Re: RegExp question

2001-10-05 Thread Roland Burger

Hi Peter,

on Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:37:01 +0200 GMT (which was Thursday, October 04,
2001, 13:37 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote:

 Hi there,

 since I moved my english lists to another email account the reply regexp
 doesn't work as it did. It doesn't display the sender's time correctly.

I have had the same problems!

Try this one, which I got from Januk:

one line
%WRAPPED='on %SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)^Date\:\s*((.*?[\d]{4})\s*([\d]{0,2}\:
[\d]{0,2})\s*(.*))%REGEXPMATCH=%HEADERS GMT (which was %ODateEn, %OTime
where I live) %OFromName wrote:'
one line

For me, it is now o.K.!

 Example:

 On Thu, 04 Oct 2001 12:09:36 +0200GMT (which was 12:06 +0200GMT where I
 live), Marck D Pearlstone presented us with these thoughts about Filter on
 Extension -- Follow up...:
 
 should be:

 On Thu, 04 Oct 2001 11:06:00 +0100GMT (which was 12:06 +0200GMT ...

 Do different providers set the headers differently? As I understand, that's
 where the regexp gets the information, so this could explain it. But I'm
 only guessing...


-- 
Best regards,
Roland   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45
Homepage: http://www.rolandburger.de

I use The Bat! v1.53t under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A !


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: %WRAPPED='%Quotes'

2001-10-05 Thread Matthias Frost

Greetings Allie,

Allie C Martin wrote on Fri, 5 Oct 2001, at 07:03:11 [GMT -0500]:
MF Can you help me?

 I'm afraid not. This is a known limitation of the macro which with
 it's present functionality cannot reflow entire posts, but only single
 paragraphs or sentences.

Thanks  for  your answer. Is there a chance that this will be fixed in
the  future?  Of  course, single paragraphs should stay single wrapped
paragraphs.  Would  be  ugly  if  several  single paragraphes would be
wrapped  into  one.  I guess this is the reason why the %wrapped macro
only works on the first paragraph, or?

-- 
Best regards,

Matthias Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
 • TB! 1.53t [85790CB6] • 05.10.2001 • 15:00 •


--
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




It's working! Thanks to Januk and Allie... And then, I have some questions :-)

2001-10-05 Thread Cyril MALKA

Hello Januk and Allie,

First of all, thanks a lot for your great help. Hope I haven't been
too much of a pain in the ... bottom...

I'll snif on the Net to find more about Regular Expressions and get to
work with it... If you have a couple of good sites to recommand, feel
free to do so :-)

Once more, thanks a lot to both of you.

Now...

On 05/10/2001, at 06:02, you wrote about almost working...:

JA I've been trying to get a working macro too, and this one is a tough
JA one.  I think the hard part is that everything is variable, so there
JA are some weird interactions.  The subject could be any one of the
JA following:

JA (subject)
JA [Flamer]: (subject)
JA [Flamer]: Re: (subject)
JA Re: [Flamer]: (subject)
JA Re: [Flamer]: Re: (subject)

JA I think that's all of them, except for mutations where fwd replaces
JA re.  However, those are all of the same form.  This is what I've
JA gotten, and it seems to work:

It does work actually... Well... It didn't at first, but I found out
that it was because you wrote flamer in English indstead of in
Danish (flammer)... You'll have to work on you Danish :-)

Anyway... It works just fine... :-)

Now... if I want to adapt it to the %¤¤ Outlook Express, where it
writes an 'SV:' in front instead of the 'RE:' Can I just replace the
Re in the expression with Sv?

Does case of characters matter? I mean: Is there a difference between
SV or Sv ?

May I ask two questions?

Well... I do anyway :-)

1. What does the Fwd in the expression means? Does it mean that it
should work if people Forward something and there is Fwd instead of Re
it'll work too?

2. Do you guy ever sleep?

-- 
Regards

 Cyril 

... If you cannot convince them, confuse them

www.malka.com - www.malkadesign.com
ICQ: 3294413


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




GnuPG, yet again.

2001-10-05 Thread Brian Clark

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings Propeller Bats!

Problems, problems. I've installed GnuGP to C:\GnuGP. I already have
GnuPG in my %PATH% as I've been using it in scripts from time to time.
I've created my options file, which contains:

default-key 0xE4D0C7C8
default-recipient-self
encrypt-to 0xE4D0C7C8
quiet
escape-from-lines
no-greeting
keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371
cipher-algo CAST5
digest-algo SHA1
compress-algo 1
force-v3-sigs
load-extension C:/GnuPG/Ext/idea
load-extension C:/GnuPG/Ext/tiger
load-extension C:/GnuPG/Ext/sha2

In SecureBat!, I've changed my OpenPGP version to GnuGP. I restarted
SecureBat!, to be sure the change has taken effect.

When I try to send myself a test message that is signed and encrypted,
I get the pop-up box asking for key and passphrase (key is already
inserted), I enter my passphrase and hit Enter.

An error then appears with the following:

  gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
  gpg: [stdin]: sign+encrypt failed: secret key not available

No idea what is going on here. Can anyone help? :-)

- --
 -Brian Clark | PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
  Crouching Bat!, Hidden Features v1.54/9/iKey1000
  Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build  A

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 05)
Comment: This space for rent.

iQA/AwUBO74I7rWi5fvk0MfIEQJM5QCg/lBOpcTHRnis2yIG45JXNEccsQ4AoMSY
NSK9b1XcXY28MAParmv4oj7l
=XC96
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: It's working! Thanks to Januk and Allie... And then, I have some questions :-)

2001-10-05 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello Cyril,

It was foretold that on Friday, October 5, 2001 at 15:54 GMT +0200,
Cyril MALKA [CM] would type:

CM First of all, thanks a lot for your great help. Hope I haven't been
CM too much of a pain in the ... bottom...

Not at all.  You've just given us a challenge that is harder than it
seems at first.  That's always welcome.  ;-)

CM It does work actually... Well... It didn't at first, but I found out
CM that it was because you wrote flamer in English indstead of in
CM Danish (flammer)... You'll have to work on you Danish :-)

sigh  Sorry about that, I should have read the thread more
carefully.

CM Now... if I want to adapt it to the %¤¤ Outlook Express, where it
CM writes an 'SV:' in front instead of the 'RE:' Can I just replace the
CM Re in the expression with Sv?

No problem.  You can just add it to the list of options:
%SUBJECT='[Flammer]: %-
%SETPATTREGEXP=(?i)^(Re\:\s*|Fwd\:\s*|Sv\:\s*)?(\[Flammer\]\:\s*)?(Re\:\s*|Fwd\:\s*|Sv\:\s*)?(.*?)$%-
%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%OFULLSUBJ%-
%SUBPATT=1%SUBPATT=4'

CM Does case of characters matter? I mean: Is there a difference between
CM SV or Sv ?

No it does not because we're using the (?i) option to make the search
case insensitive.

CM May I ask two questions?

Including this one? g

CM 1. What does the Fwd in the expression means? Does it mean that it
CM should work if people Forward something and there is Fwd instead of Re
CM it'll work too?

I thought one of your original parameters was that you wanted the
forward *and* reply marks kept.  So yes, the regexp will work if there
is Fwd, Re or Sv as the reply prefix.

CM 2. Do you guy ever sleep?

Don't forget that we're in vastly different time zones (Here: Pacific
Time GMT -0700). That means there is a 9 hour time difference between
you and me.  Allie appears to be on Central Time (GMT -0500), so there
is a 7 hour time difference between the two of you.

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/8 under Windows 98 4.10 Build  A

OK, I'm weird! But I'm saving up to become eccentric.


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: %WRAPPED='%Quotes'

2001-10-05 Thread Allie C Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 15:03:34 +0200, Matthias Frost [MF] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
MF Thanks  for  your answer. Is there a chance that this will be
MF fixed in the  future?

I don't know.

MF Of course, single paragraphs should stay single wrapped
MF paragraphs. Would be ugly if several single paragraphes would be
MF wrapped into one. I guess this is the reason why the %wrapped
MF macro only works on the first paragraph, or?

That's why it works the way it does, yes.

- --
©Allie C Martin  ••  List Moderator (and fellow end-user)
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
__
MUA: The Bat! 1.54 Beta/9 [OS: Windows 2000 Service Pack 2]

__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6a (Win32)
Comment: Sealed for security.

iEUEARECAAYFAju+FgQACgkQV8nrYCsHF+LaIACYmIWNvK75zmSPrGrpZERBRNMG
ZACfTX1Qu36owrFdnaIf8/8K8wjkNiE=
=SbsO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: GnuPG, yet again.

2001-10-05 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Friday, October 05, 2001 at 11:51:09 PM ,
Brian Clark wrote about GnuPG, yet again.:

 An error then appears with the following:

   gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
   gpg: [stdin]: sign+encrypt failed: secret key not available

 No idea what is going on here. Can anyone help? :-)

Yeah, use GPGShell for encrypting/decrypting tasks.

The current GPG plugin from both TB and SB are frustration
motives for those of us that use GPG.

- --
Well, what was the ham cured OF?
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team

iD8DBQE7viuq8WBGNj3ut+0RAmjCAJ4+OlA4Fn24ppuCcNi4+62RxAy0uwCgpA60
CUp0qZO5TaRKsc5qlyeZ0R8=
=aKS6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Argh!

2001-10-05 Thread Cyril MALKA

Hello everyone :-)

Me again O:-)

Well... I spoke too quick :-)

See?

[Flammer]: Re: : Re: : Jeg ved ikke noget


I have used:

%SUBJECT='[Flammer]: %-
%SETPATTREGEXP=(?i)^(Re\:\s*|Fwd\:\s*)?(\[Flammer\]\:\s*)?(Re\:\s*|Fwd\:\s*)?(.*?)$%-
%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%OFULLSUBJ%-
%SUBPATT=1%SUBPATT=4'


It seems as I've got a big problem to resolve, eh? :-)

--  
Regards

 Cyril 

... Yezzz maaster!

www.malka.com - www.malkadesign.com
ICQ: 3294413


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Argh!

2001-10-05 Thread Matthias Appel

On Friday, October 05, 2001, 23:32:01 (23:32:01 at my hometown),
Cyril MALKA wrote the following:

 [Flammer]: Re: : Re: : Jeg ved ikke noget

Try this one:

%SUBJECT='[Flammer]: %-
%SETPATTREGEXP=(?i)^((?:Re|Fwd)\:\s*)?(?:Re|Fwd|\[Flammer\]|\:\s*)*(.*?)$%-
%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%OFULLSUBJ%-
%SUBPATT=1%SUBPATT=2'

-- 
Matthias

Every solution breeds new problems.

[ The Bat! v1.54 Beta/9 | Windows NT v5.0 Service Pack 2 ]
[ PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 06) | Key ID: None ]
[ Keys: http://www.gadma.de/downloads/index.html ]


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re[2]: Argh!

2001-10-05 Thread Cyril MALKA

Hello Matthias,

On 05/10/2001, at 23:41, you wrote about Argh!:



MA Try this one:

Nope:

[Flammer]: Re:: Re: TILLYKKE TIL CYLLE




-- 
Regards

 Cyril 

... You will find everything in a cult... Except the exit!

www.malka.com - www.malkadesign.com
ICQ: 3294413


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Stop! (WAS: Argh!)

2001-10-05 Thread Cyril MALKA

Hello Matthias,

On 05/10/2001, at 23:41, you wrote about Argh!:



 [Flammer]: Re: : Re: : Jeg ved ikke noget

MA Try this one:

It must have been an old subject or something, because it seems to
work right now, and it can't change just by itself?

So it DOES work!

GREAT!

Thanks to everyone who helped (you've been quite a few now! eh?)

Thanks to Allie, Januk and Matthias (and of course to Silviu for
giving me the link to more informations)

Thank you everyone :-)

-- 
Regards

 Cyril 

... Very funny Scotty! Now, beam down my clothes!

www.malka.com - www.malkadesign.com
ICQ: 3294413


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: GnuPG, yet again.

2001-10-05 Thread Brian Clark

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Allie,

@ 6:37:39 PM on 10/5/2001, Allie C Martin wrote:

SC The current GPG plugin from both TB and SB are frustration
SC motives for those of us that use GPG.

BC Does this mean that no one has gotten the GnuPG plugin in TB! to
BC work _ever_?

ACM The GnuPG plug-in works but its smart matching functionality
ACM makes it tedious to use at times and decrypting is a pain.

Pffttt.. Blasphemy! Now, I remember why I stopped looking into GnuPG,
and the reason I started in the first place is because I learned of
something similar that appeared in a Beta release of TB! with the
updated PGP plug-in (or maybe it was always there, I have a terrible
memory). It's that smart matching; I should have known that's what the
problem is. I guess I'm going to have to use GnuPG Shell, but I don't
understand (as I didn't during the same topic concerning the PGP
Plugin) why it can't be an option in the preferences for OpenPGP -- to
turn off smart matching, to satisfy both camps. Ah, it's no big deal.
*Huff.*

- --
 -Brian Clark | PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
  Crouching Bat!, Hidden Features v1.54/9/iKey1000
  Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build  A

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 05)
Comment: This space for rent.

iQA/AwUBO7491bWi5fvk0MfIEQLGogCfX550viYDZaRB8j4OmW3DIG1Uj2EAoLO4
SWAQjxNRM5/s9wL4Ud0mxdUX
=8Zps
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Happy birthday [was: Re: Aha?]

2001-10-05 Thread Roland Burger

Hi Cyril,

on Sat, 6 Oct 2001 00:18:12 +0200 GMT (which was Saturday, October 06,
2001, 00:18 where I live) Cyril MALKA wrote:


 It is actually my birthday today (6th of october)... Might be a
 birthday present!? :-)

Then Happy Birthday to you, especially luck and health! Are we
invited? :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Roland   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45
Homepage: http://www.rolandburger.de

I use The Bat! v1.53t under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A !


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]