earlier] to the Carredo area in Manila, and upgrading 
the stretch of MacArthur Highway to trunk from Dolores flyover (again) to 
somewhere in Valenzuela City). Second, you have to use the comments 

Anyway, regarding the unbarricaded street corners, editing it can be a bit 
tough. I'll try to find a way on what to in that situation (since I've almost 
never experienced that scenario).

--- On Wed, 9/16/09, Jun Martin jun.mar...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Jun Martin jun.mar...@gmail.com
Subject: [talk-ph] Suggestion for unbarricaded one-way street corners
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 12:25 PM

Hi, everyone!

I've noticed that the parts of McArthur Highway in the City of San
Fernando, Pampanga (in the vicinity of the Dolores Flyover) where the
highway is split into 2 one-way roads are not properly connected to the
side streets.  I've taken the liberty of connecting side streets to BOTH
one-way roads, where such is applicable (McArthur Highway for the most
part has no center island but has been divided in the middle in some
parts of the city).

At this time (September 2009, for future reference), EDSA is the rule
(or is it the exception?) where side-streets USUALLY are not connected
to both one-way sides, but some main avenues do cross both sides of EDSA
and are therefore connected to both.

Perhaps you know of ways that are similar to the portion of McArthur
Highway that I've mentioned above and you might be able to correct the
connections.

I noticed this issue because my Nuvi keeps telling me to turn right on
McArthur and then make a U-turn at some point (the opposite way is not
connected to our village's main road) because my route is to turn left
at McArthur outside our village.


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Suggestion for unbarricaded one-way street corners

2009-09-16 Per discussione ian lopez
Update: on the Second, you have to use the comments part, it should have been:
Second, you have to describe your changes that you've done
after closing a changeset. Some users do it, others don't.
However, it may be better for you to do it, so that you may not
be suspected of vandalisingdata vandalism.

--- On Wed, 9/16/09, ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com wrote:

From: ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Suggestion for unbarricaded one-way street corners
To: Jun Martin jun.mar...@gmail.com
Cc: OSM-PH talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 8:21 PM

First, sorry for screwing up some edits that I made over the past month in 
Pampanga (since I was trying to add the Pan-Philipine Highway relation ( 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/115372 ) from the Dolores flyover 
[which you've mentioned earlier] to the Carredo area in Manila, and upgrading 
the stretch of MacArthur Highway to trunk from Dolores flyover (again) to 
somewhere in Valenzuela City). Second, you have to use the comments 

Anyway, regarding the unbarricaded street corners, editing it can be a bit 
tough. I'll try to find a way on what to in that situation (since I've almost 
never experienced that scenario).

--- On Wed, 9/16/09, Jun Martin jun.mar...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Jun Martin
 jun.mar...@gmail.com
Subject: [talk-ph] Suggestion for unbarricaded one-way street corners
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 12:25 PM

Hi, everyone!

I've noticed that the parts of McArthur Highway in the City of San
Fernando, Pampanga (in the vicinity of the Dolores Flyover) where the
highway is split into 2 one-way roads are not properly connected to the
side streets.  I've taken the liberty of connecting side streets to BOTH
one-way roads, where such is applicable (McArthur Highway for the most
part has no center island but has been divided in the middle in some
parts of the city).

At this time (September 2009, for future reference), EDSA is the rule
(or is it the exception?) where side-streets USUALLY are not connected
to both one-way sides, but some main avenues do cross both sides of EDSA
and are therefore connected to
 both.

Perhaps you know of ways that are similar to the portion of McArthur
Highway that I've mentioned above and you might be able to correct the
connections.

I noticed this issue because my Nuvi keeps telling me to turn right on
McArthur and then make a U-turn at some point (the opposite way is not
connected to our village's main road) because my route is to turn left
at McArthur outside our village.


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  


  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] several variations of postcodes in osm-ph

2009-09-15 Per discussione ian lopez
Regarding the redundancy/coterminus ares issue: Makati City is notorious for 
having two or more postal codes within the some barangays (Bangkal - 1231, 
1233; Bel-Air - 1200, 1209, 1226, 1227; Forbes Park - 1219, 1220; Dasmariñas - 
1221, 1222; Magallanes - 1231, 1232; Pio del Pilar - 1200, 1230, 1231; San 
Antonio - 1200, 1203; San Lorenzo - 1200, 1223, 1224, 1226, 1228, 1229; 
Urdaneta - 1200, 1225, 1226), and some areas that are in different 
jurisdictions have the same postal code (Kaunlaran Village in Caloocan, Malabon 
and Navotas cities - 1409). Even worse, some barangays within Metro Manila 
don't have assigned postal codes (like some areas in Mandaluyong, San Juan and 
Pateros AFAIK)

addr:postcode is okay for nodes, but can we place postal_code=* for ways (like 
buildings and streets)? I don't mind if one street is within a single postal 
code (which makes it easy to add the postal_code tag), but for streets that 
pass through many postal codes, adding add=postcode in nearby nodes could be a 
good solution instead of dividing street ways, then adding separate postal_code 
tags (which I did when tagging postal codes on streets).

--- On Tue, 9/15/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] several variations of postcodes in osm-ph
To: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
Cc: osm-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 11:49 AM

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
 I suggest using addr:postcode exclusively.

 Zip codes in the Philippines is really meant to facilitate addressing and
 addr:postcode
 does that nicely.
+1 here


 Redundancy issue:
 The issue above (of which key to use to store zip codes) is separate from
 the issue of whether we should tag *all* POIs in a zip code area with the
 zip code or to just draw a zip code polygon around the POIs. (Note that
 practically all zip code areas are coterminous to administrative boundaries
 like barangays, cities, and municipalities anyway.)
When a new barangay is created, does Philpost create a new postcode as well?
[ping or buzz]  Rally

 On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

 Follow-up.

 the is_in:zip may came from data imports.

 OSM map features actually recommends two:
 addr:postcode -
 normally attached to an address node/way of a POI
 postal_code - same as above, but can be applied to streets as well

 On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  There are several key tag for philippine postcodes in the Philippines.
 
  addr:postcode
  postal_code
  is_in:zip
 
  Often, these postcodes is attached to a POI.  Can we standardize?  Any
  ideas?



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] PNR back on track

2009-07-17 Per discussione ian lopez
Yes, the PNR tracks from the Tutuban area to Alabang are on the map - however, 
the tracks are extended to a point between Valenzuela and Meycauayan in the 
north and somewhere between Tiaong and Candelaria (both in Quezon province) in 
the south. There are some stations added/edited between Tutuban and Alabang 
since a year ago, but I've managed to add two stations south of Alabang (Pacita 
Complex, San Pablo) during that time as well. Maybe we should map the entire 
PNR line up to Bicol (and link up with the lines added in Candelaria and 
Lucena ) if the entire line is completed within two years (my estimate).

BTW, the old PNR trains are/were still in operation until possibly the time of 
the reopening.

--- On Wed, 7/15/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,

INQ reported that the PNR is operational again with new trains (yellow
curtains) up to Alabang.  The Bicol route will soon operate by next
year (?).

Is it in the map already?



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] philippine speed limits

2009-06-26 Per discussione ian lopez
The said law is obsolete by my standards. However, some major roads post 
maxspeed limits. From what I know, NLEX has an 80 kilometer per hour speed 
limit but it probably tolerates anyone until the vehicle reaches 120 kph. 
(maxspeed:recommended=80; maxspeed:tolerable=120) SLEX, on the other hand, has 
a 60 kph speed limit from the Calamba exit up to the Alaska Milk area ( 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.36649lon=121.04392zoom=16layers=B000FTF 
). From that point up to the Nichols toll plaza, the limit is at 80 kph. Also, 
some stretches of the Pan-Philippine highway may have a 60 kph speed limit. 
Streets inside downtown areas probably have a 40 kph speed limit (and I doubt 
the fact that motorists traversing Jose Rizal Avenue in San Pablo are following 
the obsolete 10 kph limit.)

--- On Thu, 6/25/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: [talk-ph] philippine speed limits
To: osm-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:46 PM

In the absence of max_speed data in osmph roads, I'm looking at
putting default values for garmin gps routing.  The Philippine law is
not very helpful and is probably obsolete:
http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1964/ra_4136_1964.html

See
CHAPTER IV TRAFFIC RULES ARTICLE I
Speed Limit and Keeping to the Right

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] tagging distinctly Philippine POIs

2009-06-18 Per discussione ian lopez
you missed out one: shop=luxury_goods ( 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/420221231 and 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1560039 )

--- On Fri, 6/19/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] tagging distinctly Philippine POIs
To: osm-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Friday, June 19, 2009, 7:16 AM

Here are some POI tags we have for the Phil amenity and shop

shop:mall    105
shop:convenience    104
shop:supermarket    87
shop:bakery    39
shop:car    33
shop:hardware    20
shop:car_repair    18
shop:car_dealer    17
shop:bicycle    16
shop:department_store    8
shop:doityourself    8
shop:books    6
shop:outdoor    6
shop:beverages    5
shop:computer    4
shop:garden    3
shop:home_furnishing    3
shop:electronics    3
shop:florist    3
shop:airline_office    3
shop:repair_service    3
shop:butcher    3
shop:laundry    2
shop:uknown    2
shop:unknown    2
shop:stationery    2
shop:scuba    2
shop:antiques    1
shop:photo    1
shop:pasalubong    1
shop:tailor    1
shop:vulcanizing    1
shop:wet market    1
shop:wine    1
shop:printing    1
shop:public_building    1
shop:public_market    1
shop:shopping_centre    1
shop:SM    1
shop:Parco Supermarket    1
shop:antique    1
shop:Shoe_store    1
shop:Evergotesco mall    1
shop:Car Mechanics    1
shop:Mall    1
shop:Lapos;Air Boutique amp; Guesthouse    1
shop:office supplies    1
shop:lumber    1
shop:general    1
shop:mobile_phone    1
shop:marketplace    1
shop:business_services    1
shop:auto repair    1
shop:garden_centre    1
shop:elctronics    1
    
amenity:fuel    1159
amenity:school    958
amenity:place_of_worship    771
amenity:bank    565
amenity:public_building    499
amenity:restaurant    449
amenity:fast_food    333
amenity:hospital    272
amenity:parking    241
amenity:police    175
amenity:college    117
amenity:pharmacy    116
amenity:fire_station    96
amenity:bus_station    81
amenity:university    70
amenity:public_market    59
amenity:cafe    51
amenity:atm    44
amenity:pub    42
amenity:post_office    27
amenity:townhall    22
amenity:bureau_de_change    17
amenity:cinema    17
amenity:library    12
amenity:toilets    11
amenity:rescue    10
amenity:kindergarten    9
amenity:clinic    8
amenity:market    7
amenity:town_hall    6
amenity:prison    5
amenity:arts_centre    5
amenity:embassy    5
amenity:car_rental    5
amenity:studio    5
amenity:doctors    5
amenity:ferry_terminal    4
amenity:theatre    4
amenity:thetre    4
amenity:bicycle_parking    4
amenity:funeral_services    4
amenity:telephone    4
amenity:airline_office    4
amenity:grave_yard    3
amenity:preschool    3
amenity:fountain    3
amenity:Subdivision    3
amenity:biergarten    3
amenity:veterinary    3
amenity:nightclub    2
amenity:public building    2
amenity:tricycle_station    2
amenity:subdivision    2
amenity:swimming_pool    2
amenity:coffee_shop    2
amenity:bar    2
amenity:courthouse    2
amenity:dentist    2
amenity:bench    2
amenity:CheckPoint    2
amenity:Graveyard    2
amenity:Place of Worship    1
amenity:resort    1
amenity:v junction lhs    1
amenity:vegetable market    1
amenity:wrecker_service    1
amenity:retail    1
amenity:slaughterhouse    1
amenity:undefined    1
amenity:Petron Station    1
amenity:Municipal Building    1
amenity:Building    1
amenity:bank;atm    1
amenity:apartment    1
amenity:Residential Condo Units    1
amenity:Police station    1
amenity:Brgy Pag-asa Hall    1
amenity:Bar and Entertainment    1
amenity:Bakery    1
amenity:Metrobank Angono    1
amenity:Memorial Park    1
amenity:Lopez park    1
amenity:Cemetery    1
amenity:marketplace    1
amenity:lake    1
amenity:internet    1
amenity:drinking_water    1
amenity:post_box    1
amenity:pool    1
amenity:police station    1
amenity:petron Station    1
amenity:convenience_store    1
amenity:car_wash    1
amenity:beauty parlor    1
amenity:ice plant    1
amenity:hair salon    1
amenity:funeral    1
amenity:event_venue    1


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] editing admin boundaries of Marikina

2009-05-28 Per discussione ian lopez
You can document the progress of various boundary relations within Metro Manila 
by posting it here. So far, some boundary relations in Quezon City needs to be 
redone and the city limits between Quezon  Marikina cities are quite unclear 
(specifically between the Ateneo de Manila to Tumana/Nangka area, other areas 
are okay).



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] san pablo house numbers

2009-05-23 Per discussione ian lopez
I started adding housenumbers at the last week of March 2009. At that time, it 
was limited to my neighborhood. However, I added a few more housenumbers in 
some nearby residential areas (including a very open subdivision) over the past 
2+ months. 

I do not know which government entity/developer  assigns housenumbers here 
before, but starting in the early 2000's, the barangays are assigning the 
housenumbers (I got the housenumber info from roaming some streets). In some 
barangays, the Block X Lot Y schema was dropped in favor of the housenumbers. 
The problem is that on certain streets, you may see the same housenumbers 
assigned in different areas (though the certain areas are quite close to each 
other). The solution is that you create two (or more) relations, assign it to 
the apropriate housenumber ways/nodes and place notes. See 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/125011 and 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/141864 as examples.

The only problem for me adding housenumbers is that they are either obscured 
(one housenumber was covered with tape since the owner didn't like the assigned 
housenumber and prefered his/her old housenumber), hidden from public view, or 
the poor mapper roaming the streets may be suspected as a thief, just because 
he or she is looking at housenumber plates. 

Regardless of such fears and frustrations, I'm still pursuing the adoption of 
the Karlsruhe Schema within its city borders. As of now, it has covered at 
least four out of 80 Barangays.


--- On Fri, 5/22/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: [talk-ph] san pablo house numbers
To: osm-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 7:55 PM

and ianlopez started adding house numbers in San Pablo!
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.07678lon=121.32241zoom=17layers=B000FTF

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] Relations for LRT/MRT lines

2009-04-06 Per discussione ian lopez
Before, the ways representing the MRT3 are disconected due to the layers. 
Recently, I created a relation that connected the said train line.
My question: Can we apply this to LRT1  LRT2 (and possibly PNR lines in the 
near future)?



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Relations for LRT/MRT lines

2009-04-06 Per discussione ian lopez
Yes, that is the relation, and I chose blue based on the information here.

--- On Tue, 4/7/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Relations for LRT/MRT lines
To: ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com
Cc: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 11:37 AM

Is this the relation:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/109159
Tags:      
name = MRT3
route = light_rail
created_by = Potlatch 0.10f
operator = Metro Rail Transit Corporation
type = route
color = #FF

Why blue for color?

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM, ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Before, the ways representing the MRT3 are disconected due to the layers.
 Recently, I created a relation that connected the said train line.
 My question: Can we apply this to LRT1  LRT2 (and possibly PNR lines in the
 near future)?


 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph





-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Media Coverage

2009-01-18 Per discussione ian lopez
The media coverage may be good for the Pinoy OSM community, but I'm probably 
concerned that this would bring in vandals. Hopefully, it wouldn't happen.

--- On Mon, 1/19/09, Jim Morgan j...@datalude.com wrote:

From: Jim Morgan j...@datalude.com
Subject: [talk-ph] Media Coverage
To: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Monday, January 19, 2009, 10:05 AM

Hi All,

I recently contacted Chin Wong over at www.chinwong.com to tell him about OSM. 
I've previously communicated with him on some other issues. He liked 
Opensteetmap a lot and tells me he's going to write a column about it in 
http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/, appearing tomorrow. 

More OSM users on the way ... would be good if it gets picked up by some of the 
nationwide newspapers. 

Jim


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] Naga osm.png now Featured Picture on OSM Wiki

2009-01-16 Per discussione ian lopez
Recently, I saw this page and it is now a featured picture. We now have a 
reason to celebrate in ths time of year (and something to discuss in the 
upcoming meetup).



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] your osm workplan for 2009

2009-01-03 Per discussione ian lopez
Add this: Some (serious mainstream) media exposure (blogs and social networking 
also recommended, just to bring our message across), more volunteers, and a 
mapping party by summer 2009, since everyone's on vacation mode at that time.

--- On Sun, 1/4/09, Maning Sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Maning Sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: [talk-ph] your osm workplan for 2009
To: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Sunday, January 4, 2009, 12:23 AM

hi,

Happy new year to all. 2008 for osm philippines is so good, but that's
just so last year ;)

Any plans/goals for the next twelve months? Please share them here and
maybe we can get it properly outlined as one group.

Maning's plans for 2009 
* I want our efforts to be a
 little bit more organized.
* Declare certain areas as complete.
* A meetup for OSM Philippines.
* Map more, more, more areas


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] from ianlopez' diary: Sorry, Manila

2008-12-30 Per discussione ian lopez


--- On Tue, 12/30/08, Maning Sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Maning Sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] from ianlopez' diary: Sorry, Manila
To: osm-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2008, 9:25 PM

I think this is the permalink:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.5977lon=120.9924zoom=14layers=0B00FTF
===
Reply: Maybe I'm the only Pinoy OSMer online tonight. Hopefully it's fixed 
before the last full midnight of 2008 (12:01 AM, December 31, 2008)



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] QC administrative boundaries

2008-12-02 Per discussione ian lopez
One, There aren't that much border disputes in my area. And I'm notinterested 
in such things, nor am I able to solve them in any way.
Two, I'm referring to the Quezon City barangay borders, excuding those 
previously done.
And three, I do appreciate the complement.

--- On Tue, 12/2/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] QC administrative boundaries
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 5:42 PM

 May I just add, political/administrative boundaries in general in the
 Philippines is a thorny issue.  So I expect we will encounter virtual
 boundary disputes in the future.  

And may I suggest that you Pinoys settle the VIRTUAL boundary disputes with
VIRTUAL shotguns. EA Games and ID Soft offer nice selections ;)  (I'd even
join then :))


 Come to think of it, this could a
 good benchmark that Openstreetmap is now popular in the Philippines.

This brings me to an(other) off topic item I encountered yesterday:
Did you know that in the Philippines Firefox has almost the same market share
as IE!? (Both around 47 % according to Hitslink. World market share is much
lower for Firefox = ca 21%; while MS' IE is STILL 'owning' the web
with almost 70%).
I find this quite surprising, since usually MS rules emerging markets.
Exemptions are only some Eastern European countries and... well and the
Philippines  :)

Cheers

Soren
 ;)
 
 cheers,
 maning
 
 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:22 PM, maning sambale
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can you be more specific?  Is it off as a whole or just particular
areas?
 
  I suggest you use openstreetbugs for identifying
 errors,
  http://openstreetbugs.appspot.com/
 
  or correct them as you see it appropriate
 
  I already connected your west and south triangle boundaries to what I
added.
 
  keep on mapping,
  maning
 
  PS.  Thank you for updating the city status in the wiki as well.
 
  On 12/2/08, ian lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I believe that the borders are a bit off the mark. Also, I did
West Triangle
  and South Triangle in just days ago. I'm also doing the same
in Manila, but
  this is for the districts (Malate, Santa Ana, etc.).
 
  --- On Tue, 12/2/08, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  From: maning sambale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [talk-ph] QC
 administrative boundaries
  To: talk-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
  Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 10:29 AM
 
  Hi,
 
  Added QC barangay administrative boundaries.
  tag:
  boundary=administrative
  admin_level=9
 
  Also removed the word Brgy. in all barangay names I
personally
  added.
 
  Please correct as necessary.
 
  cheers,
  maning
 
 
  --
 
|-|--|
  | __.-._  |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one
great. -Yoda
  |
  | '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical
idea of
  all
 -N.Branden|
  |  /'.-c  |Linux registered user #402901,
http://counter.li.org/ |
  |  |  /T  |http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ |
  | _)_/L I http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ |
 
|-|--|
 
  ___
  talk-ph mailing list
  talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
 
|-|--|
  | __.-._  |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great.
-Yoda |
  | '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical idea
of all -N.Branden|
  |  /'.-c  |Linux registered user
 #402901, http://counter.li.org/ 
   |
  |  |  /T  |http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ |
  | _)_/L I http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ |
 
|-|--|
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 |-|--|
 | __.-._  |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great. -Yoda
|
 | '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical idea of
all -N.Branden|
 |  /'.-c  |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ |
 |  |  /T  |http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ |
 | _)_/L I http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ |
 |-|--|
 
 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org

 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 



___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph