Re: [talk-ph] Icons on POI's - Proposal
Another thought, which I think is best, is to symbolize the 2/7 in the top left corner of the actual icon, hard code to look just for this 24/7 so it will fit. Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.com wrote: We can display it as part of the text ie: Mercury Drug 24/7 or add another graphic on top of he icon, like a clock or similar. I think the text is better as it it unambiguous but am open to whatever everyone wants Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Eugene, while we are discussing this, is it worth displaying the opening hours as part of the poi description if it is in the database?? It is kind of relevant to people who look at a map .. Thoughts? Yes. The opening hours is useful to users. But I have to say that this data is quite low on the priority of (at least) local OSM mappers. In OSM, it's more important to know where a store is than knowing if it is open or not. That said, the special value of opening_hours=24/7 is definitely very, very useful and I would suggest that this be shown on the map somehow. For example, knowing where the 24-hour Mercury Drug stores are is very useful. ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Tagging on OSMPH
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.com wrote: I also have a question about places:ph, there are a LOT in the database, I guess they are implemented with other tags, is there a definitive list of what the other tags are? Seem like Barangays mostly, but possibly some other places? Taginfo to the rescue! http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/place%3Aph#values Based on Taginfo, 95% of the values of the place:ph=* tag is barangay with a total of number of 1,300. This is actually quite low. There are almost 42,000 barangays in the Philippines. The other values are purok and sitio (which are unofficial subunits of a barangay) and a few other values that I think are wrong uses of the tag. To answer the other question, I think the intention of the place:ph=* tag is to definitely indicate that a node tagged as place=village refers specifically to an official barangay instead of some other village such as residential subdivisions and gated communities (which should really be tagged with place=neighbourhood) Personally, I would like to use the international designation=* tag to indicate that a place is an official barangay instead of using a Philippine-specific tag like place:ph=*. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation Thus, my personal preference is place=village, designation=barangay instead of place=village, place:ph=barangay. ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Tagging on OSMPH
I have not been using taginfo because it returns for the whole world, but in this case it works because this tag is only used in the philippines, good one. Thanks eugene Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.com wrote: I also have a question about places:ph, there are a LOT in the database, I guess they are implemented with other tags, is there a definitive list of what the other tags are? Seem like Barangays mostly, but possibly some other places? Taginfo to the rescue! http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/place%3Aph#values Based on Taginfo, 95% of the values of the place:ph=* tag is barangay with a total of number of 1,300. This is actually quite low. There are almost 42,000 barangays in the Philippines. The other values are purok and sitio (which are unofficial subunits of a barangay) and a few other values that I think are wrong uses of the tag. ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Tagging on OSMPH
Ok, I will check for both instances then, Actually, the colon ': in the tag name can confuse a database in some circumstances, if anyone is messing with this themselves, you have to denote the column header as place:ph with double quotes Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.comwrote: I also have a question about places:ph, there are a LOT in the database, I guess they are implemented with other tags, is there a definitive list of what the other tags are? Seem like Barangays mostly, but possibly some other places? Taginfo to the rescue! http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/place%3Aph#values Based on Taginfo, 95% of the values of the place:ph=* tag is barangay with a total of number of 1,300. This is actually quite low. There are almost 42,000 barangays in the Philippines. The other values are purok and sitio (which are unofficial subunits of a barangay) and a few other values that I think are wrong uses of the tag. To answer the other question, I think the intention of the place:ph=* tag is to definitely indicate that a node tagged as place=village refers specifically to an official barangay instead of some other village such as residential subdivisions and gated communities (which should really be tagged with place=neighbourhood) Personally, I would like to use the international designation=* tag to indicate that a place is an official barangay instead of using a Philippine-specific tag like place:ph=*. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation Thus, my personal preference is place=village, designation=barangay instead of place=village, place:ph=barangay. ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Tagging on OSMPH
Interestingly enough, in the ways/relations, there are 3774 items marked at boundary=administrative, admin_level=10 (barangay) Here is a count of the Other Admin_Levels out of interest in the ways/relations Admin_Level=Count 8=69 9=183 36=16 2=183 5=13 3=1179 7=221 4=2182 6=1352 admin=1 10=3778 12=16 Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I will check for both instances then, Actually, the colon ': in the tag name can confuse a database in some circumstances, if anyone is messing with this themselves, you have to denote the column header as place:ph with double quotes Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open StreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Cupitt markcup...@gmail.comwrote: I also have a question about places:ph, there are a LOT in the database, I guess they are implemented with other tags, is there a definitive list of what the other tags are? Seem like Barangays mostly, but possibly some other places? Taginfo to the rescue! http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/place%3Aph#values Based on Taginfo, 95% of the values of the place:ph=* tag is barangay with a total of number of 1,300. This is actually quite low. There are almost 42,000 barangays in the Philippines. The other values are purok and sitio (which are unofficial subunits of a barangay) and a few other values that I think are wrong uses of the tag. To answer the other question, I think the intention of the place:ph=* tag is to definitely indicate that a node tagged as place=village refers specifically to an official barangay instead of some other village such as residential subdivisions and gated communities (which should really be tagged with place=neighbourhood) Personally, I would like to use the international designation=* tag to indicate that a place is an official barangay instead of using a Philippine-specific tag like place:ph=*. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation Thus, my personal preference is place=village, designation=barangay instead of place=village, place:ph=barangay. ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] [HOT] Wikimedia Germany awards HOT with Zedler-Award for Taifun Haiyan Project
After all the media publications, we now receive the Deutch Wikimedia Zedler-Award! Thanks to the OpenStreetMap contributors from 82 countries, the developpers and coordinators that made this possible. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Zedler-Preis#Der_Zedler-Preis_2014 If you want to retweet english https://twitter.com/pierzen/status/470562696614924288 french https://twitter.com/pierzen/status/470562201464737792 Pierre De : Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de À : h...@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Dimanche 25 mai 2014 7h17 Objet : [HOT] Wikimedia Germany awards HOT with Zedler-Award for Taifun Haiyan Project Source: https://twitter.com/WikimediaDE/status/470297786911834113 Winner of Category III: Best External Projekt of the Year is the Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team. The Zedler-Award acknowledges the work of individuals, groups or projects who have made contributions to free and open knowledge. The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team was nominated for the mapping projekt after Taifun Haiyan. - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Zedler-Preis#Der_Zedler-Preis_2014 - http://wikimedia.de/wiki/Zedler-Preis - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Zedler-Preis ___ HOT mailing list h...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
