Re: [Talk-us] Directional Prefix/Postfix Proposal

2010-08-02 Thread Apollinaris Schoell

On 31 Jul 2010, at 21:58 , Kevin Atkinson wrote:

 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Val Kartchner wrote:
 
 On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 21:31 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Val Kartchner wrote:
 
 1) I agree with most of your proposal.
 a) Your proposal doesn't take into account cases where there is both a
name and a numeric designation for a street.  An instance in Ogden,
Utah is Washington Boulevard and its alias 400 East.
 
 In both cases doesn't a directional prefix apply.
 
 However, to avoid ambiguity with the _prefix tag.  How about this rule.
 The _prefix and _suffix apply to all name tags.  Hence if name_1 is
 400 East than name_1_prefix shall be S, etc.
 
 So, you're also proposing that the additional name(s) be placed in
 name_1, etc.
 
 No.  I'm saying _if_ the name is places in name_1 than use name_1_prefix, if 
 it is placed in alt_name, use alt_name_prefix, etc.
 

alt_name has a specific meaning and shouldn't be used for this. also name_1,2 … 
was used for Tiger with the same purpose as alt_name.
Now if you play around with prefeix, postfix, abbrev or expanded name it's 
better to use a different tag osm strength is to make this easy. So no reason 
to overload existing well defined tags with info which doesn't belong there and 
creates even more confusion.


 
 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Directional Prefix/Postfix Proposal

2010-08-02 Thread Kevin Atkinson

On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:



On 31 Jul 2010, at 21:58 , Kevin Atkinson wrote:


On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Val Kartchner wrote:


On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 21:31 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Val Kartchner wrote:


1) I agree with most of your proposal.
a) Your proposal doesn't take into account cases where there is both a
   name and a numeric designation for a street.  An instance in Ogden,
   Utah is Washington Boulevard and its alias 400 East.


In both cases doesn't a directional prefix apply.

However, to avoid ambiguity with the _prefix tag.  How about this rule.
The _prefix and _suffix apply to all name tags.  Hence if name_1 is
400 East than name_1_prefix shall be S, etc.


So, you're also proposing that the additional name(s) be placed in
name_1, etc.


No.  I'm saying _if_ the name is places in name_1 than use name_1_prefix, if it 
is placed in alt_name, use alt_name_prefix, etc.



alt_name has a specific meaning and shouldn't be used for this. also name_1,2 … 
was used for Tiger with the same purpose as alt_name.
Now if you play around with prefeix, postfix, abbrev or expanded name it's 
better to use a different tag osm strength is to make this easy. So no reason 
to overload existing well defined tags with info which doesn't belong there and 
creates even more confusion.


Hu?  Did you mean to refer to this:

  5) The fully expanded name may be included using the alt_name tag to
  aid those searching for an address.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Directional Prefix/Postfix Proposal

2010-08-02 Thread Alan Mintz

At 2010-07-31 18:54, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

Since someone objected to my proposed changes to Salt Lake City, I am 
going to go ahead and give my proposal for how I think directional 
prefixes should be handled.  I am going to stay out of the debate on 
street name abbreviations and focus on just the directional prefix/postfix 
parts.  I want to come an agreement on talk-us, and then would like to 
make it an official standard (at least in the U.S.).


INTRO)

A full street address included more than just a Number and a Street, it 
also includes a directional prefix.  Vid the kid, gave an excellent 
overview at http://vidthekid.info/misc/osm-abbr.html.  For example (from 
his page) in the address:

  4242 S Champion Ave E
The 'S' is a directional prefix and the 'E' is the suffix and in:
  1337 Rainbow Dr SW
The 'SW' is a directional suffix (really a quadrant suffix).

I would like to formally propose two things

  1) An exception to the abbreviation rule for directional indicators
 with the fully expanded name going into alt_name


I think that it would be better to leave the name tag as it is for now, and 
add new tags for the name components. This way, existing code that uses the 
name tag won't break, and can be modified at the developer's discretion to 
work with the new tags if necessary.




  2) New tags to record the presence of directional indicators in the
 address.

#1)

I propose an exception to the abbreviation rule be made for directional 
indicators.  'North, 'South', 'East', and 'West' when a directional 
indicator (and not part of the street name) shall be abbreviated 'N.', 
'S.', 'E.', and 'W.' (with a period, will explain why below), and 
Northeast, Southeast, Northwest, Southwest shall be abbreviated as 'NW', 
'SW', 'SE', and 'NW' (without any periods).  The fully expanded name may 
be included in alt_name.


I don't think the period convention will end up being well-used. In the 
expanded name (where it is used), I'm not sure it matters, since 
consumer-oriented searches generally use just a single query field, and the 
engine has to do the work of handling the various possibilities. If it does 
use separate fields (or parses the query into separate fields), it would 
then use the component tags instead of the expanded name.




#2)

I propose two new tags:
  name_prefix
  name_suffix

If the directional prefix is not part of the name than the appropriate tag 
shall be used to indicate the need for a directional prefix in an 
address.  North, South, etc, shall be abbreviated as one of

  'N' 'S' 'E' 'W', 'NW' 'SW', 'NE', 'SE'
There is no need for a period here.


+1


If it is included in the word included shall be used instead.  This 
means the the first word (for a prefix) or the last word (for a suffix) is 
a directional indicator and shall be left in abbreviated form by name 
correction bots and the like.


Some Examples)

To encode South 700 East in Salt Lake City:
  name = S. 700 East
  name_prefix = included
  alt_name = South 700 East


I would use
name = South 700 East
name_prefix = S
name_prefix_included = yes
name_root = 700
name_suffix = E

name continues to be used for the full expanded name

name_prefix_included indicates that the name_prefix is normally given on 
the signage in front of the name_root, and used in naming a place or giving 
directions verbally.


I don't think the distinction needs to be made between the suffix's 
inclusion in the name or not (at least I can't think of an example in the 
places I know to use them - DC and UT). That is, it is always considered in 
the same way. If that's not the case, name_suffix_included could be used.



K Street NW in Washington DC,
  name = K Street NW
  name_suffix = included
  alt_name = K Street Northwest (would anyone really write this?)


I'd use:

name = K Street Northwest (or is it K Street NorthWest?)
name_root = K
name_type = St
name_suffix = NW

Note splitting out the type of street into name_type while we're at it.



  alt_name = K Street Northwest (would anyone really write this?)


I agree, but the abbreviation police held their ground last time we tried 
this, so...



Some examples from southern CA:

1. Most places do not include the directional prefix as part of the signed 
name. If it is present, it is thought of more as a suffix to the address. 
It may be shown next to the address range on the signs in that smaller 
font, not in front of the name in larger font.


Current value of name = North Euclid Avenue
name = Euclid Avenue
name_prefix = N
name_root = Euclid
name_type = Ave

Note that, in many places, TIGER had these prefixes and they were imported 
as part of the name because TIGER made no distiction between this and case 
#2 (below). They were then expanded to the incorrect form North Euclid 
Ave. In this example, the prefix isn't even really a prefix to the name, 
but instead a suffix to the housenumber, though I'm OK with using the 
name_prefix tag to avoid confusion. An 

Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation Police

2010-08-02 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.orgwrote:


 So I would like to know has anyone tried to get the wiki page changed so
 that it is not so rigid?


feel free to do so, if there is an acceptable agreement or the wiki just
doesn't make sense. the wiki is as open as osm. there is lot of wrong info
and missing docu about real mapping usage


 Or do people here really think everything should be expand to the fullest.

 Really, would anyone say: United States Highway 29.  Rather than U S
 Highway 29 or more likely just U S 29.


you know the answer. I think a lot of the expansion is wrong. we should map
what is on the ground and what can be verified. If people write address with
abbreviations and signs use abbreviations there is no reason to have
expanded names in osm


 In the above example would anyone write out the directional suffix.  In
 fact Alan didn't even know if that would be Northwest or NorthWest.


I think typically this isn't part of a name at all. Are people using it in
an address for mailing? how is it written in official records?
how would anyone do a search for a street? there are many corner cases so
there is no simple yes or no


 At least 1st hasn't been expand to First, etc.  But just wait...


 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us