Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
Going back to this discussion and because it was raised again during a F2F meeting last Saturday [0]. I corrected a a lot of duplicates. First, I extracted all version1 node contribution of username:ivet that has a key osm_id using overpass: query type=node user name=ivet/ has-kv k=osm_id/ /query print mode=meta/ My assumption for extracting this data is that they are existing OSM POIs which were planned to be polygonized but was accidentally uploaded. In my random, eye-balling. I did see many of these duplicates (2-3 times). I completely deleted these duplicated using JOSM validation [1] Please have a look and let me know if I made it worse. [0] https://plus.google.com/106331524452439989301/posts/2c8UU1x1mLn?pid=6165066674616492242oid=109394390468066203655authkey=CMCq7fX9offhjgE [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32281314 On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Erwin Olario gov...@gmail.com wrote: Great suggestion from Eugene to merge nodes into polygons. FWIW, in the JOSM editor, the shortcut key to merge nodes is M. Erwin Olario - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Feye, This is OK. Was just curious about the similar activity and wanted to know what was happening. :-) Anyway, I do have a suggestion. Instead of deleting the original POI node, please suggest that they use the original node as one of the nodes of the new polygon. This is so that the original person that added the POI node is still credited somehow in the existing objects in the database. I have left that suggestion on a few of their changesets, but it seems they have not read it. :( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859930 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859253 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26858714 ~Eugene On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Feye Andal andalf...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Sir, We from Project NOAH are polygonizing point POIs so that we can use it for the WebSAFE feature of Project NOAH. WebSAFE (web version of InaSAFE) only uses polygons as its exposure data to be able to function correctly. Sir Maning instructed me to delete the points after we polygonize them. We apologize for not informing you right away. Thanks, Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ http://twitter.com/maningsambale -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
Thanks, Sir. Will double check po. Feye On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:39 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Going back to this discussion and because it was raised again during a F2F meeting last Saturday [0]. I corrected a a lot of duplicates. First, I extracted all version1 node contribution of username:ivet that has a key osm_id using overpass: query type=node user name=ivet/ has-kv k=osm_id/ /query print mode=meta/ My assumption for extracting this data is that they are existing OSM POIs which were planned to be polygonized but was accidentally uploaded. In my random, eye-balling. I did see many of these duplicates (2-3 times). I completely deleted these duplicated using JOSM validation [1] Please have a look and let me know if I made it worse. [0] https://plus.google.com/106331524452439989301/posts/2c8UU1x1mLn?pid=6165066674616492242oid=109394390468066203655authkey=CMCq7fX9offhjgE [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32281314 On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Erwin Olario gov...@gmail.com wrote: Great suggestion from Eugene to merge nodes into polygons. FWIW, in the JOSM editor, the shortcut key to merge nodes is M. Erwin Olario - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Feye, This is OK. Was just curious about the similar activity and wanted to know what was happening. :-) Anyway, I do have a suggestion. Instead of deleting the original POI node, please suggest that they use the original node as one of the nodes of the new polygon. This is so that the original person that added the POI node is still credited somehow in the existing objects in the database. I have left that suggestion on a few of their changesets, but it seems they have not read it. :( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859930 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859253 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26858714 ~Eugene On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Feye Andal andalf...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Sir, We from Project NOAH are polygonizing point POIs so that we can use it for the WebSAFE feature of Project NOAH. WebSAFE (web version of InaSAFE) only uses polygons as its exposure data to be able to function correctly. Sir Maning instructed me to delete the points after we polygonize them. We apologize for not informing you right away. Thanks, Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ http://twitter.com/maningsambale -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For single use buildings like that it is no problem to make them a polygon, it is better in fact because there is then more information in the database, like the size of the object, etc. I would say continue on as you were. - -AndrewBuck On 11/18/2014 08:05 PM, Feye Andal wrote: As for the buildings with many possible features, we did not polygonize them. We only polygonize (as of now) banks, markets (esp. supermarkets, groceries, and public market), schools, fuel and religious institutions/place of worship. We will wait for your replies before we proceed to editing again to avoid confusion. Thanks! Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hi Eugene, I looked at the first contributor in the list. It seems that this contributor decided to change POI from node to polygon. For every changeset, I see one node erased. You would have to look more in detail. I dont know the context.. But for buildings with many possible features, it is better to show each of these as a node. Pierre -- *De :* Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com *À :* OpenStreetMap Philippines talk-ph@openstreetmap.org *Envoyé le :* Mardi 18 novembre 2014 17h49 *Objet :* [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUbJl4AAoJEK7RwIfxHSXby3sP/3h00TtptxQ8/0lNcd9F81uM 3dkG0foVZQDuxLwtuv3MxOeiT5HvBGARnc8wvxVIaAezZQtV1FBOlykNl0tf/EpK x4o0PP8AZjr8bL74uajg/Pv1t09mQx6FYy4gfba0bKI02VI+2g+bg+65u2QIt2Rd APDltX1H7PDmZdmATxLbKHXV/JCTs145tK7k5Y6DqUNxnA7rsFFYTK/l4dZSh+dB S/S05g9/2xEWPL7rWUT6S9pGatb9/mYzHhYim54Q8sW81xhYwn/SetI77V5Y7O1l +8gmSERC1FJFpvhbaAyftF10LnVSWS2hXB7HZ9W1fqiwYIL+jfLbfUHTpXezel5T xWu4GWW7gWVTPFfDZdbZg8ojHTHTmNFOaV2nwRxhMLQTeeLcDvxVnxWVi5N59sGB 0i0SVQ383ynId+GpytoxadFN+0SOnAplO9j1Rj9pfQD8FzAJr0SEt76AWeQ485q2 QWU/eW2vGOYoifiRg8YsxO4lvLwqn5wtwbkY4XfOAmIqtfS/+qekC4bFSHIiWuZ0 qRwiW+Z6yFLt6/Ds/dlAHtYnVz+1mT901kTLadRAkcm7T3YBcIkoZKxKqAH+zeHG iTWmVuuLp290gifiyYRg/jPwLFcH0SL7fZs5KJMhlgb0E5B45KNp4HhP1jo8ckIJ tZl3Mjn+nyz3/Yyz1NeB =bzYq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
As far as the Garmin GPS map based on OSM to which I compile, either a polygon or a node would do as long as the original tags of the node are re-tagged on the new polygon. I've brought this issue up to Ivet and eventually to Feye a couple of weeks ago. I have noticed that the new nodes they create on top of the existing node is still there on most of what I checked from some of the areas I monitor. But I am aware they will fix this as soon as they are done. Ervin M. *Schadow1 Expeditions* - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own motherland. http://www.s1expeditions.com On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Feye Andal andalf...@gmail.com wrote: As for the buildings with many possible features, we did not polygonize them. We only polygonize (as of now) banks, markets (esp. supermarkets, groceries, and public market), schools, fuel and religious institutions/place of worship. We will wait for your replies before we proceed to editing again to avoid confusion. Thanks! Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hi Eugene, I looked at the first contributor in the list. It seems that this contributor decided to change POI from node to polygon. For every changeset, I see one node erased. You would have to look more in detail. I dont know the context.. But for buildings with many possible features, it is better to show each of these as a node. Pierre -- *De :* Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com *À :* OpenStreetMap Philippines talk-ph@openstreetmap.org *Envoyé le :* Mardi 18 novembre 2014 17h49 *Objet :* [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
Hi Feye, This is OK. Was just curious about the similar activity and wanted to know what was happening. :-) Anyway, I do have a suggestion. Instead of deleting the original POI node, please suggest that they use the original node as one of the nodes of the new polygon. This is so that the original person that added the POI node is still credited somehow in the existing objects in the database. I have left that suggestion on a few of their changesets, but it seems they have not read it. :( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859930 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859253 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26858714 ~Eugene On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Feye Andal andalf...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Sir, We from Project NOAH are polygonizing point POIs so that we can use it for the WebSAFE feature of Project NOAH. WebSAFE (web version of InaSAFE) only uses polygons as its exposure data to be able to function correctly. Sir Maning instructed me to delete the points after we polygonize them. We apologize for not informing you right away. Thanks, Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
Great suggestion from Eugene to merge nodes into polygons. FWIW, in the JOSM editor, the shortcut key to merge nodes is M. *Erwin Olario* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - » email: erwin@ er...@ngnuity.net*n**gnu**IT**y**.**net* http://ngnuity.net/ | gov...@gmail.com » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Feye, This is OK. Was just curious about the similar activity and wanted to know what was happening. :-) Anyway, I do have a suggestion. Instead of deleting the original POI node, please suggest that they use the original node as one of the nodes of the new polygon. This is so that the original person that added the POI node is still credited somehow in the existing objects in the database. I have left that suggestion on a few of their changesets, but it seems they have not read it. :( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859930 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859253 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26858714 ~Eugene On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Feye Andal andalf...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Sir, We from Project NOAH are polygonizing point POIs so that we can use it for the WebSAFE feature of Project NOAH. WebSAFE (web version of InaSAFE) only uses polygons as its exposure data to be able to function correctly. Sir Maning instructed me to delete the points after we polygonize them. We apologize for not informing you right away. Thanks, Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
Hi Eugene, I looked at the first contributor in the list. It seems that this contributor decided to change POI from node to polygon. For every changeset, I see one node erased. You would have to look more in detail. I dont know the context.. But for buildings with many possible features, it is better to show each of these as a node. Pierre De : Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com À : OpenStreetMap Philippines talk-ph@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Mardi 18 novembre 2014 17h49 Objet : [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
As for the buildings with many possible features, we did not polygonize them. We only polygonize (as of now) banks, markets (esp. supermarkets, groceries, and public market), schools, fuel and religious institutions/place of worship. We will wait for your replies before we proceed to editing again to avoid confusion. Thanks! Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hi Eugene, I looked at the first contributor in the list. It seems that this contributor decided to change POI from node to polygon. For every changeset, I see one node erased. You would have to look more in detail. I dont know the context.. But for buildings with many possible features, it is better to show each of these as a node. Pierre -- *De :* Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com *À :* OpenStreetMap Philippines talk-ph@openstreetmap.org *Envoyé le :* Mardi 18 novembre 2014 17h49 *Objet :* [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Mappers doing adding attribute
Hello Sir, We from Project NOAH are polygonizing point POIs so that we can use it for the WebSAFE feature of Project NOAH. WebSAFE (web version of InaSAFE) only uses polygons as its exposure data to be able to function correctly. Sir Maning instructed me to delete the points after we polygonize them. We apologize for not informing you right away. Thanks, Feye On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets that only say adding attribute? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. ~Eugene ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
