Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, Does not support. Curt Sent from my office desktop by The Bat! Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (64-bit) Windows 7 (32) with HughesNet Gen5 Satellite Internet Duetomajor policy disagreements, we no longer use turnkeyinternet.net Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 4:58:15 PM, you wrote: > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
martes, 19 may. 2020 at 22:58, it seems you wrote: > Hello Tbbeta, > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions > introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in > their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There > are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for > SHA-256. Intel i7-6700: --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.7462 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 838.8615 Megabytes per second --- Aceptar --- -- /\ / Using The Bat! x64 9.1.18 Professional + OTFE with iKey1000 / \ / \ / Windows (10.0.18363 ) /\/ e t \/ i c i o u s Plugins: AntiSpamSniper 3.3.4.4 Spanish Translator of The Bat! 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, On Tue, 19 May 2020 23:58:15 +0300 GMT (20-May-20, 3:58 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote: > You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to > figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for > example: > thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK Does not. -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! Version 9.1.18.2 (BETA) (64-bit) under Windows 10.0 Build 18362 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration? (What use the use case in The Bat!?)
Hello Maxim, On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 23:58:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:58 where I live) Maxim wrote: > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions > introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in > their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There > are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for > SHA-256. SHA1 is a outdated hashing algorithm for data. And its hashing algo is not really free from vulnerabilities. I'm just curious. What is it used for in The Bat!? I guess, not for encryption. -- Regards Gwen Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 18363 ) pgpIyB11p9mbK.pgp Description: PGP signature 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Gunivortus, Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 9:21:52 PM, you wrote: > At my PC I also saw that with data blocks etc,, but considered it > (being a rooky at that field) as unimportant and so I only took the > first sentence. OK, I was starting another instance of TheBat! with the 1st instance running in background. As the result, 2nd one was silently crashing without producing any output at all. Maxim, If you are still reading this topic (which I kind of doubt given the lack of replies from you), here is the output: > This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of > 1024 bytes took 2.2180 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 660.4376 > Megabytes per second -- Regards, A 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, here's mine ... SHA1 benchmark This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.6372 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 894.7346 Megabytes per second - -- Kind regards, Gunivortus Goos The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA) Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363 NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 5.9410 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 246.5652 Megabytes per second --- OK --- -- Best wishes Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://thebat.bplaced.net 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Christoph, Friday, May 22, 2020, 3:14:08 AM, you wrote: > 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.8513 seconds to process by > SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1720.6420 Megabytes per > second; 1.9198 seconds to process by software implementation, 763.0005 > Megabytes per second Wow! How fast! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello list! * I wrote '[1]: > Hello Maxim, hello List! > * Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote '[1]: >> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK >> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. > This is my communication laptop (which is normally running TB!). But I > can test it on my other computer, too (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Just for fun: here are the results of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: --- SHA1 benchmark --- 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.8513 seconds to process by SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1720.6420 Megabytes per second; 1.9198 seconds to process by software implementation, 763.0005 Megabytes per second --- OK --- -- Regards, Christoph TheBat! v9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) unter Windows 10.0 Build 18363 64bit [1] ~ Nachricht vom: 20.05.2020 @ 18:31:20 +0200 GMT mid:33252779.20200520183...@christoph-koch.de 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, > thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.6875 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 868.0674 Megabytes per second --- Aceptar --- -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (Els Poblets (Alicante - Spain) Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (64-bit) on Windows 10.0 18363 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 11:58:15 PM, you wrote: > Hello Tbbeta, > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions > introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in > their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There > are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for > SHA-256. > You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to > figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for > example: > thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK ... > Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. Dear Maxim, I hold the record for slowest so far - Intel Core2 Duo T9600 @ 2.80GHz --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 6.2714 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 233.5752 Megabytes per second --- OK --- Best regards, Dimitar mailto:dito...@gmail.com TheBat! 9.1.18 Pro (64-bit, non-OTFE) on Windows 10.0 14393 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
May 20, 2020 Hello Maxim, Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 4:58:15 PM, you wrote: > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced > on > Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for > these > instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based instructions, > four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256. Mine is an old CPU that is due for an upgrade. It does not support SHA extensisons. Attached is a image file of the results -- Ethan J. Mings President, The Desk Consulting Group Inc. Enabling your organization to anticipate the future with confidence! 1-200 North Service Road W. - Suite 311 | Oakville, Ontario, Canada. L6M 2Y1 Phone 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776 | e-mail supportd...@thedesk.ca Website https://thedesk.ca/main 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, hello List! * Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote '[1]: > thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK > Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.5688 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 933.7100 Megabytes per second --- OK --- On an Intel i7-8550U This is my communication laptop (which is normally running TB!). But I can test it on my other computer, too (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). -- Regards, Christoph TheBat! v9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) unter Windows 10.0 Build 18363 64bit [1] ~ Nachricht vom: 19.05.2020 @ 23:58:15 +0300 GMT mid:1734682046.20200519235...@ritlabs.com 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 1:18:19 PM, Assad Baroot wrote: > Mine is AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Processor. Technically, mine should be > faster than yours but your cpu has a slightly lower SHA1 processed time. Interesting, because I also have a Ryzen 7 3700X processor (3.60GHz), and my times are faster. What is the processor speed? Mine = 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.9128 seconds -- Julian Using The Bat! v9.1.18 on Windows 10.0 Build 18363 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, On Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 9:58:15 PM, Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote: > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions > introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in > their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There > are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for > SHA-256. --- SHA1 benchmark --- 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.9128 seconds to process by SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1604.7003 Megabytes per second; 1.7907 seconds to process by software implementation, 818.0483 Megabytes per second --- OK --- This is on a Ryzen 7 3700X 3.60 GHz processor -- Julian Using The Bat! v9.1.18 on Windows 10.0 Build 18363 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Assad, Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 7:18:19 AM, you wrote: > Mine is AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Processor. Technically, mine should be > faster than yours but your cpu has a slightly lower SHA1 processed time. Must be all the steroids I give it. :>) -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 12:47:22 AM, you wrote: > Your CPU is fastest amongst us. What is the exact model/make of your CPU? AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core Processor 3.49 GHz -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Andrew, >> This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc. > That was indeed an outdated 3-rd gen i7. However others have reported > the following output which I do not see: At my PC I also saw that with data blocks etc,, but considered it (being a rooky at that field) as unimportant and so I only took the first sentence. >> --- >> SHA1 benchmark >> --- >> This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes >> took 5.6094 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); XXX. Megabytes per >> second >> --- -- Kind regards, Gunivortus Goos The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA) Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363 NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
On my "Intel i7-4770 @ 3.4GHz" I get the following message: --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.6252 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 901.3555 Megabytes per second --- OK --- -- Regards Manuel - Original Message - From: "Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA" To: "Manuel Ostertag" Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 23:58:15 [UTC +0300] Subject: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration? Msg-Id: Priority: (unknown) Hello Tbbeta, Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256. You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example: thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results: --- SHA1 benchmark --- 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second --- OK --- Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Gunivortus, Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 8:37:09 PM, you wrote: > This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc. That was indeed an outdated 3-rd gen i7. However others have reported the following output which I do not see: > --- > SHA1 benchmark > --- > This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes > took 5.6094 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); XXX. Megabytes per > second > --- -- Regards, A 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, >> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc. -- Kind regards, Gunivortus Goos The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA) Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363 NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hi The On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:58:15 PM you wrote: > Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 5.6094 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 261.1415 Megabytes per second --- OK --- -- Best regards, Martin mar...@postzone.org TheBat! 9.1.18.3 (BETA) Pro (32 with OTFE) on Windows 10.0 18363 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 6:28:15 AM, you wrote: > thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK Returns nothing to the stdout, tried both PowerShell and "cmd.exe". v9.1.18, x64. Am I missing something? -- Regards, A 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello, My processor (Intel i7-5930K) does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.8040 seconds to process by SHA1 (software): 811.9780 Megabytes per second. -- Best regards, Petr S. mailto:p_persh...@volny.cz TheBat! version: 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) on Windows 10 buid 19628 Dobrý den, úterý 19. května 2020, 22:58:15, napsal jste: > Hello Tbbeta, > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions > introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in > their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There > are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for > SHA-256. > You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to > figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for > example: > thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK > On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results: > --- > SHA1 benchmark > --- > 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by > SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per > second; 2.1496 seconds to process by software implementation, 681.4596 > Megabytes per second > --- > OK > --- > Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
On my "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 0 @ 3.20GHz" I get the following message: --- SHA1 benchmark --- This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 3.0995 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 472.6072 Megabytes per second --- OK --- -- Regards Manuel - - Original Message - From: "Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA" To: "Manuel Ostertag" Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 23:58:15 [UTC +0300] Subject: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration? Msg-Id: Priority: (unknown) Hello Tbbeta, Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256. You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example: thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results: --- SHA1 benchmark --- 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second --- OK --- Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello The, On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 23:58:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:58 where I live) Maxim wrote: > Hello Tbbeta, > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions > introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in > their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There > are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for > SHA-256. > > You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to > figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for > example: > > thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK My Intel i5-7500 Does not support. -- Regards Gwen Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 18363 ) pgppSrycy4Ooa.pgp Description: PGP signature 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Stuart, Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 5:06:52 AM, you wrote: > 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.0014 seconds to process by SHA1 using > CPU instructions (hardware), 1462.7576 Megabytes per second; 2.2528 seconds to > process by software implementation, 650.2314 Megabytes per second Your CPU is fastest amongst us. What is the exact model/make of your CPU? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Tbbeta, Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256. Does not. You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example: thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results: --- SHA1 benchmark --- 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second --- OK --- Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Maxim, Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 3:58:15 PM, you wrote: > Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced > on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for > these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based > instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256. --- SHA1 benchmark --- 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.0014 seconds to process by SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1462.7576 Megabytes per second; 2.2528 seconds to process by software implementation, 650.2314 Megabytes per second --- OK --- -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Hello Tbbeta, Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256. You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example: thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results: --- SHA1 benchmark --- 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second --- OK --- Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html